Health Care Providers’ Perceptions of the Ministry of Health’s Organizational Readiness for Change

Jamilah Almuqati; Mysara Alfaki; Ahmed Alkarani

doi:10.14710/nmjn.v13i1.47311

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/nmjn.v13i1.47311

Health Care Providers’ Perceptions of the Ministry of Health’s Organizational Readiness for Change

Jamilah Almuqati - Nursing Department, Taif Cluster, Saudi Arabia

Mysara Alfaki - Assistant Professor, Department of Nursing, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taif University, Saudi Arabia

*Ahmed Alkarani

- Associate Professor, Department of Nursing, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taif University, Saudi Arabia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

BibTex Citation Data :

@article{NMJN47311,
    author = {Jamilah Almuqati and Mysara Alfaki and Ahmed Alkarani},
    title = {Health Care Providers’ Perceptions of the Ministry of Health’s Organizational Readiness for Change},
    journal = {Nurse Media Journal of Nursing},
  volume = {13},
    number = {1},
    year = {2023},
    keywords = {Commitment; efficacy; nurses; organisation; perception; readiness for change},
    abstract = {  Background:  Whenever an organisational change is mentioned in any research context, the uncertainty concept is usually mentioned as it is or as synonymous with lack of information, ineffective communication, and/or weak feedback. Since no previous studies have investigated the organisation’s readiness to change in Saudi Arabia, this study will provide empirical evidence regarding these critical components.   Purpose:  The study aimed to explore how healthcare providers in the Ministry of Health perceive the ministry’s readiness to change.   Methods:  A descriptive cross-sectional correlational design was used for this study. Three public hospitals under the Ministry of Health were involved in recruiting 420 healthcare providers using a convenient quota sampling. A personal data sheet and the organisational readiness for implementing change (ORIC) scale were used for data collection. ANOVA and t-tests were used to analyze the data.   Results:  The total response rate was 70%. The participants in the study perceived their organisation to be highly ready to change (3.76±0.73). The organisational readiness to change perceived by nurses (3.86 + 0.98) was significantly greater than that perceived by physicians (3.56 + 0.90) and allied healthcare providers (3.61 + 0.92), with a p-value of 0.001. In addition, the organisational readiness to change was significantly related to the participants’ specialty, age, experience, and gender ( p <0.05).  Conclusion:  The findings showed that participants believed that their organisation was highly ready to change. Participants’ specialty, age, experience, and gender were significantly related to organisational readiness to change. This study recommends that leaders need to be proactive in managing changes by assessing the change readiness in their organisation and setting out plans to prepare the organisation.},
   issn = {2406-8799},   pages = {132--140}  doi = {10.14710/nmjn.v13i1.47311},
    url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/medianers/article/view/47311}
}

Citation Format:

Abstract

Background: Whenever an organisational change is mentioned in any research context, the uncertainty concept is usually mentioned as it is or as synonymous with lack of information, ineffective communication, and/or weak feedback. Since no previous studies have investigated the organisation’s readiness to change in Saudi Arabia, this study will provide empirical evidence regarding these critical components.

Purpose: The study aimed to explore how healthcare providers in the Ministry of Health perceive the ministry’s readiness to change.

Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional correlational design was used for this study. Three public hospitals under the Ministry of Health were involved in recruiting 420 healthcare providers using a convenient quota sampling. A personal data sheet and the organisational readiness for implementing change (ORIC) scale were used for data collection. ANOVA and t-tests were used to analyze the data.

Results: The total response rate was 70%. The participants in the study perceived their organisation to be highly ready to change (3.76±0.73). The organisational readiness to change perceived by nurses (3.86+0.98) was significantly greater than that perceived by physicians (3.56+0.90) and allied healthcare providers (3.61+0.92), with a p-value of 0.001. In addition, the organisational readiness to change was significantly related to the participants’ specialty, age, experience, and gender (p<0.05).

Conclusion: The findings showed that participants believed that their organisation was highly ready to change. Participants’ specialty, age, experience, and gender were significantly related to organisational readiness to change. This study recommends that leaders need to be proactive in managing changes by assessing the change readiness in their organisation and setting out plans to prepare the organisation.

Fulltext View|Download

Keywords: Commitment; efficacy; nurses; organisation; perception; readiness for change

Funding: No

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Articles

Language : EN

In Vol 13, No 1 (2023): (April 2023)

Recent articles

Correlating Demographics and Well-being among Rural College Students in the Philippines Resilience-related Breast Cancer: A Concept Analysis Filipino Nursing Students’ Health Promoting Behaviors during Pandemic Editorial Back Matter Editorial Front Matter More recent articles

Most cited articles

Effects of Islamic Spiritual Mindfulness on Stress among Nursing Students Development of Foot Massage Program on Nausea and Vomiting for Cancer Patients: A Literature Review Family Experiences of Mental Illness: A Meta-Synthesis Attitudes, Belief, and Barriers of Indonesian Oncology Nurses on Providing Assistance to Overcome Sexuality Problem Music and Music Intervention for Therapeutic Purposes in Patients with Ventilator Support; Gamelan Music Perspective More cited articles

Abd-Elkawey, H., & Sleem, W. (2015). Factors affecting nurses’ readiness for change in health care organizations. International Journal of Advanced Research, 3(11), 1330–1343. https://www.journalijar.com/uploads/873_IJAR-7847.pdf
Ahmad, M. H., Ismail, S., Rani, W. M., & Wahab, M. H. (2017). Trust in management, communication and organisational commitment: Factors influencing readiness for change management in organisation. Proceeding of International Conference on Applied Science and Technology, 1891, 1. AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5005352
Alharbi, M. F. (2018a). An investigation of the Saudi healthcare system’s readiness for change in the light of vision 2030: The role of transformational leadership style. Journal of Health Specialties, 6(2), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.4103/jhs.JHS
Alharbi, M. F. (2018b). An analysis of the Saudi healthcare system’s readiness to change in the context of the Saudi National Healthcare Plan in Vision 2030. International Journal of Health Sciences, 12(3), 83–87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5969787/pdf/IJHS-12-83.pdf
Almuqati, M., Althomali, S., Alfaki, M., Alkrani, A.S. (2022). Examine the relationship between transparency, strategic understanding, and organisation readiness to change among healthcare providers working in The Ministry of Health. Bioscience Research, 19(3), 1615
Amarneh, B. H. (2017). Nurses’ perspectives on readiness of organizations for change: A comparative study. Nursing: Research and Reviews, 7, 37–44. https://doi.org/10.2147/NRR.S126703
Billsten, J., Fridell, M., Holmberg, R., Ivarsson, A. (2018). Organizational Readiness for Change (ORC) test used in the implementation of assessment instruments and treatment methods in a Swedish National study. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 84, 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2017.10.004
Bouckenooghe, D., M. Schwarz, G., & Minbashian, A. (2015). Herscovitch and Meyer’s three-component model of commitment to change: Meta-analytic findings. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(4), 578–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2014.963059
Dhingra, R., & Punia, B. (2016). Impact of organizational culture on employees’ readiness to change a study in Indian perspective. Journal of Management Research, 16(3), 135–147
El-Sayed, F., Seada, A., El-Guindy, H. (2017). Factors associated with nurses’ readiness for organizational change at Beni Sueif University Hospital. Egyptian Nursing Journal, 14(2), 141-151. https://doi.org/10.4103/ENJ.ENJ_24_17
Khammarnia, M., Ravangard, R., & Asadi, H. (2014). The relationship of psychological empowerment and readiness for organizational changes in health workers, Lorestan, Iran. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 64, 537–541
Nilsen, P., Wallerstedt, B., Behm, L., Ahlström, G. (2018). Towards evidence-based palliative care in nursing homes in Sweden: a qualitative study informed by the organizational readiness to change theory. Implementation Science: IS, 13(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0699-0
Perez, A. (2015). Healthcare staff readiness for change based on EHR implementation: An exploratory qualitative inquiry (Order No. 3718650) [Doctoral dissertation, Capella University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing research generating and assessing evidance for nursing practice (10th ed.). Wolters Kluwer
Rodriguez, H. P., Chen, X., Martinez, A. E., & Friedberg, M. W. (2016). Availability of primary care team members can improve teamwork and readiness for change. Health Care Management Review, 41(4), 286–295. https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000082
Sharma, N., Geest, S. De, Herrnschmidt, J., Claes, V., Bachnick, S., & Simon, M. (2018). Organizational readiness for implementing change in acute care hospitals: An analysis of a cross‐sectional, multicentre study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 74, 2798–2808. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13801
Shea, C. M., Jacobs, S. R., Esserman, D. A., Bruce, K., & Weiner, B. J. (2014). Organizational readiness for implementing change: A psychometric assessment of a new measure. Implementation Science, 9, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748- 5908-9-7
Slovin, E. (1960). Slovin’s formula for sampling technique. Prudence. https://prudencexd.weebly.com
Storkholm, M. H., Savage, C., Tessma, M. K., Salvig, J. D., & Mazzocato, P. (2019). Ready for the triple aim? Perspectives on organizational readiness for implementing change from a Danish obstetrics and gynecology department. BMC Health Services Research, 19(1), 517. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4319-3112

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-11-02 20:17:34

No citation recorded.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Journal Author(s) Rights

In order for the Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro to publish and disseminate research articles, we need non-exclusive publishing rights (transferred from the author(s) to the publisher). This is determined by a publishing agreement between the author(s) and the Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro. This agreement involves the transfer or licensing of the copyright for publishing to the publisher, while authors still retain significant rights to use and share their own published articles. The Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro supports the need for authors to share, disseminate, and maximize the impact of their research through these rights in any databases.

As the author(s), you have rights to a wide range of uses of your article, including use by your employing institution or company. These author rights can be exercised without the need to obtain specific permission. Authors publishing in the Nurse Media Journal of Nursing have extensive rights to use their works for teaching and scholarly purposes without needing to seek permission, including:

use for classroom teaching by the author or the author’s institution and presentation at a meeting or conference, including distributing copies to attendees;
use for internal training by the author’s company;
distribution to colleagues for their research use;
use in a subsequent compilation of the author’s works;
inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgment of the final article);
preparation of derivative works (other than for commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgment of the final article);
voluntary posting on open websites operated by the author or the author’s institution for scholarly purposes;

following the open access license of the Creative Commons CC BY-SA License.

Authors, readers, and third parties can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, but they must give appropriate credit (including the name of the creator and attribution parties, detailed information about the authors, a copyright notice, an open access license notice, a disclaimer notice, and a link to the material), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. The publisher will indicate any modification of the material (if any) and retain an indication of previous modifications using a CrossMark Policy and information about Erratum-Corrigendum notifications.

Authors, readers, and third parties can read, print, and download, redistribute or republish the article (e.g., display it in a repository), translate the article, download it for text and data mining purposes, reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works, sell or reuse it for commercial purposes, remix, transform, or build upon the material. They must distribute their contributions under the same license as the original Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA).

Copyright Transfer Agreement for Publishing (Publishing Right)

The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, non-exclusive right for publishing (publishing right) of the article shall be assigned/transferred to Publisher of the Nurse Media Journal of Nursing (Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro).

Upon acceptance of an article, authors will be asked to complete a 'Copyright Transfer Agreement for Publishing (CTAP)'. An e-mail will be sent to the Corresponding Author confirming receipt of the manuscript together with a 'Copyright Transfer Agreement for Publishing' form by online version of this agreement.

Nurse Media Journal of Nursing and Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, the Editors and the Editorial Board make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in the Nurse Media Journal of Nursing are sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.

Please note that even though we ask for a transfer of copyright for publishing (CTAP), our journal Author(s) retain (or are granted back) significant scholarly rights as mentioned before.

The Copyright Transfer Agreement for Publishing (CTAP) Form can be downloaded here: [Copyright Transfer Agreement for Publishing (CTAP) Form NMJN 2024]

The copyright form should be signed electronically and send to the Editorial Office in the form of original e-mail below:

Dr. Meira Erawati (Editor-in-Chief)
Editorial Office of Nurse Media Journal of Nursing
Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro
Jl. Prof. Soedarto, Tembalang, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia 50275
Telp.: +62-24-76480919; Fax.: +62-24-76486849
E-mail: media_ners@live.undip.ac.id

(This policy statements has been updated at 24th January 2024)

Health Care Providers’ Perceptions of the Ministry of Health’s Organizational Readiness for Change

Journal Author(s) Rights

Copyright Transfer Agreement for Publishing (Publishing Right)

OFFICE INFORMATION