BibTex Citation Data :
@article{NMJN61797, author = {Feriana Ira Handian and Mohd Nazri Mohd Daud and Khalid Mokti and Aye Aye Wyn and Tin Tin Thein}, title = {Exploring Public Attitude and Barriers toward Thalassemia Screening Strategies: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies}, journal = {Nurse Media Journal of Nursing}, volume = {15}, number = {3}, year = {2025}, keywords = {Attitude; barrier; screening; thalassemia; prevention; control}, abstract = { Background: Over the last decade, several countries have sought to mitigate the rise in thalassaemia through preventive screening policies; however, incidence remains high. While existing studies, predominantly quantitative, have examined thalassaemia screening, limited attention has been given to synthesizing qualitative evidence on public attitudes and barriers. Consequently, a comprehensive qualitative synthesis is needed to inform contextually relevant, effective, and equitable screening strategies. Purpose: This review systematically explores public attitudes and barriers toward thalassaemia screening strategies (TSS). Methods: A literature search was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines using four electronic databases—Scopus, PubMed, ProQuest, and ScienceDirect—covering studies published in the last ten years up to July 2, 2023, using specific keywords. The study population included the general public or parents of children with thalassaemia or sickle cell disease, and studies that investigated attitudes or barriers toward thalassaemia screening. A thorough screening of abstracts and full texts was conducted based on predetermined criteria. Overall, 11 of 472 studies were selected for qualitative analysis. The quality of abstracts and full papers was reviewed using the CASP tool, and thematic analysis was conducted line by line with assistance from OpenCode 4.03 software. Results: The findings were mapped according to attitudes and barriers toward TSS. Five main themes emerged from the thematic content analysis: (1) negative attitudes influenced by cultural and personal factors; (2) inadequate family support and decision-making; (3) limited knowledge of hereditary and genetic conditions; (4) low self and parental awareness of thalassaemia; and (5) poor communication with healthcare professionals and barriers to screening accessibility. Conclusion: Various barriers at the individual, family, and health system levels suggest that thalassaemia screening is a complex sociocultural and behavioral issue, particularly at critical life stages such as the premarital period. Education on thalassaemia and genetic inheritance should be incorporated into youth programs prior to marriage. Family-centered interventions, training in nursing and health communication, and proactive counseling to encourage regular screening and integrate thalassaemia screening into primary care are crucial for future efforts. }, issn = {2406-8799}, doi = {10.14710/nmjn.v14i3.61797}, url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/medianers/article/view/61797} }
Refworks Citation Data :
Background: Over the last decade, several countries have sought to mitigate the rise in thalassaemia through preventive screening policies; however, incidence remains high. While existing studies, predominantly quantitative, have examined thalassaemia screening, limited attention has been given to synthesizing qualitative evidence on public attitudes and barriers. Consequently, a comprehensive qualitative synthesis is needed to inform contextually relevant, effective, and equitable screening strategies.
Purpose: This review systematically explores public attitudes and barriers toward thalassaemia screening strategies (TSS).
Methods: A literature search was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines using four electronic databases—Scopus, PubMed, ProQuest, and ScienceDirect—covering studies published in the last ten years up to July 2, 2023, using specific keywords. The study population included the general public or parents of children with thalassaemia or sickle cell disease, and studies that investigated attitudes or barriers toward thalassaemia screening. A thorough screening of abstracts and full texts was conducted based on predetermined criteria. Overall, 11 of 472 studies were selected for qualitative analysis. The quality of abstracts and full papers was reviewed using the CASP tool, and thematic analysis was conducted line by line with assistance from OpenCode 4.03 software.
Results: The findings were mapped according to attitudes and barriers toward TSS. Five main themes emerged from the thematic content analysis: (1) negative attitudes influenced by cultural and personal factors; (2) inadequate family support and decision-making; (3) limited knowledge of hereditary and genetic conditions; (4) low self and parental awareness of thalassaemia; and (5) poor communication with healthcare professionals and barriers to screening accessibility.
Conclusion: Various barriers at the individual, family, and health system levels suggest that thalassaemia screening is a complex sociocultural and behavioral issue, particularly at critical life stages such as the premarital period. Education on thalassaemia and genetic inheritance should be incorporated into youth programs prior to marriage. Family-centered interventions, training in nursing and health communication, and proactive counseling to encourage regular screening and integrate thalassaemia screening into primary care are crucial for future efforts.
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Last update: 2026-01-05 18:29:07
In order for the Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro to publish and disseminate research articles, we need non-exclusive publishing rights (transferred from the author(s) to the publisher). This is determined by a publishing agreement between the author(s) and the Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro. This agreement involves the transfer or licensing of the copyright for publishing to the publisher, while authors still retain significant rights to use and share their own published articles. The Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro supports the need for authors to share, disseminate, and maximize the impact of their research through these rights in any databases.
As the author(s), you have rights to a wide range of uses of your article, including use by your employing institution or company. These author rights can be exercised without the need to obtain specific permission. Authors publishing in the Nurse Media Journal of Nursing have extensive rights to use their works for teaching and scholarly purposes without needing to seek permission, including (but not limited to):
Authors, readers, and third parties can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, but they must give appropriate credit (including the name of the creator and attribution parties, detailed information about the authors, a copyright notice, an open access license notice, a disclaimer notice, and a link to the material), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. The publisher will indicate any modification of the material (if any) and retain an indication of previous modifications using a CrossMark Policy and information about Erratum-Corrigendum notifications.
Authors, readers, and third parties can read, print, and download, redistribute or republish the article (e.g., display it in a repository), translate the article, download it for text and data mining purposes, reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works, sell or reuse it for commercial purposes, remix, transform, or build upon the material. They must distribute their contributions under the same license as the original Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA).
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, non-exclusive right for publishing (publishing right) of the article shall be assigned/transferred to Publisher of the Nurse Media Journal of Nursing (Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro).
Upon acceptance of an article, authors will be asked to complete a 'Copyright Transfer Agreement for Publishing (CTAP)'. An e-mail will be sent to the Corresponding Author confirming receipt of the manuscript together with a 'Copyright Transfer Agreement for Publishing' form by online version of this agreement.
Nurse Media Journal of Nursing and Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, the Editors and the Editorial Board make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in the Nurse Media Journal of Nursing are sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
Please note that even though we ask for a transfer of copyright for publishing (CTAP), our journal Author(s) retain (or are granted back) significant scholarly rights as mentioned before.
The Copyright Transfer Agreement for Publishing (CTAP) Form can be downloaded here: [Copyright Transfer Agreement for Publishing (CTAP) Form NMJN 2024]
The copyright form should be signed electronically and send to the Editorial Office in the form of original e-mail below:
Dr. Sri Padma Sari (Editor-in-Chief)Editorial Office of Nurse Media Journal of Nursing Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro Jl. Prof. Soedarto, Tembalang, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia 50275Telp.: +62-24-76480919; Fax.: +62-24-76486849E-mail: media_ners@live.undip.ac.id
(This policy statements has been updated at 24th January 2024)
