skip to main content

Bonding from Womb: A Mixed Method Study of Pregnant Women’s Knowledge, Attitude, and Experiences on Fetal Movement

*Restuning Widiasih orcid scopus  -  Department of Maternity Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia
Khoirunnisa Khoirunnisa orcid  -  Departement of Paediatric Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia
Lilis Mamuroh  -  Department of Maternity Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia
Windy Natasya Al Baihaqi  -  Hasan Sadikin Hospital, Indonesia, Indonesia
Tosin Popoola orcid scopus  -  School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Newcastle, Australia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2026 by the Authors, Published by Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Background: Fetal movement is an indicator of fetal life and well-being and contributes to maternal–fetal bonding through the perception and interpretation of fetal movements. However, studies exploring the experiences and knowledge of mothers and families in self-monitoring fetal well-being remain limited.

Purpose: This study aimed to comprehensively examine knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, self-efficacy, and experiences related to fetal movement monitoring among pregnant women.

Methods: A mixed-methods study with a concurrent triangulation design was conducted. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected simultaneously through a survey of 216 respondents from two districts and interviews with 18 participants drawn from the survey pool. Comparative analysis was used to assess differences in knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and self-efficacy between the two districts using the Mann–Whitney test for survey data, while thematic analysis was applied to the interview data.

Results: Overall, the majority of pregnant women demonstrated low knowledge (64.4%), negative self-monitoring behaviors (52.7%), and low self-efficacy (56.0%), while attitudes toward fetal movement self-observation were slightly more favorable (53.7%). Statistical analysis indicated significant differences in knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to fetal movement self-observation (p < .05), whereas self-efficacy was not statistically significant (p > .05). Thematic analysis identified four themes: (1) Bonding since in the womb; (2) Emotional responses; (3) Actions when sensing abnormalities; and (4) Culture and beliefs.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that mothers and fetuses form a strong emotional bond from the womb, as reflected in maternal experiences and behaviors. There is a need for nursing interventions in fetal monitoring, particularly to improve pregnant women’s knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and self-efficacy. Furthermore, this study strengthens the evidence base for maternity nursing practice, enabling nurses and midwives to design targeted educational and monitoring interventions that promote pregnant women’s autonomy in observing fetal health and responding appropriately to early warning signs.

 

Fulltext Email colleagues
Keywords: Fetal well-being; maternal-fetal attachment; mixed-methods research; pregnancy
Funding: Universitas Padjadjaran

Article Metrics:

  1. Boerma, T., Campbell, O. M. R., Amouzou, A., Blumenberg, C., Blencowe, H., Moran, A., Lawn, J. E., & Ikilezi, G. (2023). Maternal mortality, stillbirths, and neonatal mortality: a transition model based on analyses of 151 countries. The Lancet Global Health, 11(7), e1024–e1031. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00195-X
  2. Bowen, J. H. (2018). Pregnant Women’s Knowledge About Fetal Movement Count. Honors Undergraduate Theses, 282
  3. BPS. (2023). Statistik Daerah Kabupaten Garut 2023. In Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Garut (Vol. 01)
  4. Castro, F. G., Kellison, J. G., Boyd, S. J., & Kopak, A. (2010). A Methodology for Conducting Integrative Mixed Methods Research and Data Analysis. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(4), 342–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689810382916.A
  5. Chairunnisa, A., Putri, C., Puspitasari, R. D., Prabowo, A. Y., Kedokteran, F., Lampung, U., Obstetri, B., Kedokteran, F., Lampung, U., Anatomi, B., Kedokteran, F., & Lampung, U. (2017). Kematian Janin Intrauterin dan Hubungannya dengan Preeklampsia Intrauterine Fetal Death and Its Correlation with Preeclampsia. 7, 62–65
  6. Creswell. (2022). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches ((6th ed.))
  7. Dinkes. (2016). Profil Pangandaran 2016. Dinas Kesehatan Provinsi Jawa Barat
  8. Elsayed, W., & Sinha, A. (2019). Umbilical Cord Abnormalities and Pregnancy Outcome. Journal of Fetal Medicine, 06(04), 183–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40556-019-00217-7
  9. Gregory, E. C. W., & Valenzuela, C. P. (2021). User Guide to the 2021 Fetal Death Public Use File. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr71/nvsr71-04.pdf
  10. Karlina, L. (2018). Gambaran Pengetahuan Suami Tentang Suami Siaga Dalam Masa Kehamilan Di Puskesmas Matakali Kecamatan Matakali Kabupaten Polewali Mandar. Bina Generasi : Jurnal Kesehatan, 8(1), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.35907/bgjk.v8i1.56
  11. Kemenkes. (2010). Pedoman Umum Pengembangan Desa dan Kelurahan Siaga Aktif. In Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia
  12. Kemenkes. (2024). Agar Ibu dan Bayi Selamat. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia
  13. Kemenkes RI. (2020). Pedoman Pelayanan Antenatal Terpadu 2020. In Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia: Vol. III (Issue 3). https://repository.kemkes.go.id/book/147
  14. Kementerian Kesehatan RI. (2024). Laporan Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (LAKIP) Direktorat Gizi Kesehatan Ibu dan Anak Tahun Anggaran 2023
  15. Lengkong, G. T., Langi, F. L. F. ., & Posangi, J.-. (2020). Faktor-Faktor Yang Berhubungan Dengan Kematian Bayi di Indonesia. Kesmas: Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat Universitas Sam Ratulangi, 9(4), 41–47. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/kesmas/article/view/29482
  16. Mangesi, L., Hofmeyr, G. J., Smith, V., & Smyth, R. M. D. (2015). Fetal movement counting for assessment of fetal wellbeing. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2015(10), CD004909. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004909.pub3
  17. Novrianto, R., Marettih, A. K. E., & Wahyudi, H. (2019). Validitas Konstruk Instrumen. Jurnal Psikologi, 15(1), 1–9
  18. Samutri, E., & Endriyani, L. (2021). Education of fetal movement counting: an effort to increase knowledge and compliance of pregnant women to do self-assessment of fetal wellbeing. Jurnal Ners Dan Kebidanan Indonesia, 9(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.21927/jnki.2021.9(1).68-75
  19. Stahl, N. A., & King, J. R. (2020). Expanding approaches for research: understanding and using trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Development Education, 44(1), 26–28
  20. Sugiono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. .Alfabeta
  21. Sumintono, B. (2018). Rasch Model Measurements as Tools in Assesment for Learning BT - Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Education Innovation (ICEI 2017). 38–42. https://doi.org/10.2991/icei-17.2018.11
  22. Tsakiridis, I., Zerva, C., Mamopoulos, A., Kalogiannidis, I., Athanasiadis, A., & Dagklis, T. (2022). Maternal perception of fetal movements: onset and associated factors. Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 50(9), 1174–1179. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2021-0606
  23. Widiasih, R. (2020). International Students ’ Experience of Studying at Indonesian Universities : A Systematic Review Pengalaman Mahasiswa Internasional ketika Studi di Universitas di Indonesia : Kajian Sistematik. 10, 24–43
  24. World Health Organization. (2001). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. WHO Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddg.13528

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-04-23 23:14:24

No citation recorded.