skip to main content

PLURALISME HUKUM PROGRESIF: MEMBERI RUANG KEADILAN BAGI YANG LIYAN

*Eko Mukminto  -  Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Awaludin Marwan  -  Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Bhayangkara, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2019 Masalah-Masalah Hukum under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

When ideological contestation in law is controlled by the logic of the majority. Then the consequences of the legal logic will be controlled by the logic of oppression. In this context, minorities whether based on religion, ethnicity, gender or sexuality are difficult to pursuit justice. Access to justice is possible as long as minority representation is also present in state law. This paper aims to examine the concept of legal pluralism in Progressive law. Thus, it will also provide alternative ideas for resolving the problem of discrimination of minority groups. Satjipto Rahardjo’s Progressive law has a philosophical basis that sees that the discourse of law is never be final and legal pluralism will provide justice. In the progressive law reasoning, legal pluralism will be discussed with recognition and redistribution political theory, so that it will tear down constellation of hierarchical structures and provides justice for minorities or “the others”. Therefore, state law is no longer the rule of majority.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: progressive law; pluralism; minority groups; recognition politics; redistribution politics

Article Metrics:

  1. Austin, John. (2000). Province of Jurisprudence Determined. Cambridge University Press. New York
  2. Budi Hardiman, Fransiskus. (2009). Demokrasi Deliberatif: Menimbang ‘Negara Hukum’ dan ‘Ruang Publik’ Dalam Teori Diskursus Jurgen Habermas. Kanisius. Jogjakarta
  3. Barzilai, Gad. (2010). Communities and Law: Politics and Cultures of Legal Identities. Michigan University Press. Michigan
  4. Fraser, Nancy dan Honneth, Axel. (2004). Redistribution and Recognition: A Philosophical-Political Exchange. Verso. New York
  5. Hunt, Alan dan Whickam, Gary. (1994). Foucalt and Law: Toward Sociology of Law as Governance. Pluto Press. London
  6. Kaum Tjipian. (2009). Pemikiran Hukum Baru; Dari Kera ke Manusia, Dari Positivistik ke Progresif. Genta Press. Jogjakarta
  7. Marwan, Awaludin. (2013). Satjipto Rahardjo: Sebuah Biografi Intelektual dan Pertarungan Tafsir dalam Filsafat Hukum Progresif. Thafa Media, Jogjakarta
  8. Rahardjo, Satjipto. (1986). Ilmu Hukum. Almuni. Bandung
  9. ______________. (2006). Sisi-Sisi Lain dari Hukum di Indonesia. Kompas. Jakarta
  10. ______________. (2006). Hukum Dalam Jagat Ketertiban: Bacaan Mahasiswa Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum Universitas Diponegoro. UKI Press. Jakarta
  11. ______________. Membedah Hukum Progresif. Kompas. Jakarta. 2008
  12. Tamanaha, Brian. (2007). Understanding Legal Pluralisme: From Present to Past. From Local to Global. Sidney Law Review; Vol. 30
  13. Wignjosoebroto, Soetandyo. (2002). Hukum, Paradigma, Metode dan Pilihan Masalah: 70 Tahun Prof. Soetandyo. Elsam dan Huma. Jakarta
  14. Jurnal
  15. Marry, 1988. Sally Engle. Legal Pluralism. Law and Society Review; Vol 22
  16. Griffith, 1986. John. What Is Legal Pluralism, Journal of Legal Pluralism
  17. Website
  18. Komisi Nasional Hak Asasi Manusia. Laporan Komisi Hak Asasi Manusia RI Tahun 2014 Retrieved from; http://www.komnasham.go.id/pengawasan/laporan-akhir-tahun-kebebasan-beragamaberkeyakinan-komnas-ham-ri-2014

Last update:

  1. PERCEPATAN PENANGANAN COVID-19 DI BALI: KONTEKS PLURALISME HUKUM

    Anak Agung Istri Ari Atu Dewi, Ni Ketut Supasti Dharmawan, Anak Agung Istri Eka Krisna Yanti, Putri Triari Dwijayanthi. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 50 (4), 2021. doi: 10.14710/mmh.50.4.2021.447-459

Last update: 2025-07-06 22:12:25

No citation recorded.