1. Home
  2. Vol 48, No 1 (2019)
  3. Irawan

ANALISIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 16/PUU-XVI/2018 TENTANG PEMBATALAN PERLUASAN KEWENANGAN MAHKAMAH KEHORMATAN DEWAN

Yohanes Nafta Irawan, Retno Saraswati, Esmi Warassih Pujirahayu
DOI: 10.14710/mmh.48.1.2019.71-79
Copyright (c) 2019 Masalah-Masalah Hukum License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Abstract

This research analyzes the Constitutional Court Decision Number 16/PUU-XVI/2018 that has been canceled Article 122 letter l and Article 245 section (1) from the Law Number 2 of 2018. Article 122 letter l is related to legal steps or other steps that can be taken by The Council Honor Court in the event that there is individuals, groups of people, or legal entities who criticize the House of Representatives or members of the House of Representatives, while Article 245 section (1) relates to the consideration given by the Council Honor Court in the event of a summons or request for investigation into members of the House of Representatives. Both articles are considered unconstitutional and contain an extension of the authority of the Council Honor Court. The appearance of the two articles was influenced by the political configuration of the authoritarian House of Representatives and the naming of the Council Honor Court which deemed inappropriate.


Full Text: PDF

Keywords

The Council Honor Court; The Constitutional Court Decision; Expansion of Authority

References

Ardi, R.A.; H.A.; U.S.H., 2017. Pelaksanaan Tugas dan Wewenang Mahkamah Kehormatan Dewan Dalam Penegakkan Kode Etik Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia. Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum,, 6(2), p.5.

Asshiddiqie, J., 2006. Perihal Undang-Undang di Indonesia, Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia.

Habibi, N., 2014. Praktik Pengawasan Etika Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia. Jurnal Cita Hukum, II(1), p.47.

Hamzah, M.G., Paradigma Baru Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan berdasarkan Undang-undang Administrasi Pemerintahan (Kaitannya dengan Perkembangan Hukum Acara Peratun),

Imani, D., 2016. Penegakkan Kode Etik Anggota Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Melalui Mahkamah Kehormatan Dewan. Jurnal Masalah-masalah Hukum, 5(3), p.11.

Kansil, C.S.T.K.; C.S.T., 2003. Hukum Tata Negara Republik Indonesia 2, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Kantaparwira, R., 2007. Perihal Ilmu Politik, Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Marzuki, P.M., 2010. Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana.

MD, M.M., 1999. Hukum dan Pilar-pilar Demokrasi, Yogyakarta: Gama Media.

R. Soesilo, 1991. Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP serta Komentar-komentarnya Lengkap Pasal Demi Pasal, Bogor: Politea.

Setyowati, E., 2010. Bagaimana Undang-undang Dibuat, Jakarta: PSHK.

Sofian, A., 2018. Tafsir Pasal 122 huruf l UU MD3: Kriminalisasi “Rakyat”, dalam -kriminalisasi-rakyat. Available at: http://business-law.binus.ac.id/2018/06/30/tafsir-pasal-122-huruf-l-uu-md3.

Susilo, Y., 2012. Penegakkan Kode Etik Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia Periode 2009-2014, Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

Ziyadi, A., 2017. Pentingnya Pengenalan Pelajaran Norma melalui Strategi Pembelajaran Menyenangkan dengan Humor. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Tahunan Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Universitas Negeri Medan Tahun 2017. Medan: Universitas Negeri Medan, pp. 1–3.