DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.49.4.2020.345-358

JOINT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SEBAGAI SOLUSI PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA WILAYAH ZONA EKONOMI EKSKLUSIF LAUT NATUNA

*Djarot Dimas Achmad Andaru  -  Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2020 Masalah-Masalah Hukum under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract
Permasalahan sengketa pada perairan zona ekonomi eksklusif Laut Natuna antara Indonesia dan China merupakan bagian dari sengketa klaim wilayah Laut Natuna. China mengklaim Laut Natuna Utara atas dasar kebijakan nine-dash line. Perairan Natuna diprediksi menyimpan sumber daya alam hidrokarbon dengan kapasitas 11 billion barrel. Solusi hukum yang dapat menjadi solusi di wilayah tersebut adalah melalui pembuatan kerjasama pengembangan (joint development agreement) atau JDA. Agar terlaksana secara efektif Indonesia perlu memperhatikan beberapa aspek seperti political will, stigma domestik dan pemahaman negara terkait perancangan JDA. Dengan metode yuridis-normatif, komparatif terhadap peraturan internasional maupun kebijakan internasional beserta perundang-undangan. Artikel ini akan memberikan rekomendasi kepada Indonesia bahwa pemanfaatan sumber daya Laut Natuna dapat dilaksanakan melalui JDA dengan China walaupun berada dalam status sengketa dengan memperhatikan tetap mempertahankan status quo.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Joint Development Agreement; Sengketa Wilayah; Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif
Funding: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
JOINT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SEBAGAI SOLUSI PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA WILAYAH ZONA EKONOMI EKSKLUSIF LAUT NATUNA REVIEW ATAS PELAKSANAAN KETENTUAN PAJAK PENERANGAN JALAN DI INDONESIA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM DEBITOR PADA PINJAMAN KREDIT DALAM MENINGKATKAN TARAF HIDUP Indeks dan Ucapan Terima Kasih More recent articles
Most cited articles
DESAIN SISTEM PEMERINTAHAN PRESIDENSIAL YANG EFEKTIF PERAN STRATEGIS PERGURUAN TINGGI DALAM PERCEPATAN PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI MEDIASI PENAL SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PENGGELAPAN BENDA JAMINAN FIDUSIA PERKEMBANGAN PEMILIHAN PRESIDEN DAN WAKIL PRESIDEN DI INDONESIA Kebijakan Mediasi Penal Pada Kasus Pencurian di Kepolisian Surakarta More cited articles
  1. Alexander, L. M., & Charney, J. I. (2014). Dubai-Sharjah (1981) [Report Number 7-4 (Add. 1)]. In International Maritime Boundaries Online. http://doi.org/10.1163/imbo-book-7_7
  2. Anderson, D. H. (2015). United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea - maritime boundary delimitation - methodology - territorial sea - exclusive economic zone - continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles . American Journal of International Law . Washington : Cambridge University Press
  3. Azaria, D. (2016). The Scope and Content of Sovereign Rights in Relation to Non-Living Resources in the Continental Shelf and the Exclusive Economic Zone . The Journal of Territorial and Maritime Studies . Seoul : McFarland & Company
  4. Beckman, R. C., & Schofield, C. H. (2014). Defining eez Claims from Islands: A Potential South China Sea Change . The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law . The Netherlands : Brill | Nijhoff . http://doi.org/10.1163/15718085-12341321
  5. Desbarats, R., Todesco, J., & Royer, K. (2016). Sole Risk Provisions in Joint Operating Agreements for Unconventional Oil and Gas Development . Alberta Law Review . Alberta Law Review . http://doi.org/10.29173/alr472
  6. Guernsey, K. N. (2000). The North Sea Continental Shelf cases . Ohio Northern University Law Review . Ohio Northern University Law Review
  7. International Court of Justice. North Sea Continental Shelf Cases Judgement 1969 (1969)
  8. Jain, A. G. (2015). International Court of Justice - maritime territorial dispute - boundary delimitation - tacit agreement - equidistance line - equitable apportionment . American Journal of International Law . Cambridge University Press
  9. Lucky, A. (2015). The Issues Concerning the Continental Shelf: Reflections . International Community Law Review . The Netherlands : Brill | Nijhoff . http://doi.org/10.1163/18719732-12341296
  10. Masahiro Miyoshi. (1999). The Joint Development of Offshore Oil and Gas in Relation to Maritime Boundary Delimitation. Maritime Briefing, 2(52)
  11. MORTON, K. (2016). China’s ambition in the South China Sea: is a legitimate maritime order possible? . International Affairs . Wiley Subscription Services, Inc . http://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12658
  12. Ong, D. M. (1999). Joint Development of Common Offshore Oil and Gas Deposits: “Mere” State Practice or Customary International Law? The American Journal of International Law. http://doi.org/10.2307/2555344
  13. Ong, D. M. (1999). The 1979 and 1990 Malaysia—Thailand Joint Development Agreements: A Model for International Legal Co-operation in Common Offshore Petroleum Deposits? . The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law . Aspen Publishers, Inc . http://doi.org/10.1163/15718089920492384
  14. Onorato, W. T. (1981). Joint development of seabed hydrocarbon resources: an overview of precedents in the North Sea. Energy. http://doi.org/10.1016/0360-5442(81)90041-4
  15. Peoples, L. (2010). Legal Research Methods in a Modern World: A Coursebook, Third Edition. By J. Paul Lomio, Henrik S. Spang-Hanssen, and George D. Wilson. Copenhagen, Denmark: DJØF Publishing, 2011. Pp 480. ISBN 978-87-574-2467-6. US$55 . International Journal of Legal Information . http://doi.org/10.1017/S0731126500005953
  16. Sforza, J. M. (1999). The Timor Gap dispute: the validity of the Timor Gap Treaty, self-determination and decolonization . Suffolk Transnational Law Review . Suffolk University Law School
  17. Supriyanto, R. A. (2016). Out of Its Comfort Zone: Indonesia and the South China Sea . Asia Policy . Seattle : THE NATIONAL BUREAU of ASIAN RESEARCH
  18. United Nations General Assembly. (1994). Convention on the Law of the Sea. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law. http://doi.org/10.1163/15718089720491594
  19. Wang, K.-H. (2010). The ROC’s Maritime Claims and Practices with Special Reference to the South China Sea . Ocean Development & International Law: Issues in the South China Sea . Taylor & Francis Group . http://doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2010.499282
  20. XUE, S., & Assistant Professor in the Institute of International Studies Shanghai, F. U. (n.d.). Why Joint Development Agreements Fail: Implications for the South China Sea Dispute . Contemporary Southeast Asia . Singapore : ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute . http://doi.org/10.1355/cs41-3d

Last update:

  1. Kerentanan Pulau Terluar Dalam Menjaga Kedaulatan Negara Dalam Kerangka Hukum Laut Internasional

    Winanda Kusuma, A Cery Kurnia. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 4 (3), 2022. doi: 10.14710/jphi.v4i3.447-458

Last update: 2025-06-18 07:17:58

No citation recorded.