1. Home
  2. Vol 49, No 4 (2020)
  3. Andaru

JOINT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SEBAGAI SOLUSI PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA WILAYAH ZONA EKONOMI EKSKLUSIF LAUT NATUNA

Djarot Dimas Achmad Andaru
DOI: 10.14710/mmh.49.4.2020.345-358
Copyright (c) 2020 Masalah-Masalah Hukum License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Abstract

Permasalahan sengketa pada perairan zona ekonomi eksklusif Laut Natuna antara Indonesia dan China merupakan bagian dari sengketa klaim wilayah Laut Natuna. China mengklaim Laut Natuna Utara atas dasar kebijakan nine-dash line. Perairan Natuna diprediksi menyimpan sumber daya alam hidrokarbon dengan kapasitas 11 billion barrel. Solusi hukum yang dapat menjadi solusi di wilayah tersebut adalah melalui pembuatan kerjasama pengembangan (joint development agreement) atau JDA. Agar terlaksana secara efektif Indonesia perlu memperhatikan beberapa aspek seperti political will, stigma domestik dan pemahaman negara terkait perancangan JDA. Dengan metode yuridis-normatif, komparatif terhadap peraturan internasional maupun kebijakan internasional beserta perundang-undangan. Artikel ini akan memberikan rekomendasi kepada Indonesia bahwa pemanfaatan sumber daya Laut Natuna dapat dilaksanakan melalui JDA dengan China walaupun berada dalam status sengketa dengan memperhatikan tetap mempertahankan status quo.

Full Text: PDF

Keywords

Joint Development Agreement; Sengketa Wilayah; Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif

References

Alexander, L. M., & Charney, J. I. (2014). Dubai-Sharjah (1981) [Report Number 7-4 (Add. 1)]. In International Maritime Boundaries Online. http://doi.org/10.1163/imbo-book-7_7

Anderson, D. H. (2015). United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea - maritime boundary delimitation - methodology - territorial sea - exclusive economic zone - continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles . American Journal of International Law . Washington : Cambridge University Press .

Azaria, D. (2016). The Scope and Content of Sovereign Rights in Relation to Non-Living Resources in the Continental Shelf and the Exclusive Economic Zone . The Journal of Territorial and Maritime Studies . Seoul : McFarland & Company .

Beckman, R. C., & Schofield, C. H. (2014). Defining eez Claims from Islands: A Potential South China Sea Change . The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law . The Netherlands : Brill | Nijhoff . http://doi.org/10.1163/15718085-12341321

Desbarats, R., Todesco, J., & Royer, K. (2016). Sole Risk Provisions in Joint Operating Agreements for Unconventional Oil and Gas Development . Alberta Law Review . Alberta Law Review . http://doi.org/10.29173/alr472

Guernsey, K. N. (2000). The North Sea Continental Shelf cases . Ohio Northern University Law Review . Ohio Northern University Law Review .

International Court of Justice. North Sea Continental Shelf Cases Judgement 1969 (1969).

Jain, A. G. (2015). International Court of Justice - maritime territorial dispute - boundary delimitation - tacit agreement - equidistance line - equitable apportionment . American Journal of International Law . Cambridge University Press .

Lucky, A. (2015). The Issues Concerning the Continental Shelf: Reflections . International Community Law Review . The Netherlands : Brill | Nijhoff . http://doi.org/10.1163/18719732-12341296

Masahiro Miyoshi. (1999). The Joint Development of Offshore Oil and Gas in Relation to Maritime Boundary Delimitation. Maritime Briefing, 2(52).

MORTON, K. (2016). China’s ambition in the South China Sea: is a legitimate maritime order possible? . International Affairs . Wiley Subscription Services, Inc . http://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12658

Ong, D. M. (1999). Joint Development of Common Offshore Oil and Gas Deposits: “Mere” State Practice or Customary International Law? The American Journal of International Law. http://doi.org/10.2307/2555344

Ong, D. M. (1999). The 1979 and 1990 Malaysia—Thailand Joint Development Agreements: A Model for International Legal Co-operation in Common Offshore Petroleum Deposits? . The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law . Aspen Publishers, Inc . http://doi.org/10.1163/15718089920492384

Onorato, W. T. (1981). Joint development of seabed hydrocarbon resources: an overview of precedents in the North Sea. Energy. http://doi.org/10.1016/0360-5442(81)90041-4

Peoples, L. (2010). Legal Research Methods in a Modern World: A Coursebook, Third Edition. By J. Paul Lomio, Henrik S. Spang-Hanssen, and George D. Wilson. Copenhagen, Denmark: DJØF Publishing, 2011. Pp 480. ISBN 978-87-574-2467-6. US$55 . International Journal of Legal Information . http://doi.org/10.1017/S0731126500005953

Sforza, J. M. (1999). The Timor Gap dispute: the validity of the Timor Gap Treaty, self-determination and decolonization . Suffolk Transnational Law Review . Suffolk University Law School .

Supriyanto, R. A. (2016). Out of Its Comfort Zone: Indonesia and the South China Sea . Asia Policy . Seattle : THE NATIONAL BUREAU of ASIAN RESEARCH .

United Nations General Assembly. (1994). Convention on the Law of the Sea. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law. http://doi.org/10.1163/15718089720491594

Wang, K.-H. (2010). The ROC’s Maritime Claims and Practices with Special Reference to the South China Sea . Ocean Development & International Law: Issues in the South China Sea . Taylor & Francis Group . http://doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2010.499282

XUE, S., & Assistant Professor in the Institute of International Studies Shanghai, F. U. (n.d.). Why Joint Development Agreements Fail: Implications for the South China Sea Dispute . Contemporary Southeast Asia . Singapore : ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute . http://doi.org/10.1355/cs41-3d