1. Home
  2. Vol 51, No 3 (2022)
  3. Binawan

EMPAT PROBLEMATIK FILOSOFIS HUKUM DALAM DINAMIKA HUBUNGAN KEADILAN DAN KEPASTIAN

Al. Andang L. Binawan
DOI: 10.14710/mmh.51.3.2022.314-324
Copyright (c) 2022 Masalah-Masalah Hukum License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Abstract

Hukum adalah product penting kebudayaan manusia yang juga menggenggam persoalan filosofis. Banyak pemikir berusaha memaparkannya, termasuk H.L.A. Hart. Pokok-pokok persoalan filosofis penting itu antara lain muncul dalam tarik-menarik antara tujuan keadilan dan kepastiannya, seperti dalam adagium “Summum ius, summa iniuria“. Selalu ada upaya untuk memahami dan meredakan ketegangan, tetapi setiap upaya selalu menggendong persoalan filosofis­nya. Artikel ini berusaha memetakan persoalan-per­soalan filosofis itu supaya alur dan dinamika perdebatannya lebih mudah diikuti. Pro­blematik yang muncul dari hubungan antara tujuan keadilan dan kepastian itu -yang akan disebut sebagai ‚sudut sempit‘, berbeda dengan ‚sudut luas‘-nya H.L.A. Hart- dipetakan dalam dimensi ‚waktu‘ alur hidupnya suatu hukum. Dari sudut sempit ini, akan tampak empat pro­ble­­matik filosofis. Pencermatan problematik filosofis ini penting terutama untuk memahami bahwa tidak ada hukum yang sempurna, sehingga perlu terus-menerus dicermati agar lebih mencapai tujuan dasarnya.

Full Text: PDF

Keywords

Problematik Filosofis Hukum; Kepastian; Keadilan; Esensi Hukum; Tafsir Hukum; Ketidakcukupan Hukum

References

Apeldoorn, L. . J. Van. (1978). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.

Aristotle. (1999). Nicomachean Ethics. Kitchener: Batoche books.

Bello, P. C. (2012). the Controversy About the Essence of Law: a Dispute Between Hart and Dworkin. Indonesia Law Review, 2(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v2n1.11

Buckholtz, J. W., & Marois, R. (2012). The Roots Of Modern Justice: Cognitive And Neural Foundations Of Social Norms And Their Enforcement. Nature Neuroscience, 15, 655–661.

Callister, P. D. (2017). What is meant by ‘evaluation’? Pace Law Review Volume, 37(2), 507–550. https://doi.org/10.51952/9781847429162.ch002

Cotterrell, R. (2019). Access To Justice, Moral Distance And Changing Demands On Law. In Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice (Vol. 36). https://doi.org/10.22329/wyaj.v36i0.6420

Cross, F. B. (2007). Identifying the Virtues of the Common Law. In Law and Economics Working Paper No. 063 (No. 063). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.812464

Čufar, K. (2021). Pure theory’s deconstruction. European Journal of Legal Studies, 13(1), 155–186. https://doi.org/10.2924/EJLS.2019.044

Darmodiharjo, Darji, & Shidarta. (2004). Pokok-pokok Filsafat Hukum: Apa dan Bagaimana Filsafat Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Deakin, S. (2015). Juridical Ontology : The Evolution of Legal Form. Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung, 40(1), 170–184.

Delaney, D. (2001). Semantic ecology and lexical violence: nature at the limits of law. Law Text Culture, 5(2), 77–112.

Dworkin, R. (1986). Law’s Empire. Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Endicott, T. A. O. (1998). Herbert Hart and the Semantic Sting. Legal Theory, 4(3), 283–300.

Finnis, J. (2014). What is the Philosophy of Law? The American Journal of Jurisprudence, 59(2), 133–142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ajj/auu012

Finnis, J. (2016). Judicial Power: Past, Present and Future (No. 2/2016).

Folarin, P., & Sobola, E. (2019). Language of law: Imperative for linguistic simplicity. Journal of Research Findings/Revue, 2(2), 268–285. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24296.08960

Gaus, G. (2018). Theoretical Considerations: The Complexity of a Diverse Moral Order. The Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy, 16, 645–680.

Giddens, A. (1999). Runaway World: How Globalization is Reshaping Our Lives. London: Profile Books.

Gkouvas, T., & Follow. (2018). The Nature of Legal Interpretation: What Jurists Can Learn about Legal Interpretation from Linguistics and Philosophy. International Dialogue, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226445168.001.0001

Hart, H. L. A. (1983). Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Heller, A. (2000). The Complexity of Justice : A Challenge to the 21st Century. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 3(3), 247–262.

Indarti, E. (2018). Progressive Law Revealed : a Legal Philosophical Overview. Diponegoro Law Review, 03(01), 28–42.

Kincaid, E. R. (2019). The virtue of equity and the contemporary world. Journal of Moral Theology, 8(Special Issue 2), 114–133.

Kretzmann, N. (1988). Lex Iniusta Non est Lex - Laws on Trial in Aquinas’ Court of Conscience. American Journal of Jurisprudence, 33(99), 99.

Latipulhayat, A. (2014). Roscoe Pound. PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law), 1(2), 413–424. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v1n2.a12

Leiter, B. (2021). Back to Hart. Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu, 69(4), 749–760. https://doi.org/10.51204/anali_pfub_21401a

Mandel, G. N. (2007). History Lessons for a General Theory of Law and Technology. Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 8, 551–570.

Manzanares, J. V. (2014). Cognitive Linguistics and the Law. Anuari De Filologia. Estudis De Lingüística, 4, 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1344/afel2014.1.10

Marilang, M. (2017). Menimbang Paradigma Keadilan Hukum Progresif. Jurnal Konstitusi, 14(2), 315. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1424

Marmor, A. (2014). Philosophy of Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Pankova, O., & Migachev, Y. (2020). Justice in the contemporary world. BRICS Law Journal, 7(1), 119–147. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2020-7-1-119-147

Rahardjo, S. (1977). Aneka persoalan hukum dan masyarakat. Bandung: Alumni.

Rahayu, M. K. (2018). Sengketa Mazhab Hukum – Sintesis Berbagai Mazhab dalam Pemikiran Hukum. Jakarta: Penerbit Kompas.

Review, L. L., & Massey, C. (2007). The Constitution in a Postmodem Age. Washington and Lee Law Review, 64(1).

Ryan, M. (2022). The Limits of Law and AI. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 90(3), 923–950.

Shai, I. (2019). Radical transformation and the limits of law. Acta Academica, 51(1), 144–162. https://doi.org/10.18820/24150479/aa51i1.8

Spaak, T. (2017). Legal Positivism, Conventionalism, and The Normativity of Law. Jurisprudence: An International Journal of Legal and Political Thought, 9(2), 1–26.

Spaak, Torben. (2021). Legal philosophy and the study of legal reasoning. Belgrade Law Review, 69(4), 795–811. https://doi.org/10.51204/anali_pfbu_21405a

Stewart, J. G. (2019). Demystifying Critical Legal Studies. The University of Adelaide.

Thoreau, H. D. (2014). Civil Disobedience. Utah: Libertas Institute.

Torre, M. La, Hull, C., Model, T. H., & Hart, H. L. A. (2007). The Hierarchical Model and H . L . A . Hart ’ s Concept of Law. ARSP: Archiv Für Rechts- Und Sozialphilosophie / Archives for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, 93(1), 82–100.

Unger, R. M. (1996). What Should Legal Analysis Become? New York: Verso.

Vega, J. (2018). Legal philosophy as practical philosophy. Revus Journal for Constitutional Theory and Philosophy of Law / Revija Za Ustavno Teorijo in Filozofijo Prava, (34). https://doi.org/10.4000/revus.3859

Visser, P. R. S., & Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (1998). A Comparison of Four Ontologies for the Design of Legal Knowledge Systems. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 6, 27–57. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008251913710

Wignjosoebroto, S. (2003). Hukum: Paradigma, Metode Dan Dinamika Masalahnya (Ifdhal Kasim dkk, Ed.). Jakarta: ELSAM-HUMA.

Zain, Z. M., & Yusoff, M. A. (2017). Civil Disobedience: Concept and Practice. Asian Social Science, 13(8), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v13n8p129