DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.51.2.2022.130-140

PERSEPULUHAN SEBAGAI DASAR MEMPEROLEH CHARITABLE DEDUCTION: STUDI BANDING INDONESIA DAN AMERIKA SERIKAT

*Harven Filippo Taufik  -  Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 Masalah-Masalah Hukum under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Dengan batasan-batasan tertentu, Umat Kristen di Indonesia dapat memperoleh pengurangan penghasilan kena pajak dari persepuluhan yang dibayarkannya. Pengaturan demikian juga dapat ditemukan di Amerika Serikat dengan pengaturan yang lebih terbuka. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini akan membahas pengaturan persepuluhan sebagai dasar memperoleh charitable deduction di Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah model penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan undang-undang, konseptual, historis, dan komparatif. Berdasarkan penelitian, ditemukan bahwa pengaturan di Indonesia kurang sesuai dengan karakteristik persepuluhan. Berbeda dengan di Amerika Serikat yang lebih sesuai, sehingga Umat Kristen dapat memanfaatkan pengaturan yang ada untuk memperoleh pengurangan dari pendapatan yang dikenakan pajak penghasilan.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Pajak Penghasilan; Persepuluhan; Zakat; Charitable Deduction

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
KENDALA PELAKSANAAN JUAL BELI PROPERTI BAGI PASANGAN PERKAWINAN CAMPURAN URGENSI ASAS SUBSIDER PADA PENGATURAN ASAS UNIVERSAL DALAM RANCANGAN KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA PERSEPULUHAN SEBAGAI DASAR MEMPEROLEH CHARITABLE DEDUCTION: STUDI BANDING INDONESIA DAN AMERIKA SERIKAT More recent articles
Most cited articles
FAKTOR KRIMINOGEN ILLEGAL MINING TIMAH DI BANGKA BELITUNG UPAYA PERLINDUNGAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA DALAM PEMBINAAN NARAPIDANA ANAK (STUDI DI LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN KLAS II B ANAK PONTIANAK) PRISMATIKA HUKUM SEBAGAI DASAR PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA BERDASARKAN PANCASILA (Kajian terhadap Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual) PERAN SERTA MASYARAKAT DAN KEWENANGAN PEMERINTAH DALAM KONSERVASI MANGROVE SEBAGAI UPAYA MENCEGAH ROB DAN BANJIR SERTA SEBAGAI TEMPAT WISATA Kebijakan Mediasi Penal Pada Kasus Pencurian di Kepolisian Surakarta More cited articles
  1. Abiodun, A., & Eberechi, A. V. (2016). Tithe Payment in the Christian Faith : A Biblical Perspective. International Journal of Religious and Cultural Practice, 2(1), 18–27
  2. Ademiluka, S. O. (2020). A Study of Malachi 3:8-12 in Relation to Tithing in some Churches in Nigeria. Old Testament Essays, 33(2), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.17159/2312-3621/2020/v33n2a8
  3. Adriansyah, A., Mashdurohatun, A., & Handoko, W. (2021). Implementation of Zakat & Professional Income Tax Payments for Notaries & PPAT (Comparative Law Study of Zakat Payment System & Professional Income Tax). Sultan Agung Notary Law Review, 3(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.3.1.17-26
  4. Agustian, R. A., & Saliman, A. R. (2019). Model Pengakuan Hak Konstitusional Dalam Beragama (Studi Komparasi Menurut Uud Indonesia 1945 Dan Konstitusi Malaysia 1957). Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 48(2), 123. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.48.2.2019.123-136
  5. Ajah, M. (2013). The Significance of Pentateuchal Tithing as a Legal Instruction for the 21 st Century Reader. The Asbury Journal, 68(2), 106–119
  6. Albert, R. (2015). The progressive era of constitutional amendment. Boston College Law School Legal Studies Research Paper, 386, 197–219. https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v2i3.44528
  7. Blair, K. S. (2009). Praying for a Tax Break : Churches , Political Speech and the Loss of Section 501 ( c )( 3 ) Tax Exempt Status. Denver University Law Review, 86(2), 405–437
  8. Budiselić, E. (2014). The Role and the Place of Tithing in the Context of Christian Giving Part 1. Evangelical Journal of Theology, 8(2), 143–162
  9. Budiselić, E. (2015). The Role and Place of Tithing in the Context of Christian Giving - Part 2. Kairos, 9(1), 31–58
  10. Caster, A. (2012). Charitable Discrimination: Why Taxpayers Should Not Have To Fund 501(C)(3) Organizations That Discriminate Against Lgbt Employees. Regent University Law Review, 24, 403–431
  11. CCH Tax Law. (2020). State Tax Handbook. CCH Incorporation
  12. Dale, H. P., & Colinvaux, R. (2015). The Charitable Contributions Deduction: Federal Tax Rules. Tax Lawyer, 68(2), 331–366
  13. Efendi, J., & J. Ibrahim. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Prenada Media Group
  14. Eghe, I. A. (2021). Tithing In Malachi 3:8-12 and Its Implications for Christians in Edo Land. Indiana Journal of Arts & Literature, 2(3), 7–12. https://indianapublications.com/Journals/IJHSS
  15. Fresco, M. (2012). Getting to Exempt: Putting the Rubber Stamp on Section 501 (c) (3)’s Political Activity Prohibition. Fordham Law Review, 80, 3015–3055
  16. Hammond, J., & A. Hammond. (2006). Persepuluhan 10%
  17. Helge, T. L. (2017). Rejecting Charity: Why the IRS Denies Tax Exemption to 501(c)(3) Applicants. Pittsburgh Tax Review, 14(1), 1–76. https://doi.org/10.5195/taxreview.2016.51
  18. Igbo, P. (2021). The Over-Emphasis on the Paying of Tithe and the Quest for Materialism among Religious Leaders: An Evaluation of the Biblical Teaching on Tithe. Journal of Religion and Human Relations, 13(1), 187–200
  19. Ivarsen, I. (2021). Æthelstan, Wulfstan and a revised history of tithes in England. Early Medieval Europe, 29(2), 225–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/emed.12473
  20. Jensen, E. M. (2014). Did the sixteenth amendment ever matter? Does it matter today? Northwestern University Law Review, 108(3 SPEC. ISSUE), 799–824
  21. Kitause, R. H. (2013). A Historical Discourse on Tithing and Seed Sowing in some Nigerian Pentecostal Churches. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science, 18(3), 07–19. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-1830719
  22. Lewis, A. (2021). Tithe Personal and Praedial. Journal of Legal History, 42(2), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/01440365.2021.1946198
  23. Marpaung, A. (2020). Zakat Regulation as a Reduction of Income Tax in Indonesia. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(3), 2109–2116. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v3i3.1143
  24. Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi. Prenada Media Group
  25. Naharto, M. J., Tjondro, E., & Ortodoks, P. (2016). Analisis Tujuan Pemungutan Serta Pengertian Penghasilan Menurut Perpajakan Dan Persepuluhan Bagi Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Perpajakan, 4(1), 1–14
  26. Partlow, J., & Partlow, J. (2013). Wyoming Law Review The Necessity of Complexity in the Tax System. Wyoming Law Review, 13(1), 303–334. http://repository.uwyo.edu/wlr%5Cnhttp://repository.uwyo.edu/wlr/vol13/iss1/9
  27. Sabon, M. B. (2013). Teori Hukum Progresif : Pengendali Dunia Yang Lepas Kendali. Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 42(4), 503–510
  28. Septiana, A. M. (2012). Penanggulangan Krisis Legitimasi Hukum Melalui Hukum Progresif. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 41(4), 564–571
  29. Sirengo, J. (2021). The Christian Response to Poverty: Implications for the 21st Century Church. Jurnalul Practicilor Comunitare Pozitive, 21(1), 50–58
  30. Walker, D. S. (2012). A Consideration of an LLC for a 501(C)(3) Nonprofit Organization. William Mitchel Law Review, 38(2), 627–677. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2158907
  31. Widyadinata, Y. (2014). Perspective of taxpayers toward religious donations and taxes from the viewpoint of religion. The Indonesian Accounting Review, 4(01), 26. https://doi.org/10.14414/tiar.v4i01.281
  32. Zainuddin, & Sahban. (2021). Reinterpretasi Riqab Sebagai Korban Eksploitasi. Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 50(1), 17–23

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-07-06 13:17:32

No citation recorded.