DOI: https://doi.org/10.21456/vol%25viss%25ipp605-616

URGENSI ASAS SUBSIDER PADA PENGATURAN ASAS UNIVERSAL DALAM RANCANGAN KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA

*Devita Kartika Putri  -  Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 Masalah-Masalah Hukum under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract
Menurut asas subsider, yurisdiksi universal hanya dapat dilaksanakan sebagai upaya terakhir. Artikel ini berpendapat bahwa asas tersebut perlu diatur dalam Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana sebagai syarat untuk melaksanakan yurisdiksi universal berdasarkan Pasal 6 dan 7 agar dapat menjaga penghormatan terhadap kedaulatan negara lain dan menghindari resiko lainnya yang muncul dari pelaksanaan yurisdiksi universal. Artikel ini menyampaikan gagasan Penulis tentang bagaimana asas tersebut dapat dikonseptualisasikan dalam RKUHP. Kesimpulan Artikel ini menunjukkan bahwa konsep asas subsider bisa dibentuk dengan lima syarat yaitu, pemenuhan asas ‘universality plus’ dan ‘conditional universality’; adanya laporan dugaan kasus kejahatan internasional; Indonesia sebagai custodial state; dan asas ne bis in idem. Kelima syarat tersebut yang kemudian bisa menjadikan yurisdiksi universal sebagai upaya terakhir.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Kejahatan Internasional; Yurisdiksi Universal; Asas Subsider; Tidak Mampu atau Tidak Beritikad Baik

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
PERSEPULUHAN SEBAGAI DASAR MEMPEROLEH CHARITABLE DEDUCTION: STUDI BANDING INDONESIA DAN AMERIKA SERIKAT PENERAPAN PRINSIP PERSAMAAN DI DEPAN HUKUM DALAM PENANGANGAN PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI PENGADILAN NEGERI SERANG PEMBAHARUAN KEADILAN RESTORATIF DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA INDONESIA More recent articles
Most cited articles
PERLINDUNGAN EKSPRESI BUDAYA TRADISIONAL DALAM SISTEM HUKUM KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL PERAN STRATEGIS PERGURUAN TINGGI DALAM PERCEPATAN PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI FAKTOR KRIMINOGEN ILLEGAL MINING TIMAH DI BANGKA BELITUNG Kebijakan Mediasi Penal Pada Kasus Pencurian di Kepolisian Surakarta IMPLEMENTASI DIVERSI TERHADAP ANAK YANG BERHADAPAN DENGAN HUKUM (STUDI KASUS DI PULAU LOMBOK) More cited articles
  1. Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Kemenkumham RI. (2015). Draft Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Undang tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP)
  2. Bassiouni, M. C. (1996). International Crimes: Jus Cogens and Obligatio Erga Omnes. Law and Contemporary Problems, 59(4)
  3. Belgian Federal Parliament. (2019). Preliminary Title of the Belgian Code of Criminal Procedure. Belgium
  4. Burens, L. (2016). Universal Jurisdiction Meets Complementarity: An Approach towards a Desirable Future Codification of Horizontal Complementarity between the Member States of the International Criminal Court. Criminal Law Forum, 27, 75–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-016-9272-9
  5. Coffey, G. (2013). Resolving Conflicts of Jurisdiction in Criminal Proceedings: Interpreting Ne Bis In Idem in Conjuction with the Principle of Complementarity. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 4(1–2), 59–81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/203228441300400105
  6. Davidovic, J. (2016). Universal Jurisdiction an International Criminal Law. In C. Flanders & Z. Hoskins (Eds.), The New Philosophy of Criminal Law (pp. 113–130). London: Rowman & Littlefield
  7. Dodge, W. S. (2019). Jurisdictional reasonableness under customary international law: The approach of the Restatement (Fourth) of US Foreign Relations Law. Questions of International Law, 62, 5–18
  8. Dumbryte, A. (2014). Assessing Ability and Willingness of States: What Can the ICC Learn from International Refugee Law? Journal of International Criminal Justice, 12(5), 997–1017. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqu060
  9. Garrod, M. (2012). The Protective Principle of Jurisdiction over War Crimes and Hollow Concept of Universality. International Criminal Law Review, 12, 763–826. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-01205003
  10. Heller, K. J. (2017). What is an International Crime? (A Revisionist History). Harvard International Law, 58(2), 353–420
  11. Hesenov, R. (2012). Universal Jurisdiction for International Crimes - A Case Study. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 19, 275–283. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-012-9189-8
  12. Hovell, D. (2018). The Authority of Universal Jurisdiction. European Journal of International Law, 29(2), 427–456. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chy037
  13. Human Rights Watch. (2014). The Legal Framework for Universal Jurisdiction in Germany
  14. Human Rights Watch. (2017). “These are the crimes we are fleeing”: Justice for Syria in Swedish and German Courts
  15. International Court of Justice. Questions Relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belgium v. Senegal), International Court of Justice. , (2012)
  16. International Criminal Court. (2013). Prosecutor v. Saif Al-Islam Gaddafi and Abdullah Al-Senussi, Decision on the admissibility of the case against Saif Al-Islam Gaddafi, International Criminal Court. Den Haag
  17. International Criminal Court. (2019). Situation in the People’s Republic of Bangladesh/Republic of the Union of Myanmar, Decision Pursuant to Article 15 of the Rome Statute on the Authorisation of an Investigation into the Situation in the People’s Republic of Bangladesh/Republic of the Union
  18. Kaleck, W., & Kroker, P. (2018). Syrian Torture Investigations in Germany and Beyond: Breathing New Life into Universal Jurisdiction in Europe. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 16(1), 165–191. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqy014
  19. Khen, H. M.-E. (2015). Revisiting Universal Jurisdiction: The Application of the Complementarity Principle by National Courts and Implications for Ex-Post Justice in the Syrian Civil War. Emory International Law Review, 30(2), 261–311. Retrieved from https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/eilr/vol30/iss2/4
  20. Klip, A. (2019). Jurisdiction and Transnational Ne Bis In Idem in Prosecution of Transnational Crimes. In D. K. Brown (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminal Process (pp. 477–499). Oxford: Oxford University Press
  21. Lafontaine, F. (2012). Universal Jurisdiction - The Realistic Utopia. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 10(5), 1277–1302. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqs066
  22. Langer, M. (2013). Universal Jurisdiction as Janus-Faced: The Dual Nature of the German International Criminal Code. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 11(4), 737–762. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqt057
  23. Langer, M. (2015). Universal Jurisdiction is Not Disappearing: The Shift from “Global Enforcer” to “No Safe Haven” Universal Jurisdiction. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 13(2), 245–256. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqv009
  24. Langer, M., & Eason, M. (2019). The Quiet Expansion of Universal Jurisdiction. The European Journal of International Law, 30(3), 779–817. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chz050
  25. Mailart, J.-B. (2019). The limits of subjective territorial jurisdiction in the context of cybercrime. ERA Forum Journal of the Academy of European Law, 19, 375–390. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-018-0527-2
  26. Massagé, I., & Sharma, M. (2018). Regina v. Lama: Lessons Learned in Preparing a Universal Jurisdiction Case. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 10(2), 327–345. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huy020
  27. Mills, A. (2014). Rethinking Jurisdiction in International Law. British Yearbook of International Law, 84(1), 187–239. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/bybil/bru003
  28. Moyo, M. P. (2015). Final Report on the Obligation to Extradite or Prosecute (Aut dedere aut judicare). International Legal Materials, 54(4), 758–779
  29. Nimigan, S. (2019). The Malabo Protocol, the ICC and the Idea of “Regional Complementarity.” Journal of International Criminal Justice, 17(5), 1005–1029. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqz040
  30. Pramono, B., & Larasati, A. (2022). Pelaksanaan Prinsip Yurisdiksi Universal Mengenai Penanganan Menjadi Pelanggaran di Wilayah Perairan Indonesia. NUSANTARA: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 9(1), 343–351
  31. Pratiwi, D. (2019). Implementasi Prinsip Yurisdiksi Universal Mengenai Pemberantasan Kejahatan Perompakan Laut di Indonesia. Supremasi Jurnal Hukum, 2(1), 119–130
  32. Reeves, A. R. (2018). Liability to International Prosecution: The Nature of Universal Jurisdiction. The European Journal of International Law, 28(4)
  33. Stahn, C. (2019). A Critical Introduction to International Criminal Law. UK: Cambridge University Press
  34. Takeuchi, M. (2014). Modalities of the Exercise of Universal Jurisdiction in International Law. University of Glasgow
  35. Tirtawati, S. (2021). Menilik Penerapan Prinsip Yurisdiksi Universal Negara terhadap Kejahatan Perompakan di Laut Lepas Menurut Hukum Internasional. Al Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Ketatanegaraan, 10(2), 111–122
  36. United Nations Human Rights Committee. (2007). General Comment No. 32, Article 14: Right to Equality before Courts and Tribunals and to a Fair Trial
  37. Yun, X. (2016). Asia’s Reticence towards Universal Jurisdiction. Groningen Journal of International Law, 4(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21827/59db68e54df9c

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-07-27 02:15:32

No citation recorded.