DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.52.1.2023.74-85

LITIGASI PERUBAHAN IKLIM DI INDONESIA: IDENTIFIKASI ISU DAN PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM

*Laga Sugiarto  -  Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Pujiono Pujiono  -  Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Arif Hidayat  -  Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Yuli Prasetyo Adhi  -  Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2023 Masalah-Masalah Hukum under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Litigasi perubahan iklim di Indonesia mengalami perkembangan cukup pesat, mengingat bertambahnya jumlah perkara dan putusan terkait gugatan litigasi perubahan iklim. Melihat praktik litigasi perubahan iklim, setelah dilakukan pemilahan serta identifikasi isu/motivasi, maka litigasi perubahan iklim di Indonesia, meliputi jenis litigasi dengan motivasi perubahan iklim bukan sebagai isu utama dan litigasi bukan motivasi perubahan iklim, namun berimplikasi pada mitigasi dan adaptasi perubahan iklim. Tujuan tulisan ini yaitu untuk menganalisis tindakan perbuatan melawan hukum yang dilakukan oleh pelaku pelanggaran hukum dengan mendasarkan kepada doktrin kesengajaan, kelalaian, pertanggungjawaban mutlak, dan tindakan faktual. Riset ini dapat memberikan pilihan advokasi kebijakan perubahan iklim melalui litigasi di pengadilan bagi para pencari keadilan.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Litigasi Perubahan Iklim; Perbuatan Melawan Hukum; Pertanggungjawaban Mutlak; Tindakan Faktual

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
LITIGASI PERUBAHAN IKLIM DI INDONESIA: IDENTIFIKASI ISU DAN PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM BATASAN KEWENANGAN MENGADILI SENGKETA PAJAK ANTARA PENGADILAN PAJAK DAN PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA PENAFSIRAN VICTIM PRECIPITATION UNTUK PEMIDANAAN KEKERASAN SEKSUAL More recent articles
Most cited articles
URGENSI HUKUM PERIZINAN DAN PENEGAKANNYA SEBAGAI SARANA PENCEGAHAN PENCEMARAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP MARRIAGE LAW AND DIVORCE BASED ON ADAT LAW IN BALI PRINSIP MOST FAVOURED NATIONS DAN PENGECUALIANNYA DALAM WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION (WTO) PRISMATIKA HUKUM SEBAGAI DASAR PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA BERDASARKAN PANCASILA (Kajian terhadap Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual) FORMULASI MODEL PENGELOLAAN HAK ULAYAT LAUT DI PROVINSI MALUKU More cited articles
  1. Aji, F. E., & Sugiarto, L. (2018). Pemaknaan Perluasan Objek Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara Yang Meliputi Tindakan Faktual. Jurnal Justiciabelen, 1(1), 46–71. https://doi.org/10.30587/justiciabelen.v1i1.492
  2. Ariani, D. (2019). The Effectiveness of Climate Change Litigation As a Venue To Uphold State Climate Change Obligations in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 16(2), 210–234. https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol15.3.751
  3. Bakewell, F., Pauls, M. A., & Migneault, D. (2020). Ethical considerations of the duty to care and physician safety in the COVID-19 pandemic. Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, 22(4), 407–410. https://doi.org/10.1017/cem.2020.376
  4. Barnwell, M. (2010). The problem of negligent omissions : Medieval action theories to the rescue (1st ed.)
  5. Bryden, D., & Storey, I. (2011). Duty of care and medical negligence. Continuing Education in Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain, 11(4), 124–127. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaceaccp/mkr016
  6. Cahn, A., & Donald, D. C. (2012). Directors’ duties of loyalty, good faith and care. In Comparative Company Law (pp. 332–368). https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511779909.014
  7. Chafid, M. (2021). Asuransi Parametrik sebagai Mekanisme Alternatif dalam Memberikan Kompensasi kepada Korban Perubahan Iklim di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia, 8(1), 229–258. https://doi.org/10.38011/jhli.v8i1.365
  8. Coleman, J. L. (1983). Review of A Theory of Strict Liability, by R. A. Epstein. The Philosophical Review, 92(4), 613. https://doi.org/10.2307/2184887
  9. Cross, F. B. (1994). Business Law : Negligence and Torts
  10. Dua, S. K., & Turner, C. (2019). Unlocking Torts. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315178516
  11. Epstein, R. A. (2010). Toward a general theory of tort law: Strict liability in context. Journal of Tort Law, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-9148.1100
  12. Gardner, S. (1996). Contributory Negligence, Comparative Negligence, and Stare Decisis in North Carolina. Campbell Law Review, 18(1)
  13. Higham, C., Setzer, J., & Bradeen, E. (2022). Challenging Government Responses To Climate Change Through Framework Litigation About The Authors
  14. Johnson, D. (2022, July). Across The Globe, Those Harmed By Climate Change Are Turning To Courts. Ensia.Com. Retrieved from https://ensia.com/features/climate-change-litigation-courts-lawsuit-activism/
  15. Joint Centre for Bioethics Pandemic Ethics Working Group. (2008). The duty to care in a pandemic. American Journal of Bioethics, 8(8), 31–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265160802318196
  16. Loveless, J. (2013). Mens Rea: Intention, Recklessness, Negligence and Gross Negligence. In Complete Criminal Law (pp. 103–168)
  17. McDougall, R. J., Gillam, L., Ko, D., Holmes, I., & Delany, C. (2021). Balancing health worker well-being and duty to care: An ethical approach to staff safety in COVID-19 and beyond. Journal of Medical Ethics, 47(5), 318–323. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106557
  18. Peel, J., & Osofsky, H. M. (2018). A Rights Turn in Climate Change Litigation? Transnational Environmental Law, 7(1), 37–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102517000292
  19. Peel, J., & Osofsky, H. M. (2020). Climate change litigation. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 16, 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-022420-122936
  20. Pielke, R. A. (2004). What Is Climate Change? Energy and Environment, 15(3), 515–520. https://doi.org/10.1260/0958305041494576
  21. Pinching, A. J. (1999). Clinical Guidelines and the Law: Negligence, Discretion and Judgment. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 92(7), 382–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/014107689909200719
  22. Plunkett, J. (2018). The Duty of Care in Negligence. Hart Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509914876
  23. Posner, R. A. (1973). Strict Liability: A Comment. The Journal of Legal Studies, 2(1), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1086/467496
  24. Sembiring, Z. A., & Baihaqie, A. G. (2020). Litigasi Perubahan Iklim Privat di Indonesia: Prospek dan Permasalahannya. Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia, 7(1), 118–140. https://doi.org/10.38011/jhli.v7i1.215
  25. Setzer, J., & Vanhala, L. C. (2019). Climate Change Litigation: A Review Of Research On Courts And Litigants In Climate Governance. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 10(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.580
  26. Simester, A. (2010). Appraising Strict Liability. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278510.001.0001
  27. Varvastian, S. (2019). The Human Right To A Clean And Healthy Environment In Climate The Human Right To A Clean And Healthy Envi- Ronment In Climate Change Litigation. MPIL Research Paper Series, 2019–09
  28. Verschuuren, J. (Ed.). (2022). Research Handbook On Climate Change Adaptation Law (2nd ed.). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing
  29. Vines, P. (2000). The Needle in the Haystack: Principle in the Duty of Care in Negligence. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 23(2), 35–57. Retrieved from https://www.unswlawjournal.unsw.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/23-2-11.pdf
  30. Witting, C. (2005). Duty of care: An analytical approach. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 25(1), 33–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqi003

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-06-18 03:57:17

No citation recorded.