skip to main content

MENINJAU KEMBALI HUKUM DAN KEADILAN SOSIAL DALAM TRANSFORMASI DIGITAL

*Herlambang Perdana Wiratraman orcid scopus  -  Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
Arifin Setyo Budi  -  Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2023 Masalah-Masalah Hukum under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Transformasi digital menghadirkan peluang dan tantangan bagi hukum dan keadilan sosial diakibatkan revolusi digital yang mengganggu kerangka hukum lama dan konvensional, sehingga memerlukan peraturan baru guna mengatasi beragam permasalahan. Kajian ini menfokuskan pada perlunya memikirkan kembali paradigma, teori maupun pendekatan hukum dan keadilan yang selama ini diperdebatkan dan dikonsepkan dalam ranah hukum, peradilan dan kebijakan politiknya, dalam konteks muktahir dan menjadi landasan pengembangan pendidikan hukum dan praktek pengembangan hukum, terutama dengan perkembangan teknologi digital. Serta upaya menjawab, bagaimana proses pemaknaan hukum dan keadilan sosial bisa menjadi lebih relevan menawarkan dahaga pengetahuan atas ruang publik dalam konteks perkembangan teknologi digital. Artikel ini mengajak mengembangkan pemikiran kritis imajinatif atas persinggungan hukum dan keadilan sosial yang berbasis pada kebutuhan dan sekaligus realitas teknologi digital.

 

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Hukum; Keadilan Sosial; Transformasi Digital; Teknologi; Hak Asasi Manusia
Funding: URP Fakultas Hukum UGM

Article Metrics:

  1. Almeida, F., Santos, J. D., & Monteiro J. A. (2020) The Challenges and Opportunities in the Digitalization of Companies in a Post-COVID-19 World. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 48(3), 97-103. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2020.3013206
  2. Brooks, C., Gherhes, C., & Vorley, T. (2020). Artificial intelligence in the legal sector: pressures and challenges of transformation. Cambrige Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 13(1) 135-152. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsz026
  3. Baldwin, J., M., Eassey, J., M., & Brooke, E., J. (2020). Court Operations during the COVID-19 Pandemic. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 45, 743-758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-020-09553-1
  4. Barfield, W., & Pagallo, U. (Eds.). (2018). Research handbook on the law of artificial intelligence. Edward Elgar Pub., Inc
  5. Burke, T. P. (2014). The Origin of Social Justice: Taparelli D’azeglio. Intercollegiate Studies Institute. Dikutip dari https://isi.org/intercollegiate-review/the-origins-of-social-justice-taparelli-dazeglio
  6. Carneiro, D., Novais, P., Neves, J., Andrade, F., & Zeleznikow, J. (2014). Online Dispute Resolution: An Artificial Intelligence Perspective. Artificial Intelligence Review, 41. 211-240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-011-9305-z
  7. Clay, T., S., & Seeger, E., A. (2017), Law Firms in Transition. Dikutip dari https://www.altmanweil.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Law-Firms-in-Transition-2017-An-Altman-Weil-Flash-Survey-.pdf
  8. Djamali, R. A. (2010). Pengantar Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada
  9. Debnath, S., Sen, S., & Blackstock, B. (2000). Law BOT: A Multiagent Assistant for Legal Research. IEEE Journal Internet Computing, 4(6), 32-37. https://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/4236.895013
  10. Friedman, L. M. (1975), The Legal System A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russel Sage Foundation
  11. Gowder, P. (2018). Transformative Legal Technology and the rule of law. University of Toronto Law Journal, 68(1) 82-105. https://doi.org/10.3138/utlj.2017-0047
  12. Habermas, J. (2023). 1. Paradigms of Law. In M. Rosenfeld & A. Arato (Ed.), Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchanges 13-25. Berkeley: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520917613-003
  13. Habermas, J. (1996) Between Fact and Norms. Massachusetts: MIT Press
  14. Hatta, M. (2015) Keadilan Sosial dan Kemakmuran. Jakarta: LP3ES
  15. Jones, R., C. (2017). The Robot Lawyer are here – and they’re winning. Dikutip dari https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-41829534
  16. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI) ke V (2016) Penyiksaan dan HAM dalam Perspektif KUHAP, Pustaka Sinar Harapan, Jakarta,
  17. Kantaprawira, R. (2004), Sistem Politik Indonesia Suatu Model Pengantar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo
  18. Krishna, Shyam (2020) Spatiotemporal (In)justice in Digital Platforms: An Analysis of Food-Delivery Platforms in South India. IFIP Joint Working Conference on the Future of Digital Work: The Challenge of Inequality (IFIPJWC), Dec 2020, Hyderabad, India. pp.132-147
  19. Lum, S. (2022). S’pore not likely to use AI in sentencing in foreseeable future: Chief Justice, The Straits times. Dikutip dari https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime/s-pore-not-likely-to-use-ai-in-sentencing-in-foreseeable-future-chief-justice
  20. Lachapelle, E. (2005). Morality, Ethics, and Globalization: Lessons from Kant, Hegel, Rawls, and Habermas. Perspectives on Global Development and Technology, 4(3), 603–644. https://doi.org/10.1163/156915005775093296
  21. Mannes, J. (2017). DoNotPay Launches 1.000 New Bots to Help You With Your Legal Problems. Dikutip dari https://techcrunch.com/2017/07/12/donotpay-launches-1000-new-bots-to-help-you-with-your-legal-problems/
  22. Mubyarto (1993). Ideologi Pancasila dalam Kehidupan Ekonomi: Pancasila sebagai Ideologi dalam Berbagai Bidang Kehidupan Bermasyarakat Bernegara dan Berbangsa. Jakarta: BP 7 Pusat
  23. Murray, A. D. (2007). The regulation of cyberspace : control in the online environment. Routledge-Cavendish
  24. Pasquale, F. (2019). A Rule of Persons, Not Machines: The Limits of Legal Automation. George Washington Law Review, 87(1) 1-55. https://www.gwlr.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/87-Geo.-Wash.-L.-Rev.-1.pdf
  25. Qutb, S. (2000). Al-Adalat al-itjima’ iyyah fi-islam’ (Social justice in Islam). Kuala Lumpur: Islamic Book Trust
  26. Rahardjo, S. (2003). Sisi-sisi Lain dari Hukum di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kompas
  27. Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice, Revised Edition. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press
  28. Susskind, R., E. (2013). Tommorow’s Lawyers: An Introduction to Your Future. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.Rochmansjah, H., & Karno, K. (2020). The Digitalization of Public Service Assurance. MIMBAR : Jurnal Sosial Dan Pembangunan, 36(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.v36i1.5073
  29. Tangi, L., Janssen, M., Benedetti, M., & Noci, G. (2021). Digital government transformation: A structural equation modelling analysis of driving and impeding factors. International Journal of Information Management, 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102356
  30. Tsvetkova, I. (2017). AI in Court, lawyer bot in court, and legal disputes crowdfunding – LegalTech – revolution begins. Dikutip dari https://rb.ru/opinion/legaltech/
  31. Wasterman, G., Bonnet, D., & Mcafee, A. (2014). 2011, The Nine Elements of Digital Transformation Opinion & Analysis. MIT Sloan Management Review. Dikutip dari https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/the-nine-elements-of-digital-transformation/

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-07-04 08:11:33

No citation recorded.