DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.53.2.2024.191-202

PEMBATALAN PUTUSAN ARBITRASE AKIBAT DITEMUKANNYA DOKUMEN MENENTUKAN YANG DISEMBUNYIKAN: STUDI PUTUSAN MA NO. 470B/PDT.SUS-ARBT/2022

*Harven Filippo Taufik  -  Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2024 Masalah-Masalah Hukum under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Arbitral awards may be annulled if a decisive document, hidden by the opposing party, is later discovered. In PT. PLN (Persero) vs. PT. Sumsel Energi Gemilang, the Supreme Court rejected this argument, stating the document did not meet the criteria. This paper examines the requirements for such documents to justify annulment. Using doctrinal legal research with statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches, it was found that arbitration awards, though final and binding, can be annulled if hidden documents present new information not revealed during arbitration. However, documents whose substance was implied or included in other records cannot be used as grounds. As the Supreme Court's interpretation is not explicitly regulated by law, legal reform is necessary to clarify the definition of “hidden decisive documents”.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Annulment; Arbitral Award; Final and Binding

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
LEGAL STRATEGIES FOR COMBATING COCKFIGHTING GAMBLING THROUGH PUBLIC LEGAL AWARENESS REFORMULASI HUKUM TERHADAP HAK CIPTA ATAS MUSIK SEBAGAI OBJEK PELUNASAN UTANG MELALUI JAMINAN FIDUSIA URGENSI UNDANG-UNDANG PELINDUNGAN PEKERJA RUMAH TANGGA UNTUK KERJA LAYAK PEKERJA PERAWATAN More recent articles
Most cited articles
REHABILITASI DALAM UPAYA DERADIKALISASI NARAPIDANA TERORISME PERLINDUNGAN EKSPRESI BUDAYA TRADISIONAL DALAM SISTEM HUKUM KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL PEMBERANTASAN TERORISME BERORIENTASI HAM UPAYA PERLINDUNGAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA DALAM PEMBINAAN NARAPIDANA ANAK (STUDI DI LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN KLAS II B ANAK PONTIANAK) Kebijakan Mediasi Penal Pada Kasus Pencurian di Kepolisian Surakarta More cited articles
  1. Alaloul, W. S., Hasaniyah, M. W., & Tayeh, B. A. (2019). A comprehensive review of disputes prevention and resolution in construction projects. MATEC Web of Conferences, 270, 05012. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201927005012
  2. Andriani, A. (2022). Akibat Hukum Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase dalam Kaitannya dengan Prinsip Final and Binding. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 4(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v4i1.1528
  3. Ariprabowo, T., & Nazriyah, R. (2017). Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase oleh Pengadilan dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 15/PUU-XII/2014. Jurnal Konstitusi, 14(4), 701. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1441
  4. Block, M. J. (2016). The Benefits of Alternative Dispute Resolution for International Commercial and Intellectual Property Disputes. Rutgers Law Record, 44, 1–20
  5. Budiyono, Hastomo Ruslan, Jaa Rizka Pradana, R. P. (2021). Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Oleh Mahkamah Agung (Analisis Putusan No. 327 B/Pdt.Sus-Arbt/2021). Jurnal Lex Spesialis, 1(1), 69–75
  6. Entriani, A. (2017). Arbitrase Dalam Sistem Hukum Di Indonesia. An-Nisbah: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 3(2), 278–293. https://doi.org/10.21274/an.2017.3.2.277-293
  7. Fagbemi, S. A. (2015). The doctrine of party autonomy in international commercial arbitration: myth or reality? Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy (The), 6(1), 202. https://doi.org/10.4314/jsdlp.v6i1.10
  8. Lee, C. K., Yiu, T. W., & Cheung, S. O. (2016). Selection and use of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in construction projects - Past and future research. International Journal of Project Management, 34(3), 494–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.12.008
  9. Lu, W., Zhang, L., & Pan, J. (2015). Identification and analyses of hidden transaction costs in project dispute resolutions. International Journal of Project Management, 33(3), 711–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.08.009
  10. Mance, J. (2016). Arbitration: a Law unto itself? Arbitration International, 32(2), 223–241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiv072
  11. Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group
  12. McGregor, L. (2015). Alternative dispute resolution and human rights: Developing a rights-based approach through the ECHR. European Journal of International Law, 26(3), 607–634. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chv039
  13. Pratidina, I. G. (2014). Interpretasi Mahkamah Agung Terhadap Alasan Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Dalam Pasal 70 Uu No. 30/1999. Yuridika, 29(3), 310–329. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v29i3.374
  14. Price, C. (2018). Alternative Dispute Resolution in Africa: Is ADR the Bridge Between Traditional and Modern Dispute Resolution? Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal, 18(3)
  15. Rampall, Y. D., & Feehily, R. (2018). The sanctity of party autonomy and the powers of arbitrators to determine the applicable law: The quest for an arbitral equilibrium. Harv. Negot. L. Rev., 23, 345
  16. Raymond, H. (2021). Problematika Final dan Mengikat Putusan Arbitrase dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999. Sultan Jurisprudence: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, 1(2), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.51825/sjp.v1i2.12672
  17. Simamora, J. (2014). Kepastian Hukum Pengajuan Kasasi Oleh Jaksa Penuntut Umum Terhadap Vonis Bebas. Jurnal Yudisial, 7(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v7i1.90
  18. Situmorang, M. (2017). Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase Nasional di Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 17(4), 309. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2017.v17.309-320
  19. Situmorang, M. (2020). Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 20(4), 573. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020.v20.573-586
  20. Soemartono, G. P. (2006). Arbitrase dan Mediasi di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama
  21. Soesilo, R. (1991). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Serta Komentar-Komentarnya Lengkap Pasal Demi Pasal. Bogor: Politeia
  22. Stipanowich, T., & Ulrich, Z. (2014). Arbitration in Evolution: Current Practices and Perspectives of Experienced Commercial Arbitrators. The American Review of International Arbitration, 25(30), 395–480
  23. Sujayadi. (2015). Patologi dalam Arbitrase Indonesia: Ketentuan Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase dalam Pasal 70 UU No. 30/1999. Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata ADHAPER, 1(2), 189–213
  24. Sundari, E. (2019). The Limitation of Final and Binding Arbitral Awards: How Far in Supporting the Autonomy of Arbitration? International Conference on Research in Behavioral and Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.33422/6th.icrbs.2019.07.425
  25. Timex, H. (2013). Pelaksanaan dan pembatalan putusan arbitrase. Lex Privatum, 1(2), 83
  26. Widowaty, Y., & Fitriyanti, F. (2017). Inkonsistensi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Dalam Membatalkan Putusan Arbitrase. Jurnal Media Hukum, 23(2), 209–217. https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.2016.0081.209-217
  27. Yudhantaka, L., Lutfiasandhi, K., & Handojo, E. (2019). Mediation-arbitration: A proposal for private resolution of flats disputes in perspective of Indonesian law. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 22(2), 1–8
  28. Zulfa, E. A. (2016). Menghancurkan Kepalsuan (Studi Tentang Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Dan Problema Penerapannya). Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 48(2), 1–23

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-07-04 14:54:48

No citation recorded.