skip to main content

REDEFINING CHILDHOOD: ADDRESSING LEGAL INCONSISTENCIES AND THE ROLE OF TRANSITIONAL AGE IN JUVENILE JUSTICE

*Moh. Supriadi  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Tanjungpura, Indonesia
Yuliana Yuliana  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Tanjungpura, Indonesia
Mohamad Zulkifli Abdul Ghani  -  National University of Malaysia, Malaysia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2025 Masalah-Masalah Hukum under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Indonesia’s legal framework, grounded in civil law, predominantly utilizes statutes as its primary source of legal authority. Nonetheless, discrepancies in the definitions of legal terminology across different statutes have resulted in ambiguity, especially regarding the interpretation of the term “child.”  The varying definitions of “child” across the Criminal Code, the Civil Code, and other child protection laws contribute to legal ambiguity, particularly regarding the rights and protections available to children in conflict with the law. Law No. 11 of 2012, known as the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law, specifies that a child is defined as an individual between the ages of 12 and 18. Additionally, it encompasses individuals aged 18 to 21 who have yet to fulfill their sentence. This inconsistency leads to uncertainty about the enforcement of legal penalties and the suitable correctional institutions for these individuals. This study seeks to examine the legal terminology related to “children in conflict with the law” within the framework of the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law, with an emphasis on the consequences for their placement and rehabilitation in Juvenile Correctional Institutions and Youth Prisons. The study adopts an empirical-normative methodology, incorporating field interviews and document analysis as key components. The findings indicate that varying definitions of “child” create ambiguity in legal application, especially concerning rehabilitation and sanctioning processes. The research offers valuable insights by advocating for the adoption of the term “transitional age” to delineate the differences between children and adults. This would improve legal clarity, safeguard children’s rights, and guarantee rehabilitation programs that are specifically designed to meet their developmental requirements.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Juvenile Criminal Justice; Legal Terminology; Child Protection; Transitional Age; Youth Correctional Institutions

Article Metrics:

  1. Abdullah, R. Hi. (2016). Urgensi Penggolongan Narapidana Dalam Lembaga Pemasyarakatan. FIAT JUSTISIA:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 9(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v9no1.587
  2. Agustin, A., & Kusnadi, S. K. (2019). Pendekatan Mindfulness Untuk Meningkatkan Kontrol Diri Anak Berhadapan Hukum (Abh). Jurnal Psikologi: Media Ilmiah Psikologi, 17(2), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.47007/jpsi.v17i2.52
  3. Allen, B., MD, FAAP, Waterman, H., & DO. (2024). Stages of Adolescence. American Academy of Pediatrics. https://www.healthychildren.org/English/ages-stages/teen/Pages/Stages-of-Adolescence.aspx
  4. Andriyanto, R., Rivandi W, D. A., & Ismail, I. (2022). Kepastian Hukum Prosedur Penggantian Kerugian Pemegang Hak Atas Tanah Yang Terdampak Proyek Jalan Tol. Journal of Legal Research, 4(5), 1291–1310. https://doi.org/10.15408/jlr.v4i5.28921
  5. Barus, B. J. P., & Biafri, V. S. (2020). Pembinaan Kemandirian Terhadap Narapidana Lanjut Usia Di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas II B Tanjung Balai. Nusantara: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 7(1), 181–187. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v1i2.2364
  6. Bruggink, JJ. H. (1999). Refleksi Tentang Hukum (Ahli Bahasa Arief Sidharta). Citra Aditya Bakti
  7. Burhanuddin, B. (2019). Tinjauan Yuridis Tindak Pidana Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak Dibawah Umur (Studi Kasus Putusan No.1/PID.SUS-Anak/2017/PN Mll). Al-Risalah Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Dan Hukum, 19(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-risalah.v19i1.9681
  8. Butt, S., & Lindsey, T. (2018). Indonesian Law. Oxford University Press
  9. Cammack, M. E., & Feener, R. M. (2012). The Islamic Legal System in Indonesia. Washington International Law Journal, 21(1), 13–42. https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/wilj/vol21/iss1/5/
  10. Cavanagh, C. (2022). Healthy Adolescent Development and the Juvenile Justice System: Challenges and Solutions. Child Development Perspectives, 16(3), 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12461
  11. Dana, S. (2009). Beyond Retroactivity to Realizing Justice: A Theory on the Principle of Legality in International Criminal Law Sentencing. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-), 99(4), 857–928. JSTOR. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20685063
  12. Darwis, A. M. F. (2020). Penerapan Konsep Community Based Correction Dalam Program Pembinaan Di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial, 6(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.23887/jiis.v6i1.24081
  13. Davies, S. G., & Robson, J. (2016). Juvenile (In)justice: Children in Conflict with the Law in Indonesia. Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law, 17(1), 119–147. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718158-01701009
  14. Dewi, A. S. K. (2021). Interpretasi dan Implikasi Yuridis Pengaturan Bentuk Badan Hukum Badan Usaha Milik Desa. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 9(2), 96–111. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v9i2.1109
  15. Faure, M. G., Goodwin, M., & Weber, F. (2013). The Regulator’s Dilemma: Caught between the Need for Flexibility and the Demands of Foreseeability. Reassessing the Lex Certa Principle. Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology, 24(2), 283–364. https://research.tilburguniversity.edu/en/publications/the-regulators-dilemma-caught-between-the-need-for-flexibility-wi
  16. Ferdiawa, R. P., Santoso, M. B., & Darwis, R. S. (2020). Hak Pendidikan Bagi Anak Berhadapan (Berkonflik) Dengan Hukum. Jurnal Kolaborasi Resolusi Konflik, 2(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkrk.v2i1.27044
  17. Feriana, G., & Isretno, E. (2025). Legal Uncertainty Due to Differences in Children’s Age Limits in Legislation and Harmonization Efforts to Prevent Child Discrimination. Majelis: Jurnal Hukum Indonesia, 2(3), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.62383/majelis.v2i3.1037
  18. Hadisuprapto, P. (1997). Juvenile Delinquency, Pemahaman dan Penanggulangannya. PT. Citra Aditya Bakti
  19. Hamja. (2022). Implikasi Overcrowding Terhadap Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Di Indonesia. Mimbar Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 34(1), 296–324. https://doi.org/10.22146/mh.v34i1.2495
  20. Hardiansyah, V. (2022). Akibat Hukum Pasal 86 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Terhadap Warga Binaan Pemasyarakatan Khusus Anak Kelas II Bandung Yang Berusia 18 Tahun. Universitas Pasundan
  21. Hogan, H. W. (1977). Some Latent Functions of Standard Deviations. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 44(2), 676–676. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1977.44.2.676
  22. Ismail, D. E., Mantali, A. R. Y., Moha, M. R., Ahmad, N., & Machmud, A. W. (2025). The Comparative Study: Protecting Children’s Rights Through Law Reform of Restorative Justice in Juvenile Cases. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 6(2), 411–452. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v6i2.13724
  23. Kartono. (2002). Patologi Sosial 2, Kenakalan Remaja. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada
  24. Lev, D. S. (1965). The Lady and the Banyan Tree: Civil-Law Change in Indonesia. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 14(2), 282–307. https://doi.org/10.2307/838638
  25. Lev, D. S. (2008). State Law Reform in Indonesia. In T. Lindsey (Ed.), Indonesia: Law and Society. Routledge / Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203962305-12
  26. Long, D., & Liu, L. (2022). Do Juvenile, Young Adult, and Adult Offenders Target Different Places in the Chinese Context? Cities, 130(October 2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103943
  27. Maulana, A., (2023). Penetapan Permohonan Wali Adhal Perspektif Idee Des Recht Gustav Radbruch Di Indonesia. JIL : Journal of Indonesian Law, 4(1), 48–69. https://doi.org/10.18326/jil.v4i1.1002
  28. Mayasari, D. E. (2020). Legal Protection of Child’s Rights Who Conducts of Marriage. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 14(2), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v14no2.1862
  29. Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum. UPT. Mataram University Press
  30. Muñoz, N. P. (2023). Why International Criminal Law Can and Should be Conceived With Supra-Positive Law: The Non-Positivistic Nature of International Criminal Legality. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 17(2), 381–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-022-09628-6
  31. Nashriana, Banjarani, D., Rosario, M., & Novianti, V. (2023). Enhancing Restorative Justice in Indonesia: Exploring Diversion Implementation for Effective Juvenile Delinquency Settlement. Sriwijaya Law Review, 7(2), 318. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol7.Iss2.2427.pp318-334
  32. Pangestu, D. B., Komariah, M., & Indayatun, R. (2024). Tinjauan Kriminologi Terhadap Meningkatnya Narapidana Di Lapas Pemuda Kelas Iia Tangerang Atas Kasus Kekerasan Terhadap Anak Pada Masa Pandemi Covid 19. Lex Veritatis, 3(1), 78–87. https://ejournal.unis.ac.id/index.php/JournalMahasiswa/article/view/4124
  33. Prasetya, T. Y., & Purwoleksono, D. E. (2023). Reformulation of Age Limit for Criminal Liability Child Narcotics Dealer. Yuridika, 38(2), 389–398. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v38i2.47052
  34. Prayitno, K. P., Oktobrian, D., & Barkhuizen, J. (2023). Addressing Prison Education and the Obstacles in Ensuring the Right to Education in Indonesian Juvenile Correctional Facilities. Journal of Southeast Asian Human Rights, 7(2), 123–153. https://doi.org/10.19184/jseahr.v7i2.42656
  35. Radbruch, G. (1987). Rechtsphilosophie. C.F. Müller Juristischer Verlag
  36. Rahman, F. (2019). Contextualizing Restorative Justice Through Diversion Mechanism: A Study of Indonesia Juvenile Justice System. Indonesia Law Review, 9(3), 241–258. https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v9n3.584
  37. Saefudin, W., & Sriwiyanti. (2023). Boosting Academic Resilience through Spiritual Well-being: A Study in Juvenile Prison in Indonesia. Restorative : Journal of Indonesian Probation and Parole System, 1(1), 14–32. https://doi.org/10.61682/restorative.v1i1.3
  38. Santoso, T. (2023). Principles of Indonesian Criminal Law. Bloomsbury Publishing
  39. Sasangka, W. (2010). Bahasa Indonesia Dalam Perundang-Undangan. Jurnal Sosioteknologi, 21(9)
  40. Supriadi, M., & Eddyono, S. W. (2022). Problematika Pembinaan Anak Yang Berkonflik Dengan Hukum Pada Usia Peralihan Di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Pemuda Kelas Iia Tangerang. Universitas Gadjah Mada
  41. Van Hout, M. C., & Mhlanga-Gunda, R. (2019). Prison Health Situation and Health Rights of Young People Incarcerated in Sub-Saharan African Prisons and Detention Centres: A Scoping Review of Extant Literature. BMC International Health and Human Rights, 19(17), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12914-019-0200-z
  42. Veenbrink, M. (2019). Criminal Law Principles and the Enforcement of EU and National Competition Law: A Silent Takeover? Wolters Kluwer
  43. Wardhani, L. T. A. L., Noho, M. D. H., & Natalis, A. (2022). The Adoption of Various Legal Systems in Indonesia: An Effort to Initiate the Prismatic Mixed Legal Systems. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1), 2104710. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2104710
  44. Warjiyati, S., Rosyadi, I., Sari, Z. N., & Sham, F. M. (2023). The Effectiveness of Correctional Institutions for Children, Female, and Elderly Inmates in Sidoarjo District. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 12(3), 581–606. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.12.3.2023.581-606
  45. Widodo, G. (2016). Sistem Pemidanaan Anak Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Jurnal Surya Kencana Dua: Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan, 6(1), 58–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03174582
  46. Woods, D., Hassan, D., & Breslin, G. (2017). Positive Collateral Damage or Purposeful Design: How Sport-Based Interventions Impact the Psychological Well-Being of People in Prison. Mental Health and Physical Activity, 13, 152–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mhpa.2017.09.005

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-09-29 15:47:45

No citation recorded.