DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.54.2.2025.156-178

AUTHORITY, DISCRETION, AND INCLUSION: A SOCIO-LEGAL ANALYSIS OF MARRIAGE REGISTRARS AND SENSORY DISABILITIES IN INDONESIA

*Mohammad Fauzan Ni'ami orcid  -  Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Indonesia
Saifullah Saifullah  -  Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Indonesia
Fakhruddin Fakhruddin  -  Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2025 Masalah-Masalah Hukum under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

This study explores the role of marriage registrars in Indonesia when officiating marriages involving individuals with sensory disabilities. Focusing on Jombang Regency, East Java, the research investigates the legal actions and motivations of registrars in ensuring the compliance of marriage procedures for sensory-disabled couples. Using a socio-legal approach and Max Weber’s theory of action, the study identifies two models of action: legal authoritative actions and legal discretionary actions. Registrars, as legal authorities, enforce marriage registration regulations, ensuring that prospective brides and grooms with sensory disabilities meet the required criteria. However, due to the absence of specific regulations regarding marriage registration for sensory-disabled individuals, registrars exercise discretion, modifying procedures to accommodate communication limitations. The study finds that registrars’ motivations for these actions are guided by legal rationality, ensuring legal certainty in authoritative actions, and legal responsiveness, aiming to uphold the rights of individuals with sensory disabilities. The findings highlight the need for legal reforms in family law to integrate disability rights into marriage registration regulations, as registrars face challenges in officiating marriages for sensory-disabled individuals within the existing legal framework. The research contributes to the understanding of how legal actors, such as marriage registrars, balance legal obligations with the need for flexibility in ensuring inclusive practices for marginalized groups.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Marriage Registrar; Sensory Disabilities; Legal Action; Legal Rationality; Socio-Legal Approach

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
REVITALIZING POST-MINING LAND: THE ROLE OF THE LAND BANK IN PROMOTING SOCIAL JUSTICE AND ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY AUTHORITY, DISCRETION, AND INCLUSION: A SOCIO-LEGAL ANALYSIS OF MARRIAGE REGISTRARS AND SENSORY DISABILITIES IN INDONESIA DISSEMINATION OF COMMUNISM/MARXISM-LENINISM AS POLITICAL OFFENSE IN INDONESIAN: NATIONAL SECURITY PROTECTION OR ACADEMIC FREEDOM THREAT More recent articles
Most cited articles
MIGRASI PENDUDUK DAN IMPLIKASINYA TERHADAP HANKAM DI WILAYAH PERBATASAN KALBAR-SERAWAK, MALAYSIA MARRIAGE LAW AND DIVORCE BASED ON ADAT LAW IN BALI PERAN SERTA MASYARAKAT DAN KEWENANGAN PEMERINTAH DALAM KONSERVASI MANGROVE SEBAGAI UPAYA MENCEGAH ROB DAN BANJIR SERTA SEBAGAI TEMPAT WISATA Eksistensi Prinsip Responsibility to Protect Dalam Hukum Internasional IMPLEMENTASI DIVERSI TERHADAP ANAK YANG BERHADAPAN DENGAN HUKUM (STUDI KASUS DI PULAU LOMBOK) More cited articles
  1. Al-Fadl, K. A. (2004). Atas Nama Tuhan: Dari Fikih Otoriter ke Fikih Otoritatif. Serambi
  2. Ansori. L. (2015). Diskresi Dan Pertanggungjawaban Pemerintah Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan. Jurnal Yuridis, 2(1), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.35586/.v2i1.165
  3. Austin, J. (1832). The Province of Jurisprudence Determined. In Legal Theory and the Legal Academy: Volume III. John Murray, Albemarle Street. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315091907-1
  4. Burhanuddin, J. (2012). Ulama dan Kekuasaan: Pergumulan Elite Muslim dalam Sejarah Indonesia. Mizan
  5. Cammack, M. (1997). Indonesia’s 1989 Religious Judicature Act: Islamization of Indonesia or Indonesianization of Islam? Indonesia, 63(63), 143-168. https://doi.org/10.2307/3351514
  6. Coleman, J. (1998). Foundations of Social Theory. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press
  7. Diesing, P. (1962). Reason in Society: Five Types of Decisions and Their Social Conditions. University of Illinois Press
  8. Farabi, A. (2020). The State Penghulu vs The Non-State Penghulu: The Validity and Implementing Authorities of Indonesian Marriage. Justicia Islamica, 17(2), 343–364. https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v17i2.2180
  9. Fathurrahman, Zaelani, A. Q., & Syukur, I. (2023). The Role of Penghulu in Harmonising the Marriage Age Limit Perspective of Imam As-Syatibi’s Theory. Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari’ah Dan Masyarakat, 23(2), 341–354. https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v
  10. Fauzi, M. L. (2019). Registering Muslim Marriages: Penghulu, Modin, and the Struggles for Influence. Al-Jami’ah, 57(2), 397–424. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2019.572.397-424
  11. Fauzia, A. (2003). Antara Hitam dan Putih: Penghulu pada Masa Kolonial Belanda. Studia Islamika, 10(2), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.15408/sdi.v10i2.634
  12. Friedman, L. M. (1987). The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. Russel Sage Foundation
  13. Garbero, G. (2020). Rights Not Fundamental: Disability and the Right to Marry. Saint Louis University Journal of Health Law & Policy, 14(2), 587-614. https://scholarship.law.slu.edu/jhlp/vol14/iss2/17/
  14. Hadi, M. N. (2020). Pernikahan dan Disabilitas: Nalar Hukum Penghulu Kota Malang. Publica Institute
  15. Hadi, M. N., Sabri, F. A., & Masum, A. (2023). Between Conservatism and Progresivism: The Young Penghulu in East Java’s Legal Paradigm Addresses Disability Issues in Marriage. Al-Qadha: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan, 10(2), 198-216. https://doi.org/10.32505/qadha.v10i2.7352
  16. Hanapi, A., & Yuhermansyah, E. (2020). Urgency of marriage registration for women and child protection in Gayo Lues District. Samarah, 4(2), 528–544. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v4i2.7942
  17. Harris, J. E. (2019). Legal Capacity at a Crossroad: Mental Disability and Family Law. Family Court Review, 57(1), 14–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12394
  18. Hermawan, S., & Herman. (2021). Kajian Terhadap Tindakan Administrasi Pada Kekuasaan Yudikatif Pasca Berlakunya Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 18(1), 59–80. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v18i1.674
  19. Huis, S. C. van, & Wirastri, T. D. (2012). Muslim Marriage Registration in Indonesia: Revised Marriage Registration Laws Cannot Overcome Compliance Flaws. Australian Journal of Asian Law, 13(1), 1–17. https://hdl.handle.net/1887/20083
  20. Iftidah. (2017). Pandangan Masyarakat Tentang Taukil Wali: Studi di Desa Dempet Kabupaten Demak. Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 9(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2016.09106
  21. Irianto, S. (2012). Memperkenalkan Kajian Sosio-Legal dan Implikasi Metodologisnya. In A. W. Bedner (Ed.), Kajian Sosio-Legal (p. 3). Denpasar: Pustaka Larasan; Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia, Universitas Leiden, Universitas Groningen
  22. Islamy, A. (2020). Dinamika Historis Otoritas Hak Kepenghuluan Nikah Di Indonesia. Islamitch Familierecht Journal, 1(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.32923/ifj.v1i01.1472
  23. Isma’il, I. Q. (1997). Kiai, Penghulu Jawa, Peranannya di Masa Kolonial. Gema Insani
  24. Ismanto, & Suparman. (2019). Sejarah Peradaban Islam Di Nusantara Masa Kesultanan-Kesultanan Islam Pra-Kolonial. Historia Madania: Jurnal Ilmu Sejarah, 3(2), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.15575/hm.v3i2.9169
  25. Julyano, M., & Sulistyawan, A. Y. (2019). Pemahaman Terhadap Asas Kepastian Hukum Melalui Konstruksi Konstruksi Penalaran Positivisme Hukum. Jurnal Crepido, 1(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v6i1.324
  26. Kusrin, Z. M., Syaidatul, N., & Binti, A. (2020). The Implementation of Islamic Prematial Course for Deaf Group in Malaysia. Journal Al-Irsyad: Journal of Islamic and Contemporary Issues, 5(1), 285–292. https://doi.org/10.53840/alirsyad.v5i1.94
  27. Marzuki, P. M. (2015). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Prenada Media Group
  28. Murtadho, A. (2021). The Authority of Marriage Registration Through Penghulu and Head of KUA in Perspective of the Regulation Minister Religion with the Regulation Employment of State. Jurnal Harmoni, 20(1), 144–165. https://doi.org/10.32488/harmoni.v20i1.468
  29. Muzakki, M. H., Nurlaelawati, E., & Wahib, A. B. (2024). Transformation of Kyai Authority in Marriage: A Law-Abiding Society in Pekoren, Rembang, Pasuruan. Justicia Islamica, 21(2), 267–290. https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v21i2.9492
  30. Naif, F. (2012). Potret Penghulu Jawa (Telaah Atas Serat Centhini). In A. Muttaqin & F. ’Ulya (Eds.), Harga Diri Ekspresi Budaya Lokal Suku-Bangsa di Indonesia (1st ed., pp. 79–141). Laboratorium Religi dan Budaya Lokal (LABEL) Fakultas Ushuluddin, Studi Agama dan Pemikiran Islam UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
  31. Nonet, P., & Selznick, P. (2015). Law in Society in Transition (R. Muttaqin, Ed.). Nusa Media
  32. Nurlaelawati, E. (2013). Pernikahan Tanpa Pencatatan: Isbat Nikah Sebuah Solusi? Musãwa Jurnal Studi Gender Dan Islam, 12(2), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.14421/musawa.2013.122.261-277
  33. Oktaviani, & Sugitanata, A. (2019). Memberikan Hak Wali Nikah Kepada Kyai: Praktik Taukil Wali Nikah Masyarakat Adat Sasak Sade. Al-Ahwal, 12(2), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2019.12204
  34. O’Sullivan, K. (2024). Defining ‘Religious Body’ Under Irish Marriage Law. Religion, State and Society, 53(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/09637494.2024.2366168
  35. Pijper, G. F. (1985). Beberapa Studi Tentang Sejarah Islam di Indonesia 1900-1950. UII Press Indonesia
  36. Purnomosidi, A. (2017). Konsep Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional Penyandang Disabilitas di Indonesia. Refleksi Hukum, 1(2), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2017.v1.i2.p161-174
  37. Rais, H. (2020). Penghulu Diantara Dua Otoritas Fikih dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Penerbit Lingkaran
  38. Ridwan. (2007). Hukum Administrasi Negara. PT Raja Grafindo Persada
  39. Rosyadi, I., & Kahar, A. (2023). Analysis of Legal Certainty Aspects in Indonesian Marriage Registration Rule. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 12(3), 469–488. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.12.3.2023.469-488
  40. Saehu, R., Syarifudin, A., Paramitha, N. A., & Hilmi, F. (2024). Netnographic Study on the Narrative of Marriage at the Office of Religious Affairs (KUA): Opportunities And Challenges. Harmoni, 23(2), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.32488/harmoni.v23i2.793
  41. Schutz, A. (1972). The Phenomenology of Social World. Northwestern University Press
  42. Shidarta. (2024). Ilmu-Ilmu Empiris Tentang Hukum: Penerapannya pada Kajian Sosio-Legal. Kencana Prenada Media Group
  43. Suadi, A. (2018). Sosiologi Hukum; Penegakan, Realitas, dan Nilai Moralitas Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group
  44. Sutherland, H. (2003). Review of: M. Hisyam (2001) Caught Between Three Fires; The Javanese Pangulu Under the Dutch Colonial Administration, 1882-1942 (pp. 226–228). Vrije Unniversiteit Amsterdam
  45. Suwandoko, S., & Rihardi, S. A. (2020). Legal Reform for the Fulfilment of Disabilities Human Rights. Unnes Law Journal, 6(2), 217–224. https://doi.org/10.15294/ulj.v6i2.38973
  46. Syarif, M. F., & Bin-Armia, M. S. (2022). The Contribution of Islamic Kingdoms to the Development of Islamic Judiciary in Indonesia: Historical Legal Approach Analysis. Petita: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Syariah, 7(2), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v7i2.146
  47. Warman, A. B., Jafar, W. A., Asmara, M., bin Kirin, A., & Usmani, S. A. A. (2023). Reforming Marriage Registration Policies in Malaysia and Indonesia. Bestuur, 11(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v11i1.66320
  48. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. (G. Roth & C. Wittich, Eds.). University of California Press
  49. Wijayati, M., Nasrudin, M., Hamidah, T., Oktora, N. Dela, & Muchtar, I. H. (2023). “The New Men”: The Rahima’s Experiences in the Gender Sensitivity Construction among Marriage Registrar in Lampung Indonesia. Samarah, 7(3), 1489–1513. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i3.17666
  50. Wirawan, I. B. (2012). Teori-Teori Sosial Dalam Tiga Paradigma. Kencana Prenada Media Group
  51. Zahro, A. S., & Rahma, N. L. (2023). Implementation of Taukil Wali at the KUA of Jati District, Kudus Regency from the Perspective of Minister of Religious Affairs Regulation Number 20 of 2019. Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari’ah Dan Masyarakat, 33(20), 355–364. https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v
  52. Zuhriah, E. (2014). Pengadilan Agama Indonesia; Sejarah, Konsep, dan Peraktik di Pengadilan Agama. Setara Press

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-09-02 05:35:19

No citation recorded.