DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/mdl.20.2.2020.157-166

CONTEXT LEARNING TRANSFORMATION IN ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STUDIO

Kristanti Dewi Paramita orcid scopus  -  Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia
*Yandi Andri Yatmo orcid scopus  -  Department of Architecture, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

This paper reflects the shifting understanding of context in a data-based architectural studio. With the school closure in the beginning of the COVID pandemic, the overall learning process is largely conducted online. Big Data becomes an important discourse that provides some benefits and opportunities which transform the design and learning process in an architectural studio, particularly on how students may explore and understand their context. Exploring the works of third-year architectural students in Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering Universitas Indonesia, this paper highlights the ways students capture and organise urban information and construct their intervention contexts. The study points out that time, flow and narrative are key in transforming understanding of context. Based on such three aspects, the data reveals the unseen urban patterns, emerging in the imbalance relationship between user and the environment, the disconnection of urban services, and the hidden variety of urban experience. The study reflects how these urban patterns informs the ways students define and situate themselves in the context, shifting existing ideas of context and its corresponding methodologies in the architectural education.     

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: context; data; architectural education; pandemic
Funding: Students' works at Architectural Design Studio 4, Universitas Indonesia, 2019/2020

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
DAMPAK BISNIS ONLINE TERHADAP SOSIAL-EKONOMI DAN KARAKTERISTIK RUANG DALAM RUMAH TINGGAL DI CIBADUYUT, KOTA BANDUNG NARASI GERBANG RUMAH PERANAKAN DI PECINAN, LASEM, JAWA TENGAH: PENDEKATAN FENOMENOLOGI OPTIMIZATION BUILDING PERFORMANCE IN EARLY DESIGN STAGE USING INTEGRATED DYNAMIC MODEL NARRATIVE EDITORIAL OF HERITAGE ARCHITECTURE TRANSFORMATION More recent articles
Most cited articles
Simulasi Intensitas Suara Dari Model Bukaan Jendela Pada Bangunan Kuno Di Semarang Daftar Isi RESPON RUMAH TRADISIONAL KUDUS TERHADAP IKLIM TROPIS PELESTARIAN DAN PENGEMBANGAN KAWASAN KOTA LAMA SEBAGAI LANDASAN BUDAYA KOTA SEMARANG EVALUASI SISTEM PROTEKSI KEBAKARAN PADA BANGUNAN RUMAH SUSUN (STUDI KASUS : RUSUNAWA UNDIP) More cited articles
  1. Ahmad, L., Sosa, M., & Musfy, K. (2020). Interior Design Teaching Methodology During the Global COVID-19 Pandemic. Interiority, 3(2)
  2. Akiev, A. K. (1982). Epidemiology and incidence of plague in the world, 1958—79. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 60(2), 165–169
  3. Allen, S. (2003). Field. In S. Cros (Ed.), The Metapolis Dictionary of Advanced Architecture: City, Technology and Society in the Information Age (English edition). Actar
  4. Atmodiwirjo, P., Johanes, M., & Yatmo, Y. A. (2019). Mapping stories: Representing urban everyday narratives and operations. Urban Design International. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-019-00100-x
  5. Ballantyne, A., & Smith, C. (Eds.). (2011). Architecture in the Space of Flows. Routledge
  6. Baxter, R., & Brickell, K. (2014). For Home UnMaking. Home Cultures, 11(2), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.2752/175174214X13891916944553
  7. Berger, M. (2018). Death of the architect: Appropriation and interior architecture. In G. Marinic (Ed.), The Interior Architecture Theory Reader. Routledge
  8. Brand, S. (1995). How Buildings Learn: What Happens After They’re Built (Reprint edition). Penguin
  9. Burry, M. (2015). Permanence and Change. Architectural Design, 85(6), 80–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1982
  10. Burry, M. (2020). Better to Make a Good Future than Predict a Bad One. Architectural Design, 90(3), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.2561
  11. Butterworth, C., & Vardy, S. (2008). Site Seeing: Constructing the ‘Creative Survey’. Field Journal, 2(1)
  12. Castells, M. (2009). The Rise of the Network Society (2nd edition). Wiley-Blackwell
  13. Chiles, P., & Butterworth, C. (2010). Field Diaries. In S. Ewing, J. M. McGowan, C. Speed, & V. C. Bernie (Eds.), Architecture and Field/Work (1st edition). Routledge
  14. Costa, C., & Condie, J. (Eds.). (2018). Doing Research In and On the Digital: Research Methods across Fields of Inquiry (1st edition). Routledge
  15. Cowell, A. (2020, March 20). Photos From a Century of Epidemics. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/20/world/europe/coronavirus-aids-spanish-flu-ebola-epidemics.html
  16. Dann, Y. L., & Lambrou, L. (2020). Placing Elsewhere: Approaches for Physical and Digital Flânerie. Interiority, 3(2)
  17. Ewing, S. (2010). Introduction. In J. M. McGowan, C. Speed, V. C. Bernie, & S. Ewing (Eds.), Architecture and Field/Work (1st edition). Routledge
  18. Handa, R. (2014). Allure of the Incomplete, Imperfect, and Impermanent: Designing and Appreciating Architecture as Nature. Routledge
  19. Johanes, M., Febrianti, G. A., & Yatmo, Y. A. (2017). Constructing the Meaning of Mundane Urban Places through the Mapping of Geo-Tagged Social Media Content. UIA 2017 Seoul World Architects Congress. https://scholar.ui.ac.id/en/publications/constructing-the-meaning-of-mundane-urban-places-through-the-mapp
  20. Kidder, J. L. (2012). Parkour, The Affective Appropriation of Urban Space, and the Real/Virtual Dialectic. City & Community, 11(3), 229–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6040.2012.01406.x
  21. Lawson, B. (2005). How Designers Think, Fourth Edition: The Design Process Demystified (4th edition). Architectural Press
  22. LeCavalier, J. (2016). The Rule of Logistics. University Of Minnesota Press
  23. Lefebvre, H. (2013). Rhythmanalysis: Space, Time and Everyday Life (G. Moore & S. Elden, Trans.). Bloomsbury Academic
  24. Lyster, C. (2012). Learning from FedEx: Lessons for the city. Journal of Landscape Architecture, 7(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2012.693781
  25. Lyster, C. (2016). Learning from Logistics: How Networks Change Our Cities. Birkhauser
  26. Picon, A. (2015). Smart Cities: A Spatialised Intelligence. Wiley
  27. Psarra, S. (2009). Architecture and Narrative: The Formation of Space and Cultural Meaning (1st edition). Routledge
  28. Rendell, J. (2007). Art and Architecture: A Place Between. I.B. Tauris
  29. Rendell, J., Hill, J., Fraser, M., & Dorian, M. (Eds.). (2007). Critical Architecture. Routledge
  30. Sennett, R. (2006, November). Housing and Urban Neighbourhoods The Open City. Urban Age
  31. Soranart, S. (2011). Local Flows: Rom Hoob’s Phenomena of Transition. In A. Ballantyne & C. Smith (Eds.), Architecture in the Space of Flows. Routledge
  32. Thackara, J. (2006). In the Bubble: Designing in a Complex World (New Ed edition). MIT Press
  33. Thakuriah, P. (Vonu), Tilahun, N., & Zellner, M. (Eds.). (2017). Seeing Cities Through Big Data: Research, Methods and Applications in Urban Informatics. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40902-3
  34. Till, J. (2013). Architecture Depends. MIT Press
  35. Valese, M., & Natta, H. (2020). Digital Urban Narratives: The Images of the City in the Age of Big Data. IN_BO. Ricerche e Progetti per Il Territorio, La Città e l’architettura, 11(15), 68–79–68–79. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2036-1602/10532
  36. Warakanyaka, A. A. S., & Yatmo, Y. A. (2018). Tracing the Progression of Inhabitation through Interior Surface in Semarang Old Town. Interiority, 1(1)
  37. Yates, A. (2011). Oceanic Spaces of Flow. In A. Ballantyne & C. Smith (Eds.), Architecture in the Space of Flows. Routledge

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-04-18 12:48:44

No citation recorded.