DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/mdl.24.2.2024.63-70

COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS ON BIM LEARNING IN ARCHITECTURE UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS IN INDONESIA

*Elvina Shanggrama Wijaya orcid scopus  -  Petra Christian University, Indonesia
Stephanus Wirawan Dharmatanna orcid scopus  -  Petra Christian University, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

The use of software in architecture has become a necessary skill to effectively communicate designs and coordinate with stakeholders involved in the studio process. Building Information Modelling (BIM) has been integrated into the architectural education curriculum. Designing with BIM can shorten project timelines, thereby maximizing design exploration. This research aims to provide an overview of the BIM learning process in architectural studios. Data was collected through questionnaires distributed to respondents, focusing on architecture students across Indonesia. Additionally, the BIM learning process will be compared with pre-BIM software: the constraints and their influence on student design development are also key focuses of this research, captured through three stages of questionnaires: at the beginning of the semester, mid-semester, and end of the semester. The findings suggest that learning BIM in architectural studios requires adaptation, but is viewed as an important skill for career survival from the students' perspective, thus motivating their learning process.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  common.other
The PNG version of the Graphs
Subject
Type Other
  Download (79KB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: Architecture; Building Information Modelling; BIM; Learning; Studio

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS ON BIM LEARNING IN ARCHITECTURE UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS IN INDONESIA Kajian Ruang Terbuka Hijau Publik Ramah Anak Pada Area Permukiman Kota Yogyakarta DESAIN LINGKUNGAN DAN PERILAKU BERSEPEDA: STUDI DESTINASI SELAMA PANDEMI COVID-19 More recent articles
Most cited articles
EVALUASI SISTEM PROTEKSI KEBAKARAN PADA BANGUNAN RUMAH SUSUN (STUDI KASUS : RUSUNAWA UNDIP) PEMILIHAN PEDESTRIAN WAYS DITINJAU DARI PERSEPSI PENGGUNA DI KORIDOR JALAN GUNUNG SAHARI JAKARTA PUSAT RESPON RUMAH TRADISIONAL KUDUS TERHADAP IKLIM TROPIS PENGARUH IKLIM TROPIS LEMBAB TERHADAP KERUSAKAN FASADE BANGUNAN KOLONIAL DI KOTA LAMA SEMARANG Daftar Isi More cited articles
  1. Alya, J. S., Adhari, M. A. R., & Rahadian, E. Y. (2023). Upaya Pelestarian Bangunan Cagar Budaya Melalui Pendekatan Implementasi Metoda Heritage-Bim, Kasus Studi: Au Bon Marche-Braga Bandung. 58–69
  2. Brooke, J. (1995). SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval. Ind., 189
  3. Casasayas, O., Hosseini, M. R., Edwards, D. J., Shuchi, S., & Chowdhury, M. (2021). Integrating BIM in Higher Education Programs: Barriers and Remedial Solutions in Australia. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 27(1), 05020010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000444
  4. Dharmatanna, S. W., & Wijaya, E. S. (2024). COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SOFTWARE PREFERENCES AND BUILDING TYPOLOGY IN ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STUDIO. Border: Jurnal Arsitektur, 6(1), Article 1
  5. Govender, R., Saba, G., Ham, N., Hou, L., Moon, S., & Kim, J.-J. (2022). Appraisal of building information modeling (BIM) curriculum for early-career construction-industry professionals: Case study at C educational institute in Korea. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(5), 891–899. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1661069
  6. Hu, M. (2019). BIM-Enabled Pedagogy Approach: Using BIM as an Instructional Tool in Technology Courses. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 145(1), 05018017. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000398
  7. Ingram, J. (2020). Understanding BIM The Past, Present and Future (1st Edition). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.1201/9780429282300/understanding-bim-jonathan-ingram
  8. Irvansyah, Muchlis, N., & Suryawan, W. A. (2022). ANALYSIS OF THE BIM IMPLEMENTATION COMPETENCIES OF BUILDING CLUSTER VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN THE EAST JAVA. Border: Jurnal Arsitektur, 4(2), Article 2
  9. Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat. (2018, Oktober). Peraturan Menteri Nomor 22/PRT/M/2018 Tentang Pembangunan Bangunan Gedung Negara. https://jdih.pu.go.id/detail-dokumen/2594/1#div_cari_detail
  10. Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat. (2021, February 2). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 16 Tahun 2021 tentang Peraturan Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2002 Tentang Bangunan Gedung. https://jdih.pu.go.id/detail-dokumen/2851/1#div_cari_detail
  11. Lewis, J. R. (2018). The System Usability Scale: Past, Present, and Future. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(7), 577–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1455307
  12. Maharika, I., Irsan, A., Ismailiyah, S., Athas, S., Susanto, A., Abma, V., & Yuriandala, Y. (2020). Building Information Modelling (BIM) Adoption Model for Architectural Education. Journal of Design and Built Environment, 20, 22–42. https://doi.org/10.22452/jdbe.vol20no3.2
  13. Maina, J. J. (2018). Barriers to effective use of CAD and BIM in architecture education in Nigeria. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 5(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v5.n3.275
  14. Ramadhan, M. A., Sumarsono, R. A., Achmad, A. A., & Cisse, A. (2022). Implementation of Kirkpatrick evaluation model in Building Information Modeling (BIM) training program. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 28(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v28i2.43555
  15. Savaşkan, M. O., & Özener, O. Ö. (2022). H-BIM applications for vernacular architecture: A historic rural house case study in Bursa, Turkey. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(9), 3997–4017. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-01-2022-0017
  16. Tanko, B. lot, & Mbugua, L. (2022). BIM Education in Higher Learning Institutions: A Scientometric Review and the Malaysia Perspective. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 9(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v9.n1.864
  17. Vlachogianni, P., & Tselios, N. (2022). Perceived usability evaluation of educational technology using the System Usability Scale (SUS): A systematic review. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(3), 392–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1867938
  18. Yong, S. de, Kusumarini, Y., & Tedjokoesoemo, P. E. D. (2020). Interior design students’ perception for AutoCAD, SketchUp and Rhinoceros software usability. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 490(1), 012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/490/1/012015

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-12-10 17:57:58

No citation recorded.