DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/parole.v11i2.189-195

Lexical Complexity of Students' Oral Performance on PechaKucha

English Literature Program, Faculty of Cultural Science, Universitas Mulawarman, Indonesia

Received: 27 Jun 2021; Published: 31 Oct 2021.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2021 PAROLE: Journal of Linguistics and Education under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract
This study examines the lexical complexity of undergraduate students' speaking performance, taking from their performance in Pechakucha. Pechakucha is an internet-based platform that enables people to do their presentations at a specific time and share it worldwide. The researcher uses PechaKucha since it enhances the students' actual speaking competence by giving them limited time to discuss an image. The lexical complexity of the students' speaking performance is measured using Lexical Complexity Analyser (LCA). This present study finds a significant difference between students' lexical frequency when performing descriptive and narrative oral presentations, shown by the sig.2-tailed of that variable is less than 0.05. While on the other hand, students' lexical variation, lexical density and lexical sophistication showed that the sig-2 tailed value is higher than 0.05, which means there is no significant difference between those two oral presentations. The finding indicates that the students' word choices are similar, and the measurements of their lexical complexity are influenced by the different requirements applied in two oral presentations. In addition, Pechakucha is one of the speaking activities which can be an alternative activity during online classes which prevent students from having face-to-face speaking activity.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Pechakucha, Lexical Complexity, Oral Presentation

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Lexical Complexity of Students' Oral Performance on PechaKucha Interpretation of Political Inclination in Online Newspapers: An Ideological Disposition through Transitivity Analysis Representation of Government Concerning the Draft of Criminal Code in The Jakarta Post: A Critical Discourse Analysis Back Matter Parole Volume 11 Number 2 October 2021 Front Matter Parole Volume 11 Number 2 October 2021 More recent articles
Most cited articles
Backmatter EFL Prospective Teacher Educators’ Beliefs towards the Use of WhatsApp in English Learning and Teaching Interpersonal Metadiscourse pada Tagline Iklan Poster World Wildlife Fund (WWF) Back Matter COMPLAINING IN EFL LEARNERS: DIFFERENCES OF REALIZATIONS BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN (A CASE STUDY OF INDONESIAN EFL LEARNERS AT THE ENGLISH DEPARTMENT OF THE INDONESIAN UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION) More cited articles
  1. Arya, D. J., Hiebert, E. H., & Pearson, P. D. (2011). The effects of syntactic and lexical complexity on the comprehension of elementary science texts. 4(1), 107–125
  2. Bulté, B., & Housen, A. (2012). Defining and operationalising L2 complexity. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.32.02bul
  3. Dewi, R. (2018). Lexical Complexity in the Introductions of Undergraduate Students' Research Articles. Exposure : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Inggris, 6(2), 161. https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v6i2.1179
  4. Doughty, C. J., & Long, M. H. (2008). The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. In The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756492
  5. Douglas, Y., & Miller, S. (2016). Syntactic and Lexical Complexity of Reading Correlates with Complexity of Writing in Adults. 7(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijba.v7n4p1
  6. https://www.pechakucha.com/about
  7. Johnson, M. D. (2017). Cognitive task complexity and L2 written syntactic complexity, accuracy, lexical complexity, and fluency: A research synthesis and meta-analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing, 37(June), 13–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.06.001
  8. Jones, E., & Nulty, P. (2019). Quantitative measures of lexical complexity in modern prose fiction. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 34(4), 914–937. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqz020
  9. Lahmann, C., Steinkrauss, R., & Schmid, M. S. (2019). Measuring linguistic complexity in long-term L2 speakers of English and L1 attriters of German. International Journal of Applied Linguistics (United Kingdom), 29(2), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12259
  10. Lu, X. (2010). Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.15.4.02lu
  11. Lu, X. (2011). A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college-level ESL writers' language development. TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 36–62. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.240859
  12. Lu, X. (2012). The Relationship of Lexical Richness to the Quality of ESL Learners' Oral Narratives. The Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 190–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01232.x
  13. Mazgutova, D., & Kormos, J. (2015). Syntactic and lexical development in an intensive English for Academic Purposes programme. Journal of Second Language Writing, 29, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.004
  14. Mohanty, A. K. (1983). Perceptual complexity of lexical, surface structure, and deep structure types of ambiguous sentences and change in heart rate. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 12(3), 339–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067675
  15. Murugaiah, P. (2016). Pecha Kucha style powerpoint presentation: An innovative call approach to developing oral presentation skills of tertiary students. Teaching English with Technology, 16(1), 88–104
  16. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 555–578. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp044
  17. Read, J. (2000). Assessing Vocabulary. In Assessing Vocabulary. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511732942
  18. Robinson, R. (2015). Pecha Kucha: How to improve students� presentation skills. European Conference on Language Learning, Brighton, United Kingdom
  19. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2012). Complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis in task-based performance: a synthesis of the Ealing research. Dimensions of L2 Performance and Proficiency : Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in SLA. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.32.09fos
  20. Solusia, C., Kher, D. F., & Rani, Y. A. (2020). The Use of Pecha Kucha Presentation Method in the Speaking for Informal Interaction Class. 411(Icoelt 2019), 190–194. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200306.032
  21. Theriault, M. (2015). The Development of Lexical Complexity in Sixth-Grade Intensive English Students. Université du Québec à Chicoutimi
  22. Vaezi, S., & Kafshgar, N. B. (2012). Learner Characteristics and Syntactic and Lexical Complexity of Written Products. International Journal of Linguistics, 4(3), 671–687. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v4i3.2391
  23. Wang, Z. (2018). The Analysis of Lexical Complexity of Two College English Textbooks. DEStech Transactions on Social Science, Education and Human Science. https://doi.org/10.12783/dtssehs/icems2018/20109
  24. Widyaningrum, L. (2016). Pecha Kucha : a Way To Develop. Vision: Journal for Language and Foreign Language Learning, 5(1), 57–74
  25. Yoon, H. J. (2017). Linguistic complexity in L2 writing revisited: Issues of topic, proficiency, and construct multidimensionality. System. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.03.007

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-12-27 11:42:55

No citation recorded.