skip to main content

Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

The articles on the Pasir Laut Journal are the result of scientific research in coastal and marine resources management that have never been previously published. Article scope: (a)Coastal and fisheries resources, (b) Aquaculture, (c) Post Harvest Technology, (e) Resource Exploitation Fisheries, (f) Socio-Economic and Policy Fisheries, (g) Maritime Anthropology, (h) Oceanography Fisheries (i) Coastal Environment and Habitat and (j) Marine biotechnology to support management coastal and marine resources.


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions
Checked Indexed
Checked Peer Reviewed

Artikel Review

Checked Open Submissions
Checked Indexed
Checked Peer Reviewed


Peer Review Process / Policy

Blind review process will be applied and at least two reviewers will be assigned for each submitted paper. Author(s) are allowed to propose appropriate reviewers by providing their names and email addresses, but the decision remains in the hand of editor. Authors are suggested to use plagiarism detection software to check similarity of the manuscript. This similarity checking and screening is conducted using Turnitin. Decision will be made based on the level of similarities with other articles. The editor will decide on either immediately reject the manuscripts, contact authors for further clarifications, or to proceed to the peer-review process. Final decision is made by editor and editorial board.


Publication Frequency

This journal published twice a year


Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download.  We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)


Article Processing Charge (APC)

Jurnal Pasir Laut:  Journal of Coastal and Marine Resources Management is an open access Journal. Authors can submitting and processing the article for free of charge. If your article is accepted for publication, you will be charged IDR 250.000,-


Plagiarism Checking

To minimize our plagiarism use the software Turnitin to see the common percentage articles that come in with other articles that have been published.


Content Lisence

Creative Commons LicenseCreative Common Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)

You are free to:

  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
  • for any purpose, even commercially.

The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.


  • You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
  • No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.


List of Indexing

Google Scholar


Publication Ethics

Jurnal Pasir Laut (p-ISSN 1858-1684, e-ISSN 2747-0776) is a peer-reviewed journal published by Magister Program in Aquatic Resources Management, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia. The ethical statement includes standards of conduct for authors, editors, reviewers and publishers. This statement describes the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the process of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, chief editor, Editorial Board, reviewers and publishers. This statement is based on the COPE Journal Best Practice Guidelines for Editors.

Ethical Guidelines for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in Fisheries Science and Technology is a significant contribution to the development of research in the field of Aquatic, Fisheries and Marine Sciences. The articles published support the scientific method. Therefore, it is important to understand and agree on ethical standards for authors, editors, reviewers and publishers.

Journal Management Ethics

Publication Decision: 

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about the submitted manuscript to anyone other than the authors, reviewers, prospective reviewers, other appropriate editorial boards, and publishers, as appropriate. Pasir Laut Journal is responsible for deciding which submitted articles should be published. The validation of the work and its importance to researchers and readers should always drive such decisions. Editors may be guided by the discretion of the journal's editorial board and limited by applicable legal requirements, such as defamation, copyright infringement and plagiarism. Editors may consult with other editors or review partners in making this decision.

Aspects of Justice: 

The editors evaluate manuscripts at all times for the intellectual content of the authors regardless of the race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnicity, nationality, or political views of the authors.


The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about the submitted manuscript to anyone other than the authors, reviewers, prospective reviewers, other appropriate editorial boards, and publishers, as appropriate.

Writer's Ethics

Writing standards: Authors must present articles that can be accounted for. The data presented in the article is accurate data. An article should be equipped with sufficient details and relevant references. Violation or any inaccurate statement is an unacceptable unethical act.

Publication of multiple articles or repetition: Basically, the author is not allowed to publish several articles describing essentially the same research in several journals at the same time. This is unethical publication behavior and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgment of sources: Authors must appropriately acknowledge the work of others. The author must cite other publications that influence the content of the article. Information obtained in private, such as conversations, correspondence or discussions with third parties, may not be used or reported without written permission from the source.

Article writers: The authors of the article should be limited to those who made a significant contribution to the writing of the article. All significant contributors should be included in the list of authors, while others should be appropriately acknowledged. Authors who correspond with Fisheries Sciences must ensure that other authors have read and approved the final version of the article and agree to submit it to Fishery Sciences for publication.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest: All authors must disclose in their articles if there is a substantive conflict of interest that could affect the results or interpretation of research results. All sources of financial support must be disclosed. Examples of potential conflicts of interest that should be disclosed are employment, consulting, shareholding, honoraria, paid expert statements, patent registrations or applications, and funding or grants.

Fundamental errors in published work: If the author finds significant errors or inaccuracies in his own published article, it is the responsibility of the author to immediately notify the journal editor or publisher and is willing to cooperate to retract or correct the erroneous article. If the editor or publisher knows of an error from another party that an article contains a significant error, it is the author's obligation to immediately withdraw the wrong article or correct the article by providing proof of correction to the editor.

Reviewer Ethics

Contribution to editorial decisions: Editors are assisted by reviewers to decide editorial aspects as well as steps to improve article quality.

Timeliness: If the appointed reviewer is unable to review the article for reasons of competence or inability to complete the assignment in a timely manner, the reviewer must notify the editor immediately and the reviewer withdraws from the review process.

Confidentiality: Any article that has been accepted for review must be kept confidential. Reviewers may not show or discuss with anyone other than the editor.

Standard of objectivity: The review process must be objective. Personal criticism of the author is unacceptable. Reviewers must express their responses clearly with supporting arguments.

Recognition of sources: Reviewers should identify relevant sources that have not been cited by the authors. Every statement. Reviewers must also explain to the editor if there are similarities with other articles.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest: Materials that are not published in the research articles may not be used for research by the reviewer, without written permission from the author. Reviewers may not involve themselves (must ask other reviewers).


Crossmark Applying on Jurnal Pasir Laut


Applying the CrossMark icon is a commitment by Jurnal Pasir Laut to maintain the content published and alert readers to changes if and when they occur.

What is Crossmark?

CrossMark, a multi-publisher initiative from CrossRef, provides a standard way for readers to locate the authoritative version of a document. Jurnal Pasir Laut recognizes the importance of the integrity and completeness of the scholarly record to researchers and librarians and attaches the highest importance to maintaining trust in the authority of its electronic archive. Clicking on the CrossMark icon will inform the reader of the current status of a document and may also provide additional publication record information about the document.