DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/presipitasi.v0i0.%25p

Environmental Valuation of Mobile MBBR Reactor for Wastewater Management in Non-Rural Area

*Nurvita Cundaningsih orcid scopus  -  Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur, Indonesia
Rizka Novembrianto  -  Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur, Indonesia
Kabul Fadilah  -  Saitama University, Japan

Citation Format:
Abstract

Domestic waste remains a problem in Ngagel Rejo Village, Surabaya City, where the community is largely composed of small medium enterprises (SMEs) food traders. This study aims to assign an economic value to domestic waste management services that are not traded in the market. The benefits of deploying a mobile Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR) will be estimated to determine the economic value of WWTP siting and to develop a retribution (user-fee) scheme for domestic waste management, particularly for the food waste consortium. A Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) will be used to elicit willingness to pay (WTP) from WWTP users as a measure of the non-use benefits of this public service and its role in reducing the impacts of domestic waste. The analysis yielded a mean WTP value of 3.6827 (as measured in the survey), which corresponds to a recommended fee of IDR 69,496.00 per month for domestic waste management services using a mobile MBBR reactor. Key factors influencing WTP include community commitment to environmental preservation programs and support for the program, consistent with the idea that public engagement strengthens the sustainability of environmental initiatives

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: Mobile reactor; valuation; wastewater; willingness to pay
Funding: Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Regional Case Study
Language : EN
Most cited articles
KEMAMPUAN PENYERAPAN ECENG GONDOK TERHADAP AMONIAK DALAM LIMBAH RUMAH SAKIT BERDASARKAN UMUR DAN LAMA KONTAK (STUDI KASUS: RS PANTI WILASA, SEMARANG) ANALISIS PENGARUH HIDROLIKA SUNGAI TERHADAP TRANSPORT BOD DAN DO DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN SOFTWARE QUAL2E (STUDI KASUS DI SUNGAI KALIGARANG, SEMARANG ) PERKEMBANGAN BIOFILM NITRIFIKASI DI FIXED BED REACTOR PADA SALINITAS TINGGI STUDI PENGARUH PENCAMPURAN SAMPAH DOMESTIK, SEKAM PADI, DAN AMPAS TEBU DENGAN METODE MAC DONALD TERHADAP KEMATANGAN KOMPOS Kajian Dampak Rencana Pembangunan Kawasan Wisata Marina di Pesisir Kabupaten Belitung terhadap Kualitas Lingkungan Sekitarnya More cited articles
  1. Cavanaugh, J.E., and Neath, A.A. 2019. The Akaike information criterion: Background, derivation, properties, application, interpretation, and refinements. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics 11, e1460
  2. Cecilia, S., Murayama, T., Nishikizawa, S., and Suwanteep, K. 2024. Preferences and valuation of small-scale wastewater treatment system maintenance using discrete choice method: Case of community-managed system in Jakarta, Indonesia. Journal of Environmental Management 371, 123115
  3. Ćetković, J., Knežević, M., Lakić, S., Žarković, M., Vujadinović, R., Živković, A., and Cvijović, J. 2022. Financial and economic investment evaluation of wastewater treatment plant. Water (Basel) 14, 122
  4. Chotima, U.H., and Aji, J.M.M. 2021. Analysis of willingness to pay for ‘Ketakasi’ground coffee in Jember Regency. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing, p. 012060
  5. De, I., Hasan, R., and Iqbal, M. 2022. Natural treatment systems and importance of social cost benefit analysis in developing countries: A critical review. Sustainability 14, 3913
  6. Do, H.H., and Frör, O. 2022. River ecosystem resilience: applying the contingent valuation method in Vietnam. Sustainability 14, 12029
  7. Fernandez, G.C.J. 1992. Residual analysis and data transformations: important tools in statistical analysis. HortScience 27, 297–300
  8. Firdaus, M., Hatanaka, K. and Saville, R. 2021. Mangrove forest restoration by fisheries communities in lampung bay: a study based on perceptions, willingness to pay, and management strategy. Forest and Society, 5(2), 224-244
  9. Hanley, N., Barbier, E.B., and Barbier, E. 2009. Pricing nature: cost-benefit analysis and environmental policy. Edward Elgar Publishing
  10. Hasbiah, A.W., Rochaeni, A., and Sutopo, A.F. 2018. Analisis kesediaan membayar (willingness to pay) dan kesediaan untuk menerima kompensasi (willingness to accept) dari keberadaan tempat penampungan sementara ciwastra dengan Contingent Valuation Method. Infomatek 20, 107–116
  11. Ho, N.B., Vo, D. Van, and Rowley, C. 2024. Contingent valuation versus choice experiment: estimating the willingness to pay for organic oranges in Vietnam. Journal of Trade Science 12, 268–283
  12. Hutagalung, I.R., and Rachman, I. 2023. Analysis of consumer preferences on online delivery plastic packaging consumption behavior: An Indonesian survey. Jurnal Presipitasi: Media Komunikasi dan Pengembangan Teknik Lingkungan 20, 85–92
  13. Irawan, D.R., Syarifuddin, H., and Fahri, S. 2021. Household solid waste management strategy in danau teluk sub-district, Jambi City. Jurnal Presipitasi Media Komunikasi dan Pengembangan Teknik Lingkungan 18, 282–298
  14. Irawan, E. 2019. Contingent valuation of Lake Rawapening as a source raw drinking Water. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan 17, 492–499
  15. Izah, S.C., Sylva, L., and Hait, M. 2023. Cronbach’s alpha: a cornerstone in ensuring reliability and validity in environmental health assessment. ES Energy & Environment 23, 1057
  16. Jiao, J. 2024. Residents’ willingness to participate in domestic sewage treatment in rural China: Application of a multi-stakeholder perspective. Universite de Liege (Belgium)
  17. Karisyawati, N.D., Suryantini, A., and Utami, A.W. 2019. Estimation of consumers’ willingness to pay for cavendish banana using contingent valuation method in special Province Yogyakarta. Agro Ekonomi 30, 167–181
  18. Li, C., Yang, X., Wei, H., Hu, Z., and Zhang, Z. 2025. Research on the influencing factors of college students’ willingness-to-pay for carbon offsets in the context of climate change. Sustainability (Switzerland) 17
  19. Mariel, P., and Arata, L. 2022. Incorporating attitudes into the evaluation of preferences regarding agri-environmental practices. Journal of Agricultural Economics 73, 430–451
  20. Marzban, C. 2004. The ROC curve and the area under it as performance measures. Weather Forecast 19, 1106–1114
  21. Mcgranahan, G., Leitman, J., and Surjadi, C. 1998. Policy and practice green grass and brown roots: understanding environmental problems in deprived neighbourhoods. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 41, 505–518
  22. Miłaszewski, R. 2021. Application of the contingent valuation method in water resources protection. Central European Economic Journal 8, 212–218
  23. Paudel, U., Adhikari, S.R., and Pant, K.P. 2023. Willingness to pay for environmental quality improvement programs and its determinants: empirical analysis in western nepal. Sustainability (Switzerland) 15
  24. Qian, Cheng, Yu, Kangkang, Gao, and Jian. 2019. Understanding environmental attitude and willingness to pay with an objective measure of attitude strength. Environment and Behavior 53, 119–150
  25. Qiao, D., Liu, H., Zhang, D., Xu, T., and Gan, Y. 2022. Chasing the unbiased willingness to pay: Using an integrated contingent valuation survey in estimating the non-market value of rubber plantation ecological restoration programs in China. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution Volume 10-2022
  26. Senaviratna, N., and Cooray, T. 2019. Diagnosing multicollinearity of logistic regression model. Asian Journal of Probability and Statistics 5, 1–9
  27. Shrestha, N. 2021. Factor analysis as a tool for survey analysis. American journal of Applied Mathematics and statistics 9, 4–11
  28. Sugiyono, S., 2016. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D Cetakan ke-23. Bandung: CV Alfabeta
  29. Tan, Y., Ying, X., Ge, J., Gao, W., Zhao, X., and Wang, S. 2025. Study on the key factors of public participation in low carbon city construction and willingness to pay. Scientific Reports 15, 6741
  30. Venkatachalam, L. 2004. The contingent valuation method: a review. Environmental impact assessment review 24, 89–124
  31. Wang, W., Jin, J., He, R., Gong, H., and Tian, Y. 2018. Farmers’ willingness to pay for health risk reductions of pesticide use in China: A contingent valuation study. International journal of environmental research and public health 15, 625
  32. Whittington, D. 2002. Improving the performance of contingent valuation studies in developing countries. Environmental and resource economics (Dordr) 22, 323–367
  33. Wulandari, S.S., Soeprobowati, T.R., and Kismartini, K. 2024. Strategi Pengelolaan Limbah Domestik Berbasis Masyarakat pada IPAL Komunal Guyub Rukun di Kota Salatiga. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan 22, 1466–1476

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-08-01 21:27:05

No citation recorded.