Focus and Scope
Jurnal Presipitasi contains research results in the environmental field that have never been published in other publishers. It should be noted that Jurnal Presipitasi only accepts original articles and is not being submitted in other journals. Jurnal Presipitas also accepts articles / articles in English.
The scope of Jurnal Presipitasi includes:
- Environmental Health and Work Safety
- Environmental Technology and Engineering
- Conservation and Energy Efficiency
- Green Infrastructure
- Environment and Sustainable Development
- Urban Development and Rural Environment
|Open Submissions||Indexed||Peer Reviewed|
|Open Submissions||Indexed||Peer Reviewed|
|Open Submissions||Indexed||Peer Reviewed|
Peer Review Process / Policy
1. General Overview of Peer Review Process
Articles published in Jurnal Presipitasi are reviewed first by Mitra Bebestari (Reviewer) before being published. By default, the review method used is blind peer-review where reviewers can still find out the author's identity. However, if the writer wants a double-blind peer-review process, we may provide it as authors request. We really appreciate the participation of reviewers because the quality of the article can be maintained because the reviewers who work voluntarily. The decision to accept whether or not an article is made by the Chief Editor through the Editor's Board is based on recommendations or comments from the reviewers. Plagiarism screening of texts submitted to this journal is carried out with the help of Google Scholar or Turnitin apps. The more plagiarism, the article will be immediately rejected (if more than 20% does not include a bibliography). Beginning with Volume 16 Number 2 in July 2019, Jurnal Presipitasi also received articles in English.
2. Spesific Overview of Peer-Review Process
Reviewers will be asked to provide comments in a detailed and constructive manner where the comments will be the basis for consideration for editors to reject or accept articles that have been submitted. Some things that need attention from the reviewer are as follows:
a. Originality and significance
Reviewers are asked to discuss the originality of the findings submitted in an article. In addition, reviewers should see whether the findings can significantly influence the scientific community. If the reviewer finds the same work as the article being reviewed, the reviewer can provide suggestions or criticism to improve the way the research results are delivered.
b. The novelty of the theoretical approach and how to discuss the problems
Reviewers are asked to discuss the novelty of the theoretical approach and the way the authors discuss the results of research to solve problems. This novelty element can usually be seen in the introduction section as an introduction to the urgency of the research that has been done.
c. Strengths and weaknesses of the method used
Reviewers are expected to be able to assess the method used. Statistical analysis or other analytical methods that affect the interpretation of results should be criticized in order to improve the quality of the article being reviewed.
d. Reliability of the appearance of research results and conclusions
Reviewers are expected to be able to assess the reliability of the research results and conclusions obtained. This reliability can be assessed through the completeness of the analysis and the data that has been obtained.
e. Layout alignment with the guidelines
Alignment with the guidelines will make it easier for editors to do the editing and lay-outing process. Many writers often ignore this and only format their writing incompletely and perfectly according to the guidelines given. Reviewers can assess this but the main focus is on the content and some previous points.
f. Suggestion and feedback
When found several errors or shortcomings of an article, the reviewer is expected to be able to show clearly, which parts should be improved and what needs to be done to improve the quality of the article.
For reviewers, we request that no articles or research results be disseminated under review. If you are not willing to maintain this policy, we would appreciate if you, as a prospective reviewer, give other prospective reviewer that are more suitable in interest or expertise to the editorial board.
4. Other Technical Problems
Reviewers are expected to return articles that have been commented before the deadline that has been determined. If you need extra time to do the review, the reviewer is expected to immediately contact the editorial board. The results of the review can be submitted online through our OJS. However, if you experience difficulties in returning the results of the review, the results of the review can be sent via email: email@example.comfirstname.lastname@example.org.
Jurnal Presipitasi published 3 (three) times of issues a year (Trimester) every March, July and November.
Open Access Policy
Jurnal Presipitasi provides open access content, making it easier for users to search journals freely and exchange knowledge globally.
Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
The statement below explains the code of ethics of all parties involved in the activity of publishing articles in the journal, including Writers, Editor in Chief, Associate Editors, Reviewers, and Publishers. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
Guidelines for Journal Publication
Publication of articles in a peer-reviewed Jurnal Presipitasi : Media Komunikasi dan Pengembangan Teknik Lingkungan (P-ISSN : 1907-817X dan E-ISSN : 2550-0023) is an important part in the development of science based on coherence and mutual respect. This is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support it. Peer reviewed articles support and embody scientific methods, so it becomes important to agree on ethical standards for all parties involved in publishing articles in journals, including Authors, Editor in Chief, Associate Editors, Reviewers, Publishers and the public.
Universitas Diponegoro as the publisher of Jurnal Presipitasi : Media Komunikasi dan Pengembangan Teknik Lingkungan takes a serious obligation to maintain every step of the publishing activities and understand the code of ethics and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertisements, printing and other activities that generate other income do not have an impact on editorial decisions. Furthermore, Universitas Diponegoro and the Editorial Board will help communicate with other journals and / or publishers where needed.
Decision of Issuance
Editor in Chief of the Jurnal Presipitasi : Media Komunikasi dan Pengembangan Teknik Lingkungan is responsible for deciding which articles to publish from articles submitted to the journal. In making decisions, Editor in Chief can be assisted by Associate Editors and limited by legal provisions regarding defamation, copyright infringement and plagiarism. Associate editors can negotiate with other editors in making this decision.
The Editor in Chief evaluates the article regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnicity, citizenship, and / or political affiliation of the Author.
Editors in Chief and Assicoate Editors are not allowed to disclose any information about the article to parties other than the Writer, Reviewers, and Publishers as appropriate.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Material or material in articles not published in an article submitted may not be used in the Editor's Board research without the written consent of the Author.
The Duties of Reviewers
Contributions to Editorial Decisions
Reviewers helps the Editor in Chief in making editorial decisions and helps the writer improve the quality of the article.
Any selected Reviewers, who feels not qualified to review the article or feels unwilling to review an article must notify the Editor in Chief and excuse himself from the article review process.
Every article received for review must be treated as a confidential document. Articles may not be displayed or discussed with others unless authorized by the Editor in Chief.
The review process must be carried out objectively. Reviewers must express their views clearly, objectively, and using supporting arguments.
Reviewers must identify relevant published works that have not been cited by the author. A statement that observations, derivations or arguments that have been previously reported must be accompanied by relevant citations. Reviewers informs the Editor in Chief if there is a substantial or overlap between the article being reviewed and other articles that have been published from the personal knowledge they have.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Special information or ideas obtained through the peer review process must be kept confidential and must not be used for personal gain. Reviewers are not allowed to review texts where they have a conflict of interest due to competition, collaboration, or other relationships with any of the Authors, companies or institutions related to the article.
The author must present an accurate report of the research conducted and conduct an objective discussion. The underlying data must be accurately displayed in the article. An article must contain sufficient detail and references so that others can replicate the research activities carried out. Fraud or intentional statements are not unethical and unacceptable behavior.
Data Access and Retention
The author is asked to provide raw data in connection with the article for the review process, and must be prepared to provide public access to the data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), and if possible, in any case ready to store the data in reasonable time after publication.
Originality and Plagiarism
The author must ensure that the work written is original, and if the author has used the work and / or words of others, that this has been appropriately cited.
Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author may not generally publish articles that basically describe the same research in one or more journals. Submitting the same article to more than one journal simultaneously is unethical and unacceptable publishing behavior.
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors must cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature or results of the work reported.
- Directory of Open Acces Journal (DOAJ)
- Science and Technology Index (Sinta 3)
- Google Scholar
- Portal Garuda
- Garuda: Garba Rujukan Digital
- Directory of Open Acces Scholarly Resources
- Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE)
Article Processing Charges
Submission of articles to the editorial office of Jurnal Presipitasi is free of charge, but per issue of Volume 16 Number 2 of 2019, the author is subject to pay the article processing and publication charges (APC) of Rp. 250,000. The cost of this publication is borne by the respective authors.
Creative Common Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
- No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.