Journal Profile
(Updated 15th December 2025)
Number of Documents: 1030
G Scholar Citation: 2889 click here
H-Index: 26
i10-Index: 95
Impact Factor: 1.0512 (IF SINTA)
SINTA: Accredited 2nd Rank
Sinta Profile
Download
Article Template
Reviewer Guidelines
Sinta 2 Certificate
How to register for this journal if you are already registered with another UNDIP journal
Copyright Permissions: Tips for Authors
Jurnal Presipitasi publishes research and review articles in environmental science and engineering that have not been published elsewhere. Please note that Jurnal Presipitasi only accepts original articles that are not under submission to other journals. Since Volume 18, Issue 1 (2021), Jurnal Presipitasi has published all articles in English. The journal continued to accept submissions in Bahasa Indonesia until July 2021. Any articles submitted in Bahasa Indonesia after July 2021 are declined at the initial submission stage.
The scope of Jurnal Presipitasi includes:
1. General Overview of the Peer Review Process
All manuscripts submitted to Jurnal Presipitasi must adhere to the journal’s Focus and Scope as well as the Author Guidelines. Submitted manuscripts must demonstrate scientific merit and novelty appropriate to the journal’s aims.
Articles are evaluated through single‑blind peer review, in which at least two independent reviewers assess each submission prior to publication. In this model, reviewers remain anonymous, although they may still be able to infer the author’s identity. The Editor‑in‑Chief makes the final decision to accept or reject a manuscript, in consultation with the Editorial Board and based on the reviewers’ recommendations and comments.
Since Volume 18, Issue 1 (2021), Jurnal Presipitasi has published all its articles in English. Articles submitted in Bahasa Indonesia before July 2021 were translated into English by the Editor with the authors’ permission. Submissions in Bahasa Indonesia after July 2021 declined at the initial stage.
All manuscripts must be written in clear, grammatically accurate English. Authors whose first language is not English are encouraged to have their manuscripts reviewed for grammar and clarity before submission.
The final decision regarding manuscript acceptance is made by the Editor-in-Chief and Associate Editor, taking into account the reviewers’ critical comments. While reviewers’ feedback is essential, the editorial team retains full responsibility for the final decision.
2. Specific Overview of the Peer Review Process
Reviewers are asked to provide detailed and constructive comments. These comments form the basis of the editors’ decision to accept or reject submitted articles. Reviewers should pay attention to the following aspects:
a. Originality and significance
Reviewers should evaluate the originality of the findings presented in the manuscript and consider whether the results have a significant impact on the scientific community. If similar work has already been published, the reviewers may provide suggestions or constructive criticism to improve how the research results are presented.
b. Novelty of the theoretical approach and problem discussion
Reviewers should assess the novelty of the theoretical approach and the way the authors discuss their findings in addressing research problems. This element of novelty is often reflected in the introduction, which highlights the urgency and relevance of the study.
c. Strengths and weaknesses of the methodology
Reviewers are expected to evaluate the appropriateness and rigor of the methods used. Statistical analyses or other analytical techniques that influence the interpretation of results should be critically assessed to ensure the quality of the manuscript.
d. Reliability of results and conclusions
Reviewers should assess the reliability of the research findings and the conclusions. This reliability can be judged by the completeness of the analysis and the robustness of the data presented.
e. Compliance with formatting guidelines
Adherence to the journal’s formatting guidelines facilitates the editorial and production process. While the primary focus of the review should remain on content and scientific quality, reviewers may also comment on formatting issues that require attention.
f. Suggestions and feedback
When errors or shortcomings are identified, reviewers are expected to clearly indicate which sections need improvement and provide constructive recommendations to enhance the overall quality of the manuscript.
3. Confidentiality
Reviewers are requested not to disseminate any manuscripts or research results under review. If you are unable to comply with this policy, we kindly ask that you to inform the Editorial Board so that another reviewer with the appropriate expertise and interest can be assigned.
4. Technical Considerations
Reviewers are expected to submit their evaluations within the deadlines specified by the Editorial Board. If additional time is required, reviewers should notify the Editorial Board as soon as possible. Review reports should be submitted through the journal’s Online Journal System (OJS). In the event of technical difficulties, reviews may alternatively be sent directly to the Editorial Board via email (presipitasi@live.undip.ac.id / bimastyaji@live.undip.ac.id).
Since 2021 and in subsequent years, Jurnal Presipitasi publishes three issues annually: Issue 1 (March), Issue 2 (July), and Issue 3 (November), with a maximum of 25 articles per issue.
Jurnal Presipitasi provides open access content, making it easier for users to search journals freely and exchange knowledge globally.
This journal utilizes the LOCKSS (Lots of Copies Keep Stuff Safe) system to establish a distributed archiving network among participating libraries. This system ensures the long-term preservation, integrity, and restoration of journal content. More...
The following statement outlines the code of ethics for all parties involved in publishing articles in the journal, including the authors, the Editor-in-Chief, the Associate Editors, reviewers, and the publisher. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
Research Ethics Policies for Studies Involving Human Subjects
Authors are responsible for safeguarding participant confidentiality and anonymity throughout the data collection, analysis, and reporting. For studies involving human subjects, authors must obtain approval from their institutional review board and follow recognized standards, such as the Declaration of Helsinki, to minimize harm to participants. They must also obtain informed consent from participants and ensure that any information collected does not contain any identifiable data. For research involving children, consent must be obtained from a parent or legal guardian, and for other vulnerable individuals, appropriate informed consent procedures must be followed. Authors must also obtain consent for publication when participant information is included. When working with vulnerable groups, authors should carefully assess potential risks and take steps to minimize them.
If the research involves confidential business or marketing data, authors must clearly justify the use of such information and explain how the data will be securely protected.
Guidelines for Journal Publication
Publication of articles in the peer-reviewed Jurnal Presipitasi (P-ISSN: 1907-817X dan E-ISSN: 2550-0023) is an important contribution to the development of science, based on coherence and mutual respect. It reflects the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support it. Peer-reviewed articles embody scientific methods, making it essential to uphold ethical standards for all parties involved in publishing, including authors, the Editor-in-Chief, Associate Editors, reviewers, publishers, and the public.
Universitas Diponegoro as the publisher of Jurnal Presipitasi, the integrity of the publication process and upholding the highest standards of publication ethics. The publisher ensures that advertising, printing, sponsorship, and other revenue‑generating activities do not influence editorial decisions. Universitas Diponegoro and the Editorial Board also support communication with other journals and publishers when necessary to maintain ethical and professional publishing practices.
Decision of Issuance
The Editor-in-Chief of Jurnal Presipitasi is responsible for deciding which articles to publish from those submitted to the journal. In making decisions, the Editor-in-Chief may be assisted by Associate Editors and is guided by legal provisions regarding defamation, copyright infringement and plagiarism. Associate Editors may consult other editors in reaching these decisions.
Fair Play
The Editor-in-Chief evaluates manuscripts solely on their academic merit, without consideration of the authors’ race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnicity, citizenship, or political philosophy.
Confidentiality
The Editor-in-Chief and Associate Editors must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the author, reviewers, and publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Authors must notify Jurnal Presipitasi of any conflicts of interest prior to submission. Manuscripts not accepted for publication must not be used in the editors’ own research without the authors’ written consent.
Duties of Reviewers
Contributions to Editorial Decisions
Reviewers assist the Editor-in-Chief in making editorial decisions and provide feedback to help authors improve the quality of their manuscripts.
Promptness
Any reviewer who feels unqualified to evaluate a manuscript, or who is unable to complete the review in a timely manner, should notify the Editor-in-Chief and withdraw from the review process.
All manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the Editor-in-Chief.
Objectivity Standards
Reviews must be conducted objectively. Reviewers should express their views clearly, with supporting arguments.
Source Recognition
Reviewers should identify relevant published works that have not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument has been previously reported must be accompanied by the appropriate citation. Reviewers should inform the Editor-in-Chief if they detect substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under review and other published works known to them.
Information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers must decline to review manuscripts where they have conflicts of interest arising from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the manuscript.
Duties of Authors
Reporting Standards
Authors must present an accurate account of the research conducted and provide an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented clearly and accurately in the manuscript. The manuscript must contain sufficient detail and references to allow others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical publishing behavior and are unacceptable.
Data Access and Retention
Authors may be asked to provide the raw data related to a manuscript for editorial review and should be prepared to make such data publicly available, consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases[JN1] . Authors should also be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable period after the publication.
Originality and Plagiarism
Authors must ensure that their work is entirely original. If the work or words of others are used, these must be properly cited.
Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication
Authors must not submit or publish manuscripts that describe substantially the same research in more than one journal. Submitting the same manuscript to multiple journals simultaneously is considered unethical publishing behavior and is not acceptable.
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors must cite publications that have been influential in shaping the nature or results of the reported work.
Published articles in Jurnal Presipitasi (P-ISSN: 1907-817X dan E-ISSN: 2550-0023) are indexed in the following databases:
Jurnal Presipitasi is a fully open access international journal. Readers may freely access and download all full‑text articles without charge, which increases the visibility and citability of published work. Authors are required to pay an Article Processing Charge (APC) of IDR 1,500,000 per accepted manuscript. Manuscripts that include a non‑Indonesian author may be eligible for an APC waiver. The cost of publication is borne by the authors.
APC payments are made via bank transfer. The Corresponding Author will receive the transfer instructions and an invoice. After payment is confirmed, the Editorial Office will issue a receipt. Accepted articles will not be published until the APC has been paid. The APC supports the operational and management costs of the journal.
All articles published in Jurnal Presipitasi are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution–ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).
Under this license, users are free to:
These freedoms may not be revoked by the licensor, provided that the license terms are respected.
License Terms
Notices
Jurnal Presipitasi accepts discussions and corrections of published articles from readers. Readers who wish to submit a discussion or correction should contact the Editor-in-Chief via email, clearly explaining their comments. If accepted by the Editor-in-Chief, the discussion or correction will be published in the next issue as a Letter to the Editor. Authors may respond to such discussions or corrections by sending a reply to the Editor-in-Chief, which may be published as a Reply to the Letter to the Editor.
Post-publication corrections and amendments will be conducted with appropriate reference and careful scientific consideration. Once an article has been published, making replacements or issuing retractions requires significant effort and must be accompanied by proper explanations for the indexing databases. Therefore, authors are strongly advised to carefully check the final draft of their manuscript before publication.
The journal accepts the following types of publications:
Applying the CrossMark icon is a commitment by Jurnal Presipitasi to maintain the published content and alert readers to changes, if and when they occur.
What is CrossMark?
CrossMark a multi-publisher initiative from CrossRef provides a standardized method for readers to locate the authoritative version of a document. Jurnal Presipitasi recognizes the importance of integrity and completeness in the scholarly record and attaches the highest importance to maintaining trust in its electronic archive. Clicking on the CrossMark icon informs readers of the current status of the document and may also provide additional publication record information.
Jurnal Presipitasi is dedicated to maintaining academic integrity, originality, and ethical standards in scholarly communications. The journal has established a comprehensive policy regarding the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools. This policy outlines the acceptable and unacceptable practices for authors, reviewers, and editors, each of whom carries distinct responsibilities in safeguarding the credibility of the journal.
For Authors: AI tools may be used in limited and carefully supervised manner. Acceptable uses include enhancing language (grammar, clarity, style) under human oversight, transparently documenting AI-assisted data analysis, and explicitly labeling and citing illustrative examples. Prohibited uses include drafting substantive content (abstracts, results, discussions), fabricating or simulating data, figures, or claims, and creating or altering scientific images, unless part of a declared methodology. Graphical abstracts produced by AI are not permitted, and cover art requires prior approval and attribution to the source. All AI use must be disclosed in the manuscript (for example, “This manuscript was revised using [Tool Name, Version] to improve grammar and clarity. The authors take full responsibility for the content.”).
For Reviewers: Reviewers may use AI for minor language editing in their review drafts or for factual verification that does not involve confidential material. They must not use AI to assess intellectual content or upload any manuscript material to AI platforms. Reviewers are responsible for preserving confidentiality and reporting any misuse of AI that could compromise the integrity of the review process.
For Editors: Editors may use AI for administrative purposes, such as workflow management or communication, but only under human supervision. They must not rely on AI to judge scientific merit, make editorial decisions, or input confidential manuscript content into AI systems. Editors are responsible for enforcing compliance, guiding ethical AI use, and ensuring that the journal’s commitment to integrity remains uncompromised.
View My Stats
Jurnal Presipitasi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
