skip to main content

Sustainable Management and Community Willingness to Pay for Communal Wastewater Services in Yogyakarta

*Hashfi Hawali Abdul Matin orcid scopus  -  Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
Julianatasya Tantri Damayanti orcid  -  Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
Siti Rachmawati  -  Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
Sapta Suhardono  -  Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
Lia Kusumaningrum orcid scopus  -  Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
Budiyono Budiyono orcid scopus  -  Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Callista Fabiola Candraningtyas orcid scopus  -  Global Ambassador of Sustainability (GAoS), Canada

Citation Format:
Abstract
Domestic wastewater discharge into rivers remains a persistent environmental and public health challenge in rapidly urbanizing regions of developing countries such as China. Although communal wastewater treatment systems have been increasingly implemented, empirical studies integrating community willingness to pay (WTP), behavioral determinants, and sustainability planning are limited. This study analyzes community willingness to pay for communal wastewater treatment services and formulates sustainability-oriented strategies for the Sewon Communal Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) in the Special Region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia. A mixed-methods approach combined a survey of 100 households with interviews and a document analysis. WTP was estimated using the contingent valuation method with a payment card format, while behavioral determinants were examined using covariance-based Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) with AMOS. Strategic formulation was conducted using SWOT analysis supported by IFAS and EFAS matrices based on validated SEM results. The results indicate a positive willingness to pay, with a mean of IDR 7,114 and a median of IDR 7,500. The SEM revealed that supporting institutional factors significantly influenced the WTP (X4 = 0.664; p < 0.01), whereas environmental perception and inhibiting factors were not statistically significant. These findings highlight the decisive role of institutional strength in ensuring the financial sustainability of the communal wastewater service
Keywords: Community participation; communal wastewater treatment; domestic waste management; SEM-AMOS; sustainability; willingness to pay

Article Metrics:

  1. Abu-Bader, S. and Jones, T. V. 2025. Structural equation modeling: principles, assumptions, and practical application using SPSS Amos. International Journal of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods, 13(1), pp. 12–31
  2. Awewomom, J., Dzeble, F., Takyi, Y. D., Ashie, W. B., Ettey, E. N. Y. O., Afua, P. E., and Akoto, O. 2024. Addressing global environmental pollution using environmental control techniques : a focus on environmental policy and preventive environmental management. Discover Environment
  3. Azizatun, B. 2015. Implementasi instalasi pengolahan air limbah (IPAL) domestik komunal: Model tata kelola lingkungan deliberatif dalam good environmental governance di Kota Blitar. Kebijakan dan Manajemen Publik, 3(3), pp. 218–228
  4. Ferdinand, A. 2011. Structural equation modeling dalam penelitian manajemen, Semarang: Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Diponegoro
  5. Fitriyanti, R. 2020. Karakteristik limbah domestik di lingkungan mess karyawan pertambangan batubara. Jurnal Redoks, 5(2), pp. 72–77
  6. Kinasih, C. A. P. 2015. Penilaian tingkat keberlanjutan instalasi pengolahan air limbah (IPAL) domestik Sewon D.I. Yogyakarta dan Semanggi Solo
  7. Gautam, A. K., Pingua, N., Chandra, A. and Arya, R. K. 2024. Domestic waste management and their utilization. From Waste to Wealth, pp. 1371–1398
  8. Ghisellini, P., Ulgiati, S. and Zucaro, A. 2021. Policies and market drivers for the transition to a circular economy: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, p. 124853
  9. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M. and Sarstedt, M. 2021. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.), Sage Publications
  10. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M. and Ringle, C. M. 2019. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), pp. 2–24
  11. Halimoon, N., Karim, R. and Shafie, A. 2021. Reliability and validity in SEM: Comparing Cronbach’s alpha and composite reliability. Journal of Quantitative Sosial Research, 5(2), pp. 44–53
  12. Hariram, N. P., Mekha, K. B., Suganthan, V. and Sudhakar, K. 2023. An integrated socio-economic-environmental model to address sustainable development and sustainability. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(13)
  13. Harun, M., Salsabila, A. and Riyadi, D. 2022. Socio-economic determinants of willingness to pay for domestic wastewater management. Journal of Environmental Policy and Development, 14(2), pp. 115–128
  14. Isni, K. and Mustanginah, T. 2023. Pengaruh edukasi kesehatan terhadap peningkatan pengetahuan pengelolaan sampah sebagai upaya mewujudkan program Bantul Bersih Sampah 2025. Perilaku dan Promosi Kesehatan: Indonesian Journal of Health Promotion and Behavior, 5(1), p. 35
  15. Ketchen, D. J. 2013. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling. Long Range Planning, 46(1–2), pp. 184–185
  16. Kline, R. B. 2023. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (5th ed.). Guilford Press
  17. Lim, W. M. 2024. A typology of validity: Content, face, convergent, discriminant, nomological and predictive validity. Journal of Trade Science, 12(3), pp. 155–179
  18. Lozano Lazo, D. P., Bojanic Helbingen, C. and Gasparatos, A. 2023. Household waste generation, composition and determining factors in rapidly urbanizing developing cities: case study of Santa Cruz de la Sierra , Bolivia. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 25(1), pp. 565–581
  19. Mao, W. L., Chen, W. C., Fathurrahman, H. I. K. and Lin, Y. H. 2022. Deep learning networks for real-time regional domestic waste detection. Journal of Cleaner Production, 344
  20. Marhayuni, Y. and Faizi, M. N. 2022. Pembuatan IPAL (Instalasi Pengolahan Air Limbah) untuk mengatasi Limbah Domestik sebagai pengamalan Q.S Al Araf ayat 56. Prosiding Konferensi Integrasi Interkoneksi Islam dan Sains., 4, pp. 34–38
  21. Marleni, N. N. N. and Raspati, G. S. 2020. A Critical review of wastewater resource recovery implementation in Indonesia. Journal of the Civil Engineering Forum, 6(1), p. 89
  22. Marselina, M. 2021. Ability and willingness to pay for wastewater management services: a case study in Lampung Province, Indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(8), pp. 29–36
  23. Meidiana, C., Sekito, T. and Sasongko, W. 2021. Determining factors of community participation in waste bank. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 940(1)
  24. Muhdiarta, U., Cendrawasih, U. and Making, P. 2025. The role of community participation in shaping policies and its implications for government legitimacy. The Journal of Academic Science, 2(4), pp. 1109–1117
  25. Paramita, N. and Koestoer, R.H.S. 2021. Fecal sludge management in developing countries: developing countries comparison. Jurnal Presipitasi : Media Komunikasi dan Pengembangan Teknik Lingkungan, 18(3), pp. 564–570
  26. Pham, T. T., Lam, T. P. M., Le Dang, H. and Pham, N. T. 2023. Consumers, willingness to pay an environmental fee for e ‑ waste recycling in Vietnam : integrating the theory of planned behaviour and the norm activation model. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 25(5), pp. 2900–2914
  27. Pratiwi, R. and Kurniawan, B. 2023. Model kesesuaian partisipasi masyarakat dalam sistem pengelolaan limbah domestik perkotaan. Jurnal Manajemen Lingkungan dan Sanitasi, 14(2), pp. 87–98
  28. Priambodo, H. D. P. and Herumurti, W. 2020. Perencanaan pengembangan sistem penyaluran. Jurnal Teknik ITS, 9(2), pp. 196–202
  29. Rachmawati, F., and Suryani, I. 2020. Pengaruh persepsi lingkungan terhadap partisipasi masyarakat dalam pengelolaan limbah domestik. Jurnal Pengelolaan Lingkungan Tropis, 24(3), pp. 211–220
  30. Rahayu, L., Adi, S. and Purnomo, T. 2022. Analisis kesediaan membayar masyarakat terhadap layanan sanitasi berbasis komunal di kawasan perkotaan. Jurnal Pengelolaan Lingkungan, 10(3), pp. 145–156
  31. Sekaran, U. and Bougie, R. 2016. Research Methods for Business. Wiley
  32. Sekretariat Bersama Karmantul. 2014. Kerjasama Sektor Limbah, Sekretariat Bersama Karmantul
  33. Setiawan, D. and Suryandari, F. 2023. Community willingness to pay for domestik wastewater management in urban settlements. Journal of Environmental Sanitation, 17(2), pp. 101–112
  34. Simanjuntak, E. R., Simbolon, M. L. and Gultom, C.O.F. 2024. Keterkaitan kesadaran lingkungan dan aksi masyarakat dalam pengelolaan kebersihan Desa Hutapaung Utara, Kecamatan Pollung, Kabupaten Humbang Hasundutan. Jurnal Pelayanan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, pp. 64–72
  35. Sugiyono. 2017. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan RandD. Alfabeta
  36. Suhardono, S., Phan, T. T. T., Lee, C. H. and Suryawan, I. W. K. 2025. Design strategies and willingness to pay for circular economy service policies in sustainable tourism. Environmental Challenges, 18(October 2024), p. 101081
  37. Thuy, P. T., Hue, N. T., and Dat, L. Q. 2024. Trees , forests and people households, willingness-to-pay for mangrove environmental services, trees, forests and people, 15(October 2023), p. 100474
  38. Verma, N. and Reddy, A. 2025. The demographic consequences of urbanization : a study of changes in family structure and household composition. Progression Journal of Human Demography and Anthropology, 3(1), pp. 1–7
  39. Willetts, J., Mills, F. and Al’Afghani, M. 2020. Sustaining community-scale sanitation services: co-management by local government and low-income communities in Indonesia. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 8
  40. Yasra, R. and Pratama, R. T. 2021. Analisis strategi pemasaran usaha kelong studi kasus kelong nada seafood. Jurnal Industri Kreatif (JIK), 5(1), pp. 62–71
  41. Zorpas, A. A. and Lasaridi, K. 2021. Sludge management and valorization within circular economy principles. Waste Management, 120, pp. 703–716
  42. Zorpas, A. A. 2020. Strategy development in the framework of waste management. Science of the Total Environment, 716, p. 137088

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-08-01 21:20:48

No citation recorded.