BibTex Citation Data :
@article{JP50202, author = {Ni'matuzahroh Ni'matuzahroh and Frieda Mangunsong and Suen Woei and Diah Karmiyati}, title = {COLLABORATIVE STRATEGIC READING VS RECIPROCAL TEACHING STRATEGY: EVALUATION STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING INDONESIAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION PERFORMANCE}, journal = {Jurnal Psikologi}, volume = {22}, number = {2}, year = {2024}, keywords = {collaborative strategic reading; reciprocal teaching strategy; evaluation strategies; elementary school; reading comprehension performance; quasi-experiment}, abstract = { Previous research has supported strategies of Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR) and Reciprocal Teaching Strategy (RTS) to enhance reading comprehension performance in different populations but no study has been found to examine the effectiveness of both strategies of reading among elementary students. This study aims to investigate CSR and RTS among elementary students. A quasi-experiment with a non-randomized control group pre-test-post-test design was used by 125 elementary school students and 3 teachers were equally assigned to the intervention and control group. Data collection used the intelligence test (CPM) and the reading comprehension test. Treatment was carried out over ten weeks with nine meetings for each treatment. Results showed that there is a significant interaction effect between treatment and time, F(1, 36) = 140.27, p < .001, and a main effect of time, F(1, 36) = 28.50, p < .001. However, there is no main effect of the treatment, F(1, 36) = 1.11, p = .299. Due to the main effects of Time or Treatment, the post-test score (M = 18.32) is higher than the pretest ones (M = 13.24), and the score of the RTS group (M = 13.95) is like one of the CSR groups (M = 12.53). It means that children in the CSR group demonstrated significant improvement over than RTS group and the CSR was more effective than the RTS strategy. The RTS group (M = 13.95) is like the one of the CSR groups (M = 12.53, p < .05) and as expected the score of the CSR group (M = 19.89) is higher than that one of the RTS group (M = 16.7, p < .05). The CSR is a more effective method to improve reading comprehension performance for elementary school students than RTS. }, issn = {2302-1098}, pages = {77--87} doi = {10.14710/jp.22.2.77-87}, url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/psikologi/article/view/50202} }
Refworks Citation Data :
Previous research has supported strategies of Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR) and Reciprocal TeachingStrategy (RTS) to enhance reading comprehension performance in different populations but no study has beenfound to examine the effectiveness of both strategies of reading among elementary students. This study aims toinvestigate CSR and RTS among elementary students. A quasi-experiment with a non-randomized control grouppre-test-post-test design was used by 125 elementary school students and 3 teachers were equally assigned to theintervention and control group. Data collection used the intelligence test (CPM) and the reading comprehensiontest. Treatment was carried out over ten weeks with nine meetings for each treatment. Results showed that thereis a significant interaction effect between treatment and time, F(1, 36) = 140.27, p < .001, and a main effect oftime, F(1, 36) = 28.50, p < .001. However, there is no main effect of the treatment, F(1, 36) = 1.11, p = .299. Dueto the main effects of Time or Treatment, the post-test score (M = 18.32) is higher than the pretest ones (M =13.24), and the score of the RTS group (M = 13.95) is like one of the CSR groups (M = 12.53). It means thatchildren in the CSR group demonstrated significant improvement over than RTS group and the CSR was moreeffective than the RTS strategy. The RTS group (M = 13.95) is like the one of the CSR groups (M = 12.53, p < .05)and as expected the score of the CSR group (M = 19.89) is higher than that one of the RTS group (M = 16.7, p< .05). The CSR is a more effective method to improve reading comprehension performance for elementary schoolstudents than RTS.
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Last update: 2024-10-09 17:42:26
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Jurnal Psikologi and Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Diponegoro as the publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
Jurnal Psikologi and Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Diponegoro and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in Jurnal Psikologi are the sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
The Copyright Transfer Form can be downloaded here: [Copyright Transfer Form JP]. The copyright form should be signed originally, scanned and uploaded as supplementary file when submitting the manuscript.
View My Stats
Jurnal Psikologi is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.