skip to main content

Ruang Kebersamaan: Suatu Kajian Sinergitas Dan Kreativitas Di Ruang Publik Kota

*Bambang Heryanto  -  Universitas Mercu Buana, Indonesia
Rona Fika Jamila scopus  -  Universitas Mercu Buana, Indonesia
Ashri Prawesthi Dharmaraty  -  Universitas Pancasila, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

The purpose of this research is to examine public space services in meeting the needs and activities of the community in their spare time. Synergy and creativity are two factors to measure how the public space functions and functions properly. A good public space has an index of synergy and creativity that can be used collectively and is interesting for its visitors to interact with. The synergy of public spaces is manifested in how compatible spaces are mutually compatible in serving the activities of its users. Creativity is how existing facilities have an attractive form so that visitors can use them together. The method used in this study is to spread questions to visitors who visit heritage areas in the old city area in Jakarta. Descriptive description is used in research to determine the togetherness aspect of the community using public space in carrying out the needs and activities of visitors. The results of this study found that most visitors like to do activities together, share space with other visitors, especially if there are events such as music, culture or carnivals, but most are still embarrassed to initiate the initiative to invite other visitors, besides that in Kota Tua the visitors also sometimes want a little privacy, so additional furniture such as seating and shade is needed.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: heritage area; public space; shared space, synergy; creativity
Funding: Puslit Universitas Mercu Buana

Article Metrics:

  1. Basova, B., and Stefancova, L. (2016). Creative Parameters of Urban Spaces. International Journal of Arts and Commerce ISSN 1929-7106 www.ijac.org.uk. Diakses dari https://ijac.org.uk/images/frontImages/gallery/Vol._5_No._2/7._54-68.pdf
  2. Basova, B., and Stefancova, L. (2016). Creative And Smart Public Spaces. International Journal of Liberal Arts and Social Science Vol. 5 No. January 2017. Diakses dari https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317167769_Creative_And_Smart_Public_Spaces
  3. Ben, B.HB. (2010). Shared Space and Street Design Emerging best practice for reconciling people, places and traffic. Diakses dari http://www.solaripedia.com/files/1233.pdf
  4. Cvetinovic, M. (2018). Shared Creativity – a Driving Force of Urban Development Marija. 48th ISOCARP Congress 2012. Diakses dari http://www.isocarp.net/Data/case_studies/2272.pdf
  5. Gilles, A. (2009) Is the Road There to Share? Shared Space in Australian Context. Thesis Project. University of New South Wales 2pp9. Diakses dari file:///D:/BERBAGI%20SINERGI%20INOVATIF/5A2_44.pdf
  6. Jeffres, L.W., Bracken, C.C., Jian, G. and Mary, F. (2009). The Impact of Third Places on Community Quality of Life Casey. Applied Research in Quality of Life · December 2009. Diakses dari file:///D:/BERBAGI%20SINERGI%20INOVATIF/Jeffres_Leo_W_impactofthirdplaces.pdf
  7. Karndacharuk, A. , WILSON, D,J. and Dunn, R. (2014). A Review of the Evolution of Shared (Street) Space Concepts in Urban Environments Transport Reviews, 2014 Vol. 34, No. 2, 190–220. Diakses dari http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2014.893038 1404TransportReviews.pdf
  8. Koželj, J. (2015). Shared space – reinventing public space in Ljubljana
  9. Mehta V. (2007). A toolkit for performance measures of public space. 43rd ISOCARP Congress 2007. Diakses dari http://www.isocarp.net/Data/case_studies/983.pdf
  10. Memarovic, N. (2010). Enhancing Community Interaction in Public Spaces Through Situated Public Displays University of Lugano. Marc Langheinrich University of Lugano. Diakses dari https://uc.inf.usi.ch/pubs/pre/2010-Memarovic-SISSI.pdf
  11. Minou, G., TabrSaeed-Khajeh Farnaz, KK. (2018). Woonerf A Study of Living on Urban Components Landscape. Maznar 10 (43): 40-49/ September 2018 . diakses dari http://www.manzar-sj.com/?_action=showPDF&sc=1&article=68625&_ob=1ba0c3b589297ffadca4f4d6d281cc4e&fileName=full_text.pdf
  12. Nasution, S.P. (2017). Persepsi Dan Partisipasi Masyarakat Dalam Mendukung Kota Pusaka Di Kawasan Kota Tua Jakarta. Bogor : Institut Pertanian Bogor. Diakses dari https://repository.ipb.ac.id/jspui/bitstream/123456789/84791/1/log_A17spn.pdf
  13. Oldenburg, R. (1999). The great good place. New York: Marlowe & Company
  14. Project for Public Space (PPS). (2017). What is Shared Space. Diakses dari https://www.pps.org/article/what-is-shared-space
  15. Rowntree, J. (2007). The social value of public spaces. Published by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, The Homestead, 40 Water End, York YO30 6WP. Diakses dari https://www.jrf.org.uk/sites/default/files/jrf/migrated/files/2050-public-space-community.pdf
  16. Siregar, J.P. (2013). Good Public Space Index: Teori dan metode. Diakses dari http://johannes.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2013/11/GOOD-PUBLIC-SPACE-INDEX-Teori-dan-Metode.pdf
  17. Siregar, J.P. (2013). (2013). Assessment of Public Space Quality Using Good Public Space Index (Case Study of Merjosari Sub District, Municipality of Malang, Indonesia). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 135 ( 2014 ) 10 – 17. Diakses dari https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265089730_Assessment_of_Public_Space_Quality_Using_Good_Public_Space_Index_Case_Study_of_Merjosari_Sub_District_Municipality_of_Malang_Indonesia/link/55221b420cf2f9c130529cbb/download
  18. Tonnelat, S. (2010). The sociology of urban public spaces. In WANG Hongyang, SAVY Michel and ZHAI Guofang (eds.), Territorial Evolution and Planning Solution: Experiences from China and France. Paris: Atlantis Press, 2010. Diakses dari http://stephane.tonnelat.free.fr/Welcome_files/SFURP-Tonnelat-published.pdf
  19. Waxman, L. (2006), Journal of Interior Design, Volume 31 Number 3 2006. Diakses dari https://bork.hampshire.edu/~groundswell/transfers/hermens/coffee%20shop.pdf

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-11-22 04:22:18

No citation recorded.