DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jpwk.v22i3.82211

Fasilitas Sosialisasi dan Kesesakan Sarusun sebagai Faktor yang Memengaruhi Harmoni Sosial Penghuni Rusuna Kemayoran

*Hanny Wahidin Wiranegara orcid scopus publons  -  Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Landscape Architecture and Environmental Technology, Universitas Trisakti, Indonesia
Yayat Supriatna  -  Prodi Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Fakultas Arsitektur Lanskap dan Teknologi Lingkungan, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia
Marselinus Nirwan Luru  -  Prodi Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Fakultas Arsitektur Lanskap dan Teknologi Lingkungan, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia
Anindita Ramadhani  -  Prodi Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Fakultas Arsitektur Lanskap dan Teknologi Lingkungan, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia
Ros Dwita Gresia Parapat  -  Prodi Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Fakultas Arsitektur Lanskap dan Teknologi Lingkungan, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Pembangunan rumah susun sederhana (rusuna) masih berfokus pada pendekatan aspek fisik. Di sisi lain, penelitian banyak menggali aspek sosial penghuni rumah susun. Sementara yang dibutuhkan adalah pendekatan yang memadukan aspek fisik dan sosial. Harmoni sosial merupakan ukuran kualitas komunitas yang belum mendapat banyak perhatian, padahal merupakan prasyarat bagi keberlanjutan komunitas. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pengaruh karakteristik fisik dan sosial pada harmoni sosial. Variabel yang dianalisis meliputi ukuran unit, ketinggian lantai, fasilitas sosialisasi, utilitas, status kepemilikan, jarak ke tempat kerja, dan kesesakan sarusun. Mengambil kasus di Rusuna Kemayoran, Jakarta, yang memiliki keragaman tipe sarusun dan keragaman sosial penghuni, tetapi di sisi lain ada keguyuban. Konstruk harmoni sosial mencakup dimensi harmoni dalam nilai, perasaan, dan tindakan. Desain riset menggunakan survei kuesioner terhadap 143 responden. Analisis dilakukan dengan regresi Partial Least Squares (PLS) menggunakan SmartPLS. Hasil menunjukkan fasilitas sosialisasi (β = 0,404; p = 0,000) dan kesesakan sarusun (β = 0,309; p = 0,014) terbukti berpengaruh positif. Temuan ini menegaskan peran ruang komunal dalam menghubungkan penghuni lama dan penghuni baru, serta mendukung pentingnya mengintegrasikan pertimbangan fisik dan sosial dalam perencanaan perumahan susun publik.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext |  common.other
Untitled
Subject
Type Other
  View (41KB)    Indexing metadata
 common.other
Untitled
Subject
Type Other
  Download (191KB)    Indexing metadata
 common.other
Untitled
Subject
Type Other
  Download (12KB)    Indexing metadata
Email colleagues
Keywords: Faktor Sosialisasi; Harmoni Sosial; Hunian Vertikal; Kesesakan Sarusun; Rusuna Kemayoran

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : ID
Most cited articles
Kajian Erosi Dan Hasil Sedimen Untuk Konservasi Lahan DAS Kreo Hulu Dampak Sosial Ekonomi dan Lingkungan Fisik Masyarakat Akibat Pengembangan Hotel di Kota Yogyakarta Transformasi Spasial di Kawasan Peri Urban Kota Malang PENINGKATAN KUALITAS PERMUKIMAN KUMUH UNTUK MENDUKUNG WISATA KAMPUNG PELANGI KOTA SEMARANG Perkembangan Permukiman di Sekitar Lingkungan Kampus Undip Tembalang More cited articles
  1. Aziz, A. A., Ahmad, A. S., & Nordin, T. E. (2017). Flats outdoor space as a vital social place. Asian Journal of Environment-Behaviour Studies, 2(5), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.21834/aje-bs.v2i5.221
  2. Azli, M., Abdullah, J., Abdullah, Y. A., Shukri, S. M., Sahabuddin, M. F. M., Abdullah, A., & Taib, I. (2024). Sense of Community: A Thematic Review on Neighbourhood Built Environment. MAJ - Malaysia Architectural Journal, 6(1). Retrieved from https://majournal.my/index.php/maj/article/view/206
  3. Azli, M., Abdullah, J., Ayu Abdullah, Y., Abdulkareem Salih, S., Firrdhaus Mohd Sahabuddin, M., Mohmad Shukri, S., & Taib, I. (2025). The Impact of Neighbourhood Built Environment to The Sense of Community in Malaysia: A Qualitative Study. 5th International Conference on Architectural and Civil Engineering Sciences (CIC-ICACE'25)
  4. Barros, P., Ng Fat, L., Garcia, L. M. T., Slovic, A. D., Thomopoulos, N., de Sá, T. H., Morais, P., & Mindell, J. S. (2019). Social consequences and mental health outcomes of living in high-rise residential buildings and the influence of planning, urban design and architectural decisions: A systematic review. Cities, 93, 263–272. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.015
  5. Chan, C. Y., Lai, R. Y. S., Hoi, B., Li, M. Y. Y., Chan, J. H. Y., Sin, H. H. F., Chung, E. S. K., Cheung, R. T. Y., & Wong, E. L. Y. (2024). The effect of dwelling size on the mental health and quality of life of female caregivers living in informal tiny homes in Hong Kong. BMC Public Health, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19915-7
  6. Chitrakar, R. (2016). Meaning of public space and sense of community: The case of new neighbourhoods in the Kathmandu Valley. International Journal of Architectural Research: Archnet-IJAR, 10, 213-227. https://scispace.com/pdf/meaning-of-public-space-and-sense-of-community-the-case-of-4627vym7sw.pdf
  7. Clark, W. A. V., ViforJ, R. O., Smith, S. J., Wood, G. A., Truong, N. T. K., & Lisowski, W. (2025). Wellbeing at the Edges of Ownership: The Impacts of Housing Tenure, Social Capital, and Institutions. International Regional Science Review, 48(4), 339-370. https://doi.org/10.1177/01600176241291140
  8. Dewanti, T.R., & Sudarwanto, B. (2025). Comparative study of transition spaces in public housing (rusun) in supporting social interaction. Jurnal Arsitektur dan Perencanaan (JUARA), 8(2), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.31101/juara.v8i2.4256
  9. Dirksmeier, P. (2025). A sense of belonging to the neighbourhood in places beyond the metropolis – the role of social infrastructure. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 12, 774. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05115-0
  10. Dovey, K., & Wood, S. (2015). Public/private urban interfaces: Type, adaptation, assemblage. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 8(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2014.891151
  11. Dwijendra, N. K. A., Akhmadeev, R., Tumanov, D., Kosov, M., Shoar, S., & Banaitis, A. (2021). Modeling Social Impacts of High-Rise Residential Buildings during the Post-Occupancy Phase Using DEMATEL Method: A Case Study. Buildings, 11(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11110504
  12. Efimova, G. Z., & Korobova, Y. A. (2023). Friends, strangers, or foes? Neighborhood relationships of residents in apartment buildings. Sociology of the City, 2(30), 5–29
  13. Ewen, C., Warner, E., & Andrews, F. J. (2022). Communal spaces in apartment complexes in Melbourne, Australia: Designs to foster social connectedness. Cities & Health, 7(3), 363–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2022.2141376
  14. Gehl, J. (1987). Life between buildings: Using public space. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company
  15. Gómez-Jacinto, L., & Hombrados-Mendieta, I. (2002). Multiple Effects of Community and Household Crowding. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22(3), 233–246. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2002.0236
  16. Gu, N. (2019). Place, people, and health: Korean apartment residents’ experiences of local social relationships and their effects on mental health and well-being. Dissertation. University of Washington
  17. Hammoud, R., Tognin, S., Bakolis, I., Ivanova, D., Fitzpatrick, N., Burgess, L., Smythe, M., Gibbons, J., Davidson, N., & Mechelli, A. (2021). Lonely in a crowd: Investigating the association between overcrowding and loneliness using smartphone technologies. Scientific Reports, 11, 24134. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03398-2
  18. Ichsan, F., & Ir. Bakti Setiawan, M. (2010). The Development of social cohesion in public housing. A study in a flat housing project in Sukaramai, Medan. Tesis Magister Perencanaan Kota dan Daerah. Universitas Gadjah Mada
  19. Juvenius, J. (2023). Well-Behaved Owners and Troublesome Tenants? How Dense Social Mixing Shapes Housing Communities and Dispels Prejudices. Housing, Theory and Society, 41(1), 110–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2023.2264311
  20. Kadhim, L.A., & Shok, M.E. (2022). Improving Social Interaction in Vertical Housing. The Iraqi Journal of Architecture and Planning. Vol. 21: Iss. 1, Article 9. https://doi.org/10.36041/iqjap.2022.174520
  21. Kleeman, A., Giles-Corti, B., Gunn, L., Hooper, P., & Foster, S. (2023). The impact of the design and quality of communal areas in apartment buildings on residents' neighbouring and loneliness. Cities, 133, Article 104118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.104126
  22. Kolodziejski, A.L. (2014). Connecting People and Place: Sense of Place and Local Action
  23. Lee, S., Jang, H.J., Yun, H.K., Jung, Y., & Hong, I. (2022). Effect of Apartment Community Garden Program on Sense of Community and Stress. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(2), 708; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020708
  24. Levasseur, M., Gauvin, L., Richard, L., Kestens, Y., Daniel, M., & Payette, H. (2011). Associations Between Perceived Proximity to Neighborhood Resources, Disability, and Social Participation Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Results From the VoisiNuAge Study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92(12), 1979–1986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.06.035
  25. Levy, D., Perkins, H. C., & Ge, D. (2022). Improving the management of common property in multi-owned residential buildings: Lessons from Auckland, New Zealand. Housing Studies, 37(7), 1225–1249. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2018.1563672
  26. Malik, A., & Yoshida, T. (2021). A Pattern of Social Interaction of the High–Rise Public-Housing of Jatinegara Barat in Jakarta, Indonesia. Urban and Regional Planning Review, 8:1-25. https://doi.org/10.14398/urpr.8.1
  27. Mellen, H., & Short, M. (2023). Designing for social interaction in high-density housing: A multiple case analysis of recently completed design-led developments in London. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 4, 1043701. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2022.1043701
  28. Mouratidis, K., & Poortinga, W. (2020). Built environment, urban vitality and social cohesion: Do vibrant neighborhoods foster strong communities? Landscape and Urban Planning, 204, 103951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103951
  29. Muczyński, A. (2023). Potential impact of property management on the market value of dwellings in multi-owned housing. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 38(4), 2207–2227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-023-10032-2
  30. Muhuri, S., & Basu, S. (2018). Developing Residential Social Cohesion Index for High-Rise Group Housing Complexes in India. Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, 137(3), 923–947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1633-1
  31. Nguyen, L., van den Berg, P., Kemperman, A., & Mohammadi, M. (2020). Where do People Interact in High-rise Apartment Buildings? Exploring the Influence of Personal and Neighborhood Characteristics. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(13), Article 4619. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32604991/
  32. Noviantri, R. U., Wiranegara, H. W., & Supriatna, Y. (2019). Jenis Ruang Publik di Kampung Kota dan Sense of Community Warganya (Kasus: Kampung Kali Apuran, Jakarta Barat). Jurnal Pengembangan Kota, 7(2), 191–198. https://doi.org/10.14710/jpk.7.2.191-198
  33. Perdana, A. S., Avrillyandhita, P. W., & Ikhsaniyah, N. (2023). Analysis of Shared Spaces and Corridor Spaces Effectiveness Rusunawa Ganda Maghfirah Banjarmasin ity. Border, 5(2), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.33005/border.v5i2.754
  34. Peters, K., Elands, B., & Buijs, A. (2010). Social interactions in urban parks: Stimulating social cohesion? Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 9(2), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2009.11.003
  35. Ramadhani, A., Wiranegara, H. W., Tuguis, I., & Thahirah, D. (2023). Spatial factors influencing sense of belonging of the middle-income residents living in planned housing in Jabodetabek. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2706(February). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0120576
  36. Rapoport, A. (1977). Human aspects of urban form: Towards a man–environment approach to urban form and design. Pergamon Press
  37. Ridwana, R., Prayitno, B., & Hatmoko, A.U. (2018). The relationship between spatial configuration and social interaction in high-rise flats: a case study on Jatinegara Barat in Jakarta. SHS Web of Conferences 41, 07003. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184107003
  38. Šakaja, L. (2018). Sense of Place in A Neighbourhood - Vrbik (Zagreb). Geografski horizont, 64/1, pp. 9–28
  39. Sari, N., Wiranegara, H.W., Supriatna, Y. (2024). Indikator Sense of Place Kampung Kota dan Rusunawa. Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Trisakti, 9 (1), 203 – 213. https://doi.org/10.25105/pdk.v9i1.18167
  40. Sauter, D., & Huettenmoser, M. (2008). Liveable streets and social inclusion. URBAN DESIGN International, 13(2), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2008.15
  41. Simard, C. O., Riva, M., Dufresne, P., Perreault, K., Muckle, G., Poliakova, N., Desrochers-Couture, M., Fletcher, C., Moisan, C., Fraser, S., Bélanger, R., Courtemanche, Y., & Bignami, S. (2024). The psychosocial dimension of housing in Nunavik: Does social support vary with household crowding? Canadian Journal of Public Health, 115(1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-022-00716-7
  42. Stoiljković, B. (2022). Social Cohesion and Neighbor Interactions within Multifamily Apartment Buildings: Challenges of COVID-19 and Directions of Action. Sustainability, 14(2), 738; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020738
  43. Sucipto, I. B. (2019). Tipologi ruang komunal untuk peningkatan interaksi sosial penghuni pada rumah susun sederhana sewa di Jakarta. Jurnal Lingkungan Binaan Indonesia, 10(3), 132–137
  44. Sumertha, W., Busro, B., & Wibisono, M.Y. (2025). Sacred Spaces, Shared Souls: Interfaith Harmony at Taman Kemaliq Lingsar, Lombok, Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v13i1.1584
  45. Svirčić Gotovac, A., Đokić, R., & Adamović, M. (2023). Management and maintenance of multi-family buildings in Croatia: Perspective of co-owners’ representatives. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 38(4), 2427–2447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-023-10046-w
  46. Tedja, M., & Radha, G.C. (2024). Apartment with Social Interaction Approach in West Jakarta. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1324 (1), 012062. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/1324/1/012062/pdf
  47. van Damme, M. (2020). Overcrowded Housing and Relationship Break-up. European Journal of Population, 36(1), 119–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-019-09523-2
  48. Van, H., & Hardi, J. (2017). Pola Pemanfaatan Ruang Bersama pada Rusunawa Jatinegara Barat. Vitruvian: Jurnal Arsitektur, Bangunan, dan Lingkungan 6 (3), 133-142. https://www.neliti.com/publications/185918/pola-pemanfaatan-ruang-bersama-pada-rusunawa-jatinegara-barat
  49. Wiranegara, H.W. et al. (2013). A Model of Environmental Harmony Towards Sustainable Walk-Up Flats Community in Kemayoran – Jakarta. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences http://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/RHSS/article/viewFile/6943/7080
  50. Wiranegara, H. W., Arninda, P., & Harefa, Y. (2018). Perbedaan Harmoni Sosial Penghuni Rumah Susun dan Penghuni Rumah Tapak di Kawasan Tebet, Jakarta. Tataloka, 20(3), 295. https://doi.org/10.14710/tataloka.20.3.295-308
  51. Wu, W., & Ge, X. J. (2020). Communal Space Design of High-Rise Apartments: A Literature Review. Journal of Design and Built Environment, 20(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.22452/jdbe.vol20no1.4
  52. Yuliastuti, N., Sukmawati, A. M., & Purwoningsih, P. (2018). Utilization of Social Facilities to Reinforce Social Interaction in Formal Housing. Archnet-IJAR, 12(1), 134-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v12i1.1295
  53. Zahira, Z., Wiranegara, H. W., & Supriyatna, Y. (2023). Tingkat Sense of Place Penghuni Rusunami. Reka Ruang, 6(1), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.33579/rkr.v6i1.3829
  54. Zhang, T., Li, X., & Liu, J. (2023). How does housing tenure mix affect residents' mental health through a social environment lens? An empirical examination from Guangzhou (China). Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 1024796. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1024796
  55. Zhang, W., & Lawson, G. (2009). Meeting and greeting: Activities in public outdoor spaces outside high-density urban residential communities. URBAN DESIGN International, 14, 207-214. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2009.19

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-09-30 23:20:03

No citation recorded.