DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/teknik.v43i1.42660

Aplikasi Metode DRASTIC untuk Analisis Kerentanan Air Tanah terhadap Pencemaran di Kabupaten Tanah Laut, Kabupaten Banjar, dan Kota Banjarbaru, Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan

*Thomas Triadi Putranto scopus  -  Departemen Teknik Geologi, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Mochamad Arief Budihardjo  -  Departemen Teknik Lingkungan, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Anik Sarminingsih  -  Departemen Teknik Lingkungan, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 TEKNIK

Citation Format:
Abstract

In 2017-2019, the Tanah Laut Regency, Banjar Regency, Banjarbaru City population was relatively high and continued to increase every year. The increase in the population reaches 1.39% to 2.92%. Along with population growth, the human need for clean water also increases, especially from groundwater. The study aims to assess the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination. The method used for the analysis of groundwater vulnerability to contamination is the DRASTIC method. It refers to seven parameters, namely groundwater depth (D), net recharge (R), aquifer media (A), soil layer (S), topography (T), impact to vadose zone (I) and hydraulic conductivity (C) by using geospatial analysis to calculate the DRASTIC Index/DI. From the results of geospatial analysis, there are three zones of groundwater vulnerability to contamination based on DI values, namely low vulnerability (95-106), medium vulnerability (106-146), and high vulnerability (146-186). The distribution of high zones dominates in the research area around of 75, 8%. The DRASTIC method requires a lot of data to provide an accurate analysis of groundwater vulnerability zone maps. This method has excellent accuracy and more effective in producing a map of the groundwater vulnerability zones to contamination.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: vulnerability; groundwater; DRASTIC; Banjarbaru; contamination
Funding: Dinas ESDM Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Artikel
Language : ID
Recent articles
UPS Design for Increased Flexibility of Use and More Economic with PWM Controlled Inverter Based on ATmega 328 Microcontroller Spatial Analysis of Urban Settlement Development in Kudus District with Cellular automata marcov Model (Case Study: Kota District, Bae District, Jati District and Kaliwungu District) Aplikasi Metode DRASTIC untuk Analisis Kerentanan Air Tanah terhadap Pencemaran di Kabupaten Tanah Laut, Kabupaten Banjar, dan Kota Banjarbaru, Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan Back Matter Front Matter Erratum More recent articles
Most cited articles
INVENTARISASI PERUBAHAN WILAYAH PANTAI DENGAN METODE PENGINDERAAN JAUH (STUDI KASUS KOTA SEMARANG) Modifikasi Pati Sukun (Artocarpus Altilis) dengan Teknik Oksidasi Menggunakan Hidrogen Peroksida Tanpa Katalis KONVERSI ELEKTROKIMIA AMONIA MENJADI HIDROGEN KINETIKA REAKSI ESTERIFIKASI GLISEROL DAN ASAM ASETAT MENJADI TRIACETIN MENGGUNAKAN KATALIS ASAM SULFAT PENGARUH PEMBEBASAN LAHAN TERHADAP RISIKO PROYEK KONSTRUKSI (STUDI KASUS SOCIAL ENGINEERING PROYEK JALAN TOL RUAS SEMARANG BAWEN) More cited articles
  1. Aller, L. (1985). DRASTIC: a standardized system for evaluating ground water pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings. Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency
  2. Arfianty, D. (2019). Pencemaran Sungai Makin Parah, Dinas Lingkungan Hidup Kalsel Ajukan Revisi Perda ke Dewan. Diakses dari https://kanalkalimantan.com/pencemaran sungai-makin-parah-dinas-lh-kalsel-ajukan-revisi-perda-ke-dewan, tanggal 2 September 2021
  3. Arief, T. (2020). Sungai Martapura di Kalimantan Selatan Tercemar Oli. Diakses dari https://regional.kompas.com/read/2020/01/09/19214611/sungai-martapura-di-kalimantan-selatan-tercemar-oli, tanggal 2 September 2021
  4. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Banjar. (2016). Kabupaten Banjar Dalam Angka. Martapura: Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Banjar
  5. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Banjar. (2017). Kabupaten Banjar Dalam Angka (p.12). Kabupaten Banjar Martapura
  6. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Banjar. (2018). Kabupaten Banjar Dalam Angka. Martapura: Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Banjar
  7. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Banjar. (2020). Kabupaten Banjar Dalam Angka. Martapura: Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Banjar
  8. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Tanah Laut (2018). Kota Banjarbaru Dalam, Pelaihari. Pelaihari; Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Tanah Laut
  9. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Tanah Laut. (2016). Kota Banjarbaru Dalam, Pelaihari. Pelaihari : Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Tanah Laut
  10. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Tanah Laut. (2017). Kota Banjarbaru Dalam, Pelaihari. Pelaihari: Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Tanah Laut
  11. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Tanah Laut. (2020). Kabupaten Tanah Laut Dalam Angka. Pelaihari: Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Tanah Laut
  12. Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Banjarbaru. (2016). Kota Banjarbaru Dalam Martapura. Banjarbaru: Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Banjarbaru
  13. Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Banjarbaru. (2017). Kota Banjarbaru Dalam Martapura. Banjarbaru: Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Banjarbaru
  14. Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Banjarbaru. (2018). Kota Banjarbaru Dalam Martapura. Banjarbaru: Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Banjarbaru
  15. Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Banjarbaru. (2020). Kota Banjarbaru Dalam Angka. Banjarbaru: Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Banjarbaru
  16. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan. (2020). Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan Dalam Angka. Banjarmasin. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan
  17. Belle, .J.A., Saungweme, K.E., Ojo, T.O. (2020). An evaluation of groundwater vulnerability to pollution in Ga-segonyana municipality area, Kuruman, Northern Cape in South Africa. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 11 100389
  18. Civita, M. V. (2010). The Combined Approach When Assessing and Mapping Groundwater Vulnerability to Contamination. Journal Water Resource and Protection, 2, 14-28
  19. Foster, S., Hirata, R. (1988). Groundwater Contamination Risk Assessment; A Methodology Using Available Data. PAN American Center for Sanitary Engineering and Environmental Sciences. Peru, 36, 69-86
  20. Gunawan, W.A.F., Sisinggih, D., Dermawan, V. (2013). Studi Kerentanan Air Tanah Terhadap Kontaminan di Cekungan Air tanah Negara Kabupaten Jembrana Provinsi Bali. Jurnal Teknik Pengairan, 4(2), 1-10
  21. Hailin.Y., Xu-Ligang, X., Ye-Chang, Y., Jiaxing, X. (2011). Evaluation of Groundwater Vulnerability with Improved DRASTIC Method. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 10, 2690 – 2695
  22. Hidayat, R.S. (2001). Peta Hidrogeologi Lembar Bajarmasin. Bandung: Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Geologi
  23. Linggasari, S., Chayadi, T.A., Ernawati, T. (2019). Overview metode perhitungan kerentanan air tanah terhadap rencana penambangan. Prosiding Nasional Rekayasa Teknomogi Industri dan Informasi XIV, 123-219
  24. Lobo-Ferreira, J.P., and Oliveira. (2004). Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment in Portugal. Geofisica Internacional, 43(4), 541-550
  25. Lobo-Ferreira, J.P., Chachadi, A.G., Diamantino, C., & Henriques, M.J. (2007). Assessing Aquifer Vulnerability to Seawater Intrusion Using the GALDIT method: part 1, application to the Portuguese Monte Gord aquifer. In: Lobo-Ferreira JP, Ferreira VJMP (eds). Proceedings Water in Celtic countries: Quantity, Quality and Climate Variability, IAHS Publication 310. International Association of Hydrological Sciences, Wallingford, 161–171
  26. Mandel, Shiftan. (1981). Groundwater Resources. Investigation and Development. New York: Academic Press
  27. Olivares, O.E.A., Jiménez, S.I.B., Torres, S.S., Enríquez, J.O.C., Tiefenbacher, J.P., Takaro, T.K. (2020). A simple method to evaluate groundwater vulnerability in urbanizing agricultural regions. Journal of Environmental Management, 261

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-12-26 05:02:48

No citation recorded.