Accept articles written in English.
Research (Original Articles), Case Reports, Systematic Reviews in the scope of:
JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indoneia) is a journal that is reviewed by peer reviewers. For articles to be published it is necessary to agree on standards of ethical behavior for all parties involved in publishing actions: authors, journal editors, peer reviewer and publishers.
Peer Reviewer's Assignment
Contributions to Editorial Decisions
Peer reviewers can advise editors in making editorial decisions and through communication with editorial authors can also help authors improve the quality of research reports.
Appropriateness
Each selected peer reviewers who feels that he or she does not meet the requirements to review the research or the manuscript given must inform the editor and resign from the review process.
Confidentiality
Each manuscript is accepted to be treated as a confidential document. They do not have to be displayed or discussed with others except as permitted by the editor.
Objectivity Standard
The review must be carried out objectively. Inappropriate author's personal criticism. Peer reviewers must express their views clearly and be supported by arguments.
Introduction to Resources
Reviewers must identify other reports that are relevant to the work being assessed and have not been quoted by the author. Each statement that observations, derivations, or arguments have been previously reported must be accompanied by relevant citations. The peer reviewers must also notify the editor if there is substantial or overlapping similarity between the text being considered and any other published papers known privately.
Disclosure of Confidentiality and Conflict of Interest
Confidential information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers must not consider manuscripts where they have a conflict of interest due to competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with one of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the paper.
JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia) (e-ISSN : 2089-970X, p-ISSN : 2337-5124) provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Creative Commons-Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
You are free to :
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.Under the following terms :
Notice :
Articles published in JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia), e-ISSN: 2089-970X are indexed in the following indexes:
The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia) is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society.
Departement of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy Diponegoro University as publisher of JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia) takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Theraphy and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.
JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia) clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer and the publisher (Departement of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy Diponegoro University). This statement is based on COPE’s Code of Conduct
1. Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors
2. Code of Conduct for Reviewers
3. Code of Conduct for Journal Publishers
it is expected of authors, reviewers and editors that they follow the best-practice guidelines on ethical behaviour contained therein.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CODE OF CONDUCT AND BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR JOURNAL EDITORS
Background/structure
The COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors is designed to provide a set of minimum standards to which all COPE members are expected to adhere. The Best Practice Guidelines are more aspirational and were developed in response to requests from editors for guidance about a wide range of increasingly complex ethical issues. While COPE expects all members to adhere to the Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (and will consider complaints against members who have not followed it), we realise that editors may not be able to implement all the Best Practice recommendations (which are therefore voluntary), but we hope that our suggestions will identify aspects of journal policy and practice that should be reviewed and discussed.
In this combined version of the documents, the mandatory Code of Conduct for Journal Editors standards are shown in regular script and with numbered clauses
The editor of the JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia) is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
If the work involves chemicals, human, animals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or another substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia) is scheduled for publication in March, July, November ( 3 issue a year. It is electronically published via journal website (https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/janesti). Each published articles will be assigned with a DOI (digital object identifier)
Crossmark
Applying the CrossMark icon is a commitment by JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia) to maintain the content published and alert readers to changes if and when they occur.
What is Crossmark?
CrossMark, a multi-publisher initiative from CrossRef, provides a standard way for readers to locate the authoritative version of a document. JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia recognizes the importance of the integrity and completeness of the scholarly record to researchers and librarians and attaches the highest importance to maintaining trust in the authority of its electronic archive. Clicking on the CrossMark icon will inform the reader of the current status of a document and may also provide additional publication record information about the document.
View My Stats.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
