DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/geoplanning.11.1.57-70

Optimizing GISTARU: Evaluating a GIS-Based Platform’s Contribution to Indonesian Spatial Planning for Smart City Development

*Rini Rachmawati orcid scopus publons  -  Department of Development Geography, Faculty of Geography, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia
Rizki Adriadi Ghiffari  -  Department of Development Geography, Faculty of Geography, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 55281, Indonesia
Ach Firyal Wijdani  -  Graduate Program on Regional Development, Faculty of Geography, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 55281, Indonesia
Maryam Qonita  -  Graduate Program on Regional Development, Faculty of Geography, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 55281, Indonesia
Novirene Tania  -  Undergraduate Program on Regional Development, Department of Development Geography Faculty of Geography, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 55281, Indonesia
Bitta Pigawati  -  Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia, 50275, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

GISTARU (Geographic Information System for Spatial Planning) is a web-based and GIS-based information system in Indonesia that makes it easy for the public to access spatial information. In GISTARU, there are an Online Spatial Plan (RTR Online) and an Interactive Detailed Spatial Plan (RDTR) application. This research aims to; Identify and analyze the use of the Online Spatial Plan (RTR Online) website and Interactive Detailed Spatial Planning (RDTR Interactive) application in GISTARU and as well as identify the requirements for developing the website and application. In addition, the research outcomes are analyzed in terms of their contribution to the development of smart cities. Data was collected through in-depth interviews and website searches related to GISTARU, RTR Online, and RDTR Interactive at the national, provincial, and district or city levels. In-depth interview analysis is carried out through selected cases. The results showed that most regions in Indonesia have an integrated spatial pattern with GISTARU. However, there were inconsistencies in the RTR Online and RDTR Interactive data entry in GISTARU. In the meantime, relatively few spatial structure data are integrated with RTR Online. The Interactive Detailed Spatial Plan application is now operational in the majority of Indonesian provinces. The only province in which all regions have implemented interactive RDTR is DKI Jakarta. This Geographic Information System for Spatial Planning is very useful for achieving the goal of smart cities, particularly related to public services in the smart governance dimension.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Spatial Planning; GISTARU; Web GIS; Detailed Spatial Plan, Smart City
Funding: The research was funded by the Faculty of Geography, Universitas Gadjah Mada, through the Penelitian Mandiri Dosen Scheme in 2022.

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Research
Language : EN
Recent articles
Comparison of Land Cover Change Prediction Models: A Case Study in Kedungkandang District, Malang City Mapping Landslide Vulnerability using Machine Learning Approach along the Taba Penanjung-Kepahiang Road, Bengkulu Province Tracking the Temporal Changes in Land Surface Temperature, Vegetation, and Built-up Patterns in Rizal Province, Philippines using Landsat Imagery More recent articles
Most cited articles
THE DEVELOPMENT OF MARINE SPATIAL PLANNING AND ITS APPLICATION FOR FLOATING FISH NET CULTURE EVALUASI CITRA WORLDVIEW-2 UNTUK PENDUGAAN KEDALAMAN PERAIRAN DANGKAL PULAU KELAPA-HARAPAN MENGGUNAKAN ALGORITMA RASIO BAND SPATIAL VARIETY AND DISTRIBUTION OF TRADITIONAL MARKETS IN SURAKARTA AS POTENTIAL FACTORS IN IMPROVING SPATIAL-BASED MANAGEMENT POTENTIAL OF BIG DATA FOR PRO-ACTIVE PARTICIPATORY LAND USE PLANNING MODEL OF CLIMATE AND LAND-USE CHANGES IMPACT ON WATER SECURITY IN AMBON CITY, INDONESIA More cited articles

  1. Albert, C., Fürst, C., Ring, I., & Sandström, C. (2020). Research note: Spatial planning in Europe and Central Asia–Enhancing the consideration of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Landscape and Urban Planning, 196, 103741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103741">[Crossref] 

  2. Allwinkle, S., & Cruickshank, P. (2011). Creating smart-er cities: An overview. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2011.601103">[Crossref] 

  3. Amir, S. S., Nursadi, H., & Sari, I. M. (2022). Implikasi yang Timbul dalam Kemudahan Penerbitan Perizinan Berusaha Berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 5 Tahun 2021 tentang Perizinan Berusaha Berbasis Risiko. SUPREMASI: Jurnal Pemikiran, Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, Hukum Dan Pengajarannya, 17(1), 8–24. 

  4. Arkdata. (2021). Sistem Manajemen Informasi Tata Ruang. http://www.arkdata.id/app/simtaru">  

  5. Armstrong-Moore, R., White, M., & Burgoine, T. (2021). Stakeholder experiences of using online spatial data visualisation tools for local public health decision support: A qualitative study. Health & Place, 71, 102648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102648">[Crossref]

  6. Directorate General of Spatial Planning Ministry ATR/BPN. (2021). Tingkatkan kualitas Produk Tata Ruang, Kementerian ATR/BPN Dorong Platform Berbasis Digital. Direktorat Jenderal Tata Ruang - Kementerian Agraria Dan Tata Ruang / Badan Pertanahan Nasional. https://tataruang.atrbpn.go.id/Berita/Detail/4031">  

  7. Directorate General of Spatial Planning Ministry ATR/BPN. (2022). Panduan Penggunaan Aplikasi Sistem Informasi Geografi Tata Ruang. https://gistaru.atrbpn.go.id/rtronline/data/Leaflet%20GISTARU.pdf">  

  8. Djasriain, E. A. (2022). “Perizinan Pemanfaatan Ruang” (Kesesuaian Kegiatan Pemanfaatan Ruang / KKPR) (First Edit). Lembaga Pengkajian Tata Ruang (LAPATARU).

  9. Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R., Pichler-Milanovic, N., & Meijers, E. J. (2007). Smart cities. Ranking of European medium-sized cities. Final Report.

  10. Government Regulation Number 21 of 2021 concerning the Implementation of Spatial Planning (Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 21 Tahun 2021 tentang Penyelenggaraan Penataan Ruang), PPRI 1 (2021). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/161851/pp-no-21-tahun-2021">

  11. Haryanti, R. (2018). Kementerian ATR Luncurkan Situs Informasi Tata Ruang. Kompas.Com. https://properti.kompas.com/read/2018/10/11/104330321/kementerian-atr-luncurkan-situs-informasi-tata-ruang">  

  12. Haughton, G., Allmendinger, P., Counsell, D., & Vigar, G. (2009). The new spatial planning: Territorial management with soft spaces and fuzzy boundaries (1st Editio). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203864425">[Crossref]

  13. Indrajit, A., Van Loenen, B., Ploeger, H., & Van Oosterom, P. (2020). Developing a spatial planning information package in ISO 19152 land administration domain model. Land Use Policy, 98, 104111. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2019.104111">[Crossref]

  14. Indrajit, A., van Oosterom, P. J. M., van Loenen, B., Yusa, M. H., & Suwardhin, D. (2021). Prototype voor participatieve monitoring van stedelijke plannen. TVVL Magazine.

  15. Johannessen, M. R., & Berntzen, L. (2018). The Transparent Smart City - How City Councils and City Administrations Can Apply Smart Technology for Increased Transparency - With Case Evidence from Norway. Smart Technologies for Smart Governments. Public Administration and Information Technology, 24, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58577-2_5">[Crossref]

  16. Kalinka, M., Geipele, S., Pudzis, E., Lazdins, A., Krutova, U., & Holms, J. (2020). Indicators for the smart development of villages and neighbourhoods in Baltic Sea coastal areas. Sustainability, 12(13), 5293. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135293">[Crossref]

  17. Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 26 Year 2007 on Spatial Planning (Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 26 Tahun 2007 tentang Penataan Ruang)

  18. Lingua, V., & Caruso, E. (2022). Futures Literacy as a reading key for strategic spatial planning: A community learning process for defining shared futures in the Ombrone River Agreement. Futures, 140, 102935. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUTURES.2022.102935">[Crossref]

  19. Lorek, D., & Horbiński, T. (2020). Interactive web-map of the European freeway junction A1/A4 development with the use of archival cartographic sources. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(7), 438.

  20. McCall, M. K., & Dunn, C. E. (2012). Geo-information tools for participatory spatial planning: Fulfilling the criteria for ‘good’governance? Geoforum, 43(1), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.07.007">[Crossref] 

  21. Ministry of Investment/BKPM. (2021). Basic Requirements for Conformity of Space Utilization Activities. OSS Agency - Ministry of Investment/BKPM (Persyaratan Dasar Kesesuaian Kegiatan Pemanfaatan Ruang. Badan OSS - Kementerian Penanaman Modal/BKPM).  https://oss.go.id/informasi/persyaratan-dasar?tab=kesesuaian-ruang&page=1

  22. Mustofa, F. C. (2020). Evaluasi Pengembangan Sistem Informasi Pertanahan di Kementerian Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Badan Pertanahan Nasional (Evaluation of Land Information System Development in The Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency). BHUMI Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan, 6(2), 158–171. 

  23. Nadin, V., Stead, D., Dąbrowski, M., & Fernandez-Maldonado, A. M. (2021). Integrated, adaptive and participatory spatial planning: trends across Europe. Regional Studies, 55(5), 791–803. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1817363">[Crossref]

  24. Oliveira, V. T. de, Teixeira, D., Rocchi, L., & Boggia, A. (2022). Geographic Information System Applied to Sustainability Assessments: Conceptual Structure and Research Trends. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 11(11), 569. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11110569">[Crossref]

  25. Pratikno, H., Paramita, B. A. P., Iswari, A. R., Dom, G. E., Mufida, R. F., Fidiashtry, A., Maulana, J., Fahreza, Rezita, N. D., Yashinta, W., Hasan, M. F., Ismawan, M. F., Mawarni, A. S., Oktarian, D., Fadhilah, N., Putra, M. D., & Septianti, K. (2020). Panduan Pengisian Basis Data Peta Rencana Tata Ruang (D. J. T. R. K. A. dan T. R. P. N. Tim Studio Peta (ed.); 1st ed.). Direktorat Jenderal Tata Ruang Kementerian Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Badan Pertanahan Nasional. http://tataruang.big.go.id/modules/pustaka/Peraturan Perundangan/Peraturan Menteri dan Kepala Badan/Peraturan Menteri ATR BPN/Standar Penyusunan Basis Data Peta RTR/Panduan Pengisian Basis Data Peta Rencana Tata Ruang.pdf

  26. Rachmawati, R. (2019a). Toward better City Mangement through Smart City Implementation. Human Geograhies-Journal of Studies and research in Human Geography, 13 (2), 209-218. [Crossref]

  27. Rachmawati, R. (2019b). ICT-Based Innovation in the Smart City Masterplan and Its Relation to Regional Planning. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 328(1), 2–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/328/1/012026">[Crossref]

  28. Rachmawati, R. (2021). Urban Development, Land Use, and Spatial Planning for Settlements: Lessons Learned from Yogyakarta City, Indonesia. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 80(2), 757–775. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajes.12393">[Crossref]

  29. Rachmawati, R., Anjani, D. F., Rohmah, A. A., Nurwidiani, T., & Almasari, H. (2022). Electronically-based governance system for public services: implementation in the Special Region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Human Geographies, 16(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.5719/hgeo.2022.161.5">[Crossref]

  30. Rahmawati, A. A., Noviandi, D. D., & Sulchan, A. (2018). Effectiveness Identification Number Filing for Solutions to Accelerate in Complete Systematic Land Registration Program (PTSL) in Blora District Land Office. Jurnal Akta, 5(4), 885–890.

  31. Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of  2021 concerning Procedures for the Preparation, Review, Revision, and Issuance of Substance Approval of Provincial, Regency Spatial Plans (Peraturan Menteri Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2021 tentang Tata Cara Penyusunan, Peninjauan Kembali, Revisi, dan Penerbitan Persetujuan Substansi Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Provinsi, Kabupaten), (2021).

  32. Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia Number 16 of 2018 concerning Guidelines for the Preparation of Detailed Spatial Plans and District/City Zoning Regulations (Peraturan Menteri Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 Tahun 2018 tentang Pedoman Penyusunan Rencana Detail Tata Ruang dan Peraturan Zonasi Kabupaten/Kota, 1 (2018). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/217570/permen-agrariakepala-bpn-no-16-tahun-2018), 1 (2018). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/217570/permen-agrariakepala-bpn-no-16-tahun-2018

  33. Sejati, A. W., Buchori, I., Rudiarto, I., Silver, C., & Sulistyo, K. (2020). Open-Source Web GIS Framework in Monitoring Urban Land Use Planning: Participatory Solutions for Developing Countries. Journal of Urban & Regional Analysis, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.37043/JURA.2020.12.1.2">[Crossref] 

  34. Soekemi, T. S. (2022). Evaluasi Program Layanan Pertimbangan Teknis Pertanahan dalam Mendukung Online Single Submission (OSS). Syntax Literate; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 7(4), 4747–4762. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v7i4.6818">[Crossref] 

  35. Sutanta, E., Kumalasanti, R. A., Nurnawati, E. K., Iswahyudi, C., & Putra, T. A. (2021). RDBMS dan Google Maps Integration Model for WebGIS Based Land Ownerships Data Visualization. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1823(1), 12031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1823/1/012031">[Crossref]

  36. Utami, W., Rahmat, A., Sialagan, B. H., Exaudia, S., & Turnip, A. L. (2021). Settlement Suitability Analysis Based on the Catastrophic Eruption of Sinabung. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 884(1), 12056. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/884/1/012056">[Crossref]

  37. Vaitis, M., Kopsachilis, V., Tataris, G., Michalakis, V.-I., & Pavlogeorgatos, G. (2022). The development of a spatial data infrastructure to support marine spatial planning in Greece. Ocean & Coastal Management, 218, 106025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2022.106025">[Crossref]

  38. Wahyuni, W., Pinuji, S., & Mujiburohman, D. A. (2019). Ketersediaan Metadata Data Geospasial Dan Informasi Geospasial Tematik Pertanahan Berbasis Bidang Dalam Kerangka Kebijakan Satu Peta (One Map Policy). Sekolah Tinggi Pertanahan Nasional, Yogyakarta.

  39. Wiwaha, R. A., Sudarsono, B., & Amarrohman, F. J. (2020). Analisis Perubahan Zona Nilai Tanah Akibat Perubahan Penggunaan Lahan Menggunakan Data NJOP di Kecamatan Pedurungan Kota Semarang. Jurnal Geodesi Undip, 10(1), 277–285. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/geodesi/article/view/29756">  

  40. Yoshida, T., Yamagata, Y., Chang, S., de Gooyert, V., Seya, H., Murakami, D., Jittrapirom, P., & Voulgaris, G. (2020). Spatial modeling and design of smart communities. Urban Systems Design, 199–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816055-8.00007-5">[Crossref]

  41. Zhou, X., Lu, X., Lian, H., Chen, Y., & Wu, Y. (2017). Construction of a Spatial Planning system at city-level: Case study of “integration of multi-planning” in Yulin City, China. Habitat International, 65, 32–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.04.015">[Crossref]

  42. Zulkarnain, C. S. A., & Priyanta, M. (2021). Kewenangan Pemerintah Daerah dalam Penataan Ruang Kawasan Perdesaan: Implikasi Perubahan Pasca Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja (The Authority of The Local Government in Rural Area Spatial Planning: Post-Implications of Indonesian Law Number 11 Year 2020). Bina Hukum Lingkungan, 5(3), 416–431.


Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-11-20 23:04:59

No citation recorded.