skip to main content

Urban Morphology and Development of Mae Hong Son Old City: A Geospatial Analysis for Sustainable Heritage Conservation

*Supharerk O-in orcid  -  Department of Geography, Faculty of Arts, Silpakorn University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand, 73000, Thailand

Citation Format:
Abstract

This study investigates the urban morphology and development of Mae Hong Son's old city through geospatial analysis to support sustainable heritage conservation. It focuses on spatiotemporal changes in urban expansion by utilizing aerial photographs, high-resolution satellite imagery, and geospatial techniques including Change Detection and Kernel Density Estimation (KDE), to analyze the city’s development patterns from 1971 to 2023. The results indicate that the built-up area increased significantly from 0.47 km² in 1971 to 9.71 km² in 2023, while the number of buildings grew from 2,855 to 11,948 during the same period. These findings reveal significant physical transformations, primarily driven by economic growth and increased settlement in the early 20th century. Urban growth predominantly occurred in the northern part of the city, constrained by surrounding mountains and rivers. Despite modern urban development, Mae Hong Son has retained its unique identity through a combination of traditional wooden structures and contemporary architecture. The findings emphasize the need to balance modern urban expansion with the preservation of cultural heritage and offer insights for sustainable conservation planning in historic cities and it contributes to understand the historical urban dynamics of Mae Hong Son’s old city and provides recommendations for sustainable heritage conservation planning.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Urban morphology; Kernel Density Estimation; Cultural Heritage; Mae Hong Son

Article Metrics:

  1. Amato, F., Martellozzo, F., Nolè, G., & Murgante, B. (2017). Preserving cultural heritage by supporting landscape planning with quantitative predictions of soil consumption. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 23, 44–54. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2015.12.009">Crossref]

  2. Apostolou, G., Venieri, K., Mayoral, A., Dimaki, S., Garcia-Molsosa, A., Georgiadis, M., & Orengo, H. A. (2024). Long-term settlement dynamics in ancient Macedonia: A new multi-disciplinary survey from Grevena (NW Greece). Land, 13(11), 1769. [https://doi.org/10.3390/land13111769">Crossref]

  3. Brandes, G., Sieg, C., Sander, M., & Henze, R. (2024). Driving domain classification based on kernel density estimation of urban land use and road network scaling models. Urban Science, 8(2), 48. [https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci8020048">Crossref]

  4. Chen, S., Wang, X., & Lin, Q. (2024). Spatial pattern characteristics and influencing factors of mountainous rural settlements in metropolitan fringe areas: A case study of Pingnan County, Fujian Province. Heliyon, 10(4), e26606. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26606">Crossref]

  5. Coppin, P., Jonckheere, I., Nackaerts, K., Muys, B., & Lambin, E. (2004). Digital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: A review. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25(9), 1565–1596. [https://doi.org/10.1080/0143116031000101675">Crossref]

  6. Ghaderpour, E., & Vujadinovic, T. (2020). Change detection within remotely sensed satellite image time series via spectral analysis. Remote Sensing, 12(23), 4001. [https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12234001">Crossref]

  7. Guan, Q., Chen, J., Guan, C., Li, H., Zhou, X. & Meng, T. (2024). The responses of ecosystem services in coastal cities to urbanization in 30 years: A case study of Qingdao City, China, Ocean and Coastal Management, 258, 107415. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107415">Crossref]

  8. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J.H. (2001). The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference, and prediction. Springer.

  9. Jennie, S., & Erik, H. (2020). Urban conservation and urban morphology in Kiruna, Sweden. Urban Morphology, 24(2), 167-183. [https://doi.org/10.51347/jum.v24i2.4094">Crossref]

  10. King, T.L., Thornton, L.E., Bentley, R.J. & Kavanagh, A.M. (2015). The Use of Kernel Density Estimation to Examine Associations between Neighborhood Destination Intensity and Walking and Physical Activity. PLOS ONE, 10(9), e0137402. [https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137402">Crossref]

  11. Lazzari, M., Oltean, I., Oyaneder Rodríguez, A., Scattolin, M.C., & Pereyra Domingorena, L. (2024). Andean landscape legacies: Comprehensive remote sensing mapping and GIS analysis of long-term settlement and land use for sustainable futures (NW Argentina). Remote Sensing, 16(20), 3795. [https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16203795">Crossref]

  12. Li, J., Stoffelen, A., Meijles, E., & Vanclay, F. (2023). Local people’s sense of place in heavily touristified protected areas: Contested place meanings around the Wulingyuan World Heritage Site, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 237, 104792. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104792">Crossref]

  13. Li, M.R., Cao, Y., & Li, G.W. (2023). An approach to developing and protecting linear heritage tourism: The construction of cultural heritage corridor of traditional villages in Mentougou District using GIS. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks. 11(4), 607-623. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2023.11.002">Crossref]

  14. Li, X., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Urban Morphology and Historical Urban Landscape Conservation and Management. In Conserving and Managing Historical Urban Landscape. Springer. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4222-8_2">Crossref]

  15. Lu, D., Mausel, P., Brondízio, E., & Moran, E. (2004). Change detection techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25(12), 2365–2401. [https://doi.org/10.1080/0143116031000139863">Crossref]

  16. Mas, J. F. (1999). Monitoring land-cover changes: A comparison of change detection techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 20(1), 139-152. [https://doi.org/10.1080/014311699213659">Crossref]

  17. Maurizio, G., Paul, L., & Phil, A. (2007). Kernel density estimation and percent volume contours in general practice catchment area analysis in urban areas. In Proceedings of the Geographical Information Science Research UK 15th Annual Conference (GISRUK), Maynooth, Ireland, 11th-13th April 2007. [https://www.geos.ed.ac.uk/~gisteac/proceedingsonline/GISRUK2007/PDF/5A3.pdf">Crossref]

  18. Moe, K.C., & Sein, M.M. (2016). Urban Build-Up Building Change Detection Using Morphology Based on GIS. In Zin, T., Lin, JW., Pan, JS., Tin, P., Yokota, M. (Eds.), Genetic and Evolutionary Computing. (GEC 2015) (vol. 388, pp263-272). Springer. [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23207-2_26">Crossref]

  19. Mohamed, S.A., Harun, N.Z. & Abdullah, A. (2018). Urban morphological analysis framework for conservation planning and management. Planning Malaysia, 16(1), 360-371. [https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v16i5.438">Crossref]

  20. Office of Natural Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning. (2018). Announcement of Mae Hong Son Old City area. [https://law.onep.go.th/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/law10.25.pdf">Crossref]

  21. Patel, A., Vyas, D., Chaudhari, N., Patel, R., Patel, K., & Mehta, D. (2024). Novel approach for the LULC change detection using GIS & Google Earth Engine through spatiotemporal analysis to evaluate the urbanization growth of Ahmedabad city. Results in Engineering, 21, 101788. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.101788">Crossref]

  22. Picard, D. (1985). Testing and estimating change-points in time series. Advances in Applied Probability, 17(4), 841–867. [Crossref]

    " target="_blank">%20https://doi.org/10.2307/1427090">Crossref]
  23. Teerarojanarat, S. (2012). Using GIS for exploring Karen settlements: A case study of western and northern Thailand in the vicinity of the Thai-Burmese border. Manusya, Journal of Humanities, 15(2), Article 5. [Crossref]

  24. Umar, G.K., Yusuf, D.A., Ahmed, A., and Usman, A.M. (2019). The practice of Hausa traditional architecture: Towards conservation and restoration of spatial morphology and techniques. Scientific African, 5, e00142. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2019.e00142">Crossref]

  25. UNESCO. (2011). Recommendation on the historic urban landscape. The General Conference 36th session, Paris, 25 October - 10 November 2011, p. 50.

  26. Whitehand, J.W.R., Gu, K., Whitehand, S.M., & Zhang, J. (2011). Urban morphology and conservation in China. Cities, 28(2), 171-185. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2010.12.001">Crossref]

  27. Whitehand, J.W.R. (2015). Conservation, heritage and urban morphology. Urban Morphology, 19(2), 115-116. [https://doi.org/10.51347/jum.v19i2.5160">Crossref]

  28. Win, E.P.S. (2021). Urban Road Change Detection using Morphological Processing. Qubahan Academic Journal, 1(1), 57-61. [https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v1n1a29">Crossref]

  29. Witjaksono, A., Gai, A.M., & Maulida, R. R. (2023). Settlement development based on environmental carrying capacity in Batu City, Indonesia. Geography Environment Sustainability, 16(1), 64-72. [https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2022-018">Crossref]

  30. Xie, S., Gu, K., & Zhang, X. (2020). Urban conservation in China in an international context: Retrospect and prospects. Habitat International, 95, 102098. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102098">Crossref]

  31. Zehui, L., Jiao, L., Zhang, B., Xu, G., & Liu, J. (2021). Understanding the pattern and mechanism of spatial concentration of urban land use, population and economic activities: a case study in Wuhan, China. Geo-spatial Information Science, 24, 1-17. [https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2021.1978276">Crossref]


Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-06-13 16:15:39

No citation recorded.