Economic Benefit and Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Potential of A Family-Scale Cowdung Anaerobic Biogas Digester

*Agus Haryanto  -  University of Lampung, Indonesia
Dwi Cahyani  -  Wageningen University, Netherlands
Sugeng Triyono  -  University of Lampung, Indonesia
Fauzan Murdapa  -  University of Lampung, Indonesia
Dwi Haryono  -  University of Lampung, Indonesia
Published: 22 Mar 2017.
Open Access Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

The objective of this research was to evaluate economic benefit and greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction potential of a family-scale anaerobic cowdung biogas digester. Research was conducted at two villages in Lampung Province, namely Marga Lestari, District of South Lampung and Pesawaran Indah, District of Pesawaran. Economic benefit and GHG emission reduction potential were evaluated from LPG saving due to biogas utilisation for cooking and fertilizer substitution by slurry digestate. Results showed that a family-scale anaerobic cowdung biogas digester demonstrated a good potential to reduce GHG emission, but not in economic. A digester with 4 heads of cow produced biogas at a rate of 1582 L/day. With average methane content of 53.6%, energy value of the biogas was equivalent to 167 kg LPG and able to substitute 52 bottles LPG annually. A family-scale biogas contributed 108.1 USD/year and potentially reduced GHG emission by 5292.5 kg CO2e/year resulted from biomethane potential, LPG, and fertilizer savings.

Article History: Received November 15th 2016; Received in revised form January 16th 2017; Accepted February 2nd 2017; Available online

How to Cite This Article: Haryanto, A., Cahyani, D., Triyono, S., Murdapa, F., and Haryono, D. (2017) Economic Benefit and Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Potential of A Family-Scale Cowdung Anaerobic Biogas Digester. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development 6(1), 29-36.

http://dx.doi.org/10.14710/ijred.6.1.29-36

Keywords: biogas; cowdung; greenhouse gas; economy; benefit
Funding: Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Research Article
Language: EN
In Vol 6, No 1 (2017): February 2017
Statistics: 1507 1299
Related articles
A life cycle assessment model for quantification of environmental footprints of a 3.6 kWp photovoltaic system in Bangladesh Comparative analysis between pyrolysis products of Spirulina platensis biomass and its residues Biogas Production from Cow Manure The Utilization of Water Hyacinth for Biogas Production in a Plug Flow Anaerobic Digester Improving the Quantity and Quality of Biogas Production in Tehran Anaerobic Digestion Power Plant by Application of Materials Recirculation Technique Performance investigation of a gasifier and gas engine system operated on municipal solid waste briquettes
  1. An, B.X., Preston, T.R., & Dolberg, F. (1997) The introduction of low-cost polyethylene tube biodigesters on small scale farms in vietnam. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 11(1). http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd9/2/an92.htm (Accessed July 10, 2015)
  2. ASAE (American Society of Agricultural Engineers). (2003) Manure production and characteristics (ASAE D384.1 FEB03)
  3. Barnhart, S. (2014) From household decisions to global networks: biogas and the allure of carbon trading in Nepal. The Professional Geographer, 66(3): 345-353
  4. Bird, L. & Sumner, J. (2014) Using renewable energy purchases to achieve institutional carbon goals: A review of current practices and considerations. NREL Report No. TP-6A20-49938. http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy11osti/49938.pdf (April 14, 2014)
  5. BPS Lampung. (2013) Lampung in figures. Statistical Bureau of Lampung: 217
  6. Chen, Y., Hua, W., Feng, Y., & Sweeney, S. (2014) Status and prospects of rural biogas development in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39: 679-685
  7. Feng, Y., Guo, Y., Yang, Y., Qin, X., & Song, Z. (2014) Household biogas development in rural China: On policy support and other macro sustainable conditions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16: 679-685
  8. Forte, A.J. (2011) A Glimpse into community and institutional biogas plants in Nepal. http://my.ewb-usa.org/theme/library/myewb-usa/project-resources/technical/2-1440-a-glimpse-into-community-and-institutional-biogas-plants-in-nepal.pdf (Accessed July 7, 2015)
  9. Ghimire, P.C. (2013) SNV supported domestic biogas programmes in Asia and Africa. Renewable Energy, 49: 90-94
  10. Guinée, J.B. (2004) Handbook on life cycle assessment: Operational guide to the ISO standards. New York. Kluwer Academic Publishers: 185
  11. Hariyanto. (2012) Model pengembangan energi alternatif biogas di KPSP Setia Kawan (Model for biogas alternative energy development at KPSP Setia Kawan). Presentation at Workshop Coordination Biogas Rumah (BIRU) Program, Lampung, Oktober 23, 2012
  12. Haryanto, A. & Triyono, S. (2011) Kinerja biogas skala rumah tangga. Prosiding Seminar BKS PTN Barat. (Performance of family size biogas digester. In Proceeding of BKS PTN Barat Seminar). Editors: Abrar A, Muslim G, Rosana E, Thirtawati, Oktarina S, Agustina H, Aryani D. Sriwijaya University, Palembang: 860-866
  13. IPCC (The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2006) 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories – Volume 4: Agriculture, forestry and other land use. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Hayama, Japan: 10.1-10.87
  14. Kabir, H., Palash, M.S., & Bauer, S. (2012) Appraisal of domestic biogas plants in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Economics, XXXV(1&2): 71-89
  15. Kabir, H., Yegbemey, R.N., & Bauer, S. (2013) Factors determinant of biogas adoption in Bangladesh. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 28: 881-889
  16. Kandpal, T.C., Bharati, J., & Sinha, C.S. (1991) Economics of family sized biogas plants in India. Energy Conversion & Management, 32: 101-113
  17. Khan, U.K., Mainali, B., Martin, A., & Silveira, S. (2014) Techno-economic analysis of small scale biogas based polygeneration systems: Bangladesh case study. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 7: 68-78
  18. Lie, A. (2009) Program konversi minyak tanah ke elpiji: Potret kebijakan pemerintah dalam sektor pengelolaan energi nasional (Kerosene-to-LPG conversion program: A portrait of government policy in national energy management sector). Presentation at Stadium General, Diponegoro University, Semarang. January 10, 2009
  19. Manariotis, I.D., Grigoropoulos, S.G., & Hung, Y-T. (2010) Anaerobic treatment of low-strength wastewater by a biofilm reactor. In Environmental Bioengineering. Eds. Wang, L.K., Tay, J-H., Tay, ST-L., & Hung, Y-T. Humana Press, New York: 445-496
  20. Nguyen, V.C.N. (2011) Small-scale anaerobic digesters in Vietnam – Development and challenges. Journal of Vietnamese Environment, 1(1): 12-18
  21. Pathak, H., Jain, N., Bhatia, A., Mohanty, S., & Gupta, N. (2009) Global warming mitigation potential of biogas plants in India. Environment Monitoring Assessment, 157: 407-418
  22. RISE-AT (Regional Information Service Centre for South East Asia on Appropriate Technology). (1998) Review of current status of anaerobic digestion technology for treatment of municipal solid waste. http://www.ist.cmu.ac.th/riseat/documents/adreview.pdf (Accessed July 10, 2015)
  23. Singh, K.J. & Sooch, S.S. (2004) Comparative study of economics of different models of family size biogas plants for state of Punjab, India. Energy Conversion & Management, 45: 1329-1341
  24. Schmidt, T. S. & Dabur, S. (2014) Explaining the diffusion of biogas in India: a new functional approach considering national borders and technology transfer. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 16, 171-199
  25. Suhedi, F. (2006) Keterkaitan aktivitas domestik dengan emisi CO2 (Relationship between domestic activities to CO2 emission). Presentation at Workshop “Alternatif Rancangan Permukiman Perkotaan Berdasarkan Emisi CO2” (Urban Planning Alternative Based on CO2 Emission). Bandung, March 21, 2006. In Bahasa Indonesia
  26. Vorley, B., Porras, I., & Amrein, A. (2015) The Indonesia Domestic Biogas Programme: can carbon financing promote sustainable agriculture? IIED (International Institute for Environment and Development) and Hivos. 80–86 Gray’s Inn Road, London WC1X 8NH, UK: 10
  27. Wright, L., Boundy, B., Badger, P.C., Perlack, B., & Davis, S. (2009) Biomass Energy Data Book. 2nd edition. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee: 189
  28. Yadvika, S., Sreekrishnan, T.R., Kohil, S., & Rana, V. (2004) Enhancement of biogas production from solid substrates using different techniques: A review. Bioresource Technology, 95: 1-10
  29. Yavini, T.D., Chia, A.I., & John, A. (2014) Evaluation of the effect of total solids concentration on biogas yields of agricultural wastes. International Research Journal of Environment Sciences, 3(2): 70-75

Last update: 2021-03-01 15:45:42

  1. Life cycle assessment of biogas digester in small scale tapioca industry

    D Cahyani, A Haryanto, G A Putra, R Fil’aini, D S S Marpaung. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 127 , 2019. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/258/1/012017

  2. Effect of load on the performance of a family scale biogas-fuelled electricity generator

    IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 127 , 2019. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/355/1/012078

  3. Greenhouse gas emission of household plastic biogas digester using life cycle assessment approach

    A Haryanto, D Cahyani. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 127 , 2019. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/258/1/012015

  4. Biogas production from anaerobic codigestion of cowdung and elephant grass (Pennisetum Purpureum) using batch digester

    Agus Haryanto, Udin Hasanudin, Chandra Afrian, Iskandar Zulkarnaen. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 127 , 2018. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/141/1/012011

  5. Anaerobic Co-digestion of Cow Dung and Rice Straw to Produce Biogas using Semi-Continuous Flow Digester: Effect of Urea Addition

    A Haryanto, B P Sugara, M Telaumbanua, R A B Rosadi. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 127 , 2018. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/147/1/012032

Last update: 2021-03-01 15:45:43

  1. Developing a family-size biogas-fueled electricity generating system

    Haryanto A.. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 6 (2), 2017. doi: 10.14710/ijred.6.2.111-118

  2. A social cost-benefit analysis of biogas technologies using rice straw and water hyacinths as feedstock

    Bentzen J.. International Energy Journal, 18 (4), 2018.

  3. Effect of hydraulic retention time on biogas production from cow dung in a semi continuous anaerobic digester

    Haryanto A.. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 7 (2), 2018. doi: 10.14710/ijred.7.2.93-100

  4. Life cycle assessment of biogas digester in small scale tapioca industry

    D Cahyani, A Haryanto, G A Putra, R Fil’aini, D S S Marpaung. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 127 , 2019. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/258/1/012017

  5. The determinant factors of biogas technology adoption in cattle farming: Evidences from Pati, Indonesia

    Wahyudi J.. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 6 (3), 2017. doi: 10.14710/ijred.6.3.235-240

  6. Effect of load on the performance of a family scale biogas-fuelled electricity generator

    IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 127 , 2019. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/355/1/012078

  7. Greenhouse gas emission of household plastic biogas digester using life cycle assessment approach

    A Haryanto, D Cahyani. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 127 , 2019. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/258/1/012015

  8. Biogas production from anaerobic codigestion of cowdung and elephant grass (Pennisetum Purpureum) using batch digester

    Agus Haryanto, Udin Hasanudin, Chandra Afrian, Iskandar Zulkarnaen. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 127 , 2018. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/141/1/012011

  9. Anaerobic Co-digestion of Cow Dung and Rice Straw to Produce Biogas using Semi-Continuous Flow Digester: Effect of Urea Addition

    A Haryanto, B P Sugara, M Telaumbanua, R A B Rosadi. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 127 , 2018. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/147/1/012032
Copyright (c) 2017
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Articles are freely available to both subscribers and the wider public with permitted reuse.

All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA). Authors and readers can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, as well as remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, but they must give appropriate credit (cite to the article or content), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.