skip to main content

Response surface optimization and social impact evaluation of Houttuynia cordata Thunb solar drying technology for community enterprise in Chiangrai, Thailand

1School of Energy and Environment, University of Phayao, Tambon Maeka, Amphur Muang, Phayao 56000, Thailand

2Faculty of Public Health, Burapha University, Tambon Saensuk, Amphur Muang, Chonburi 20131, Thailand

3Faculty of Engineering, Mahasarakham University, Tambon Khamriang, Amphur Kantarawichai, Mahasarakham 44150, Thailand

Received: 4 Feb 2023; Revised: 28 Mar 2023; Accepted: 16 Apr 2023; Available online: 26 Apr 2023; Published: 15 May 2023.
Editor(s): H Hadiyanto
Open Access Copyright (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Centre of Biomass and Renewable Energy (CBIORE)
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract
Drying has emerged as one of the most important ways of preserving high-quality and quantity food goods. A force convection solar drying is considered an ecologically and environmentally friendly alternative. This research presents parameter optimization of greenhouse tunnel dryer  of  Houttuynia cordata Thunb (H. cordata) using response surface methodology with the assessment of economic feasibility and social return on invesment. The influence parameters of the drying process were evaluated to obtain maximum efficiency. The individual parameters were temperature (40 – 60 °C), material length (10 – 30 cm), and relative humidity (30 – 50%). The individual parameters of drying temperature showed an extreme effect on the response of moisture content and color value change, while the relative humidity had only an influence on moisture content. On the other hand, the parameter of material length was not significance in both responses. When compared to open-air drying, solar drying reduced the drying time of H. cordata by 57.14%. The payback period of the dryer was found to be 2.5 years. Furthermore, the results reveal that the social return on investment ratio in 2021 was 2.18, then increasing to 2.52 in 2022 and 2.91 in 2023. According to the findings, solar drying technology has the potential to be an adequate product quality improvement technology for H. cordata. It is a feasible drying technology in terms of economic evaluation.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Solar drying; Houttuynia cordata Thunb; Response Surface Methodology; Social Return on Investment analysis; Community enterprise
Funding: This project was financially supported by Unit of Excellence (UOE65008) from the University of Phayao.

Article Metrics:

  1. Afolabi, I. (2014). Moisture Migration and Bulk Nutrients Interaction in a Drying Food Systems: A Review. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 5, 692-714; https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2014.58080
  2. Azaizia, Z., Kooli, S., Hamdi, I., Elkhal, W., Guizani, A.A. (2020). Experimental study of a new mixed mode solar greenhouse drying system with and without thermal energy storage for pepper. Renewable Energy, 145, 197201984; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.07.055
  3. Azam, M.M., Eltawil, M.A., Amer, B.M.A. (2020). Thermal analysis of PV system and solar collector integrated with greenhouse dryer for drying tomatoes. Energy, 212, 118764; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118764
  4. Babu, A.K., Kumare san, G., Raj, A.A., Velraj, R. (2018). Review of leaf drying: Mechanism and influencing parameters, drying methods, nutrient preservation, and mathematical models. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 90, 536-556; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.002
  5. Calín-Sánchez, A., Lipan, L., Cano-Lamadrid, M., Kharaghini, A., Masztalerz, K., Carbonell-Barrachina, A.A., Figiel, A. (2020). Comparison of traditional and novel drying techniques and its effect on quality of fruits, vegetables and aromatic herbs. Foods, 9, 1261; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9091261
  6. Chikpah, S.K., Korese, J.K., Sturm, B., Hensel, O. (2022). Colour change kinetics of pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata) slices during convective air drying and bioactive compounds of the dried products. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 10, 100409; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2022.100409
  7. Chuahan, P.S., Kumar, A. (2016). Performance analysis of greenhouse dryer by using insulated north-wall under natural convection mode. Energy Reports, 2, 107-116; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2016.05.004
  8. Colorado, A., Morales, O., Ossa, D., Amell, A., Chica, E. (2022). Modeling the optimal condition for drying rumen contents using a solar greenhouse dryer. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 30, 101678; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2021.101678
  9. Courtney, P., Powell, J. (2022). Evaluating innovation in european rural development programmes: Application of the social return on investment (SROI) method. Sustainability, 12, 2657; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072657
  10. Demiray, E., Tulek, Y. (2015). Color degradation kinetics of carrot (Daucus carota L.) slices during hot air drying. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 39, 800-805; http://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.12290
  11. Desa, W.N.Y.M., Fudholi, A., Yaakob, Z. (2020). Energy-economic-environmental analysis of solar drying system: A review. International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive System, 11 (2), 1011-1018; http://doi.org/10.11591/ijpeds.v11.i2.pp1011-1018
  12. Ekka, J.P., Palanisamy, M. (2020). Performance assessments and techno and enviro-economic analyses on forced convection mixed mode solar dryer. Journal of food process engineering, 44, 13675; https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.13675
  13. Elkhadraoui, A., Kooli, S., Hamdi, I., Farhat, A. (2015). Experimental investigation and economic evaluation of a new mixed mode solar greenhouse dryer for drying of red pepper and grape. Renewable Energy, 77, 1-8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.11.090
  14. Engin, D. (2020). Effect of drying temperature on color and desorption characteristics of oyster mushroom. Food science and technology, 40(1); https://doi.org/10.1590/fst.37118
  15. Etim, P.J., Eke, A.B., Simonyan, K.J., Umani, K.C., Udo, S. (2021). Optimization of solar drying process parameters of cooking banana using response surface methodology. Scientific African, 13, e00964; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2021.e00964
  16. El Khadraoui, A., Kooli, S., Hamdi, I., Farhat, A. Experimental investigation and economic evaluation of a new mixed-mode solar greenhouse dryer for drying of red pepper and grape. Renewable Energy, 77, 1-8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.11.090
  17. Getahun, E., Delele, M.A., Gabbiye, N., Fanta, S.W., Demisse, P., Vanierschot, M. (2021). Importance of integrated CFD and product quality modeling of solar dryers for fruits and vegetables: A review. Solar Energy, 220, 88-110; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2021.03.049
  18. Guiné, R.P.F., Barroca, M.J. (2012). Effect of drying treatments on texture and color of vegetables (pumpkin and green pepper). Food and Bioproducts Processing, 90, 58-63; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2011.01.003
  19. Hempattarasuwan, P., Somsong, P., Duangmal, K., Jaskulski, M., Adamiec, J., Srzednicki, G. (2019). Performance evaluation of parabolic greenhouse type solar dryer used for drying of cayenne pepper. Drying Technology, 38, 48-54; https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2019.1609495
  20. Jangde, P.K., Singh, A., Arjunan, T.V. (2021). Efficient solar drying techniques: a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 50970–50983; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15792-4
  21. Jha, A., Tripathy, P.P. (2021). Optimization of process parameters and numerical modeling of heat and mass transfer during simulated solar drying of paddy. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 187, 106215; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2021.106215
  22. Kaewkiew, J., Nabnean, S., Janjai, S. (2012). Experimental investigation of the performance of a large-scale greenhouse type solar dryer for drying chilli in Thailand. Procedia Engineering, 32, 433-439; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.1290
  23. Kamarulzaman, A., Hasanuzzaman, M., Rahim, N.A. (2021). Global advancement of solar drying technologies and its future prospects: A review. Solar Energy, 221, 559-582; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2021.04.056
  24. Krungkaew, S., Kingphadung, K., Kwonpongsagoon, S., Mahayothee, B. (2020). Cost and benefits of using parabolic greenhouse solar dryers for dried herb production in Thailand. International Journal of GEOMATE, 18, 96-101; https://doi.org/10.21660/2020.67.5798
  25. Kumar, M., Prasad, S.K., Hemalatha, S. (2014). A current update on the phytopharmacological aspects of Houttuynia cordata Thunb. Pharmacognosy Reviews, 8, (15); https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-7847.125525
  26. Lakshmi, D.V.N., Muthukumar, P., Layek, A., Nayak, P.K. (2018). Drying kinetics and quality analysis of black turmeric (Curcuma caesia) drying in a mixed mode forced convection solar dryer integrated with thermal energy storage. Renewable Energy, 120, 23-34; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.12.053
  27. Lingayat, A., Chandramohan, V.P., Raju, V.R.K., Kumar, A. (2020). Development of indirect type solar dryer and experiments for estimation of drying parameters of apple and watermelon. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 16, 100477; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2020.100477
  28. Majdi, H., Esfahani, J.A., Mohebbi, M. (2019). Optimization of convective drying by response surface methodology. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 156, 574-584; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.12.021
  29. Mcguire, R.G. (1992). Reporting of Objective Color Measurements. HortScience, 27, 1254-1255; https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.27.12.1254
  30. Morad, M.M., El-Shazly, M.A., Wasfy, K.I., El-Maghawry, H.A.M. (2017). Thermal analysis and performance evaluation of a solar tunnel greenhouse dryer for drying peppermint plants. Renewable Energy, 101, 992-1004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.09.042
  31. Mustayen, A.G.M.B., Mekhilef, S., Saidur, R. (2014). Performance study of differen tsolar dryers: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 34, 463-470; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.020
  32. Philip, N., Duraipandi, S., Sreekumar, A. (2022). Techno-economic analysis of greenhouse solar dryer for drying agricultural produce. Renewable Energy, 199, 613-627; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.08.148
  33. Nhut, L.M., Sang, B.D. (2022). A Study on Effects of Temperature and Velocity of Drying Air on Flavonoids Extraction Rate of Houttuynia Cordata Thunb. Key Engineering Materials, 923, 177-184; https://doi.org/10.4028/p-f35at4
  34. Nimnuan, P., Nabnean, S. (2020). Experimental and simulated investigations of the performance of the solar greenhouse dryer for drying cassumunar ginger (Zingiber cassumunar Roxb.). Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 22, 100745; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2020.100745
  35. Özbek, B., Dadali, G. (2007). Thin-layer drying characteristics and modelling of mint leaves undergoing microwave treatment. Journal of Food Engineering, 83, 541-549; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.04.004
  36. Poblete, R., Cortes, E., Macchiavello, J., Bakit, J. (2018). Factors influencing solar drying performance of the red algae Gracilaria chilensis. Renewable Energy, 126, 978-986; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.04.042
  37. Premi, M., Sharma, H., Upadhyay, A. (2012). Effect of air velocity and temperature on the drying kinetics of drumstick leaves (Moringa Oleifera). International Journal of Food Engineering, 8(4); https://doi.org/10.1515/1556-3758.1986
  38. Rafiq, S., Hao, H., Ijaz, M., Raza, A. (2022). Pharmacological Effects of Houttuynia cordata Thunb (H. cordata): A Comprehensive Review. Pharmaceuticals, 15, 1079; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph15091079
  39. Rocha, R.P., Melo, E.C., Radünz, L.L. (2011). Influence of drying process on the quality of medicinal plants: A review. Journal of Medicinal Plant Research, 5, 7076-7084; https://doi.org/10.5897/JMPRx11.001
  40. Saxena, A., Maity, T., Raju, P.S., Bawa, A.S. (2012). Degradation kinetics of colour and total carotenoids in jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus) bulb slices during hot air drying. Food Bioprocess Technology, 5, 672-679; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-010-0409-2
  41. Seerangurayar, T., Al-Ismaili, A.M., Jeewantha, L.H.J., Al-Habsi, N.A. (2019). Effect of solar drying methods on color kinetics and andtexture of dates. Food and Bioproducts Processing, 116, 227-239; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2019.03.012
  42. Vengsungnle, P., Jongpluempiti, J., Srichat, A., Wiriyasart, S., Naphon, P. (2020). Thermal performance of the photovoltaic–ventilated mixed mode greenhouse solar dryer with automatic closed loop control for Ganoderma drying. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 21, 100659; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2020.100659
  43. VijayaVenkataRaman, S., Iniyan, S., Goic, R. (2012). A review of solar drying technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 2652-2670; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.01.007
  44. Wang, J., Wang, L., Wang, L., Han, L., Chen, L., Tang, S., Wen, P. (2022). Response surface optimization of solar drying conditions and the effect on the quality attributes and drying characteristics of qula casein. Foods, 11, 2406; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11162406
  45. Zhang, X., Bai, S., Jin, W., Yuan, P., Yu, M., Liu, L., Luo, K. (2019). Hot air drying characteristics and process parameters optimization of jujube. International Agricultural Engineering Journal, 28 (3), 221-228; https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20203242891

Last update:

  1. Dataset on the optimization by response surface methodology for dried banana products using greenhouse solar drying in Thailand

    Torpong Kreetachat, Saksit Imman, Kowit Suwannahong, Surachai Wongcharee, Trairat Muangthong-on, Nopparat Suriyachai. Data in Brief, 49 , 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2023.109370

Last update: 2023-12-02 15:56:28

No citation recorded.