DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jil.18.3.503-514

Ekologi Tradisional Dayak Tamambaloh

Universitas Tanjungpura, Indonesia

Received: 20 Aug 2020; Published: 30 Nov 2020.
Editor(s): Sudarno Utomo

Citation Format:
Abstract

Penduduk lokal khususnya yang tersebar di Nusantara memiliki beragam ekologi tradisional yang memiliki nilai-nilai konservatif. Di Kalimantan Barat, pada etnis Dayak Tamambaloh, terdapat fenomena pengelolaan lingkungan alam yang menjunjung nilai-nilai kelestarian. Mengkaji lebih dalam praktek ekologi tradisional Dayak Tamambaloh, menjadi tujuan utama penelitian ini. Data terkait praktek ekologi tradisional ini dikumpulan dengan wawancara mendalam, pengamatan lapangan dan studi dokumen. Tamanggung Tamambaloh, para petani, kelompok pengambil kebijakan dan pemangku adat Tamambaloh, ditentukan menjadi sumber informasi. Tindakan dalam pemanfaatan hutan dan isinya menjadi objek pengamatan. Beberapa buku terkait dengan profil ketamanggungan Tamambaloh, menjadi sumber informasi tertulis pada penelitian ini. Dari sejumlah data yang diperoleh di lapangan, ekologi tradisional Dayak Tamambaloh dapat dibagi dalam 4 kategori, yakni 1) pembagian kawasan adat berdasarkan peruntukannya, dan berdasarkan akses sumber daya, 2) Aturan akses sumber daya alam, 3) Proses pengambilan keputusan Pemanfaatan Sumber daya Alam, 4) Pengetahuan Gentika, dan 5) Kalender Musim. Kelima ekologi tradisional ini dapat direduksi ke dalam 4 model konservasi, yakni 1)Model Environmental Norms, 2) Model Proenvironmental Behavior  dan Environmental Concern, 3)Model Community Involvemen, dan 4) Model enviromental Dicision 

ABSTRACT

The Indigenous people, especially those scattered in the archipelago, has a variety of traditional ecologies that have conservative values. In West Kalimantan, the Dayak Tamambaloh ethnicity, there is a phenomenon of natural environmental management that upholds the importance of sustainability. Examining deeper into the traditional ecological practice of Dayak Tamambaloh is the main objective of this research. Data related to traditional ecological practices were collected through in-depth interviews, field observations and document studies. Tamanggung Tamambaloh, peasants, policy-making groups and Tamambaloh customary stakeholders were determined to be sources of information. Actions in forest utilization and their contents are objects of observation. Several books related to the Tamambaloh profile are the source of written information on this research. From a number of data obtained in the field, the traditional ecology of Dayak Tamambaloh can be divided into four categories, namely 1) division of common areas based on their designation and based on access to resources, 2) rules of access to natural resources, 3) Decision-making processes for the Use of Natural Resources, 4) scientific knowledge, and 5) seasonal calendars. These five traditional ecologies can be reduced to 4 conservation models, namely 1) Environmental Norms Model, 2) Proenvironmental Behavior and Environmental Concern Model, 3) Community Involvement Mode, and 4) Environmental Dicision Model.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Ekologi Tradisional, Konservasi Lingkungan, Norma Lingkungan, Peduli Lingkungan, Dayak Tamambaloh

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Article
Language : ID
Recent articles
Keanekaragaman Jenis, Tutupan Lamun, dan Kualitas Air di Perairan Teluk Ambon Emisi Karbon Dioksida (CO2) dari Pertanian Skala Kecil di Lahan Gambut Pengaruh Beban Hidrolik pada Biofilter Anaerobik untuk Mengolah Air Limbah Rumah Potong Ayam dengan Menggunakan Persamaan Eckenfelder More recent articles
Most cited articles
HUBUNGAN PENGETAHUAN DAN ETIKA LINGKUNGAN DENGAN SIKAP DAN PERILAKU MENJAGA KELESTARIAN LINGKUNGAN Perencanaan Kegiatan Wisata Pendidikan Dalam Kawasan Geopark Rinjani Lombok Berbasis Daya Dukung Lingkungan (Studi Daerah Aik Berik) Emisi Gas Rumah Kaca dan Hasil Padi dari Cara Olah Tanah dan Pemberian Herbisida Di Lahan Sawah MK 2015 IDENTIFIKASI KEMISKINAN AIR DI DAERAH ALIRAN SUNGAI CITARUM HULU: KASUS DAERAH BANDUNG RAYA Analisis Penyebab Masyarakat Tetap Tinggal di Kawasan Rawan Bencana Gunung Merapi (Studi di Lereng Gunung Merapi Kecamatan Cangkringan, Kabupaten Sleman Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta) More cited articles
  1. Abdoellah, O. S. (2012). Antropologi Ekologi; Konsep, Teori dan Aplikasi dalam Konteks Pembangunan Berkelanjutan. Bandung: AIPI, Puslitbang KPK LPPM Unpad dan M63 Foundation
  2. Agrawal, A. (2014). Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge: Some Critical Comments. Antropologi Indonesia, 0(55). https://doi.org/10.7454/ai.v0i55.3331
  3. Al-Fattal, R. (2009). The tragedy of the commons: Institutions and fisheries management at the local and EU levels. Review of Political Economy, 21(4), 537–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/09538250903214834
  4. Anbleyth-Evans, J., Lacy, S. N., Aguirre-Muñoz, C., & Tredinnick-Rowe, J. (2020). Port dumping and participation in England: Developing an ecosystem approach through local ecological knowledge. Ocean and Coastal Management, 192(April 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105195
  5. Anup, K. C., Rijal, K., & Sapkota, R. P. (2015). Role of ecotourism in environmental conservation and socioeconomic development in Annapurna conservation area, Nepal. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 22(3), 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2015.1005721
  6. Aziz Nasihuddin, A. (2017). Kearifan Lokal Dalam Perlindungan Dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup ( Studi Di Desa Janggolan Kec. Sumpiuh, Banyumas). Bina Hukum Lingkungan, 2(1), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.24970/jbhl.v2n1.9
  7. Baharudin, E. (2012). Kearifan Lokal , Pengetahuan Lokal dan Degradasi Lingkungan (pp. 1–13). pp. 1–13. Universitas Esa Unggul
  8. Barbieri, C., & Aguilar, F. X. (2011). The Ius in Re Model to Analyze Users Rights Within Complex Property Regimes: Two Ex Post Applications in South America. Society and Natural Resources, 24(3), 292–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920903278178
  9. Berkes, F. (1993). Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Perspective. In J. T. Inglis (Ed.), Traditional EcologicalKnowledge: Concepts and Cases (pp. 1–10). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22944-3_13
  10. Berkes, F. (2008). Sacred Ecology (Second Edi). New York: Routledge
  11. Boafo, Y. A., Saito, O., Kato, S., Kamiyama, C., Takeuchi, K., & Nakahara, M. (2016). The role of traditional ecological knowledge in ecosystem services management: the case of four rural communities in Northern Ghana. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management, 12(1–2), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2015.1124454
  12. Bromley, D. W., & Cernea, M. M. (1989). The management of common property natural resources. In Human Ecology (Vol. 17). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01047654
  13. Daeng, H. J. (2008). Manusia, Kebudayan dan Lingkungan: Tinjauan Antropologis. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
  14. Docherty, M. (2016). Environmental Decision-Making (G. Hanne, Ed.). e Advanced Technology Environmental and Energy Center (ATEEC)
  15. Efriani, Gunawan, B., & Judistira, K. G. (2019). Kosmologi dan Konservasi Alam pada Komunitas Dayak Tamambaloh di Kalimantan Barat. Studi Desain, 2(2), 66–74
  16. Erawati, E. (2016). Traditional Settlement Patterns of Kajang. Kapata Arkeologi, 12(2), 147–162
  17. Ferrante, L., Gomes, M., & Fearnside, P. M. (2020). Amazonian indigenous peoples are threatened by Brazil’s Highway BR-319. Land Use Policy, 94(October 2019), 104548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104548
  18. Ford, J. D., King, N., Galappaththi, E. K., Pearce, T., McDowell, G., & Harper, S. L. (2020). The Resilience of Indigenous Peoples to Environmental Change. One Earth, 2(6), 532–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.05.014
  19. Grim, J. A. (2001). Deep Ecology And World Religions New Essays On Sacred Grounds. In D. L. B. R. S. Gottlieb (Ed.), Deep Ecology and World Religions : New Essays on Sacred Grounds (pp. 35–58). New York: State University Of New York
  20. Harris, M. (1979). Cultural Materialism: The Struggle for a Science of Culture. New York: Random House
  21. Herlan, Praptantya, D. B., Juliansyah, V., Efriani, & Dewantara, J. A. (2020). Konsep sehat dan sakit pada Budaya Etnis Dayak Kebahan. Etno, 9(1), 24–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33772/etnoreflika.v9i1.720
  22. Iskandar, J. (2017). Etnobiologi dan Keragaman Budaya di Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Anthropology, 1(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.24198/umbara.v1i1.9602
  23. Iskandar, J., & Iskandar, B. Su. (2016). Etnoekologi dan Pengelolaan Agroekosistem oleh Penduduk Desa Karangwangi Kecamatan Cidaun, Cianjur Selatan Jawa Barat. Jurnal Biodjati, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.15575/biodjati.v1i1.1035
  24. Iskandar Johan. (2012). Etnobiologi dan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan. Bandung: AIPI Bandung, Puslitbang KPK LPPM Unpad Bandung dan M63 Foundation
  25. Kakoty, S. (2018). Ecology, sustainability and traditional wisdom. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3215–3224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.036
  26. Kalland, A. (2005). Indigenous Knowledge: Prospects And Limitations. In A. Ellen, Roy. Parkes, Peter dan Bicker (Ed.), Indigenous Environmental Knowledge and its Transformations: Critical Anthropological Perspectives (pp. 316–331). Taylor and Francis
  27. Kloek, M. E., Elands, B. H. M., & Schouten, M. G. C. (2017). Race/Ethnicity in Visual Imagery of Dutch Nature Conservation Organizations. Society and Natural Resources, 30(9), 1033–1048. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2017.1295500
  28. Larson, L. R., Cooper, C. B., Stedman, R. C., Decker, D. J., & Gagnon, R. J. (2018). Place-Based Pathways to Proenvironmental Behavior: Empirical Evidence for a Conservation–Recreation Model. Society and Natural Resources, 31(8), 871–891. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2018.1447714
  29. Laughlin, C. D. (2013). Consciousness and the commons: A cultural neurophenomenology of mind states, landscapes, and common property. Time and Mind, 6(3), 287–312. https://doi.org/10.2752/175169713X13673499387046
  30. Lestariningsih, D., & Wariyatun. (2015). “nDuweni Ibu Pertiwi”(Keeping the motherland): Women’s agency to resist cement plants in Tegaldowo and Timbrangan villages, Rembang. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 21(2), 166–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/12259276.2015.1062271
  31. Messalina Lovenia Salampessy, Indra Gumay Febryano, & Iskar Bone. (2017). Pengetahuan ekologi Masyarakat Lokal dalam pemilihan Pohon Pelindung Padasistem Agroforestri Tradisional “Dusung” Pala di Ambon. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Ekonomi Kehutanan, 14(2), 135–142. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.20886/jpse.2017.14.2.135-142
  32. Nurani, C. (2015). Kearifan Lingkungan dalam Pengelolaan Hutan, Tanah dan Sungai di Desa Singengu, Kecamatan Kotanopan Kabupaten Mandailing Natal, Sumatera Utara. Jurnal Manusia Dan Lingkungan, 22(1), 100–105
  33. Paroki Santo Martinus. (2013). Buku Kenangan 100 Tahun Paroki ST. Martinus. Banua Martinus: Paroki St. Martinus
  34. Patriana, R., Adiwibowo, S., Kinseng, R. a, & Satria, A. (2016). Perubahan Kelembagaan dalam Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Laut Tradisional ( Kasus Kelembagaan Sasi Di Kaimana ). Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, 4(3), 257–264
  35. Posey, D. A. (2005). Ethnobiology and Ethnoecology in the Context of National Laws and International Agreements Affecting Indigenous and Local Knowledge, Traditional Resources and Intellectual Property Rights. In R. Ellen, P. Parkes, & A. Bicker (Eds.), Indigenous Environmental Knowledge and its Transformations Critical Anthropological Perspectives (pp. 32–55). Australia • Canada • France • Germany • India Japan • Luxembourg • Malaysia • The Netherlands Russia • Singapore • Switzerland: harwood academic publishers
  36. Quan-Baffour, K. P. (2018). A Systemic View of the Value of Environmental Conservation: The Case of Bono Takyiman, Ghana. In J. McIntyre-Mills, N. Romm, & Y. Corcoran-Nantes (Eds.), Contemporary Systems Thinking Balancing Individualism and Collectivism Social and Environmental Justice (pp. 211–220). Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-319-58014-2.pdf
  37. Rusmana, A., Edwin Rizal, Khadih, U. L., & Anwar, R. K. (2017). Pengembangan Kelembagaan Tradisional Masyarakat Daerah Sebagai Penyangga Hutan Untuk Pelestarian Taman Nasional Gunung Halimun Salak ( Tnghs ). JISPO, 1(Januari-Juni), 50–73. https://doi.org/10.15575/jp.v7i1.1736
  38. Schindler, S., Cimadom, A., & Wrbka, T. (2011). The attitude towards nature and nature conservation on the urban fringes. Innovation, 24(3), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2011.596700
  39. Seftyono, C. (2011). Pengetahuan Ekologi Tradisional Masyarakat Orang Asli Jakun dalam Menilai Ekosistem Servis di Tasik Chini, Malaysia. JSP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 15(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.10925
  40. Setyawan, A. D. W. I. (2010). Dayak Conservation knowledge(2010).pdf. Bioscience, 2(2), 97–108
  41. Siahaya, M. E., Hutauruk, T. R., Aponno, H. S. E. S., Hatulesila, J. W., & Mardhanie, A. B. (2016). Traditional ecological knowledge on shifting cultivation and forest management in East Borneo, Indonesia. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management, 12(1–2), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2016.1169559
  42. Sick, D. (2008). Social contexts and consequences of institutional change in common-pool resource management. Society and Natural Resources, 21(2), 94–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920701681524
  43. Singh, N. (2006). Indigenous water management systems: Interpreting symbolic dimensions in common property resource regimes. Society and Natural Resources, 19(4), 357–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920500519297
  44. Siswadi, S., Taruna, T., & Purnaweni, H. (2012). KEARIFAN LOKAL DALAM MELESTARIKAN MATA AIR (Studi Kasus di Desa Purwogondo, Kecamatan Boja, Kabupaten Kendal). Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan, 9(2), 63. https://doi.org/10.14710/jil.9.2.63-68
  45. Sonowal, R., & Barua, I. (2011). Ethnomedical practices among the Tai-Khamyangs of Assam, India. Studies on Ethno-Medicine, 5(1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09735070.2011.11886390
  46. Sumunar, D. R. S., Suparmini, & Setyawati, S. (2017). Masyarakat desa Tenganan Pegringsingan. Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora, 22(2), 111–124
  47. Suradisastra, K. (2011). Membangkitkan ketangguhan sosial dan ekologi. Pusat Analisis Sosial Ekonomi Dan Kebijakan Pertanian Bogor
  48. Taman Nasional Betung Kerihun. (2009). Buku Informasi Taman Nasional Betung Kerihun. Putussibau: Balai Besar Taman Nasional Betung Kerihun
  49. Uprety, Y., Asselin, H., Bergeron, Y., Doyon, F., & Boucher, J. F. (2012). Contribution of traditional knowledge to ecological restoration: Practices and applications. Ecoscience, 19(3), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.2980/19-3-3530
  50. Wiersum, K. F., Singhal, R., & Benneker, C. (2004). Common property and collaborative forest management: Rural dynamics and evolution in community forestry regimes. Forests Trees and Livelihoods, 14(2–4), 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2004.9752498
  51. Yuliani, E. L., Adnan, H., Sunderland, R. A., Bakara, D., Heri, V., Sammy, J., & Terry, A. salim; (2018). The roles of traditional knowledge systems in orang-utan Pongo spp. and forest conservation: a case study of Danau Sentarum, West Kalimantan, Indonesia. 52(1), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605316000636

Last update:

  1. Social resilience of indigenous community on the border: Belief and confidence in anticipating the spread of COVID‐19 through the Besamsam custom in the Dayak community

    Fatmawati, Jagad Aditya Dewantara. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 32 (6), 2022. doi: 10.1002/casp.2611

  2. Social resilience of indigenous community on the border: Belief and confidence in anticipating the spread of COVID‐19 through the Besamsam custom in the Dayak community

    Fatmawati, Jagad Aditya Dewantara. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 32 (6), 2022. doi: 10.1002/casp.2611

Last update: 2024-11-06 15:55:43

No citation recorded.