DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jil.19.2.459-464

A Review on Sustainable Construction Regulations in Asian Countries: Savvy Insights for Indonesia

1School of Environmental Science, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia

2Coordinating Ministry for Economic Affairs, Indonesia

Received: 16 May 2021; Revised: 8 Jul 2021; Accepted: 15 Jul 2021; Available online: 25 Jul 2021; Published: 1 Aug 2021.
Editor(s): H Hadiyanto

Citation Format:
Abstract

Infrastructure projects, more specifically the construction, operation and deconstruction phase, are claimed to have the potential to cause profound impacts on the environment. The construction industry worldwide attains to generate the consumption for 40% of total energy production and 16% of the entire sum of water volume available, as well as the production for 25% of greenhouse gas emissions and 30-40% of all solid wastes. This circumstance has led to the rising of global awareness with regards to the importance of sustainability concept implementation in the construction industry which subsequently resulted in the formulation of corresponding laws and regulations in recent years. Indonesia is no exception. Decree of the Minister of Public Works and Public Housing of the Republic of Indonesia No: 05/PRT/M/2015 concerning General Guidelines for the Implementation of Sustainable Construction in Infrastructure Projects Execution has been enacted to provide a direction for sustainable construction implementation that creates sustainable infrastructure, which will eventually contribute to a sustainable development. Based upon the decree, this study conducts a literature review on the implementation process of laws and regulations related to sustainable construction in Asian countries. The review contains exploratory case studies and comparative analysis on general overview of the regulations format and the challenges encountered, as well as strategies taken, during the implementation process. This paper provides a useful reference for policy makers in Indonesia, while simultaneously benefits the construction industry practitioners and other related stakeholders.  

ABSTRAK

Penyelenggaraan infrastruktur, khususnya pada tahapan pelaksanaan konstruksi, pemanfaatan dan pembongkaran, memberikan dampak negatif yang cukup signifikan terhadap lingkungan. Sektor industri konstruksi tercatat berkontribusi atas penggunaan 40% total produksi energi di dunia, 16% total jumlah konsumsi air, 25% emisi gas Rumah Kaca (GRK), serta 30–40% dari volume limbah padat dunia. Kondisi ini telah disadari oleh negara-negara di dunia, termasuk Indonesia, sehingga ditindaklanjuti dengan diterbitkannya regulasi-regulasi sehubungan dengan konstruksi berkelanjutan. Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat Republik Indonesia (Permen PUPR) Nomor: 05/PRT/M/2015 tentang Pedoman Umum Implementasi Konstruksi Berkelanjutan Pada Penyelenggaraan Infrastruktur Bidang Pekerjaan Umum dan Permukiman telah diterbitkan untuk dapat dijadikan acuan bagi para penyelenggara infrastruktur dalam mengimplementasikan pendekatan konstruksi berkelanjutan di Indonesia. Mengacu kepada Permen tersebut, penelitian ini melakukan studi komparasi berdasarkan kajian literatur terhadap proses implementasi regulasi konstruksi berkelanjutan di beberapa negara Asia lainnya dengan tujuan tidak hanya untuk mengetahui format regulasinya namun juga tantangan-tantangan yang dihadapi dan strategi-strategi yang diambil dalam proses implementasinya. Hasil dari penelitian ini diharapkan dapat digunakan sebagai bahan pertimbangan penentuan kebijakan lanjutan sehubungan penyelenggaraan infrastruktur berkelanjutan di Indonesia.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: environmental regulation, construction, sustainable construction, infrastructure, sustainable infrastructure

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Usulan strategi pengelolaan sampah padat di TPA Burangkeng Bekasi dengan pendekatan SWOT dan AHP Effect of Land Clearing Activity on Environmental and Arthropods Diversity (Case Study: Jati Agung, Lampung) Studi Benchmarking Unit Sistem Pengelolaan Air Limbah Domestik Terpusat (SPALDT) Program SANIMAS IDB di Kota Pontianak More recent articles
Most cited articles
PENGAMBILAN MINYAK KEDELAI DARI AMPAS TAHU SEBAGAI BAHAN BAKU PEMBUATAN BIODIESEL Strategi Pembangunan Pertanian Berkelanjutan di Pedesaan Berbasis Citra Drone (Studi Kasus Desa Sukadamai Kabupaten Bogor) KAJIAN DAMPAK KERUSAKAN LINGKUNGAN AKIBAT KEGIATAN PENAMBANGAN PASIR DI DESA KENINGAR DAERAH KAWASAN GUNUNG MERAPI Struktur Vegetasi Kawasan Hutan Pada Zona Ketinggian Berbeda di Kawasan Gunung Galunggung Kabupaten Tasikmalaya Jawa Barat Emisi Gas Rumah Kaca dan Hasil Padi dari Cara Olah Tanah dan Pemberian Herbisida Di Lahan Sawah MK 2015 More cited articles
  1. Andelin, M., Sarasoja, A. L., Ventovuori, T., & Junnila, S. (2015). Breaking the circle of blame for sustainable buildings – evidence from Nordic countries. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 17(1), 26-45. DOI: 10.1108/JCRE-05-2014-0013
  2. Berardi, U. (2013). Clarifying the new interpretations of the concept of sustainable building. Sustainable Cities and Society, 8, 72–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2013.01.008
  3. Building and Construction Authority (BCA). (2008). Building Control (Environmental Sustainability) Regulations
  4. Chang, R., Soebarto, V., Zhao, Z., & Zillante, G. (2016). Facilitating the transition to sustainable construction: China's policies. Journal of Cleaner Production 131, 534-544. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.147
  5. Cheah, Y.JC., & Chew, A.S.D. (2005). Dynamics of strategic management in the Chinese construction industry. Management Decision 43 (4), 551-567. DOI 10.1108/00251740510593558
  6. Darko, A., Zhang, C., & Chan, A.P.C. (2017). Drivers for green building: A review of empirical studies. Habitat International, 60, 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.12.007
  7. He, Q., Wang, Z., Wang, G., Zuo, J., Wu, G., & Liu, B. (2020). To be green or not to be: How environmental regulations shape contractor greenwashing behaviors in construction projects. Sustainable Cities and Society, 63, Article 102462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102462
  8. Hong, J., Zhong, X., Guo, S., Liu, G., Shen, G. Q., & Yu, T. (2019). Water-energy nexus and its efficiency in China’s construction industry: Evidence from province-level data. Sustainable Cities and Society, 48, Article 101557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101557
  9. International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. (2021). China Design and Construction Services Sector. https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/china-design-and-construction
  10. Kamar, K.A.M., & Hamid, Z.A. (2011). Sustainable construction and green building: the case of Malaysia. WIT Transactions on Ecology and The Environment, Vol 167. doi: 10.2495/ST110021
  11. Kibwami, N., & Tutesigensi, A. (2016). Enhancing sustainable construction in the building sector in Uganda. Habitat International, 57, 64-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.06.011
  12. Klufallah, M., Ibrahim, I.S., & Moayedi, F. (2019). Sustainable practices barriers towards green projects in Malaysia. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 220 012053. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/220/1/012053
  13. Low, S. P., Liu, J.Y., & Wu, P. (2009). Sustainable facilities: Institutional compliance and the Sino-Singapore Tianjin Eco-city Project. Facilities Vol. 27 No. 9/10, pp. 368-386. DOI 10.1108/02632770910969612
  14. Qi, G.Y., Shen, L.Y., Zeng, S.X., & Jorge, O.J. (2010). The drivers for contractors' green innovation: an industry perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 18, Issue 14, 1358-1365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.04.017
  15. Sha, K., Deng, X., & Cui, C. (2000). Sustainable construction in China: status quo and trends. Building Research and Information, Vol. 28, Issue No. 1, pp. 59-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/096132100369109
  16. Shan, M., Hwang, B., & Zhu, L. (2017). A Global Review of Sustainable Construction Project Financing: Policies, Practices, and Research Efforts. Sustainability, 9, 2347. doi: 10.3390/su9122347
  17. Susanti, B., Filestre, S.F.H., Juliantina, I. (2019). The Analysis of Barriers for Implementation of Sustainable Construction in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 396, 012033. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/396/1/012033
  18. Wang, L., Toppinen, A., & Juslin, H. (2014). Use of wood in green building: A study of expert perspectives from the UK. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 350-361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.023
  19. Willar, D., Waney, E.V.Y., Pangemanan, D.D.G., & Mait, R.E.G. (2019). Sustainable construction practices in the execution of infrastructure projects. The extent of implementation. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment 10 (1),. 106-124. DOI 10.1108/SASBE-07-2019-0086
  20. Xue, X., Wu, H., Zhang, X., Dai, J., & Su, C. (2014). Measuring energy consumption efficiency of the construction industry: the case of China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 509-515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.082
  21. Ye, L., Cheng, Z., Wang, Q., Lin, W., & Ren, F. (2013). Overview on green building label in China. Renewable Energy, 53, 220-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.11.022
  22. Yin, B.C.L., Laing, R., Leon, M., & Mabon, L. (2018). An evaluation of sustainable construction perceptions and practices in Singapore. Sustainable Cities and Society, 39, 613–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.03.024
  23. Zhang, W., & Dong, J. (2011). Research on Laws and Regulations of Sustainable Construction in China. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Vol:5, No:6. DOI: doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1327610

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-11-11 22:57:19

No citation recorded.