DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jil.22.2.408-420

Partisipasi Komunitas dalam Konservasi Lingkungan (Studi Implementasi Perhutanan Sosial di Kawasan Hutan Sesaot, Lombok Barat, Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat)

1Pusat Riset Kesejahteraan Sosial, Desa dan Konektivitas. Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional., Indonesia

2Gedung Sasana Widya Sarwono Lantai 6, Indonesia

3Jl. Jenderal Gatot Subroto No. 10, DKI Jakarta Indonesia, Indonesia

4 Telp : 0811-1064-6803 email: prksdk@brin.go.id / https://www.brin.go.id, Indonesia

5 Departemen Sosiologi, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia

6 Pusat Riset Masyarakat dan Budaya, Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional, Indonesia

7 Gedung Widya Graha, Jl. Gatot Subroto No. 10, Mampang Prapatan, Jakarta Selatan 12710, Indonesia

8 Pusat Riset Kependudukan. Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional. Jakarta. Indonesia, Indonesia

View all affiliations
Received: 1 Sep 2022; Revised: 27 Sep 2023; Accepted: 8 Nov 2023; Available online: 4 Feb 2024; Published: 15 Feb 2024.
Editor(s): Budi Warsito

Citation Format:
Abstract

Indonesia memiliki hutan tropis terluas ketiga di dunia. Sumberdaya tersebut memiliki banyak manfaat bagi masyarakat di sekitarnya. Namun ancaman perubahan fungsi hutan akibat illegal logging, perluasan pemukiman, kegiatan pertanian yang tidak lestari, dan kebakaran hutan menjadi meningkat. Aktivitas tersebut mengancam kelestarian lingkungan dan sumber penghidupan masyarakat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis bagaimana upaya perhutanan sosial dalam melestarikan lingkungan. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif di kawasan Hutan Kemasyarakatan (HKm) Sesaot, Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat. Data diperoleh melalui observasi, penelusuran dokumen, dan wawancara mendalam dengan pihak terkait. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa perhutanan sosial dilatarbelakangi oleh kepemilikan lahan yang sempit, dan kondisi sosial ekonomi masyarakat setempat yang tertinggal yang meningkatkan tekanan terhadap hutan. Program HKm bertujuan untuk melestarikan hutan dan memperbaiki kondisi sosial ekonomi lewat pemberian hak kelola kepada penggarap untuk mengusahakan berbagai jenis Hasil Hutan Bukan Kayu (HHBK). Upayanya lewat tata kelola kawasan untuk memastikan pengusahaan sesuai kaidah pengelolaan lestari sekaligus menyeimbangkan dengan kebutuhan sosial ekonomi masyarakat. Untuk menjaga kondisi lingkungan sehat, dilakukan konservasi antara lain dengan penanaman beringin, aren, dan bambu untuk kelestarian tanah dan sumber air. Pandangan warga sekitar mengindikasikan bahwa tanah masih dapat untuk menanam dengan baik. Kondisi air juga masih bisa dimanfaatkan untuk berbagai macam keperluan, meskipun debitnya sudah berkurang dalam beberapa tahun ini. Ada ancaman seperti penambangan di sekitar kawasan yang dapat mengakibatkan ketidakeimbangan lingkungan.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: perhutanan sosial; konservasi; kehutanan; pemberdayaan; masyarakat; HKm

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Article
Language : ID
Recent articles
Vegetasi Riparian Telaga Pengilon dan Gangguan Antropogenik Short Communication: Aplocheilus panchax Hamilton, 1822 Found at Acidic Waters of Abandoned Ex-tin Mining Ponds as Insectivorous Fish and Its Role for Water Quality Improvement Keragaman Pohon dan Nilai Ekonomi Potensi Karbon Taman Kehati Kaki Dian, Minahasa Utara, Provinsi Sulawesi Utara More recent articles
Most cited articles
PENGARUH FAKTOR-FAKTOR SOSIAL-EKONOMI TERHADAP PERILAKU PENGELOLAAN SAMPAH DOMESTIK DI NUSA TENGGARA TIMUR KAJIAN DAMPAK KERUSAKAN LINGKUNGAN AKIBAT KEGIATAN PENAMBANGAN PASIR DI DESA KENINGAR DAERAH KAWASAN GUNUNG MERAPI Menakar Kapasitas Adaptasi Perubahan Iklim Petani Padi Sawah (Kasus Kabupaten Pasuruan Jawa Timur) HUBUNGAN PENGETAHUAN DAN ETIKA LINGKUNGAN DENGAN SIKAP DAN PERILAKU MENJAGA KELESTARIAN LINGKUNGAN STUDI DAMPAK EL NINO DAN INDIAN OCEAN DIPOLE (IOD) TERHADAP CURAH HUJAN DI PANGKALPINANG More cited articles
  1. Aggestam, F., Konczal, A., Sotirov, M., Wallin, I., Paillet, Y., Spinelli, R., Lindner, M., Derks, J., Hanewinkel, M., & Winkel, G. (2020). Can nature conservation and wood production be reconciled in managed forests? A review of driving factors for integrated forest management in Europe. Journal of Environmental Management, 268, 110670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110670
  2. Andersson, K. P., Cook, N. J., Grillos, T., Lopez, M. C., Salk, C. F., Wright, G. D., & Mwangi, E. (2018). Experimental evidence on payments for forest commons conservation. Nature Sustainability, 1(3), 128–135. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0034-z
  3. Barri, F. M., Setiawan, A. A., Oktaviani, R. A., Prayoga, P. A., & Ichsan, C. A. (2018). DEFORESTASI TANPA HENTI. Forest Watch Indonesia
  4. Blackman, A., Corral, L., Lima, E. S., & Asner, G. P. (2017). Titling indigenous communities protects forests in the Peruvian Amazon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(16), 4123–4128. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1603290114
  5. Bong, I. W., Moeliono, M., Wong, G. Y., & Brockhaus, M. (2019). What is success? Gaps and trade-offs in assessing the performance of traditional social forestry systems in Indonesia. Forest and Society, 3(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.5184
  6. Börner, J., & Vosti, S. A. (2013). Managing Tropical Forest Ecosystem Services: An Overview of Options (pp. 21–46). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5176-7_2
  7. DLHK NTB. (2016). No Title. Dinas Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat
  8. DLHK NTB. (2018). Tabel Luas Lahan Kritis di provinsi NTB Tahun 2018. https://dislhk.ntbprov.go.id/data/dataset/data-lahan-kritis-provinsi-ntb/resource/b3f4a65b-0d5e-4d96-a166-39bc4dd10085#%7Bview-graph:%7BgraphOptions:%7Bhooks:%7BprocessOffset:%7B%7D,bindEvents:%7B%7D%7D%7D%7D,graphOptions:%7Bhooks:%7BprocessOffset:%7B%7D,
  9. Ellison, D., Morris, C. E., Locatelli, B., Sheil, D., Cohen, J., Murdiyarso, D., Gutierrez, V., Noordwijk, M. van, Creed, I. F., Pokorny, J., Gaveau, D., Spracklen, D. V., Tobella, A. B., Ilstedt, U., Teuling, A. J., Gebrehiwot, S. G., Sands, D. C., Muys, B., Verbist, B., … Sullivan, C. A. (2017). Trees, forests and water: Cool insights for a hot world. Global Environmental Change, 43, 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.01.002
  10. Fatem, S. M., Awang, S. A., Pudyatmoko, S., Sahide, M. A. K., Pratama, A. A., & Maryudi, A. (2018). Camouflaging economic development agendas with forest conservation narratives: A strategy of lower governments for gaining authority in the re-centralising Indonesia. Land Use Policy, 78, 699–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.07.018
  11. Fisher, M. R., Moeliono, M., Mulyana, A., Yuliani, E. L., Adriadi, A., Kamaluddin, Judda, J., & Sahide, M. A. K. (2018). Assessing the new social forestry project in Indonesia: recognition, livelihood and conservation? International Forestry Review, 20(3), 346–361. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554818824063014
  12. Galvin, K. A., Beeton, T. A., & Luizza, M. W. (2018). African community-based conservation: a systematic review of social and ecological outcomes. Ecology and Society, 23(3), art39. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10217-230339
  13. Harbi, J., Erbaugh, J. T., Sidiq, M., Haasler, B., & Nurrochmat, D. R. (2018). Making a bridge between livelihoods and forest conservation: Lessons from non timber forest products’ utilization in South Sumatera, Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 94, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.05.011
  14. Imansyah, N., & Fahriza, R. (2018). DLHK: kerusakan hutan di Pulau Sumbawa kritis. https://mataram.antaranews.com/berita/39174/dlhk-kerusakan-hutan-di-pulau-sumbawa-kritis
  15. Irawanti, S., Ginoga, K. L., Prawestisuka, A., & Race, D. (2014). Commercialising Community Forestry in Indonesia: Lessons About the Barriers and Opportunities in Central Java. Small-Scale Forestry, 13(4), 515–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-014-9268-4
  16. Joa, B., Winkel, G., & Primmer, E. (2018). The unknown known – A review of local ecological knowledge in relation to forest biodiversity conservation. Land Use Policy, 79, 520–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.09.001
  17. Kaskoyo, H., Mohammed, A., & Inoue, M. (2017). Impact of community forest program in protection forest on livelihood outcomes: A case study of Lampung Province, Indonesia. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 36(3), 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2017.1296774
  18. Kastanya, A., Tjoa, M., Mardiatmoki, G., Latumahina, F., Bone, I., & Aponno, E. S. H. (2018). No Title. BPSKL Wilayah Maluku Papua
  19. Kemen LHK. (2020). Hutan Dan Deforestasi Indonesia Tahun 2019. http://ppid.menlhk.go.id/siaran_pers/browse/2435
  20. KLHK. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Kehutanan No 83 Tentang Kehutanan. Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Republik Indonesia
  21. KLHK. (2017). Perhutanan Sosial, Membangun Kemakmuran Dari Desa. https://www.menlhk.go.id/site/single_post/235
  22. KLHK. (2021). Tiga Negara Pemilik Hutan Tropis Terbesar di Dunia Jalin Kerja Sama Trilateral
  23. Kompas.com. (2016). Kerugian Banjir Bima Lebih dari Rp 1 triliun. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2016/12/26/22523061/bnpb.kerugian.banjir.bima.lebih.dari.rp.1.triliun?page=all
  24. West Rinjani Forest Management Unit (FMUs). (2019). Makalah Perkembangan (IUPHKm) Batu Mekar ”Gapoktan Alam Lestari. Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan (KPH) Rinjani Barat
  25. Langston, J., Riggs, R., Sururi, Y., Sunderland, T., & Munawir, M. (2017). Estate Crops More Attractive than Community Forests in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Land, 6(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/land6010012
  26. Lehmann, J., Bossio, D. A., Kögel-Knabner, I., & Rillig, M. C. (2020). The concept and future prospects of soil health. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 1(10), 544–553. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0080-8
  27. Lelli, C., Bruun, H. H., Chiarucci, A., Donati, D., Frascaroli, F., Fritz, Ö., Goldberg, I., Nascimbene, J., Tøttrup, A. P., Rahbek, C., & Heilmann-Clausen, J. (2019). Biodiversity response to forest structure and management: Comparing species richness, conservation relevant species and functional diversity as metrics in forest conservation. Forest Ecology and Management, 432, 707–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.09.057
  28. Mardikanto, T., & Soebianto, P. (2015). Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Alfabeta
  29. Maryudi, A., Devkota, R. R., Schusser, C., Yufanyi, C., Salla, M., Aurenhammer, H., Rotchanaphatharawit, R., & Krott, M. (2012). Back to basics: Considerations in evaluating the outcomes of community forestry. Forest Policy and Economics, 14(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.07.017
  30. Melnykovych, M., Nijnik, M., Soloviy, I., Nijnik, A., Sarkki, S., & Bihun, Y. (2018). Social-ecological innovation in remote mountain areas: Adaptive responses of forest-dependent communities to the challenges of a changing world. Science of The Total Environment, 613–614, 894–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.065
  31. Nurrochmat, D. R., Dharmawan, A. H., Obidzinski, K., Dermawan, A., & Erbaugh, J. T. (2016). Contesting national and international forest regimes: Case of timber legality certification for community forests in Central Java, Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 68, 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.09.008
  32. Nursyamsi, M., & Hafil, M. (2018). Kerusakan Hutan Jadi Masalah Serius NTB. https://www.republika.co.id/berita/nasional/daerah/18/11/12/pi2of7430-kerusakan-hutan-jadi-masalah-serius-ntb
  33. O’Neill, P. K., Amacher, C. M., & Charles, P. H. (2005). Soils as an indicator of forest health: a guide to the collection, analysis, and interpretation of soil indicator data in the Forest Inventory and Analysis program. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2737/NC-GTR-258
  34. Ordóñez, C., Threlfall, C. G., Kendal, D., Hochuli, D. F., Davern, M., Fuller, R. A., van der Ree, R., & Livesley, S. J. (2019). Urban forest governance and decision-making: A systematic review and synthesis of the perspectives of municipal managers. Landscape and Urban Planning, 189, 166–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.04.020
  35. Orias, A. B., & Bande, M. M. (2018). Policy and Socio-ecological Assessment of the Integrated Social Forestry Program after 25 Years of Implementation in St. Bernard, Southern Leyte, Philippines. IJERD – International Journal of Environmental and Rural Development, 7–13
  36. Purnomo, H., Okarda, B., Dermawan, A., Ilham, Q. P., Pacheco, P., Nurfatriani, F., & Suhendang, E. (2020). Reconciling oil palm economic development and environmental conservation in Indonesia: A value chain dynamic approach. Forest Policy and Economics, 111, 102089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102089
  37. Putraditama, A., Kim, Y.-S., & Baral, H. (2021). Where to put community-based forestry?: Reconciling conservation and livelihood in Lampung, Indonesia. Trees, Forests and People. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2021.100062
  38. Rakatama, A., & Pandit, R. (2020). Reviewing social forestry schemes in Indonesia: Opportunities and challenges. Forest Policy and Economics, 111, 102052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102052
  39. Rochmah, S. F., Safe’i, R., Bintoro, A., Kaskoyo, H., & Rahmat, A. (2021). The effect of forest health on social conditions of the community. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 739(1), 012016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/739/1/012016
  40. Santika, T., Meijaard, E., Budiharta, S., Law, E. A., Kusworo, A., Hutabarat, J. A., Indrawan, T. P., Struebig, M., Raharjo, S., Huda, I., Sulhani, Ekaputri, A. D., Trison, S., Stigner, M., & Wilson, K. A. (2017). Community forest management in Indonesia: Avoided deforestation in the context of anthropogenic and climate complexities. Global Environmental Change, 46, 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.08.002
  41. Soe, K. T., & Yeo-Chang, Y. (2019). Perceptions of forest-dependent communities toward participation in forest conservation: A case study in Bago Yoma, South-Central Myanmar. Forest Policy and Economics, 100, 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.11.009
  42. Tague, L. C., Moritz, M., & Hanan, E. (2019). The changing water cycle: The eco-hydrologic impacts of forest density reduction in Mediterranean (seasonally dry) regions. Wires Water. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1350
  43. Veettil, A. V., & Mishra, A. K. (2018). Potential influence of climate and anthropogenic variables on water security using blue and green water scarcity, Falkenmark index, and freshwater provision indicator. Journal of Environmental Management, 228, 346–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.012

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-11-02 01:28:03

No citation recorded.