skip to main content

Green Environmental Management Practices in Schools in The Implementation of the Deming Cycle: A Narrative Inquiry Approach

1Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunungdjati Bandung, Indonesia

2Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Kendari Sulawesi Tenggara, Indonesia

Received: 7 Feb 2023; Revised: 9 Sep 2023; Accepted: 8 Nov 2023; Available online: 4 Feb 2024; Published: 15 Feb 2024.
Editor(s): Budi Warsito

Citation Format:
Abstract

The aim of this research is to apply the Deming cycle to green environmental management to improve sustainable practices in schools. Using an inquiry-narrative approach by collecting data through semi-structured interviews with school principals, teachers, and students to explore green environmental management practices at Adiwiyata schools Analysis is carried out interpretatively by expanding, exploring, retelling, and fictionalising the data. The findings presented in green environmental management practices show four main themes in translating strategies into operational practices, including planning, implementation, learning, and action, to assist in identifying and analysing environmental practices reflectively. This research has implications for pro-environmental behaviour through a scientific approach to environmental management in schools.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  Cover Letter
Cover Letter
Subject
Type Cover Letter
  Download (352KB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: Green environmental management; School; Deming Cycle

Article Metrics:

  1. Aikens, K., & McKenzie, M. (2021). A comparative analysis of environment and sustainability in policy across subnational education systems. The Journal of Environmental Education, 52(2), 69–82. doi: 10.1080/00958964.2021.1887685
  2. Alkaher, I., & Gan, D. (2020). The role of school partnerships in promoting education for sustainability and social capital. The Journal of Environmental Education, 1–18. doi: 10.1080/00958964.2020.1711499
  3. Arnett, J. (2000). Emerging Adulthood: A Theory of Development from the Late Teens through the Twenties. American Psychologist 55 (5): 469–480. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
  4. Bynner, J. (2005). Rethinking the Youth Phase of the Life-Course: The Case for Emerging Adulthood?. Journal of Youth Studies 8 (4): 367–384. doi: 10.1080/13676260500431628
  5. Botta, S., Comoglio, C., & Petrosillo, I. (2013). Implementing the environmental and social policies of a municipality through an integrated management system: theoretical framework and case study. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56(7), 1073–1095. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2012.743881
  6. Challies, E., J. Newig, E. Kochsk€amper, and N. W. Jager. (2017). Governance Change and Governance Learning in Europe: Stakeholder Participation in Environmental Policy Implementation. Policy and Society 36 (2): 288–303. doi: 10.1080/14494035.2017.1320854
  7. Charnley, S., and B. Engelbert. (2005). Evaluating Public Participation in Environmental Decision-Making: EPA's Superfund Community Involvement Program. Journal of Environmental Management 77 (3): 165–182. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.04.002
  8. Colvin, R.M., Witt, G.B., Lacey, J., (2016). Approaches to identifying stakeholders in environmental management: insights from practitioners to go beyond the ‘usual suspects. Land Use Pol. 52, 266–276. doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12. 032
  9. Clayton, S. (2003). Environmental Identity: A Conceptual and an Operational Definition. In Identity and the Natural Environment: The Psychological Significance of Nature, edited by S. Clayton and S. Opotow, 317–341. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press
  10. Evan D.G. Fraser; Andrew J. Dougill; Warren E. Mabee; Mark Reed; Patrick McAlpine (2006). Bottom up and top down: Analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management. , 78(2), 114–127. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.04.009
  11. Freeman, C., Buttery, Y., & van Heezik, Y. (2021). Nature exposure and use of open spaces in three generation families: implications for planning. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 1–19. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2021.1891870
  12. Greene, Jeffrey A.; Copeland, Dana Z.; Deekens, Victor M. (2020). A Model of Technology Incidental Learning Effects. Educational Psychology Review, (1-31), doi: 10.1007/s10648-020-09575-5
  13. Green, C., D. Kalvaitis, and A. Worster. (2016). Recontextualizing Psychosocial Development in Young Children: A Model of Environmental Identity Development. Environmental Education Research 22 (7): 1025–1048. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2015.1072136
  14. Ghavami, N., D. Katsiaficas, and L. O. Rogers. (2016). Toward an Intersectional Approach in Developmental Science: The Role of Race, Gender, Sexual Orientation, and Immigrant Status. In Advances in Child Development and Behavior, Vol. 50, 31–73. Cambridge, MA: Elsevier Academic Press doi: 10.1016/bs.acdb.2015.12.001
  15. Giorgi, A. (2009). The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 233 pp., ISBN 978-0-8207-0418-0. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 41(2), 269–276. doi: 10.1163/156916210x526079
  16. Hards, Sarah (2011). Social Practice and the Evolution of Personal Environmental Values. Environmental Values, 20(1), 23–42. doi: 10.3197/096327111x12922350165996
  17. Holland, D., G. Fox, and V. Daro. (2008). Social Movements and Collective Identity: A Decentered, Dialogic View. Anthropological Quarterly 81 (1): 95–126. doi: 10.1353/anq.2008.0001
  18. Holland, D., W. Lachicotte, Jr., D. Skinner, and C. Cain. (1998). Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press https://www.infoamerica.org/documentos_pdf/holland02.pdf
  19. Holland, D., and J. Lave. (2009). Social Practice Theory and the Historical Production of Persons. Actio: An International Journal of Human Activity Theory 2 (1): 1–15 doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-6826-4_15
  20. Huang, Y., J. Fu, W. Wang, J. Li. (2019). Development of China’s nature reserves over the past 60 years: an overview. Land Use Policy, 80 , pp. 224 232, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.020
  21. Holifielda, Ryan, Kathleen C. Williams. (2019). Recruiting, integrating, and sustaining stakeholder participation in environmental management: A case study from the Great Lakes Areas of Concern. Journal of Environmental Management, 230: 422-433 http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jenvman
  22. Hargreaves, T. 2011. “Practice-Ing Behaviour Change: Applying Social Practice Theory to Pro-Environmental Behaviour Change.” Journal of Consumer Culture 11 (1): 79–99. doi: 10.1177/1469540510390500
  23. Johnson, R. J., & Scicchitano, M. J. (2009). Willing and able: explaining individuals’ engagement in environmental policy making. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 52(6), 833–846. doi: 10.1080/09640560903083772
  24. Kresl, P.K. (2015). Cities and Partnerships for Sustainable Urban Development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. doi: 10.4337/9781783479641
  25. Kerret, D., Orkibi, H., Bukchin, S., & Ronen, T. (2020). Two for one: achieving both pro-environmental behavior and subjective well-being by implementing environmental-hope-enhancing programs in schools. The Journal of Environmental Education, 1–15. doi: 10.1080/00958964.2020.1765131
  26. Kopnina, H. (2020). Education for the future? Critical evaluation of education for sustainable development goals. The Journal of Environmental Education, 1–12. doi: 10.1080/00958964.2019.1710444
  27. Kempton, W., and D. C. Holland. (2003). Identity and Sustained Environmental Practice. In Identity and the Natural Environment: The Psychological Significance of Nature, edited by S. Clayton and S. Opotow, 317–341. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press
  28. Kautto, P. (2006). New instruments – old practices? The implications of environmental management systems and extended producer responsibility for design for the environment. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(6), 377–388. doi: 10.1002/bse.454
  29. Luyet, V., Schlaepfer, R., Parlange, M.B., Buttler, A., (2012). A framework to implement stakeholder participation in environmental projects. Journal Environmental Management. 111, 213–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.026
  30. Li, Y., & Krasny, M. E. (2021). Relationship between professional networks and practice change in environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 1–16. doi: 10.1080/00958964.2021.1899107
  31. Lowan-Trudeau, G. (2021). Indigenous environmental media coverage in Canada and the United States: A comparative critical discourse analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 52(2), 83–97. doi: 10.1080/00958964.2020.1852525
  32. Loris, A.A. (2009). Water Reforms in Brazil: Opportunities and Constraints. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 52: 813–832 doi: 10.1080/09640560903083756
  33. Liddicoat, K. R., and M. E. Krasny. (2014). Memories as Useful Outcomes of Residential Outdoor Environmental Education. The Journal of Environmental Education 45 (3): 178–193. doi: 10.1080/00958964.2014.905431
  34. McGuire, N. M. (2015). Environmental Education and Behavioral Change: An Identity-Based Environmental Education Model. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 10 (5): 695–715 http://www.ijese.net/makale_indir/ijese.2015.261a.pdf
  35. Monroe, C., M., Crandall, C., & T. Maynard, L. (2021). Conservation behavior can defy traditional predictors. The Journal of Environmental Education, 1–13. doi: 10.1080/00958964.2021.1899108
  36. Mease, L.A., Erickson, A., Hicks, C. (2018). Engagement takes a (fishing) village to manage a resource: principles and practice of effective stakeholder engagement. Journal. Environment. Managament. 212, 248–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.015
  37. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jowwey-Bass https://download.e-bookshelf.de/download/0003/7195/84/L-G-0003719584-0007575839.pdf
  38. Newig, J., and O. Fritsch. (2009). Environmental Governance: Participatory, Multi-Level – and Effective? Environmental Policy and Governance 214: 197–214. doi: 10.1002/eet.509
  39. Newig, J., E. Challies, N. W. Jager, E. Kochskaemper, and A. Adzersen. (2018). The Environmental Performance of Participatory and Collaborative Governance: A Framework of Causal Mechanisms. Policy Studies Journal 00 (00): 1–29. doi: 10.1111/psj.12209
  40. Ojala, M. (2020). Safe spaces or a pedagogy of discomfort? Senior high-school teachers’ meta-emotion philosophies and climate change education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 52(1), 40–52. doi: 10.1080/00958964.2020.1845589
  41. Padilla-Walker, L. M., C. M. Barry, J. S. Carroll, S. D. Madsen, and L. J. Nelson. (2008). Looking on the Bright Side: The Role of Identity Status and Gender on Positive Orientations during Emerging Adulthood. Journal of Adolescence 31 (4): 451–467. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.09.001
  42. Ramayah, T., Lee, J. W. C., & Lim, S. (2012). Sustaining the environment through recycling: An empirical study. Journal of Environmental Management, 102, 141–147. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.02.025
  43. Reifman, A., J. J. Arnett, and M. J. Colwell. 2007. “Emerging Adulthood: Theory, Assessment and Application.” Journal of Youth Development 2 (1): 37–48. doi: 10.5195/JYD.2007.359.file:///C:/Users/WIN%2010/Downloads/359-393-1-PB.pdf
  44. Reed, M.S., Vella, S., Challies, E., de Vente, J., Frewer, L., Hohenwallner‐Ries, D., Huber, T., Neumann, R., Oughton, E., Sidoli del Ceno, J., van Delden, H., 2018. “A theory of participation: what makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work?” Restor. Ecol. 26, S7–S17. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12541
  45. Rowe, G., Frewer, L.J., 2000. “Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation”. Sci. Technol. Hum. Val. 25 (1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 016224390002500101
  46. Schwartz, Daniel; Loewenstein, George (2017). The Chill of the Moment: Emotions and Pro-environmental Behavior. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, (), jppm.16.132–. doi: 10.1509/jppm.16.132
  47. Syed, M., and M. Azmitia. 2008. “A Narrative Approach to Ethnic Identity in Emerging Adulthood: Bringing Life to the Identity Status Model.” Developmental Psychology 44 (4): 1012–1027. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.4.1012
  48. Sinnott, J. D. 2017. “Cognitive Underpinnings of Identity Flexibility in Adulthood.” In Identity Flexibility during Adulthood: Perspectives in Adult Development,” edited by J. D. Sinnott, 19–49. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-55658-1_2
  49. Troy Frensley, B., Stern, M. J., & Powell, R. B. 2020. “Does student enthusiasm equal learning? The mismatch between observed and self-reported student engagement and environmental literacy outcomes in a residential setting.” The Journal of Environmental Education, 1–12. doi: 10.1080/00958964.2020.1727404
  50. Van der Werff, E., L. Steg, and K. Keizer. 2014. “I Am What I Am, by Looking past the Present: The Influence of Biospheric Values and past Behavior on Environmental Self-Identity.” Environment and Behavior 46 (5): 626–657. doi: 10.1177/0013916512475209
  51. Williams, C. C., and L. Chawla. 2015. “Environmental Identity Formation in Nonformal Environmental Education Programs.” Environmental Education

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-05-12 11:10:11

No citation recorded.