DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jil.22.1.69-78

Analisis Kebijakan Restorasi Ekosistem Gambut di Indonesia dengan Discourse Network Analysis

1Department of Public Administration, University of Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia, Indonesia

2Jurusan Ilmu Komunikasi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Ilmu Politik, Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia, Indonesia

Received: 2 Dec 2022; Revised: 25 Jul 2023; Accepted: 21 Sep 2023; Available online: 16 Nov 2023; Published: 10 Dec 2023.
Editor(s): Budi Warsito

Citation Format:
Abstract

After the forest fires in 2014-2016, the Government of Indonesia (GoI) placed the restoration of the peatland ecosystem (RPE) as one of its priority policies in the environmental sector. This study seeks to analyze RPE in Indonesia using a discourse network analysis approach. Researchers utilize Twitter as primary research data. This data was processed with R, rDNA, and Gephi. Researchers found three network patterns that are connected to RPE efforts in Indonesia. First, affiliate networks connect actors and the concepts voiced by the actors. This network involves various actors such as government institutions, civil society organizations, private corporations, universities, research institutes, foreign governments, international organizations, and local citizens. The dominant concept in the affiliate network is peatland restoration and multi-stakeholder collaboration. Second, the actor congruence network assigns Mangrove and Peatland Restoration Agency (Badan Restorasi Gambut dan Mangrove or BRGM) as the dominant and central actors. However, some actors are not connected to the core network and create separate sub-groups. Third, a network of conflicts between actors involving four conflict themes: Government Regulation Number 57/2016 concerning Amendments to Government Regulation Number 71/2014 on Protection and Management of Peatland Ecosystems, peatland conversion, horizontal conflicts between the local community and plantation corporations, and prevention and law enforcement related to forest fires. The researcher recommends BRGM to: (a) strengthen collaborative practices with the various parties involved in RPE; (b) beware in converting peatland so it does not damage the peatland ecosystem landscape; (c) integrate community conflicts with plantation corporations as part of the RPE agenda in Indonesia. The researcher also recommends NGO activists in Indonesia who care about peatlands to continue monitoring and criticizing the RPE process in Indonesia, and fight for local community groups that have been marginalized by the RPE process. Researchers also encourage plantation corporations, both oil palm plantations and industrial timber plantations, to jointly guard RPE in Indonesia by not opening up new land as part of the actual contribution of the Indonesian people to climate change adaptation and mitigation.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  Cover Letter
cover letter
Subject
Type Cover Letter
  Download (126KB)    Indexing metadata
 Luaran iThenticate
Hasil pemeriksaan plagarisme dengan iThenticate
Subject
Type Luaran iThenticate
  Download (3MB)    Indexing metadata
 potential reviewer
Daftar usulan reviewer
Subject
Type potential reviewer
  Download (80KB)    Indexing metadata
 About the author
Tentang penulis
Subject
Type About the author
  Download (103KB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: Analisis Wacana; Discourse Network Analysis; Lahan Gambut; Perubahan Iklim; Restorasi Ekosistem Gambut
Funding: Universitas Sriwijaya

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Article
Language : ID
Recent articles
Indeks Saprobik di Kawasan Mangrove Bedono, Kecamatan Sayung, Kabupaten Demak, Jawa Tengah Potensi Energi Terbarukan dari Pemanfaatan Energi Biogas POME (Palm Oil Mill Effluent) sebagai Sumber Energi Terbarukan di Provinsi Jambi Penilaian Status Kualitas Air Sungai Kapuas Kecil Kalimantan Barat Menggunakan Biota Bentik More recent articles
Most cited articles
Melihat Kondisi Kesetimbangan Ekologi Terumbu Karang di Pulau Sempu, Malang Menggunakan Pendekatan Luasan Koloni Karang Keras (Scleractinia) STRATEGI PENGELOLAAN AIR LIMBAH SENTRA UMKM BATIK YANG BERKELANJUTAN DI KABUPATEN SUKOHARJO PENGAMBILAN MINYAK KEDELAI DARI AMPAS TAHU SEBAGAI BAHAN BAKU PEMBUATAN BIODIESEL BACTERIAL Cr (VI) REDUCTION AND ITS IMPACT IN BIOREMEDIATION RANCANG BANGUN DAN UJI ALAT PROSES PENINGKATAN MINYAK CENGKEH PADA KLASTER MINYAK ATSIRI KABUPATEN BATANG More cited articles
  1. Adriani, D., Yulius, I. Alamsyah, and M. Pijianti. 2022. “Stakeholder Mapping for Scaling up Purun Woven Agroindustry as an Alternative to Strengthening Livelihoods on Peatlands.” In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Vol. 1025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1025/1/012002
  2. Astuti, Rini. 2021. “Governing the Ungovernable: The Politics of Disciplining Pulpwood and Palm Oil Plantations in Indonesia’s Tropical Peatland.” Geoforum 124: 381–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.03.004
  3. Barrie, Christopher, and Justin Ho. 2021. “AcademictwitteR: An R Package to Access the Twitter Academic Research Product Track v2 API Endpoint.” Journal of Open Source Software 6 (62): 3272. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03272
  4. Bastian, Mathieu, Mathieu Jacomy, and Sebastien Heymann. 2009. “Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks.” In . http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/09/paper/view/154
  5. Birkin, Mark. 2020. “Big Data.” In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, 303–11. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102295-5.10616-X
  6. Buckton, Christina H., Gillian Fergie, Philip Leifeld, and Shona Hilton. 2019. “A Discourse Network Analysis of UK Newspaper Coverage of the ‘Sugar Tax’ Debate before and after the Announcement of the Soft Drinks Industry Levy.” BMC Public Health 19 (1): 490. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6799-9
  7. Jalil, A., Y. Yesi, S. Sugiyanto, D. Puspitaloka, and H. Purnomo. 2021. “The Role of Social Capital of Riau Women Farmer Groups in Building Collective Action for Tropical Peatland Restoration.” Forest and Society 5 (2): 341–51. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v5i2.12089
  8. Januar, Rizky, Eli Nur Nirmala Sari, and Surahman Putra. 2021. “Dynamics of Local Governance: The Case of Peatland Restoration in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia.” Land Use Policy 102: 105270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105270
  9. Krejcie, Robert V., and Daryle W. Morgan. 1970. “Determining Sample Size for Research Activities.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 30 (3): 607–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
  10. Leifeld, Philip, and Sebastian Haunss. 2012. “Political Discourse Networks and the Conflict over Software Patents in Europe: Political Discourse Networks.” European Journal of Political Research 51 (3): 382–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.02003.x
  11. Liu, Felicia H. M., Vignaa Ganesan, and Thomas E. L. Smith. 2020. “Contrasting Communications of Sustainability Science in the Media Coverage of Palm Oil Agriculture on Tropical Peatlands in Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore.” Environmental Science and Policy 114 (January): 162–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.07.004
  12. Merten, Jennifer, Jonas Østergaard Nielsen, Rosyani, and Heiko Faust. 2021. “Climate Change Mitigation on Tropical Peatlands: A Triple Burden for Smallholder Farmers in Indonesia.” Global Environmental Change 71: 102388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102388
  13. Nugroho, I.A., Darwo, and D. Yuniarti. 2021. “Stakeholders’ Mapping and Strategy for Restoring Peatland Forest in West Tanjung Jabung Jambi, Indonesia.” Indonesian Journal of Forestry Research 8 (1): 37–57. https://doi.org/10.20886/IJFR.2021.8.1.37-57
  14. Purnomo, Herry, Sonya D. Kusumadewi, Qori P. Ilham, Dyah Puspitaloka, Durrah Hayati, Made Sanjaya, Beni Okarda, Sonya Dewi, Ahmad Dermawan, and Michael A. Brady. 2021. “A Political-Economy Model to Reduce Fire and Improve Livelihoods in Indonesia’s Lowlands.” Forest Policy and Economics 130: 102533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102533
  15. Puspitaloka, Dyah, Yeon Su Kim, Herry Purnomo, and Peter Z. Fulé. 2020. “Defining Ecological Restoration of Peatlands in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia.” Restoration Ecology 28 (2): 435–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13097
  16. Puspitaloka, Dyah, Yeon-Su Kim, Herry Purnomo, and Peter Z. Fulé. 2021. “Analysis of Challenges, Costs, and Governance Alternative for Peatland Restoration in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia.” Trees, Forests and People 6: 100131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2021.100131
  17. R Core Team. 2022. “R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.” Windows 11. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org
  18. Ramdani, Rijal, and Anu K. Lounela. 2020. “Palm Oil Expansion in Tropical Peatland: Distrust between Advocacy and Service Environmental NGOs.” Forest Policy and Economics 118 (June): 102242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102242
  19. Rozaki, Z., E.D. Nopembereni, L. Rahayu, N. Rahmawati, M.L. Murhidayah, T.M. Rejeki, A.S. Ariffin, S.N. Azizah, and M.M. Tjale. 2022. “Farmers’ Lives and Adaptation Strategies toward the Forest and Peatland Fires in Indonesia: Evidence from Central and South Kalimantan, Indonesia.” Biodiversitas 23 (5): 2379–88. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d230515
  20. Sanders, Anna J. P., Rebecca M. Ford, Rodney J. Keenan, and Anne M. Larson. 2020. “Learning through Practice? Learning from the REDD+ Demonstration Project, Kalimantan Forests and Climate Partnership (KFCP) in Indonesia.” Land Use Policy 91: 104285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104285
  21. Sanders, Anna J. P., Rebecca M. Ford, Lilis Mulyani, Rut Dini Prasti H, Anne M. Larson, Yusurum Jagau, and Rodney J. Keenan. 2019. “Unrelenting Games: Multiple Negotiations and Landscape Transformations in the Tropical Peatlands of Central Kalimantan, Indonesia.” World Development 117: 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.01.008
  22. Sayer, Jeffrey, Agni Klintuni Boedhihartono, James Douglas Langston, Chris Margules, Rebecca Anne Riggs, and Dwi Amalia Sari. 2021. “Governance Challenges to Landscape Restoration in Indonesia.” Land Use Policy 104: 104857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104857
  23. Uda, Saritha Kittie, Greetje Schouten, and Lars Hein. 2020. “The Institutional Fit of Peatland Governance in Indonesia.” Land Use Policy 99: 103300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.03.031
  24. Uda, S.K., L. Hein, and E. Sumarga. 2017. “Towards Sustainable Management of Indonesian Tropical Peatlands.” Wetlands Ecology and Management 25 (6): 683–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-017-9544-0

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-07-04 11:02:15

No citation recorded.