skip to main content

Assessing the Effectiveness of CCME-WQI, NSF-WQI, OWQI, and Smith Index Water Quality Indices in Karst Areas

1Master of Environmental Science, Graduate School, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia

2Departemen Geografi Lingkungan, Fakultas Geografi, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia

Received: 15 May 2023; Revised: 17 Mar 2024; Accepted: 16 May 2024; Available online: 7 Aug 2024; Published: 12 Aug 2024.
Editor(s): Budi Warsito

Citation Format:
Abstract

Water quality assessment employs various methods, including water quality indices (WQI). This study compares several WQI methods to evaluate Sumurup River and Seropan Underground River in Gunungkidul Regency. The study aims to analyze the effectiveness of CCME-WQI, NSF-WQI, OWQI, and Smith Index methods. Parameter selection was conducted using Principal Component Analysis, and the NSF-WQI method was found to best represent water quality in the study area. OWQI produced consistently poor results due to an overly idealized formula, while CCME-WQI's sensitivity to parameter number reduced its effectiveness. The Smith Index, based on New Zealand standards, yielded the lowest quality results, regardless of parameter modifications. Thus, NSF-WQI is recommended for assessing water quality in karst areas like Sumurup and Seropan Underground Rivers. This research underscores the importance of selecting appropriate WQI methods tailored to specific environmental conditions to support effective water resource management and conservation efforts.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  Research Instrument
Cover Letter
Subject
Type Research Instrument
  Download (15KB)    Indexing metadata
 Research Results
Assessing the Effectiveness of CCME-WQI, NSF-WQI, OWQI And Smith Index Water Quality Indices in Karst Areas (revised title)
Subject Revised journal draft according to the reviewer suggestion
Type Research Results
  Download (758KB)    Indexing metadata
 common.other
Detailed Response and Statement Reflecting Feedback to Reviewer Comments
Subject
Type Other
  Download (15KB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: Water Quality Index; Principal Component Analysis; Karst; Water Quality; Environmental Assessment
Funding: Universitas Gajah Mada under contract MU123123

Article Metrics:

  1. Abbasi, T., and Abbasi, S., (2012), Water Quality Indices, Oxford, Elsevier
  2. Abdi, H., & Williams, L. J. (2010). Principal component analysis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 2(4), 433-459
  3. Akkoyunlu, A., and Akiner, M, E., (2012), Pollution evaluation in streams using water quality indices: a case study from turkey’s sapanca lake basin. Ecological Indicators,18, 501–511
  4. Alver, A., (2019), Evaluation of Conventional Drinking Water Treatment Plant Efficiency According to Water Quality Index and Health Risk Assessment, Environmental Science and Pollution Research
  5. Barakat, A., Meddah, R., Afdali, M., and Touhami, F., (2018), Physicochemical and microbial assessment of spring water quality for drinking supply in Piedmont of Béni-Mellal Atlas (Morocco), Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 104, 39-46
  6. Cahyadi, A., Haryono, E., Adji, T, N., Widyastuti, M., Riyanto, I, A., Naufal, M., and Ramadhan, F., (2020), Allogenic River in the Hydrogeological System of Gremeng Cave, Gunungsewu Karst Area, Java Island, Indonesia, Earth and Environmental Science, 448, 1-7
  7. CCME., (2001), Canadian environmental quality guidelines for the protection of aquatic life. CCME water quality index: technical report
  8. Cude, C, G., (2001), Oregon Water Quality Index a tool for evaluating water quality management effectiveness. Journal of The American Water Resources Association, 37(1), 125-137
  9. Darvishi, G., Kootenaei, F, G., Ramezani, M., Lotfi, E., and Asgharnia, H., (2016), Comparative Investigation of River Water Quality by OWQI, NSFWQI and Wilcox Indexes (Case study: The Talar River - Iran), Archives of Environmental Protection, 42(1), 41–48
  10. Ford, D., and Williams, P., (2007), Karst Hydrogeology and Geomorphology, Hoboken, USA, John Wiley & Sons
  11. Jolliffe, I. T. (2002). Principal component analysis. Springer
  12. Lobato, T, C., Hauser-Davis, R, A., Oliveira, T, F., Silveira, A, M., Silva, H, A, N., Tavares, M, R, M., and Saraiva, A, C, F., (2015), Construction of a novel water quality index and quality indicator for reservoir water quality evaluation: A case study in the Amazon region. Journal of Hydrology,522, 674-683
  13. Mandaric, L., Mor, J., Sabater, S., and Petrovic, M., (2018), Impact of urban chemical pollution on water quality in small, rural and effluent-dominated Mediterranean streams and rivers, Sci. Total Environ, 613–614, 763–772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.128
  14. Marselina, M., Wibowo, F., and Mushfiroh, A., (2022), Water quality index assessment methods for surface water: A case study of the Citarum River in Indonesia. Heliyon, 8(7)
  15. Ockenden, M., Hollaway, M., Beven, K., Collins, A., Evans, R., Falloon, P., Forber, K., Hiscock, K., Kahana, R., Macleod, C., Tych, W., Villamizar, M., Wearing, C., Withers, P., Zhou, J., Barker, P., Burke, S., Freer, J., Johnes, P., and Haygarth, P., (2017), Major agricultural changes required to mitigate phosphorus losses under climate change, Nature Communications, 8
  16. Ott, W, R., (1978), Environmental Indices: Theory and Practice, Ann Arbor Science Publishers Inc: Ann Arbor
  17. Ren, K., Pan, X., and Zeng, J., (2019), Contaminant sources and processes affecting spring water quality in a typical karst basin (Hongjiadu Basin, SW China): insights provided by hydrochemical and isotopic data, Environ Sci Pollut Res, 31354–31367
  18. Renouf, M, A., Serrao-Neuman, S., Kenway, S, J., Morgan, E, A., and Low, Choy, D., (2017), Urban water metabolism indicators derived from a water mass balance: Bridging the gap between visions and performance assessment of urban water resource management, Water Research, 122, 669-677
  19. Saraswati, S, P., Sunyoto, S., Bambang, A, K., and Suwarno, H., (2014), Kajian Bentuk Dan Sensitivitas Rumus Indeks Pi, Storet, Ccme Untuk Penentuan Status Mutu Perairan Sungai Tropis Di Indonesia, Journal of People and Environment, 2, 21
  20. Singh, K. P., Malik, A., Mohan, D., & Sinha, S. (2007). Multivariate statistical techniques for the evaluation of spatial and temporal variations in water quality of Gomti River (India)—a case study. Water Research, 41(18), 4065-4076
  21. Smith, D, G., (1990), A Better Water Quality Indexing System For Rivers And Streams, Wat. Res, 24
  22. Sutadian, A, D., Muttil, N., Yilma, A, G., and Perera, B, J, C., (2016), Development of river water quality indices—a review, Environ. Monit. Assess, 188, 58
  23. Tian, Y., Jiang, Y., Liu, Q., Dong, M., Xu, D., Liu, Y., and Xu, X., (2019), Using A Water Quality Index To Assess The Water Quality of The Upper and Middle Streams of The Luanhe River, Northern China, Science of the Total Environment, 667, 142–151
  24. Tirkey, P., Bhattacharya, T., and Chakraborty, S., (2015), Water Quality Indices-Important Tools for Water Quality Assessment: A Review, IJAC, 1, 15-29
  25. Tyagi, S., Sharma, B., Singh, P., and Dobhal, R., (2013), Water Quality Assessment in Terms of Water Quality Index, American Journal of Water Resources, 1(3), 34-38
  26. Uddin, M, G., Nash, S., and Olbert, A, I., (2021). A review of water quality index models and their use for assessing surface water quality, Ecol. Indic, 122
  27. Widyastuti, M., Cahyadi, A., Adji, T, N., Purnama, S., Firizqi, F., Naufal, M., and Irshabdillah, M, R., (2019), Kualitas Air Sungai-sungai Alogenik di Kawasan Karst Gunungsewu, Kabupaten Gunungkidul pada Musim Kemarau. Yogyakarta, In Proceeding of The Thrid National Seminar on Geography
  28. Xiong, Y., Liu, J., Yuan, W., Liu, W., Ma, S., Wang, Z., Li, T., Wang, Y., and Wu, J., (2022), Groundwater Contamination Risk Assessment Based on Groundwater Vulnerability and Pollution Loading: A Case Study of Typical Karst Areas in China, Sustainability, 14, 9898

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-11-22 04:58:50

No citation recorded.