DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jil.22.3.825-835

Evaluation of Rural Urban Waste Management : Integrating Logic Model and GIS Approach in Pemalang, Central Java, Indonesia

1Magister Environemntal Science, School of Postgraduate Studies, Diponegoro University, Indonesia

2Department Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty Engineering, Diponegoro University, Indonesia

3Center for Green Infrastructure Resilience Development, Magister Environmental Science, School of Postgraduate Studies, Diponegoro University, Indonesia

4 Magister Environmental Science, School of Postgraduate Studies, Diponegoro University, Indonesia

View all affiliations
Received: 30 Oct 2023; Revised: 28 Feb 2024; Accepted: 7 Mar 2024; Available online: 18 Mar 2024; Published: 28 Mar 2024.
Editor(s): Budi Warsito

Citation Format:
Abstract

To carry out the mandate of Presidential Regulation Number 97 of 2017 concerning Household Waste Management Policies and Strategies, the Pemalang Regency Government issued Regent Regulation Number 60 of 2018. This policy consists of 2 (two) main programs, namely the waste reduction program with a target of 30% and waste treatment, with a target 70%. This study aims to evaluate the program. The methods used are logic model and GIS. Logic models evaluate input process output and program outcomes, while GIS evaluates geospatial program achievements. Total of 8 indicators were evaluated, consisting of 3 (three) indicators for the reduction program and 5(five) indicators for the treatment program. For waste reduction program, 3 (three) indicators that are assessed, namely 1) Development of waste banks; 2) Development of compost houses and 3) development of TPS3R. In handling, 5 (five) indicators were analyzed, namely 1). Sorting; 2) Collection; 3) Transportation; 4) Itermediate Treatment; 5). Final treatment. Assessment for 2 years (2021-2023) shows 1). The number of waste banks increased by 32 units from 63 to 95 units; 2) Composting facilities increased by 2 units from 1 to 3) TPS3R facilities increased by 3 units from 3 to 6. GIS analysis showt that waste reduction programs are implemented mostly in urban areas. For treatment program, 84.92% of waste has been handled while 15.08% has not yet. The number of TPS for collection increased by 18 units from 116 units, to 134 units. There have been no significant changes regarding sorting and transportation and Intermediate treatment. In 2023, a landfill fire occurred, indicating that the final processing facilities were not yet optimal.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Evaluation; Waste Management; Logic Model; GIS; Pemalang

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Netralisasi Air Asam Tambang Menggunakan Pengolahan Aktif dan Pasif Analisis Kandungan Timbal (Pb) pada Daun Pterocarpus indicus dan Mimusops elengi di Jalan Protokol Kabupaten Banyuwangi Pengembangan Rotary Algae Biofilm Reactor (RABR) Sistem Semikontinu untuk Produksi Biomassa dan Kadar Lipid, serta Penyisihan Polutan Organik Konsentrasi Tinggi More recent articles
Most cited articles
Daya Dukung Jalur Pendakian Bukit Raya Di Taman Nasional Bukit Baka Raya Kalimantan Barat Pengembangan Potensi Energi Alternatif Dengan Pemanfaatan Limbah Cair Kelapa Sawit Sebagai Sumber Energi Baru Terbarukan Di Kabupaten Kotawaringin Timur POTENSI GLISEROL DALAM PEMBUATAN TURUNAN GLISEROL MELALUI PROSES ESTERIFIKASI Evaluasi Penerapan Program Adiwiyata Untuk Membentuk Perilaku Peduli Lingkungan di Kalangan Siswa (Kasus: SMA Negeri 9 Tangerang Selatan dan MA Negeri 1 Serpong) ANALISIS PEMANFAATAN RUANG YANG BERWAWASAN LINGKUNGAN DI KAWASAN PESISIR KOTA TEGAL More cited articles
  1. Wilson, D. C. (1985). Long-term planning for solid waste management. Waste Management & Research, 3(3), 203-216
  2. Dyer, M., Dyer, R., Weng, M. H., Wu, S., Grey, T., Gleeson, R., & Ferrari, T. G. (2019). Framework for soft and hard city infrastructures. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Urban Design and Planning, 172(6), 219-227
  3. Hostovsky, C. (2000). Integrating planning theory and waste Management—an annotated bibliography. Journal of Planning Literature, 15(2), 305-332
  4. Cervantes, D. E. T., Martínez, A. L., Hernández, M. C., & de Cortázar, A. L. G. (2018). Using indicators as a tool to evaluate municipal solid waste management: A critical review. Waste management, 80, 51-63
  5. Llanquileo-Melgarejo, P., Molinos-Senante, M., Romano, G., & Carosi, L. (2021). Evaluation of the impact of separative collection and recycling of municipal solid waste on performance: An empirical application for Chile. Sustainability, 13(4), 2022
  6. Rousta, K., Bolton, K., Lundin, M., & Dahlén, L. (2015). Quantitative assessment of distance to collection point and improved sorting information on source separation of household waste. Waste management, 40, 22-30
  7. Musella, G., Agovino, M., Casaccia, M., & Crociata, A. (2019). Evaluating waste collection management: the case of macro-areas and municipalities in Italy. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 21, 2857-2889
  8. Wada, Y., Okumoto, T., & Wada, N. (2009). Evaluating household waste treatment systems with specific examination of collection and transportation processes. Journal of material cycles and waste management, 11, 82-94
  9. Ibrahim, M. A., Göransson, G., Kaczala, F., Hogland, W., & Marques, M. (2013). Characterization of municipal solid waste temporary storage sites: Risks posed to surrounding areas as a consequence of fire incidents. Waste management, 33(11), 2296-2306
  10. Wada, Y., Okumoto, T., & Wada, N. (2008). Evaluating waste disposal systems. Journal of material cycles and waste management, 10, 173-187
  11. D'Amato, A., Mazzanti, M., Nicolli, F., & Zoli, M. (2018). Illegal waste disposal: Enforcement actions and decentralized environmental policy. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 64, 56-65
  12. Seydel, A., Wilson, O. D., & Skitmore, R. M. (2002). Financial evaluation of waste management methods: a case study. Journal of Construction Research, 3(01), 167-179
  13. Delmas, M. A. (2002). The diffusion of environmental management standards in Europe and in the United States: An institutional perspective. Policy sciences, 35(1), 91-119
  14. Heydari, Z. (2020). Evaluation and analysis of factors affecting citizen participation in household waste management (Case study of 19 districts of Tehran). Journal of Environmental Science Studies, 5(3), 2943-2951
  15. Hasome, H., Tachio, K., Yokota, I., & Nitta, Y. (2001). Studies on the evaluation of municipal waste management systems. Waste management & research, 19(1), 2-11
  16. El-Messery, M. A., Ismail, G. A., & Arafa, A. K. (2009). Evaluation of municipal solid waste management in Egyptian rural areas. J Egypt Public Health Assoc, 84(1-2), 51-71
  17. Farzadkia, M., Jorfi, S., Nikzad, M., & Nazari, S. (2020). Evaluation of industrial wastes management practices: Case study of the Savojbolagh industrial zone, Iran. Waste Management & Research, 38(1), 44-58
  18. Koul, B., Yakoob, M., & Shah, M. P. (2022). Agricultural waste management strategies for environmental sustainability. Environmental Research, 206, 112285
  19. Brown, C., Milke, M., & Seville, E. (2011). Disaster waste management: A review article. Waste management, 31(6), 1085-1098
  20. Maryono.( 2015). Evaluation Of Disaster Resilience On Waste Management In Developing Countries. Kyushu University, Japan available at https://api.lib.kyushu-u.ac.jp/opac_download_md/1500708/eng2443.pdf , online access 29,2, 2024
  21. Trochim, W. M. (1989). An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Evaluation and program planning, 12(1), 1-16
  22. Julian, D. A., Jones, A., & Deyo, D. (1995). Open systems evaluation and the logic model: Program planning and evaluation tools. Evaluation and program planning, 18(4), 333-341
  23. Julian, D. A. (1997). The utilization of the logic model as a system level planning and evaluation device. Evaluation and Program Planning, 20(3), 251-257
  24. Azizah, R., Eriyan, I. D., & Chaigarun, S. (2019). Management of solid medical waste in hospital a logic model approach: A literature review. Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences, 15(3), 49-51
  25. US EPA, (2010). Evaluation of the WasteWise Program, access online on https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-09/documents/eval-wastewise-program.pdf, Access 29, 2, 2024
  26. Department for Environment Food and Rural Affair, UK (2020), Resources and Waste Strategy Evaluation Plan, available online at https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5f2ac1a6e90e0732e5efe2af/resources-and-waste-strategy-evaluation-plan.pdf access 29,2,2024
  27. Hills, D. (2010). Logic mapping: hints and tips
  28. Kellogg, W. K. (2004). Logic Model development guide. Available at: https://www.nj.gov/state/assets/pdf/ofbi/kellogg-foundation-logic-model-development-guide.pdf. Accessed: 12 February 2024
  29. Arbia, G. (1993). The use of GIS in spatial statistical surveys. International Statistical Review/Revue Internationale de Statistique, 339-359
  30. Khan, D., & Samadder, S. R. (2014). Municipal solid waste management using Geographical Information System aided methods: A mini review. Waste management & research, 32(11), 1049-1062
  31. Ghose, M. K., Dikshit, A. K., & Sharma, S. K. (2006). A GIS based transportation model for solid waste disposal–A case study on Asansol municipality. Waste management, 26(11), 1287-1293
  32. Ohri, A., & Singh, D. P. (2010). GIS based secondary storage and transportation system planning for municipal solid waste. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 1(1), 108-130
  33. Sumathi, V. R., Natesan, U., & Sarkar, C. (2008). GIS-based approach for optimized siting of municipal solid waste landfill. Waste management, 28(11), 2146-2160
  34. Sunardi, K. S., & Akliyah, L. S. (2023). Identifikasi Faktor Kurang Berjalannya TPS3R Citepus di Pasawahan Dayeuhkolot Kabupaten Bandung. Jurnal Riset Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, 159-166
  35. Budihardjo, M. A., Wahyuningrum, I. F. S., Muhammad, F. I., & Pardede, R. (2019, November). The role of waste banks in the reduction of solid waste sent to landfill in Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 337, No. 1, p. 012028). IOP Publishing
  36. Yudiatmaja, W. E., Samnuzulsari, T., Rezeki, S. R. I., Akbar, D., & Alfiandri, A. (2021, April). Reducing solid waste through waste banks: an empirical study in Kepulauan Riau, Indonesia. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 755, No. 1, p. 012076). IOP Publishing
  37. Fatmawati, F., Mustari, N., Haerana, H., Niswaty, R., & Abdillah, A. (2022). Waste bank policy implementation through collaborative approach: comparative study—Makassar and Bantaeng, Indonesia. Sustainability, 14(13), 7974
  38. Ferronato, N., & Torretta, V. (2019). Waste mismanagement in developing countries: A review of global issues. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(6), 1060
  39. Septiani, B. A., Arianie, D. M., Risman, V. F. A. A., Handayani, W., & Kawuryan, I. S. S. (2019). Pengelolaan sampah plastik di Salatiga: praktik dan tantangan. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan, 17(1), 90-99
  40. Trisnawati, L. E., & Agustana, P. (2018). Manajemen Pengelolaan Sampah Melalui TPS3R (Tempat Pengolahan Sampah Reuse-Reduce-Recycle) di Desa Selat Kecamatan Sukasada Kabupaten Buleleng. Locus, 9(1), 75-88

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-11-21 12:32:26

No citation recorded.