DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jil.23.2.305-315

Evolusi Studi Global tentang Keberlanjutan Ekologis: Sebuah Kebijakan Adaptif untuk Indonesia

Department of Government Studies, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Islam Riau, Indonesia, Indonesia

Received: 15 Apr 2024; Revised: 5 Dec 2024; Accepted: 21 Feb 2025; Available online: 15 Mar 2025; Published: 31 Mar 2025.
Editor(s): Budi Warsito

Citation Format:
Abstract

Urgensi penelitian ini terletak pada kebutuhan mendesak untuk mengatasi masalah ekologis di Indonesia dengan mengadopsi temuan studi global yang relevan menjadi kebijakan adaptif yang sesuai dengan konteks lokal. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengisi kesenjangan dalam literatur dengan menyediakan panduan konkret bagi pengambilan keputusan dalam upaya menjaga keberlanjutan ekologis di Indonesia, serta memperkuat kapasitas negara dalam merumuskan dan melaksanakan kebijakan yang berkelanjutan secara lingkungan. Penelitian ini menggunakan analisis bibliometrik dengan data dari database Scopus untuk mendapatkan pemahaman yang mendalam tentang tren penelitian, tema, dan kontribusi para peneliti dalam domain keberlanjutan ekologis. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan melakukan filter pada pencarian keyword berdasarkan judul “ecological sustainability”. Tahapan ini berhasil mengumpulkan dokumen relevan sebanyak 1,550 dokumen. Alat analisis yang dimaksimalkan yaitu memanfaatkan Vosviewer. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa tren peningkatan minat penelitian dalam keberlanjutan ekologis, terutama setelah tahun 2010, menyoroti kesadaran global tentang urgensi masalah lingkungan. Namun, kontribusi Indonesia dalam literatur ilmiah global masih terbatas, sementara pemetaan tematema menunjukkan bahwa beberapa aspek, seperti ekonomi, inovasi, dan energi terbarukan, memerlukan eksplorasi lebih lanjut. Dalam konteks ini, literatur global menjadi sumber berharga untuk menginformasikan kebijakan adaptif untuk Indonesia, memungkinkan pengembangan langkah-langkah konkret yang responsif terhadap dinamika sosial, ekonomi, dan ekologis. Dengan memperkuat kerjasama lintas sektor, meningkatkan kesadaran masyarakat, dan mendorong inovasi serta investasi dalam energi alternatif dan terbarukan, Indonesia dapat maju menuju sistem ekonomi yang ramah lingkungan dan berkelanjutan, merespons tantangan keberlanjutan ekologis secara efektif. Pemerintah Indonesia harus memainkan peran utama dalam implementasi kebijakan adaptif untuk mencapai keberlanjutan ekologis.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  common.other
Hasil cek plagiarism (Turnitin)
Subject
Type Other
  Download (3MB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: Keberlanjutan ekologi; Pelestarian lingkungan; Pembangunan berkelanjutan; Energi terbarukan; Pertumbuhan ekonomi

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Article
Language : ID
Recent articles
Analisis Kesesuaian dan Daya Dukung Ekowisata Mangrove Telok Bediri, Kabupaten Kubu Raya, Kalimantan Barat Environmental Management Model for Tanjung Benoa Tourism Attraction Calla Lily (Zantedeschia aethiopica (L.) Spreng) as a Bioremediation Agent of Jatibarang Landfill Leachate Conterminated Waters More recent articles
Most cited articles
RESOLUSI KONFLIK ANTARA MASYARAKAT LOKAL DENGAN PERUSAHAAN PERTAMBANGAN (STUDI KASUS: KECAMATAN NAGA JUANG, KABUPATEN MANDAILING NATAL, PROVINSI SUMATERA UTARA) Studi Pendahuluan Cemaran Air Limbah Rumah Potong Hewan di Kota Mataram Analisis Tingkat Kenyamanan Di DKI Jakarta Berdasarkan Indeks THI (Temperature Humidity Index) PENGENDALIAN EMISI GAS BUANG BOILER BATUBARA DENGAN SISTEM ABSORBSI Strategi Pembangunan Pertanian Berkelanjutan di Pedesaan Berbasis Citra Drone (Studi Kasus Desa Sukadamai Kabupaten Bogor) More cited articles
  1. Al-Saidi, M., & Elagib, N. A. (2018). Ecological modernization and responses for a low-carbon future in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 9(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.528
  2. Baharuddin, T., Nurmandi, A., Qodir, Z., & Jubba, H. (2022). Bibliometric Analysis of Socio-Political Research on Capital Relocation: Examining Contributions to the Case of Indonesia. Journal of Local Government Issues (LOGOS), 5(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22219/logos.v5i1.19468
  3. Bender, S. F., Wagg, C., & van der Heijden, M. G. A. (2016). An Underground Revolution: Biodiversity and Soil Ecological Engineering for Agricultural Sustainability. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 31(6), 440–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.02.016
  4. Bodin, Ö., Robins, G., McAllister, R. R. J., Guerrero, A. M., Crona, B., Tengö, M., & Lubell, M. (2016). Theorizing benefits and constraints in collaborative environmental governance: A transdisciplinary social-ecological network approach for empirical investigations. Ecology and Society, 21(1), 210140. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08368-210140
  5. Broadbent, C. D., Brookshire, D. S., Goodrich, D., Dixon, M. D., Brand, L. A., Thacher, J., & Stewart, S. (2015). Valuing preservation and restoration alternatives for ecosystem services in the southwestern USA. Ecohydrology, 8(5), 851–862. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1628
  6. Dao, N. B., Truong, H. H. D., Shahbaz, M., & Chu, L. K. (2024). The impacts of natural resources rents diversification, uncertainty, and environmental technologies on ecological sustainability: Empirical evidence from OECD countries. Resources Policy, 91, 104895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104895
  7. Desta, M., Lee, T., & Wu, H. (2022). Life cycle energy consumption and environmental assessment for utilizing biofuels in the development of a sustainable transportation system in Ethiopia. Energy Conversion and Management: X, 13, 100144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2021.100144
  8. Ding, R., Ren, C., Hao, S., Lan, Q., & Tan, M. (2022). Polycentric Collaborative Governance, Sustainable Development and the Ecological Resilience of Elevator Safety: Evidence from a Structural Equation Model. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(12), 14127124. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127124
  9. Folke, C., Biggs, R., Norström, A. V., Reyers, B., & Rockström, J. (2016). Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science. Ecology and Society, 21(3), 210341. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08748-210341
  10. Galli, A., Iha, K., Moreno Pires, S., Mancini, M. S., Alves, A., Zokai, G., Lin, D., Murthy, A., & Wackernagel, M. (2020). Assessing the Ecological Footprint and biocapacity of Portuguese cities: Critical results for environmental awareness and local management. Cities, 96(August 2019), 102442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102442
  11. Ibrahim, A. H. H., Baharuddin, T., & Wance, M. (2023a). Bibliometric Analysis of E-Government and Trust : A Lesson for Indonesia. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 19(3), 269–284. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v19i3.1303
  12. Ibrahim, A. H. H., Baharuddin, T., & Wance, M. (2023b). Developing a Forest City in a New Capital City: A Thematic Analysis of the Indonesian Government’s Plans. Jurnal Bina Praja, 15(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/ 10.21787/jbp.15.2023.1-13
  13. Ishaq, M., & Dincer, I. (2024). Development of a new renewable energy system for clean hydrogen and ethanol production. Energy Conversion and Management, 306, 118304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118304
  14. Jiang, S., Feng, F., Zhang, X., Xu, C., Jia, B., & Lafortezza, R. (2024). Ecological transformation is the key to improve ecosystem health for resource-exhausted cities: A case study in China based on future development scenarios. Science of the Total Environment, 921, 171147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171147
  15. Karinda, K., & Baharuddin, T. (2024). Climate change policy based on global study evolution 1979-2023: An insight and direction for Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1388(1), 012054. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1388/1/012054
  16. Lestaluhu, S., Baharuddin, T., & Wance, M. (2023). Indonesian Policy Campaign for Electric Vehicles to Tackle Climate Change: Maximizing Social Media. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 18(8), 2547–2553. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.180826
  17. Ma, F., Saleem, H., Ding, X., Nazir, S., & Tariq, S. (2024). Resources Policy Do natural resource rents , green technological innovation , and renewable energy matter for ecological sustainability ? Role of green policies in testing the environmental kuznets curve hypothesis. Resources Policy, 91, 104844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104844
  18. Malik, I., Prianto, A. L., Roni, N. I., Yama, A., & Baharuddin, T. (2023). Multi-level Governance and Digitalization in Climate Change: A Bibliometric Analysis. In S. Motahhir & B. Bossoufi (Eds.), International Conference on Digital Technologies and Applications (pp. 95–104). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29860-8_10
  19. Mariyono, J. (2020). Improvement of economic and sustainability performance of agribusiness management using ecological technologies in Indonesia. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 69(5), 989–1008. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-01-2019-0036
  20. Nolos, R. C., Zamroni, A., & Evina, K. F. P. (2022). Drivers of Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Palawan, Philippines: an Analysis Using Social-Ecological Systems (Ses) and Institutional Analysis and Development (Iad) Approaches. Geography, Environment, Sustainability, 15(4), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2022-081
  21. Nurdin, M., & Baharuddin, T. (2023). Capacity Building Challenges and Strategies in the Development of New Capital City of Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, 15(2), 221–232. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.15.2023.221-232
  22. Nurkaidah, Anas, A., & Baharuddin, T. (2024). Implementation of environmental policies on the development of a new capital city in Indonesia. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2297764. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2297764
  23. Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133
  24. Pata, U. K. (2021). Linking renewable energy, globalization, agriculture, CO2 emissions and ecological footprint in BRIC countries: A sustainability perspective. Renewable Energy, 173, 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.03.125
  25. Purba, N. P., Handyman, D. I. W., Pribadi, T. D., Syakti, A. D., Pranowo, W. S., Harvey, A., & Ihsan, Y. N. (2019). Marine debris in Indonesia: A review of research and status. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 146, 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.05.057
  26. Ramzan, M., Razi, U., Quddoos, M. U., & Adebayo, T. S. (2023). Do green innovation and financial globalization contribute to the ecological sustainability and energy transition in the United Kingdom? Policy insights from a bootstrap rolling window approach. Sustainable Development, 31(1), 393–414. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2399
  27. Rastegar, P. J., Chenoweth, F., & Schwebel, D. C. (2022). Mental Health and Injury Outcomes in Liberia, 1990–2017: An Ecological Systems Analysis. Social and Health Sciences, 20(1 and 2), 25159. https://doi.org/10.25159/2957-3645/10807
  28. Rees, W., & Wackernagel, M. (1996). Urban ecological footprints: Why cities cannot be sustainable - and why they are a key to sustainability. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16(4–6), 223–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(96)00022-4
  29. Sahri, A., Mustika, P. L. K., Dewanto, H. Y., & Murk, A. J. (2020). A critical review of marine mammal governance and protection in Indonesia. Marine Policy, 117, 103893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.103893
  30. Scheidel, A., Temper, L., Demaria, F., & Martínez-Alier, J. (2018). Ecological distribution conflicts as forces for sustainability: an overview and conceptual framework. Sustainability Science, 13(3), 585–598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0519-0
  31. Schneider, F., Kallis, G., & Martinez-Alier, J. (2010). Crisis or opportunity? Economic degrowth for social equity and ecological sustainability. Introduction to this special issue. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(6), 511–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.014
  32. Shen, R. (2024). Regional Governance and Multiplex Networks in Environmental Sustainability: An Exponential Random Graph Model Analysis in the Chinese Local Government Context. Urban Affairs Review, 60(2), 571–613. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874231199390
  33. Wang, R., Usman, M., Radulescu, M., Cifuentes-Faura, J., & Balsalobre-Lorente, D. (2023). Achieving ecological sustainability through technological innovations, financial development, foreign direct investment, and energy consumption in developing European countries. Gondwana Research, 119, 138–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.02.023
  34. Wang, Y., Zhao, Z., Shi, M., Liu, J., & Tan, Z. (2024). Public environmental concern, government environmental regulation and urban carbon emission reduction—Analyzing the regulating role of green finance and industrial agglomeration. Science of the Total Environment, 924, 171549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171549
  35. Wang, Z., Yen-Ku, K., Li, Z., An, N. B., & Abdul-Samad, Z. (2022). The transition of renewable energy and ecological sustainability through environmental policy stringency: Estimations from advance panel estimators. Renewable Energy, 188, 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.01.075
  36. Wedayanti, M. D., Santri, S. H., Rustam, A., Baharuddin, T., Yogia, M. A., & Pulungan, B. I. (2023). CSR and Sustainability of the Palm Oil Industry in Riau Province. Aspirasi: Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Sosial, 14(2), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.46807/aspirasi.v14i2.4128
  37. Xin, M., Guo, H., Li, S., & Chen, L. (2023). Can China achieve ecological sustainability? An LMDI analysis of ecological footprint and economic development decoupling. Ecological Indicators, 151, 110313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110313
  38. Yudha, R. P., Sugito, Y. S., Sillanpää, M., & Nurvianto, S. (2021). Impact of logging on the biodiversity and composition of flora and fauna in the mangrove forests of Bintuni Bay, West Papua, Indonesia. Forest Ecology and Management, 488, 119038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119038
  39. Yurui, L., Xuanchang, Z., Zhi, C., Zhengjia, L., Zhi, L., & Yansui, L. (2021). Towards the progress of ecological restoration and economic development in China’s Loess Plateau and strategy for more sustainable development. Science of the Total Environment, 756, 143676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143676
  40. Zhang, M., Yang, Y., Du, P., Wang, J., Wei, Y., Qin, J., & Yu, L. (2024). The effect of public environmental participation on pollution governance in China: The mediating role of local governments’ environmental attention. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 104, 107345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107345
  41. Zhou, Y., Luo, H., Tang, J., Zhang, L., Zhu, H., & Sun, S. (2023). Study on ecological environment damage compensation in China. Journal for Nature Conservation, 76, 126503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2023.126503

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-04-01 05:07:47

No citation recorded.