skip to main content

Pemanfaatan Abu Dasar Hasil Pembakaran Sampah Rumah Tangga untuk Produksi Blok Paving Berkelanjutan: Optimalisasi Kekuatan Tekan dan Imobilisasi Kromium

1Program Studi S1 Ilmu Lingkungan, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakart, Indonesia

2Program Studi S1 Ilmu Lingkungan, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia

3Pascasarjana Ilmu Lingkungan, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia

4 Program Studi D4 Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja, STikes Mitra Husada Karanganyar, Indonesia

5 Program Studi S1 Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia

6 Program Studi D4 Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja, Sekolah Vokasi Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia

7 Program Studi Kesehatan Lingkungan, Poltekkes Kemenkes Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia

View all affiliations
Received: 15 Jun 2026; Revised: 12 Sep 2026; Accepted: 16 Sep 2026; Available online: 29 Sep 2026; Published: 30 Sep 2026.
Editor(s): Budi Warsito

Citation Format:
Abstract
Pembakaran sampah rumah tangga sebagai strategi pengurangan sampah menghasilkan residu, yang mungkin mengandung logam berat dan menimbulkan risiko lingkungan jika tidak dikelola dengan benar. Studi ini menilai kelayakan penggunaan abu dasar hasil pembakaran sampah rumah tangga sebagai pengganti sebagian agregat halus dalam produksi paving block melalui proses pemadatan berbasis semen. Tujuannya adalah untuk mengidentifikasi komposisi abu dasar yang optimal berdasarkan kinerja kekuatan tekan dan untuk mengevaluasi imobilisasi kromium (Cr) setelah pemadatan. Sampel abu dasar dikumpulkan dari insinerator sampah rumah tangga skala komunitas di Kabupaten Karanganyar, Indonesia. Paving block disiapkan dengan tingkat substitusi abu dasar sebesar 0%, 10%, 20%, dan 40% (w/w) dari agregat halus. Uji kekuatan tekan dilakukan setelah 28 hari pengeringan sesuai dengan SNI 03-0691-1996. Perbedaan statistik antar campuran dievaluasi menggunakan ANOVA One Way diikuti dengan analisis post hoc. Konsentrasi kromium dianalisis menggunakan metode TCLP-AAS sebelum dan sesudah proses pemadatan. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa penambahan 20% abu dasar menghasilkan kekuatan tekan rata-rata tertinggi memenuhi persyaratan untuk paving block Kategori A menurut standar Indonesia. ANOVA One Way mengungkapkan perbedaan signifikan dalam kekuatan tekan di antara variasi campuran (p < 0,001). Konsentrasi kromium menurun dari 0,53 ± 0,01 mg/kg pada abu dasar mentah menjadi 0,24 ± 0,01 mg/kg pada matriks paving block yang telah dipadatkan, yang sesuai dengan efisiensi imobilisasi sebesar 54,7%. Proses pemadatan berbasis semen berkontribusi untuk mengurangi mobilitas kromium dan mendukung praktik pengelolaan sampah berkelanjutan.
Keywords: Abu; Insinerasi; paving block; kromium; solidifikasi

Article Metrics:

  1. Abramov, S., He, J., Wimmer, D., Lemloh, M. L., Muehe, E. M., Gann, B., et al. (2018). Heavy metal mobility and valuable contents of processed municipal solid waste incineration residues from Southwestern Germany. Waste Management, 79, 735–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.08.010
  2. Abubakar, I. R., Maniruzzaman, K. M., Dano, U. L., AlShihri, F. S., AlShammari, M. S., Ahmed, S. M. S., Al-Gehlani, W. A. G., & Alrawaf, T. I. (2022). Environmental sustainability impacts of solid waste management practices in the Global South. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 12717. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912717
  3. Ajorloo, M., Ghodrat, M., Scott, J., et al. (2022). Heavy metals removal/stabilization from municipal solid waste incineration fly ash: A review and recent trends. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 24, 1693–1717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-022-01459-w
  4. Al-Kindi, G. Y. (2019). Evaluation the solidification/stabilization of heavy metals by Portland cement. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 20(3), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/99739
  5. Alam, Q., Schollbach, K., van Hoek, C., van der Laan, S., de Wolf, T., & Brouwers, H. J. H. (2019). In-depth mineralogical quantification of MSWI bottom ash phases and their association with potentially toxic elements. Waste Management, 87, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.01.031
  6. Bahrami, A., Cehlin, M., Wallhagen, M., Nexén, O., & Paul, E. (2026). Toward sustainable concrete: Experimental investigation using municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash. Buildings, 16, 1331. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16071331
  7. Belebchouche, C., Bensebti, S.-E., Ould-Said, C., Moussaceb, K., Czarnecki, S., & Sadowski, L. (2023). Stabilization of chromium waste by solidification into cement composites. Materials, 16, 6295. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16186295
  8. Chen, B., Perumal, P., Illikainen, M., & Ye, G. (2023). A review on the utilization of municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) bottom ash as a mineral resource for construction materials. Journal of Building Engineering, 71, 106386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106386
  9. Chen, D., Zhang, Y., Xu, Y., Nie, Q., Yang, Z., Sheng, W., & Qian, G. (2022). Municipal solid waste incineration residues recycled for typical construction materials: A review. RSC Advances, 12(10), 6279–6291. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RA08050D
  10. Chimenos, J. M., Cuspoca, F., Maldonado-Alameda, A., Mañosa, J., Rosell, J. R., Andrés, A., Faneca, G., & Cabeza, L. F. (2025). MSW incineration bottom ash-based alkali-activated binders as an eco-efficient alternative for urban furniture and paving: Closing the loop towards sustainable construction solutions. Buildings, 15, 1571. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15091571
  11. Dutka, B., Rada, S., Godyń, K., Moldovan, D., Chelcea, R. I., & Tram, M. (2024). Structural and textural characteristics of municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash subjected to periodic seasoning. Sustainability, 16, 9597. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219597
  12. Embong, R. (2025). Transforming coal bottom ash into a high-performance pozzolan: Effects of acid treatment on material properties. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 10, 313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-025-02110-x
  13. Ferronato, N., & Torretta, V. (2019). Waste mismanagement in developing countries: A review of global issues. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(6), 1060. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16061060
  14. Ghani, J., Toller, S., Dinelli, E., & Funari, V. (2023). Impact and recoverability of metals from waste: A case study on bottom ash from municipal solid waste incineration plants. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, 1252313. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1252313
  15. Gholizadeh Khasevani, S., Carabante, I., Bjuhr, J., & Andreas, L. (2026). Bioash-based stabilization/solidification for heavy metal(oid) soil remediation: A case study in Northern Sweden. Materials, 19(4), 790. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19040790
  16. Hafez, H., Kurda, R., Kurda, R., Al-Hadad, B., Mustafa, R., & Ali, B. (2020). A critical review on the influence of fine recycled aggregates on technical performance, environmental impact and cost of concrete. Applied Sciences, 10, 1018. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10031018
  17. He, Y., Jiang, Y., Ren, L., Qian, C., Zhang, H., Zhong, Y., Qu, X., Dou, J., Zhang, S., Ding, J., & Zhang, H. (2025). Recent advances in heavy metal stabilization and resource recovery from municipal solid waste incineration fly ash. Toxics, 13(8), 695. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13080695
  18. Kabbo, M. K. I., Sobuz, M. H. R., Khatun, M., et al. (2025). Analyzing the influence of chemical components of incinerated bottom ash on compressive strength of magnesium phosphate cement using machine learning analysis. Geoenvironmental Disasters, 12, 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-025-00341-9
  19. Li, J., Hou, Q., Peng, J., Hu, H., & Vizzari, D. (2025). A critical review of heavy metal characteristics and risk assessment approaches of municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash in subgrade construction. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 12(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2025.02.004
  20. Liu, J., Wu, Y., Cheng, L., Jin, H., Liu, J., & Xing, F. (2024). Recycling of municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash (MSWIBA) particles into natural fine sands for sustainable engineering cementitious composites. Construction and Building Materials, 418, 135500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135500
  21. Lu, J., Wu, D., Li, S., & Gao, X. (2024). Reaction process of solid waste composite-based cementitious materials for immobilizing and characterizing heavy metals in lead and zinc tailings: Based on XRD, SEM-EDS and compressive strength characterization. Molecules, 29, 996. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29050996
  22. Luhar, I., Luhar, S., Abdullah, M. M. A. B., Sandu, A. V., Vizureanu, P., Razak, R. A., Burduhos-Nergis, D. D., & Imjai, T. (2023). Solidification/stabilization technology for radioactive wastes using cement: An appraisal. Materials, 16, 954. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16030954
  23. Marandi, N., & Shirzad, S. (2025). Sustainable cement and concrete technologies: A review of materials and processes for carbon reduction. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 10, 408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-025-02213-5
  24. Nan, Y., Wang, W., Chen, H., Guo, J., Chen, Y., & Yuan, D. (2026). A review of research on the valorization and risk management of municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash. Materials, 19(7), 1471. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19071471
  25. Petrillo, A., Fraternali, F., Acampora, A., Di Chiara, G., Colangelo, F., & Farina, I. (2025). Innovative solidification and stabilization techniques using industrial by-products for soil remediation. Applied Sciences, 15, 4002. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15074002
  26. Reis, D. C., Quattrone, M., Souza, J., Punhagui, K. R. G., Pacca, S. A., & John, V. M. (2021). Potential CO₂ reduction and uptake due to industrialization and efficient cement use in Brazil by 2050. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 25, 344–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13130
  27. Sarkar, B. K., & Ghosh, P. (2026). Sustainable resource-efficient concrete using bottom ash as a partial sand replacement. Sustainability, 18, 5435. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18115435
  28. Scrivener, K. L., John, V. M., & Gartner, E. M. (2018). Eco-efficient cements: Potential, economically viable solutions for a low-CO₂ cement-based materials industry. Cement and Concrete Research, 114, 2–26
  29. Tram, M., Sułkowska, K., Jarosz, A., & Nowakowski, A. (2025). Mechanical properties of composite made from bottom ash fractions of municipal waste incineration plant products. Materials, 18(23), 5302. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18235302
  30. Wei, X., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Wu, M., Yang,J., Meng, T., Wang, S., Yap, Z. S., Huang, Y., Zhou, W., et al. (2026). Mechanical and environmental performance of chemical pretreated incineration bottom ash as a supplementary cementitious material. Materials, 19, 706. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19040706
  31. Zhang, S., Ghouleh, Z., He, Z., Hu, L., & Shao, Y. (2021). Use of municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash as a supplementary cementitious material in dry-cast concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 266(Part A), 120890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120890
  32. Zuraida, S., Dewancker, B., & Margono, R. B. (2023). Application of non-degradable waste as building material for low-cost housing. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 6390. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32981-y

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-09-30 17:12:56

No citation recorded.