DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jis.19.2.2020.160-179

The Impact of the Government Revolution 4.0 on District Integrated Administration Service (DIAS)

*Karno Karno  -  Public Policy Study Program, Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri, Indonesia
Andi Masrich  -  Government Management Study Program, Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri, Indonesia
Afif Syarifudin Yahya  -  Government Management Study Program, Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri, Indonesia
Afni Nooraini  -  Financial Management Study Program, Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2021 JURNAL ILMU SOSIAL under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract
The government is required to manage the government system to achieve the state’s goals as guaranteed by the Republic of Indonesia’s constitution. The management of a government system requires fundamental changes through the Government Revolution 4.0 approach. One form of the government revolution is the District Integrated Administration Service (DIAS) in Cibitung District of Bekasi Regency. However, not all DIAS has made fundamental changes with the Government Revolution 4.0 approach. This research aimed to find out and analyze the government revolution in DIAS in Cibitung District, Bekasi Regency. The study used a mixed-method between quantitative and qualitative methods. The data collection used is closed questionnaires and open questionnaires with a total sample of 49 respondents. The data analysis used is Structure Equation Model (SEM) of Lisrel and Microsoft Excel. The research found that the District Integrated Administration Service in the Government Revolution 4.0 has an average value of 6.80 for positive factors and 5.20 for negative factors. The results are due to weaknesses, namely recurring problems, system failures, complaints, and delays in service. Moreover, the government revolution had a positive impact of 74.83% and a negative impact of 25.17%, hence categorized as “good”. The study concludes that the District Integrated Administration Service acquire the category of “not yet star service”, thus requires a solution for weakness factors.
Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: District Integrated Administration Service; Government Revolution; Star Service

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Most cited articles
Peran Indonesia Dalam Memerangi Terorisme ECONOMIC RESILIENCE PADA INDUSTRI KREATIF GUNAMENGHADAPI GLOBALISASI DALAM RANGKA KETAHANAN NASIONAL More cited articles
  1. Agamba, J., & Keengwe, J. (2012). Pre-Service Teachers’ Perceptions of Information Assurance and Cyber Security. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 8(2): 94–101 (doi: 10.4018/jicte.2012040108),[Online]
  2. Anangkota, M. (2017). Klasifikasi Sistem Pemerintahan (Perspektif Pemerintahan Modern Kekinian). CosmoGov, 3(2): 148-153 (doi: 10.24198/cosmogov.v3i2.14725),[Online]
  3. Ayanso, A., Cho, D. I., & Lertwachara, K. (2010). The digital divide: Global and regional ICT leaders and followers. Information Technology for Development, 16(4): 304–319 (doi: 10.1080/02681102.2010.504698),[Online]
  4. Blavatnik School of Government. (2017). Civil Service Effectiveness (InCiSE) Index. 1. [online]. Retrieved from http://classroom.google.com/u/0/w/MTQwNDczOTQ4NTY5/t/all [Accessed September 22, 2020]
  5. De La Cámara, M., Marcilla, F. J. S., Calvo-Manzano, J. A., & Fernández Vicente, E. (2012). Integrating governance, service management and project management of IT. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 301: 109-120 (doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-31199-4_10),[Online]
  6. Edwards, R. (2018). An Elaboration of the Administrative Theory of the 14 Principles of Management by Henri Fayol. International Journal for Empirical Education and Research, 2(6): 41–52 (doi: 10.35935/edr/21.5241),[Online]
  7. Firlena, D., & Ramhan, A. Z. (2016). Implementasi Pelayanan Administrasi Terpadu Kecamatan (PATEN) di Kecamatan Bergas Kabupaten Semarang. Journal of Public Policy and Management Review, 5(2): 1-11 [online]. Retrieved from https://www.neliti.com/id/publications/98020/implementasi-pelayanan-administrasi-terpadu-kecamatan-paten-di-kecamatan-bergas [Accessed December 27, 2020]
  8. Gil-Garcia, J. R., Dawes, S. S., & Pardo, T. A. (2018). Digital government and public management research: finding the crossroads. In Public Management Review, 20(3): 1-14(doi: 10.1080/14719037.2017.1327181),[Online]
  9. Goodrick, D., & Rogers, P. J. (2015). Qualitative Data Analysis. In Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation: Fourth Edition (doi: 10.1002/9781119171386.ch22),[Online]
  10. Gottschalk, P. (2009). Maturity levels for interoperability in digital government. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1): 75-81 (doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2008.03.003),[Online]
  11. Gouscos, D., Laskaridis, G., Lioulias, D., Mentzas, G., & Georgiadis, P. (2002). An approach to offering one-stop e-government services - available technologies and architectural issues. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-46138-8_42),[Online]
  12. Haris, O. K. (2017). Good Governance (Tata Kelola Pemerintahan yang Baik) dalam Pemberian Izin Oleh Pemerintah Daerah di Bidang Pertambangan. Yuridika, 30(1): 58-83 (doi: 10.20473/ydk.v30i1.4879),[Online]
  13. Henny Juliani, Adi Lukman Saputra, N. S. (2017). Implementasi Peraturan Menteri dalam Negeri Nomor 4 Tahun 2010 Tentang Pedoman Pelayanan Administrasi Terpadu Kecamatan (Paten) di Kecamatan Kendal Kabupaten Kendal. Diponegoro Law Review, 6(1): 1-21 [online]. Retrieved from https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr/article/view/15548 [Accessed December 27, 2020]
  14. Heppell, M. (2015). How to deliver exceptional customer service - Praise for 5 Star Service. Third Edition, London, United Kingdom
  15. ICT. (2015). ICT Facts & Figures. The world in 2015. Telecommunication Development Bureau, 6. (doi: 10.1787/9789264202085-5-en),[Online]
  16. Janssen, M., Rana, N. P., Slade, E. L., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2018). Trustworthiness of digital government services: deriving a comprehensive theory through interpretive structural modelling. Public Management Review, 20(10): 1-25(doi: 10.1080/14719037.2017.1305689),[Online]
  17. Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher, 33(7): 14–26 (doi: 10.3102/0013189X033007014),[Online]
  18. Kang, G. Du, & James, J. (2004). Service quality dimensions: An examination of Grönroos’s service quality model. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 14(4): 266–277 (doi: 10.1108/09604520410546806),[Online]
  19. Karno, Adi, I. R., & Laksmono, B. S. (2018). Analisis Pengaruh Faktor Organisasi dan Faktor Individu terhadap Kualitas Pelayanan Puskesmas Studi pada Puskesmas Kecamatan Kedawung Jurnal Ilmu Kesejahteraan Sosial, 18(1): 34–47 (doi: 10.7454/jurnalkessos.v18i1.101),[Online]
  20. Kung, H. H. (2006). Nanotechnolgy: Opportunities for chemical engineering. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Chemical Engineers, 37(1): 1-7 (doi: 10.6967/JCICE.200601.0001),[Online]
  21. Lestari, H. (2016). Analisis Kualitas Pelayanan Perijinan di Bpmppt (Badan Penanaman Modal Dan Pelayanan Perizinan Terpadu) Kabupaten Pekalongan. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 14(1): 79-86 (doi: 10.14710/jis.14.1.2015.79-86),[Online]
  22. Mehta, A., & Sharma, S. (2015). Perception of Service Quality in Hotel Industry: A Case of Five Star Hotels of Jaipur City. ATITHYA: A Journal of Hospitality, 1(2): 54-61 (doi: 10.21863/ATITHYA/2015.1.2.018),[Online]
  23. Minnite, L. C., & Mazelis, J. M. (2015). Welfare. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition (doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.32170-5),[Online]
  24. Mosadeghrad, A. M. (2014). Factors Affecting Medical Service Quality. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 43(2): 210-20 [online]. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26060745/ [Accessed December 23, 2018]
  25. Muharam, R. S. (2019). Inovasi Pelayanan Publik Dalam Menghadapi Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 di Kota Bandung. Decision: Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 1(1): 39-47 (doi: 10.23969/decision.v1i01.1401),[Online]
  26. Nawawi, J. (2016). Membangun Kepercayaan dalam Mewujudkan Good Governance. GOVERNMENT : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 2(1): 19-30 [online]. Retrieved from https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/government/article/view/1130 [Accessed June 4, 2020]
  27. Neuman, W. L. (2006). Social Research Methods. Needham Heights, Allyn and Bacon
  28. Rihandoyo, & Rahman, A. Z. (2016). Evaluasi Keselarasan Kebijakan Pembanguan Electronic Government antara Pemerintah Pusat, Provinsi Jawa Tengah, dan Kabupaten/ Kota (Kota Tegal dan Kabupaten Batang). Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 13(2): 45-50 (doi: 10.14710/jis.13.2.2014.45-50),[Online]
  29. Rochmansjah, H., & Karno, K. (2020). The Digitalization of Public Service Assurance. MIMBAR : Jurnal Sosial Dan Pembangunan, 36(1): 43–52 (doi: 10.29313/mimbar.v36i1.5073),[Online]
  30. Rust, R. T., & Huang, M. H. (2014). The service revolution and the transformation of marketing science. Marketing Science, 33(2): 206-221 (doi: 10.1287/mksc.2013.0836),[Online]
  31. Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. In World Economic Forum 91–93 route de la Capite CH-1223 Cologny/Geneva Switzerland www.weforum.org 3 (Vol. 91). World Economic Forum 91–93 route de la Capite CH-1223 Cologny/Geneva Switzerland
  32. Setiawan, W. (2017). Era Digital dan Tantangannya. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan 2017. [online]. Retrieved from http://eprints.ummi.ac.id/id/eprint/151 [Accessed September, 21, 2020]
  33. Skilton, M., & Hovsepian, F. (2018). The Technology of the 4th Industrial Revolution. In The 4th Industrial Revolution 29–68 (doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-62479-2_2),[Online]
  34. Sukarno, D. (2017). Infrastruktur dan Teknologi pada Kecamatan-Kecamatan di Kabupaten Bandung dalam Mendukung Pelaksanaan Program Paten (Pelayanan Administrasi Terpadu Kecamatan). Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Publik, 1(1): 109-124 (doi: 10.24198/jmpp.v1i1.13565),[Online]
  35. Suryono, A. (2018). Kebijakan Publik untuk Kesejahteraan Rakyat. Transparansi Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi, 6(2): 98-102 (doi: 10.31334/trans.v6i2.33),[Online]
  36. Susanti, A., Kusmanto, H., & Tarigan, U. (2018). Implementasi Kebijakan Pelayanan Administrasi Terpadu Kecamatan (PATEN) Terhadap Kualitas Pelayanan Publik di Kecamatan Sidikalang Kabupaten Dairi. Publikauma : Jurnal Administrasi Publik Universitas Medan Area, 6(1): 47-57 (doi: 10.31289/publika.v6i1.1526),[Online]
  37. Suwandi, I Made & Afif Syarifudin Yahya. (2017). Refleksi Otonomi Daerah di Indonesia. Jatinangor: Alqa print
  38. Taherdoost, H., Sahibuddin, S., & Jalaliyoon, N. (2013). E-Services Usage Evaluation; Applications‘ level of Co-Creation and Digitalization. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 2(1): 10–18 [online]. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2371011[Accessed September, 16,2020)
  39. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Sage
  40. Tatapudi, G. V., & Turki AlSudairi, M. A. (2013). Suggesting e-service quality model for e-governance service delivery in Saudi Arabia. Proceedings of the European Conference on E-Government, ECEG [online]. Retrieved from https://issuu.com/acpil/docs/eceg13-issuu_vol_2 [Accessed September, 21, 2020]
  41. Wijanto, S.(2008). Structural equation modeling dengan LISREL 8.8.2 konsep dan tutorial. In structural equation modeling dengan LISREL 8.8.2 konsep dan tutorial (p. 61) (doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.11.005),[Online]
  42. Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., & Berry, L. L. (1990). Delivering quality service: Balancing customer perceptions and expectations. Simon and Schuster

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-06-30 14:54:09

No citation recorded.