DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/vol%25viss%25ipp430-443

Supply Chain Performance Determinants Model in Furniture SMIs

*Widiartanto Widiartanto  -  Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Fendy Eko Wahyudi  -  Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Amni Zarkasyi Rahman  -  Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2023 JURNAL ILMU SOSIAL under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Research to find the determinants of company performance has long been a field of strategic management studies. Many researchers discover why companies do better than others. In recent years, supply chain terminology has begun to emerge, in which a supply chain is a unit that transforms raw materials into finished products through a gradual, parallel, and/or networked structure partially or simultaneously. This study focuses on explaining supply chain performance in order fulfillment and delivery of required products to customers, with the market turbulence as a moderating variable that strengthens or weakens the relationship between the culture of competitiveness and knowledge development on supply chain performance. The research was conducted in Jepara Regency by taking samples of the Wood Furniture UKM in the Tahunan Village, Tahunan District with quantitative approach. The population in this study are all wood furniture business owners in the Tahunan Village, Tahunan District, Jepara Regency. The data are collected through a cluster random sampling technique with a probability proportional to size sampling method, with a research sample of 65 Wood Furniture UKM. The results show that the culture of competitiveness and knowledge development has a positive and significant effect on supply chain performance, either partially or simultaneously. Meanwhile, the market turbulence is only a potential moderating variable in the relationship between the culture of competitiveness and knowledge development on supply chain performance. Suggestions that can be given include sharing data and information as well as developing a shared understanding of supply chain management information that needs to be done among members of the Wood Furniture UKM Association in the Tahunan Village.

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: Competitiveness Culture; Knowledge Development; Market Turbulence; Overseas Supply Performance

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Most cited articles
Peran Indonesia Dalam Memerangi Terorisme ECONOMIC RESILIENCE PADA INDUSTRI KREATIF GUNAMENGHADAPI GLOBALISASI DALAM RANGKA KETAHANAN NASIONAL More cited articles
  1. Aldrich, H. (2008). Organizations And Environments. Stanford Business Books
  2. Anderson, J. C., Cleveland, G., & Schroeder, R. G. (1989). Operations Strategy: A Literature Review. Journal of Operations Management, 8(2): 133–158 (doi: 10.1016/0272-6963(89)90016-8),[Online]
  3. Argyris, Ch., & Schön, D. A. (1997). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reis, 77/78, 345 (doi: 10.2307/40183951),[Online]
  4. Baker, W. E., & Sinkula, J. M. (1999). The Synergistic Effect of Market Orientation and Learning Orientation on Organizational Performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(4): 411–427 (doi: 10.1177/0092070399274002),[Online]
  5. Barney, J. B., & Mackey, T. B. (2005). Testing Resource-Based Theory. In D. Ketchen & D. Bergh (Eds.), Research Methodology in Strategy and Management (pp. 1–13). Emerald Group Publishing Limited
  6. Bowersox, D. J., Closs, D. J., & Stank, T. P. (1999). 21st Century Logistics: Making Supply Chain Integration A Reality. Council of Logistics Management
  7. Child, J. (1972). Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice. Sociology, 6(1): 1–22 (doi: 10.1177/003803857200600101),[Online]
  8. Corner, P. D., Kinicki, A. J., & Keats, B. W. (1994). Integrating Organizational and Individual Information Processing Perspectives on Choice. Organization Science, 5(3): 294–308 (doi: 10.1287/orsc.5.3.294),[Online]
  9. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1992). A Behavioral Theory of The Firm (2nd ed.). Blackwell Business
  10. Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. E. (1984). Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems. The Academy of Management Review, 9(2): 284. (doi: 10.2307/258441),[Online]
  11. Day, G. S. (1994). The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations. Journal of Marketing, 58(4): 37 (doi: 10.2307/1251915),[Online]
  12. Dess, G. G., & Beard, D. W. (1984). Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(1): 52 (doi: 10.2307/2393080),[Online]
  13. Duncan, R. B. (1972). Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3): 313 (doi: 10.2307/2392145)
  14. Dutton, J. E., & Jackson, S. E. (1987). Categorizing Strategic Issues: Links to Organizational Action. The Academy of Management Review, 12(1): 76 (doi: 10.2307/257995),[Online]
  15. Garson, G. D. (2016). Partial Least Squares: Regression & Structural Equation Models. Statistical Publishing Associates
  16. Ghozali, I. (2008). Structural Equation Modelling Metode Alternatif dengan Partial Least Square. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro
  17. Godfrey, P. C., & Hill, C. W. L. (1995). The Problem of Unobservables in Strategic Management Research. Strategic Management Journal, 16(7): 519–533 (doi: 10.1002/smj.4250160703),Online
  18. Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward A Knowledge-Based Theory of The Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2): 109–122 (doi: 10.1002/smj.4250171110),[Online]
  19. Hall, R. H., Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1968). Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration. Administrative Science Quarterly, 13(1): 180 (doi: 10.2307/2391270),Online
  20. Handfield, R. B., & Nichols, E. L., J. (2008). Supply Chain Redesign Transforming Supply Chains into Integrated Value Systems. Financial Times Management
  21. Hendricks, K. B., & Singhal, V. R. (2003). The Effect of Supply Chain Glitches on Shareholder Wealth. Journal of Operations Management, 21(5): 501–522 (doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2003.02.003),[Online]
  22. Hitt, M., Boyd, B., & Li, D. (2004). The State of Strategic Management Research and A Vision of The Future. In D. J. Ketchen & D. Bergh (Eds.), In Research Methodology in Strategy and Management: Vol. I (pp. 1–31). Elsevier
  23. Huber, G. (1991). Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and The Literature. Organization Science, 2(1) (doi: 10.1287/orsc.2.1.88),[Online]
  24. Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen, D. J., & Nichols, E. L. (2002). An Examination of Cultural Competitiveness and Order Fulfillment Cycle Time Within Supply Chains. Academy of Management Journal, 45(3): 577–586 (doi: 10.2307/3069382),[Online]
  25. Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen, D. J., & Slater, S. F. (2004). Information Processing, Knowledge Development, and Strategic Supply Chain Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2): 241–253 (doi: 10.5465/20159575),[Online]
  26. Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, Market Orientation, and Organizational Learning: An Integration and Empirical Examination. Journal of Marketing, 62(3): 42 (doi: 10.2307/1251742),[Online]
  27. Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(3): 53 (doi: 10.2307/1251854),[Online]
  28. Kohli, A. K., Jaworski, B. J., & Kumar, A. (1993). MARKOR: A Measure of Market Orientation. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(4): 467 (doi: 10.2307/3172691),[Online]
  29. Levinthal, D., & March, J. G. (1981). A Model of Adaptive Organizational Search. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2(4): 307–333 (doi: 10.1016/0167-2681(81)90012-3),[Online]
  30. Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational Learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14(1): 319–338 (doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001535),[Online]
  31. Meyer, A. D. (1982). Adapting to Environmental Jolts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(4): 515 (doi: 10.2307/2392528),[Online]
  32. Moorman, C., & Miner, A. S. (1997). The Impact of Organizational Memory on New Product Performance and Creativity. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1): 91–106 (doi: 10.1177/002224379703400108),[Online]
  33. Naman, J. L., & Slevin, D. P. (1993). Entrepreneurship and The Concept of Fit: A Model and Empirical Tests. Strategic Management Journal, 14(2): 137–153 (doi: 10.1002/smj.4250140205)
  34. Nystrom, P. C., & Starbuck, W. H. (1984). To Avoid Organizational Crises, Unlearn. Organizational Dynamics, 12(4), 53–65 (doi: 10.1016/0090-2616(84)90011-1),[Online]
  35. Ray, G., Barney, J. B., & Muhanna, W. A. (2004). Capabilities, Business Processes, and Competitive Advantage: Choosing the Dependent Variable in Empirical Tests of The Resource-Based View. Strategic Management Journal, 25(1): 23–37 (doi: 10.1002/smj.366),[Online]
  36. Rumelt, R., Schendel, D., Schroeder, R., Bates, K., & Junttila, M. (2002). A Resource-Based View of Manufacturing Strategy and The Relationship To Manufacturing Processes. Strategic Management Journal, 23(2): 105 – 117 (doi: 10.1002/smj.213),[Online]
  37. Rumelt, R., Schendel, D., & Teece, D. (2005). Fundamental Issues in Strategy. In In Fundamental Issues in Strategy: A Research Agenda
  38. Sharfman, M. P., & Dean, J. W. (1991). Conceptualizing and Measuring the Organizational Environment: A Multidimensional Approach. Journal of Management, 17(4): 681–700 (doi: 10.1177/014920639101700403),[Online]
  39. Sholihin, M., & Ratmono, D. (2013). Analisis SEM-PLS dengan WarpPLS 3.0. ANDI
  40. Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (1995). Market Orientation and the Learning Organization. Journal of Marketing, 59(3): 63 (doi: 10.2307/1252120),[Online]
  41. Summer, C. E., Bettis, R. A., Duhaime, I. H., Grant, J. H., Hambrick, D. C., Snow, C. C., & Zeithaml, C. P. (1990). Doctoral Education in the Field of Business Policy and Strategy. Journal of Management, 16(2): 361–398 (doi: 10.1177/014920639001600207),[Online]
  42. Thomas, J. B., Clark, S. M., & Gioia, D. A. (1993). Strategic Sensemaking and Organizational Performance: Linkages Among Scanning, Interpretation, Action, and Outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 36(2): 239–270 (doi: 10.2307/256522),[Online]
  43. Thomson, J. D. (2003). Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. Transaction Publishers
  44. Weiss, A. M., & Heide, J. B. (1993). The Nature of Organizational Search in High Technology Markets. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(2): 220–233 (doi: 10.1177/002224379303000207),[Online]
  45. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A Resource-Based View of The Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2): p. 171 – 180

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-07-02 09:40:06

No citation recorded.