skip to main content

Village’s Digital Capital: Positioning and Implementation Concept

*Emma Rahmawati  -  Ministry of Villages, Disadvantaged Regions Development and Transmigration, Indonesia
Varenna Faubiany  -  Ministry of Villages, Disadvantaged Regions Development and Transmigration, Indonesia
Nurul Aldha Mauliddina Siregar  -  Ministry of Villages, Disadvantaged Regions Development and Transmigration, Indonesia
Taufan Daniarta Sukarno  -  Ministry of Villages, Disadvantaged Regions Development and Transmigration, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

The progress of a region cannot be separated from the development of digitalization. Now, digitalization is very important in development, because it is a capital that interacts with five offline capitals as social capital, economic capital, personal capital, political capital, and cultural capital owned by the community so that it will improved welfare, income, health, and others. Digital village is an idea that is being proclaimed by local government in collaboration with rural government. Punggul village Badung Region and Beraban village Tabanan Region in Bali Province already programmed digital village in their village development. The purpose of this research is to describe how digitalization is applied in services to the community and village development and how to carry out digitalization as a capital carried out by the Punggul and Beraban Village Governments. This research uses qualitative research methods with case study. Data collecting methods uses interview, observation, and documentation. This research result show us about the position interaction between digital capital and five offline capitals in Punggul village and Beraban village the same is in “the third level of digital divide” which internet used driven by and for the increasing offline capital. While the relationship between digital capital and five offline capital, the Punggul village is the ideal type and Beraban village is the third level of ideal scenario. Digitalization in both of villages become a supportive capital in improving villagers welfare.

 

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Digital Village; Digital Capital; Digitalization; Offline Capital

Article Metrics:

  1. Alvaro, R. & Emilia O. (2019). “Digital Village: Its Potential and Challenges” Buletin in APBN, 4 (8): 8-11. ISSN 2502-8685
  2. Aziiza, A.A., Susanto, T.D. (2020). The Smart Village Model for Rural Area (Case Study: Banyuwangi Regency). IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 722: 1-10 (doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/722/1/012011),[Online]
  3. Statistics Indonesia (BPS). (2019). Statistics of Indonesia Communications. Jakarta: BPS
  4. Bourdie, P. (1982). The Forms of Capital. Perancis: Les Rites d’Institution
  5. Dhahir, D. F. (2018). Pemanfaatan Program Desa Broadband Terpadu oleh Masyarakat Desa Lutharato. Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi dan Pembangunan, 19 (2): 73-84 (doi: 10.31346/jpkp.v19i2.1520),[Online]
  6. Galuh. (2019). Interview. “Digitalization Development in Punggul Village”
  7. Katz, Y. (2019). Technology, Society, and the Digital Gap. Advances in Applied Sociology, 9 (1): 60-69 (doi: 10.4236/aasoci.2019.91005),[Online]
  8. Knickrehm, et al. (2016). Digital Disruption the Growth Multiplier. Accenture Company
  9. Lupton, D. (2015). Digital Sociology. New York and Oxon: Routledge
  10. Nasution, R. D. (2016). Effect of Digital Divide on Rural Development (Rural Development). Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi dan Opini Publik, 20 (1): 31-44 (doi: 10.33299/jpkop.20.1.525),[Online]
  11. Nurcholish, H. (2011). Growth and Implementation of Village Government. Jakarta: Erlangga
  12. Park, S. & Kim, G. (2014). Lessons from South Korea’s Digital Divide Index (DDI). The Journal of Policy, Regulation and Strategy for Telecommunications, Information and Media, 16 (3): 72-84 (doi: 10.1108/info-07-2013-0042),[Online]
  13. Permata, D.A., Sugiharti, L., & Fudholi, A. (2019). Digital Poverty Conditions for East Java in Fourth Industrial Revolution. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), 8 (4): 12451-12456 (doi: 10.35940/ijrte.D9249.118419),[Online]
  14. Priardi, S.D. (2011). The Strategic Role of Banking in Supporting the Realization of Digital Villages in Indonesia. Published in “The National Seminar on Sustainable Technoloy Programme Book”. Purwokerto: University of Jenderal Soedirman
  15. Putra, I.G.G. (2009). Seka dalam Konteks Kehidupan Masyarakat dan Kesenian Bali. GELAR: Jurnal Seni Budaya, 7 (1): 1-12 (doi: 10.33153/glr.v7i1.1259),[Online]
  16. Ragnedda, M. (2018). Conceptualizing Digital Capital. Telematics and Informatics, 35 (8): 2366-2376 (doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2018.10.006),[Online]
  17. Republics of Indonesia. (1945). The Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia
  18. Republics of Indonesia. (2014). Law No. 6 of 2014
  19. Rachmawati, R. (2018). Pengembangan Smart Village untuk Penguatan Smart City dan Smart Regency. Jurnal Sistem Cerdas, 1 (2): 12-19 (doi: 10.37396/jsc.v1i2.9),[Online]
  20. Rosyadi, K. (2018). New Social Capital and Industrial Revolution 4.0: Study on Community Development UMKM Batik Tanjung Bumi Bangkalan Madura. Pamator Journal, 11 (2): 49-54 (doi: 10.21107/pamator.v11i2.4772),[Online]
  21. Rozi, F., Listiawan, T. (2017). Pengembangan Website dan Sistem Informasi Desa di Kabupaten Tulungagung. Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Informatika, 2 (2): 107-112 (doi: 10.29100/jipi.v2i2.366),[Online]
  22. Salvia, M.C. Cornacchia, G.C. Di Renzo, G. Braccio, M. Annunziato, A. Colangelo, L. Orifici, and V. Lapenna. (2016). Promoting Smartness among Local Areas in a Southern Italian Region: The Smart Basilicata Project. Indoor and Built Environment, 25 (7): 1024–1038 (doi: 10.1177/1420326X16659328),[Online]
  23. Sukariana, I.W. (2019). Interview. “Digitalization Development in Beraban Village”
  24. Wahyunengseh, R. D., dkk. (2020). Digital Governance and The Digital Divide: A Matrix of the Poor’s Vulnerabilities. Policy & Governance Review, 4 (2): 152-166 (doi: 10.30589/pgr.v4i2.296),[Online]
  25. Woolcock, M. & Narayan, D. (2000). Social Implication for Development Theory, Research, and Policy. The World Bank Research and Policy, 15 (2): 225-249 (doi: 10.1093/wbro/15.2.225),[Online]
  26. World Bank. (2016). World development report 2016: Digital dividends. Washington, DC: World Bank (doi: 10.1596/978-1-4648-0671-1),[Online]
  27. Wuryanta, A.G.E.W. (2013). Digitalization of Society: Looking at the Strengths and Weaknesses of the Dynamics of the Digital Information Age and the Information Society. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 1 (2): 131-142 (doi: 10.24002/jik.v1i2.163),[Online]
  28. Yin RK. (2014). Case Study of Design and Method. Jakarta: Rajawali Press
  29. Yusuf TI, Salim S, Irawaty A, Dako A, Dako R, Dali SW, Hidayat I. (2019). Precondition of Digital Village in Tamboo Village, Bone Pantai District, Bone Bolango Regency. Journal of Community Empowerment Synergy 8(1): 93-103 (doi: 10.37905/sibermas.v8i1.8209),[Online]
  30. Zavratnik, Veronika, Andrej Kos, and Emilija Stojmenova Duh. (2018). Smart Villages: Comprehensive Review of Initiatives and Practices. Sustainability (Switzerland) 10 (7) (doi: 10.3390/su10072559),[Online]
  31. Zhang, Xiaojuan, and Zhengang Zhang. (2020). How Do Smart Villages Become a Way to Achieve Sustainable Development in Rural Areas? Smart Village Planning and Practices in China. Sustainability (Switzerland) 12 (24): 1–20 (doi: 10.3390/su122410510),[Online]

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-04-17 22:13:37

No citation recorded.