DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jis.25.1.2026.1-22

When the last bus leaves: Digital citizen discourse and urban transit service failures in Surabaya

*Esa Wahyu Endarti  -  Universitas Wijaya Putra, Indonesia
M. Roehman Zainur Riedho orcid publons  -  Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
Ridha Amaliyah  -  Beijing Foreign Studies University, China
Salismi Zulfi Maulidita  -  Chosun University, South Korea
Open Access Copyright (c) 2026 Esa Wahyu Endarti, Esa Wahyu Endarti, M. Roehman Zainur Riedho, Ridha Amaliyah, Ridha Amaliyah, Salismi Zulfi Maulidita, Salismi Zulfi Maulidita
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Urban transit disruptions increasingly trigger citizen complaints on social media, yet multilingual and platform-specific discourse in the Global South remains difficult to analyze computationally. This study examines Instagram-based grievances following Surabaya transit service disruptions during the 2025-2026 New Year period. Using computational discourse analysis within a critical discourse orientation, the study analyzed 134 public comments from a government operator account and an independent civic forum through sentiment classification, thematic clustering, and multivariate modeling. Results show that negative sentiment concentrated around limited operating hours, unreliable service, weak institutional communication, and perceived governance accountability deficits. Thematic content explained sentiment variation with an exploratory pseudo-R² of 0.42, although fair human-model agreement (Cohen's κ = 0.36) and small sample size require cautious, hypothesis-generating interpretation. The findings indicate that the disruption exposed structural problems in temporal accessibility, operational reliability, information provision, and leadership accountability. The study proposes "Digital Informal Accountability" to describe platform-mediated citizen oversight that extends social accountability theory by linking citizen voice with expectations of state responsiveness in urban public service delivery.

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: urban transportation; sentiment analysis; topic modeling; service quality; digital discourse

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Most cited articles
Peran Indonesia Dalam Memerangi Terorisme ECONOMIC RESILIENCE PADA INDUSTRI KREATIF GUNAMENGHADAPI GLOBALISASI DALAM RANGKA KETAHANAN NASIONAL More cited articles
  1. Aji, A. F., Winata, G. I., Koto, F., Cahyawijaya, S., Romadhony, A., Mahendra, R., Kurniawan, K., Moeljadi, D., Prasojo, R. E., Baldwin, T., Lau, J. H., & Ruder, S. (2022). One Country, 700+ Languages: NLP Challenges for Underrepresented Languages and Dialects in Indonesia. Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), 7226–7249. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.500
  2. Angger Saputra, R., & Sibaroni, Y. (2025). Multilabel Hate Speech Classification in Indonesian Political Discourse on X using Combined Deep Learning Models with Considering Sentence Length. Jurnal Ilmu Komputer Dan Informasi, 18(1), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.21609/jiki.v18i1.1440
  3. Avery, E. J., & Graham, M. W. (2013). Political Public Relations and the Promotion of Participatory, Transparent Government Through Social Media. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 7(4), 274–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2013.824885
  4. Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Surabaya. (2025, February 28). Kota Surabaya Dalam Angka 2025. Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Surabaya. https://surabayakota.bps.go.id/id/publication/2025/02/28/bd1f25e59ae790cc8a7c0c07/kota-surabaya-dalam-angka-2025.html
  5. Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent dirichlet allocation. The Journal of Machine Learning Research. 3, 993–1022. https://doi.org/10.5555/944919.944937
  6. Bouvier, G., & Machin, D. (2018). Critical Discourse Analysis and the challenges and opportunities of social media. Review of Communication, 18(3), 178–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2018.1479881
  7. Chakraborty, M., Saha, S., & Sharmin, S. (2025). Quality-aware bus-driver scheduling for intelligent transportation system. Transportation Engineering, 20, 100337. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRENG.2025.100337
  8. Chaniotakis, E., & Pel, A. J. (2015). Drivers’ parking location choice under uncertain parking availability and search times: A stated preference experiment. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 82, 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRA.2015.10.004
  9. Cho, W., & Melisa, W. D. (2021). Citizen Coproduction and Social Media Communication: Delivering a Municipal Government’s Urban Services through Digital Participation. Administrative Sciences, 11(2), 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11020059
  10. Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018). BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. NAACL HLT 2019 - 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies - Proceedings of the Conference, 1, 4171–4186. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1810.04805
  11. Dziekan, K., & Kottenhoff, K. (2007). Dynamic at-stop real-time information displays for public transport: effects on customers. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 41(6), 489–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRA.2006.11.006
  12. El-Diraby, T., Shalaby, A., & Hosseini, M. (2019). Linking social, semantic and sentiment analyses to support modeling transit customers’ satisfaction: Towards formal study of opinion dynamics. Sustainable Cities and Society, 49, 101578. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCS.2019.101578
  13. Fox, J. A. (2015). Social Accountability: What Does the Evidence Really Say? World Development, 72, 346–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.03.011
  14. Gilley, Bruce. (2009). The right to rule : how states win and lose legitimacy. Columbia University Press
  15. Graham, M. W. (2014). Government communication in the digital age: Social media’s effect on local government public relations. Public Relations Inquiry, 3(3), 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X14545371
  16. Hardiansyah, D., Aziz, R. A., & Hasibuan, M. S. (2024). The Classification Method is Used for Sentiment Analysis in My Telkomsel. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 8(2), 169. https://doi.org/10.29099/ijair.v8i2.1229
  17. Haryanti, S., & Rusfian, E. Z. (2019). Government Public Relations and Social Media: Bridging the Digital Divide on People with Social Welfare Problems. JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik), 22(2), 128. https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.34602
  18. Kemp, S. (2025, February 23). Digital 2025: Indonesia. Global Digital Insights. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2025-indonesia
  19. Khairunnisa, S. Z., & Widyastuti, H. (2024). Improving The Integration and Connectivity of Feeder Wira Wiri, Suroboyo Bus, Trans Semanggi Bus, and Trans Jatim Bus in Surabaya City Purabaya-Rajawali Routes. Journal of Civil Engineering, 39(2), 147. https://doi.org/10.12962/J20861206.V39I2.20592
  20. Kirana, L. I. (2024, October 18). Bagaimana Warga Surabaya Memanfaatkan Internet?. GoodStats Data. https://data.goodstats.id/statistic/bagaimana-warga-surabaya-memanfaatkan-internet-B4JtB
  21. Krisdamarjati, Y. A., & Fatahillah, G. A. (2025, July 29). Assessing the Commitment of the Surabaya and Semarang City Governments to Develop Public Transportation. Kompas.Id. https://www.kompas.id/artikel/en-menilai-kesungguhan-pemerintah-kota-surabaya-dan-kota-semarang-membangun-transportasi-umum
  22. Linders, D. (2012). From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 446–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GIQ.2012.06.003
  23. Lucas, K. (2012). Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now? Transport Policy, 20, 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.01.013
  24. Manurung, C. E., & Mayatopani, H. (2025). Sentiment Analysis of Indonesian Society Toward the Launch of iPhone 16 Using Naive Bayes, Random Forest, and KNN Algorithms. Jurnal Komputer, Informasi Dan Teknologi, 5(1), 13–13. https://doi.org/10.53697/JKOMITEK.V5I1.2219
  25. Meijer, A., & Thaens, M. (2013). Social media strategies: Understanding the differences between North American police departments. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 343–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GIQ.2013.05.023
  26. Mergel, I. (2010, January). Gov 2.0 Revisited: Social Media Strategies in the Public Sector - PA TIMES Online | PA TIMES Online. Public Administration Times. https://patimes.org/gov-2-0-revisited-social-media-strategies-in-the-public-sector/
  27. Nugroho, Y., & Sujarwoto. (2021). Institutions, Outputs and Outcomes: Two Decades of Decentralization and State Capacity in Indonesia. Southeast Asian Economies, 38(3), 296–319. https://doi.org/10.1355/ae38-3b
  28. Padhilah, F. A., Surya, I. R. F., Adiatma, C. J., Sari, R. P., Permono, R. H., & Pradityo, R. (2025). Indonesia Sustainable Mobility Outlook 2025 Driving Transport Decarbonization: Multi-pathways to Sustainable Mobility in Indonesia. www.iesr.or.id
  29. Publication of Research Community Services and Innovation (P3MI). (2020). Nawasona (H. Delik & M. R. R. Ramadani, Eds.). ITB Press
  30. Putra, A. P. (2023). Impact of Toll Road Development on Modern Retail Growth in Indonesia. Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management, 2(8). https://doi.org/10.59141/jrssem.v2i08.407
  31. Redman, L., Friman, M., Gärling, T., & Hartig, T. (2013). Quality attributes of public transport that attract car users: A research review. Transport Policy, 25, 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRANPOL.2012.11.005
  32. Ruder, S., Vulić, I., & Søgaard, A. (2019). A Survey of Cross-lingual Word Embedding Models. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 569–631. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.11640
  33. Schweitzer, L. (2014). Planning and Social Media: A Case Study of Public Transit and Stigma on Twitter. Journal of the American Planning Association, 80(3), 218–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2014.980439
  34. Shah, A. (2007). Participatory Budgeting (A. Shah, Ed.). The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-6923-4
  35. Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2008). The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion. American Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 840–857. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00346.x
  36. Sitten, M. (2012). A service-oriented approach to public sector social media strategy. Public Interest and Private Rights in Social Media: A Volume in Chandos Publishing Social Media Series, 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-84334-693-7.50005-2
  37. Suartika, I. M., & Maya Dora, Y. (2025). Moving A Nation: The Evolution of Public Transit in Indonesia - Enhanced Analysis. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 6(10), 4537–4548. https://doi.org/10.59141/japendi.v6i10.8684
  38. Torres, E. C. M., Picado-Santos, L. G. de, Torres, E. C. M., & Picado-Santos, L. G. de. (2025). Sentiment Analysis and Topic Modeling in Transportation: A Literature Review. Applied Sciences 2025, Vol. 15, 15(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/APP15126576
  39. van Lierop, D., Badami, M. G., & El-Geneidy, A. M. (2018). What influences satisfaction and loyalty in public transport? A review of the literature. Transport Reviews, 38(1), 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2017.1298683

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-06-21 21:53:48

No citation recorded.