DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jai.v0i0.62613

Comparison of The Effectiveness of Use Antiseptic Povidone Iodine 10% And Octenidine Hydrochloride 0.1% in The Action of Neuroaxial Blocks in Patients Who Will Surgery in Haji Adam Malik General Hospital Medan

1Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara/Haji Adam Malik General Hospital, Medan, Indonesia

2Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara/Haji Adam Malik General Hospital, Medan, Indonesia

3Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia

Received: 13 Mar 2024; Revised: 16 Oct 2024; Accepted: 7 Jan 2025; Available online: 23 Jan 2025.
Open Access Copyright 2021 JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia)
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Cover Image
Abstract

Background: Antiseptics or germicides are chemical compounds used to kill or inhibit the growth of microorganisms on living tissue such as the surface of the skin and mucous membranes.

Objective: To determine the comparative effectiveness of povidone iodine 10% antiseptic compared to octenidine hydrochloride 0.1% in neuraxial blockade in patients undergoing surgery at Haji Adam Malik General Hospital, Medan.

Methods: This study is an experimental study of the two-group pre-test - post-test study type. This design is a design that groups patients into certain groups that receive different treatments based on group division. There are two groups, with each group containing 10 samples.

Result: In group A (povidone iodine 10%), the average value of bacterial growth before aseptic action was 192.20±117.54, and after aseptic action, no bacterial growth was found with a P Value of 0.005. In group B (octenidine hydrochloride 0.1%) before aseptic action was performed, the average bacterial growth value was 212.20 ± 107.21, and after aseptic action, no bacterial growth was found with a P Value of 0.004.

Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the bacterial profile after aseptic with povidone iodine 10% and octenidine hydrochloride 0.1%.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  common.other
Ethical Clearance
Subject
Type Other
  View (89KB)    Indexing metadata
 common.other
Copyright Transfer Agreement
Subject
Type Other
  View (104KB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: aseptic; bacteria; neuroaxial block; octenidine hydrochloride 0.1%; povidone iodine 10%

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
Comparison of The Effectiveness Between Fentanyl and Ketamine as Adjuvant Epidural Analgesia with Ropivacaine In Post Operation of The Lower Extremity Effectiveness and Efficiency of Peripheral Nerve Blocks as Adjunct to General Anaesthesia for Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Surgery at Primary Hospital in Tangerang Comparison of The Effectiveness of Use Antiseptic Povidone Iodine 10% And Octenidine Hydrochloride 0.1% in The Action of Neuroaxial Blocks in Patients Who Will Surgery in Haji Adam Malik General Hospital Medan Anesthetic Management of Supraglottic Tumors Undergoing Direct Laryngoscopy Predictors of Severity and Management of Severe Leptospirosis Patients in Intensive Care Unit Management of Adult-Onset Still's Disease Patients in Intensive Care Unit: a Case Report More recent articles
Most cited articles
Midazolam Intravena Dosis Rendah Tidak Mempengaruhi Nitric Oxide Intraperitoneal Mencit Balb/C Yang Terpapar Lipopolisakarida Patofisiologi Penyakit Jantung Koroner More cited articles
  1. Buttress, J.A.; Malanovic, N.; Vejzovic, D.; Ön, A.; Piller, P.; Kolb, D.; Lohner, K.; Strahl, H. Disruption of the Cytoplasmic Membrane Structure and Barrier Function Underlies the Potent Antiseptic Activity of Octenidine in Gram-Positive Bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2022, 88, 0018022
  2. Williamson DA, Carter GP, Howden BP. 2017. Current and emerging topical antibacterials and antiseptics: agents, action, and resistance patterns. Clin Microbiol Rev 30 : 827–860. PubMed
  3. Assadian O. Octenidine dihydrochloride: Chemical characteristics and antimicrobial properties. Journal of Wound Care. 2016;25:S36. Available: https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2016.25.sup3.s316
  4. Basrani BR, Manek S, Mathers D, Fillery E, Sodhi RNS. Determination of 4- chloroaniline and its derivatives formed in the interaction of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine by using gas chromatography. J Endod.2014;36:312–4
  5. Varghese VS, Uppin V, Bhat K, Pujar M, Hooli AB, Kurian N. Antimicrobial efficacy of octenidine hydrochloride and calcium hydroxide with and without a carrier: A broth dilution analysis. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018;9:72–6
  6. Kock, R. et al. Clinical Evidence for the Use of Octenidine Dihydrochloride to Prevent Healthcare-Associated Infections and Decrease Staphylococcus aureus Carriage or Transmission—A Review. Journal of MDPI. 2023. 12, 612. Available from : https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12040612
  7. Barzah AM, Pradian, E., Bisri, T. Perbandingan Antiseptik Chlorhexidine Alkohol dengan Povidon Iodine terhadap Penurunan Pertumbuhan Koloni Bakteri pada Kateter Epidural yang Dipasang di Kamar Operasi Rumah Sakit Dr. Hasan Sadikin Bandung. Jurnal Anestesi Perioperatif. 2016. 4:1. Available from : https://journal.fk.unpad.ac.id/index.php/jap/article/view/742
  8. Lorenz, P. et al. (2017) ‘Povidone iodine in wound healing : A review of current concepts and practices’, International Journal of Surgery. The Authors, 44, pp. 260–268. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.06.073
  9. Indrawan K, Jaya W, Noorhamdi. Perbandingan Efektifitas Larutan Antiseptik Kombinasi Chlorhexidine Gluconate Cetrimide-Alkohol 70% Dengan Povidone Iodine 10% Terhadap Kepadatan Kuman Pada Tindakan Anestesi Spinal. Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia. 2015.Vol VII:1. Available from : file:///C:/Users/HP/Downloads/13.pdf
  10. Lachapelle, et al. Antiseptics in the era of bacterial resistance: a focus on povidone iodine. Clin. Pract. (2013)10 (5), 579–592
  11. Perhimpunan Dokter Spesialis Kulit dan Kelamin Indonesia (PERDOSKI). Panduan Praktik Klinis bagi Dokter Spesialis Kulit dan Kelamin di Indonesia. Jakarta: PERDOSKI; 2017. Hal :121
  12. Al-Doori, Z.; Goroncy-Bermes, P.; Gemmell, C.G.; Morrison, D. Low-Level Exposure of MRSA to Octenidine DihydrochlorideDoes Not Select for Resistance. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2013, 59, 1280–1281
  13. Bangun, P., Hanafie, W., Wijaya, D.S., Perbandingan Chlorhexidine 2% - Alkohol 70% Dengan Povidone Iodine 10% - Alkohol 70% Terhadap Penurunan Kepadatan Kuman Dalam Mengurangi CRBSI Pada Pemasangan CVC. Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia. Vol: VIII:2, Tahun. 2016
  14. Guddety SR, Kajagar BM. Comparison of octenidine wound gel versus povidone iodine dressing in healing of chronic diabetic foot ulcers: A randomized controlled trial for period of 1 year. Indian Journal of Health Sciences and Biomedical Research (KLEU) 13(3):p 240-243, Sep–Dec 2020. | DOI: 10.4103/kleuhsj.kleuhsj_25_20
  15. Lachapelle, et al. Antiseptics in the era of bacterial resistance: a focus on povidone iodine. Clin. Pract. (2013)10 (5), 579–592

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-02-21 14:54:15

No citation recorded.