1Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University/ Dr. Kariadi General Hospital, Semarang, Indonesia
2Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia
BibTex Citation Data :
@article{JAI65469, author = {Yulia Villyastuti and Indrawan Wicaksono}, title = {Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway and Endotracheal Tube on Intraocular Pressure in Vitrectomy}, journal = {JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia)}, volume = {0}, number = {0}, year = {2021}, keywords = {airway management; endotracheal tube; intraocular pressure; laryngeal mask airway; vitrectomy}, abstract = { Background: Increased intraocular pressure (IOP) is a common complication after vitrectomy. Tracheal intubation and insertion of a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) are noxious stimuli that can increase IOP. Objective: To analyze the difference between the use of LMA and an endotracheal tube (ETT) on the increase in IOP in vitrectomy. Method: Experimental study with a randomized controlled trial design in 28 patients undergoing vitrectomy who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Subjects were divided into 2 groups with the use of LMA and ETT. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured using a Schiotz tonometer before induction of anesthesia, 5 minutes after intubation, 5 minutes before extubation, 5 minutes after extubation and 24 hours after vitrectomy in healthy eyes. The analysis was carried out with the unpaired T-test and the alternative Mann Whitney test, the results were significant if the p value <0.05. Results: The mean IOP in the LMA group was 11.71 ± 1.90 mHg before induction of anesthesia; 11.04 ± 1.71 mmHg 5 min after induction; 10.86 ± 1.44 mmHg 5 min before discharge; 12.11 ± 1,49 mmHg after removal and 12.21 ± 2.63 mmHg 24 hours after discharge. The mean IOP in the ETT group was 11.05 ± 2.57 mHg before induction of anesthesia; 14.26 ± 2.59 mmHg 5 min after induction; 11.71 ± 1.90 mmHg 5 min before extubation; 14.70 ± 0,98 mmHg after extubation and 12.74 ± 1.82 mmHg 24 hours after extubation. A significant difference in IOP was found after ETT intubation and extubation (p < 0,05). Conclusion: Endotracheal tube (ETT) significantly increases IOP compared to LMA during intubation and extubation in vitrectomy surgery. }, issn = {2089-970X}, doi = {10.14710/jai.v0i0.65469}, url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/janesti/article/view/65469} }
Refworks Citation Data :
Background: Increased intraocular pressure (IOP) is a common complication after vitrectomy. Tracheal intubation and insertion of a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) are noxious stimuli that can increase IOP.
Objective: To analyze the difference between the use of LMA and an endotracheal tube (ETT) on the increase in IOP in vitrectomy.
Method: Experimental study with a randomized controlled trial design in 28 patients undergoing vitrectomy who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Subjects were divided into 2 groups with the use of LMA and ETT. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured using a Schiotz tonometer before induction of anesthesia, 5 minutes after intubation, 5 minutes before extubation, 5 minutes after extubation and 24 hours after vitrectomy in healthy eyes. The analysis was carried out with the unpaired T-test and the alternative Mann Whitney test, the results were significant if the p value <0.05.
Results: The mean IOP in the LMA group was 11.71 ± 1.90 mHg before induction of anesthesia; 11.04 ± 1.71 mmHg 5 min after induction; 10.86 ± 1.44 mmHg 5 min before discharge; 12.11 ± 1,49 mmHg after removal and 12.21 ± 2.63 mmHg 24 hours after discharge. The mean IOP in the ETT group was 11.05 ± 2.57 mHg before induction of anesthesia; 14.26 ± 2.59 mmHg 5 min after induction; 11.71 ± 1.90 mmHg 5 min before extubation; 14.70 ± 0,98 mmHg after extubation and 12.74 ± 1.82 mmHg 24 hours after extubation. A significant difference in IOP was found after ETT intubation and extubation (p < 0,05).
Conclusion: Endotracheal tube (ETT) significantly increases IOP compared to LMA during intubation and extubation in vitrectomy surgery.
Note: This article has supplementary file(s).
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Last update: 2024-11-23 15:38:34
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia) and Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University as publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses exclusive rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia) and Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia) are the sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
The Copyright Transfer Form can be downloaded here:[Copyright Transfer Form JAI]. The copyright form should be signed originally and send to the Editorial Office in the form of original mail, scanned document:
Mochamat (Editor-in-Chief)
Editorial Office of JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia)
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University/ Dr. Kariadi General Hospital Medical Center (RSUP Dr. Kariadi)
Jl. Dr. Soetomo No. 16 Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50231
Telp. : (024) 8444346
Email : janestesiologi@gmail.com
View My Stats
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License