1Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
2Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
3Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
BibTex Citation Data :
@article{JAI67835, author = {Fandy Attamimi and Dadik Wijaya and Qadri Tanjung and Rina Amelia}, title = {Comparison of The Efficacy of Intravenous Norepinephrine and Phenylephrine as Vasopressor Agents in The Management of Septic Shock in ICU Patients at Haji Adam Malik General Hospital Using Lactate and Stroke Volume Variation Indicators}, journal = {JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia)}, volume = {0}, number = {0}, year = {2021}, keywords = {lactate levels; norepinephrine; phenylephrine; septic shock; stroke volume variation}, abstract = { Background: Septic shock is a life-threatening complication of sepsis, characterized by refractory hypotension and tissue hypoperfusion, requiring rapid vasopressor therapy. Norepinephrine is the drug of choice, but phenylephrine is still used in certain conditions, such as tachyarrhythmia or high output. Evidence comparing the effectiveness of the two is still limited, especially in Indonesian ICUs. Therefore, this study assessed the efficacy of norepinephrine and phenylephrine using lactate clearance and stroke volume variation (SVV) as indicators of perfusion and hemodynamic response in the intensive care unit (ICU) of Haji Adam Malik General Hospital, Medan. Methods: This study was a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial conducted in the ICU of Haji Adam Malik General Hospital, Medan, involving 32 adult patients (aged 18–65 years) with septic shock, as defined by the Sepsis-3 criteria. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups receiving norepinephrine infusion (n = 16) or phenylephrine infusion (n = 16) as the primary vasopressor. Lactate levels and SVV were measured at baseline (T0) and 6 hours after therapy (T1). The primary outcome was the change in lactate and SVV, with analysis using paired and independent t-tests at a significance level of p < 0.05. Results: 32 patients were divided into two groups, each with 16 patients receiving norepinephrine or phenylephrine. After 6 hours of therapy, norepinephrine reduced lactate levels from 8.41±1.88 to 5.76±1.99 mmol/L and SVV from 14.25±2.17 to 8.18±1.90 mmHg (p<0.001). Phenylephrine also reduced lactate from 7.40±1.77 to 6.70±1.77 mmol/L and SVV from 15.93±2.56 to 12.50±2.63 mmHg (p<0.001). Conclusions: Intravenous norepinephrine is more effective than phenylephrine in lowering lactate and improving SVV in septic shock patients in the ICU, thus supporting its use as the primary vasopressor. Phenylephrine remains an alternative with close hemodynamic monitoring. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and understand the mechanism behind the difference in effectiveness between the two. }, issn = {2089-970X}, doi = {10.14710/jai.v0i0.67835}, url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/janesti/article/view/67835} }
Refworks Citation Data :
Background: Septic shock is a life-threatening complication of sepsis, characterized by refractory hypotension and tissue hypoperfusion, requiring rapid vasopressor therapy. Norepinephrine is the drug of choice, but phenylephrine is still used in certain conditions, such as tachyarrhythmia or high output. Evidence comparing the effectiveness of the two is still limited, especially in Indonesian ICUs. Therefore, this study assessed the efficacy of norepinephrine and phenylephrine using lactate clearance and stroke volume variation (SVV) as indicators of perfusion and hemodynamic response in the intensive care unit (ICU) of Haji Adam Malik General Hospital, Medan.
Methods: This study was a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial conducted in the ICU of Haji Adam Malik General Hospital, Medan, involving 32 adult patients (aged 18–65 years) with septic shock, as defined by the Sepsis-3 criteria. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups receiving norepinephrine infusion (n = 16) or phenylephrine infusion (n = 16) as the primary vasopressor. Lactate levels and SVV were measured at baseline (T0) and 6 hours after therapy (T1). The primary outcome was the change in lactate and SVV, with analysis using paired and independent t-tests at a significance level of p < 0.05.
Results: 32 patients were divided into two groups, each with 16 patients receiving norepinephrine or phenylephrine. After 6 hours of therapy, norepinephrine reduced lactate levels from 8.41±1.88 to 5.76±1.99 mmol/L and SVV from 14.25±2.17 to 8.18±1.90 mmHg (p<0.001). Phenylephrine also reduced lactate from 7.40±1.77 to 6.70±1.77 mmol/L and SVV from 15.93±2.56 to 12.50±2.63 mmHg (p<0.001).
Conclusions: Intravenous norepinephrine is more effective than phenylephrine in lowering lactate and improving SVV in septic shock patients in the ICU, thus supporting its use as the primary vasopressor. Phenylephrine remains an alternative with close hemodynamic monitoring. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and understand the mechanism behind the difference in effectiveness between the two.
Note: This article has supplementary file(s).
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Last update: 2026-01-08 05:35:29
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia) and Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University as publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses exclusive rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia) and Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia) are the sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
The Copyright Transfer Form can be downloaded here:[Copyright Transfer Form JAI]. The copyright form should be signed originally and send to the Editorial Office in the form of original mail, scanned document:
Mochamat (Editor-in-Chief)
Editorial Office of JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia)
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University/ Dr. Kariadi General Hospital Medical Center (RSUP Dr. Kariadi)
Jl. Dr. Soetomo No. 16 Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50231
Telp. : (024) 8444346
Email : janestesiologi@gmail.com
View My Stats
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License