1Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
2Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
BibTex Citation Data :
@article{JAI79220, author = {Mhd Fadli and Rr Sinta Irina and Luwih Bisono}, title = {Effects of Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol–Fentanyl on QoR-15 Recovery in Cranioplasty}, journal = {JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia)}, volume = {0}, number = {0}, year = {2021}, keywords = {anesthesia recovery; cranioplasty; dexmedetomidine; fentanyl; propofol}, abstract = { Background: Optimizing postoperative recovery is essential in neurosurgical anesthesia. Dexmedetomidine, a selective α2-adrenergic agonist, may improve sedation and recovery outcomes. This study compared intraoperative dexmedetomidine versus propofol-fentanyl in cranioplasty patients using the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score. Methods: A prospective comparative study was conducted at Adam Malik General Hospital and Haji Medan Hospital from May - August 2025 involving 42 adult patients undergoing elective cranioplasty. Subjects were divided into two groups: dexmedetomidine (n=21) and propofol-fentanyl (n=21). Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15), a validated 15-item questionnaire assessing five domains of postoperative recovery (pain, physical comfort, emotional state, psychological support, and physical independence; total score range 0–150), was recorded at 12 and 24 hours postoperatively. Hemodynamic parameters, sedation depth, and operator satisfaction were assessed. Data were analyzed using t-tests and Fisher’s exact test with p < 0.05. Results: Patients receiving dexmedetomidine showed higher QoR-15 scores at 12 hours (p = 0.045) and 24 hours (p = 0.003). Heart rate was significantly lower (p = 0.02), while systolic and diastolic pressures showed no significant differences. Sedation depth and operative duration were comparable. Operator satisfaction reached 100% in both groups. Discussion: Dexmedetomidine improved recovery quality compared to propofol-fentanyl, with better hemodynamic stability and fewer sympathetic responses. These findings align with previous studies supporting its use in enhanced recovery anesthesia. Limitations include a small sample size and a lack of intraoperative sedation monitoring. Conclusion: Intraoperative dexmedetomidine offers superior recovery quality and stable hemodynamics, suggesting its potential for broader use in neurosurgical anesthesia. }, issn = {2089-970X}, doi = {10.14710/jai.v0i0.79220}, url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/janesti/article/view/79220} }
Refworks Citation Data :
Background: Optimizing postoperative recovery is essential in neurosurgical anesthesia. Dexmedetomidine, a selective α2-adrenergic agonist, may improve sedation and recovery outcomes. This study compared intraoperative dexmedetomidine versus propofol-fentanyl in cranioplasty patients using the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score.
Methods: A prospective comparative study was conducted at Adam Malik General Hospital and Haji Medan Hospital from May - August 2025 involving 42 adult patients undergoing elective cranioplasty. Subjects were divided into two groups: dexmedetomidine (n=21) and propofol-fentanyl (n=21). Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15), a validated 15-item questionnaire assessing five domains of postoperative recovery (pain, physical comfort, emotional state, psychological support, and physical independence; total score range 0–150), was recorded at 12 and 24 hours postoperatively. Hemodynamic parameters, sedation depth, and operator satisfaction were assessed. Data were analyzed using t-tests and Fisher’s exact test with p < 0.05.
Results: Patients receiving dexmedetomidine showed higher QoR-15 scores at 12 hours (p = 0.045) and 24 hours (p = 0.003). Heart rate was significantly lower (p = 0.02), while systolic and diastolic pressures showed no significant differences. Sedation depth and operative duration were comparable. Operator satisfaction reached 100% in both groups.
Discussion: Dexmedetomidine improved recovery quality compared to propofol-fentanyl, with better hemodynamic stability and fewer sympathetic responses. These findings align with previous studies supporting its use in enhanced recovery anesthesia. Limitations include a small sample size and a lack of intraoperative sedation monitoring.
Conclusion: Intraoperative dexmedetomidine offers superior recovery quality and stable hemodynamics, suggesting its potential for broader use in neurosurgical anesthesia.
Note: This article has supplementary file(s).
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Last update: 2026-03-11 17:40:13
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia) and Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University as publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses exclusive rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia) and Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia) are the sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
The Copyright Transfer Form can be downloaded here:[Copyright Transfer Form JAI]. The copyright form should be signed originally and send to the Editorial Office in the form of original mail, scanned document:
Mochamat (Editor-in-Chief)
Editorial Office of JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia)
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University/ Dr. Kariadi General Hospital Medical Center (RSUP Dr. Kariadi)
Jl. Dr. Soetomo No. 16 Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50231
Telp. : (024) 8444346
Email : janestesiologi@gmail.com
View My Stats
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License