DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jati.21.3.257-270

FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS AND COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF SUSTAINABLE HEAD-TRUCK SYSTEMS USING LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA), OPERATIONAL COST ANALYSIS, AND ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS (ANP) IN THE LOGISTICS OPERATIONS OF PT XYZ

*Rayhan Fatur Maulana  -  Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur, Indonesia
Isna Nugraha  -  Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

The transition toward sustainable port logistics requires evaluating head-truck technologies from environmental, economic, technical, and social perspectives. This study evaluates the feasibility and sustainability of diesel and electric (EV) head-truck systems at PT XYZ by integrating Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Operational Cost Analysis, Sensitivity Analysis, and Analytic Network Process (ANP). LCA was conducted using SimaPro 9.0, ecoinvent 3.9, and ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H), while operational costs were compared based on actual energy consumption. ANP integrated technical, economic, environmental, and social criteria to determine the overall priority of the alternatives. The results show that the EV system has a lower aggregated environmental burden, despite trade-offs in several impact categories. Its annual operational cost is approximately Rp 258.1 million per unit, compared with Rp 808.1 million for diesel, yielding potential annual savings of approximately Rp 550 million per unit. The ANP results also indicate a higher overall priority for the EV alternative. These findings demonstrate the potential of electric head-truck technology to support more sustainable and economically efficient internal container transportation at PT XYZ.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  Research Instrument
HT EV Evaluation
Subject
Type Research Instrument
  Download (14KB)    Indexing metadata
 common.other
CEK TURNITIN
Subject
Type Other
  Download (800KB)    Indexing metadata
 common.other
Kuisioner ANP
Subject
Type Other
  Download (153KB)    Indexing metadata
Email colleagues
Keywords: analytic network process; electric head-truck; life cycle assessment; operational cost analysis; port logistics; sustainability

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Articles
Language : EN
Most cited articles
BEHAVIORAL INTENTION PENUMPANG KRL COMMUTER LINE JABODETABEK STUDI KOMPARASI DAN ANALISIS SWOT PADA IMPLEMENTASI KECERDASAN BUATAN (ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE) DI INDONESIA PEMBAHASAN MENGENAI EFEK URBAN HEAT ISLAND DAN SOLUSI ALTERNATIF BAGI KOTA JAKARTA ANALISIS TINGKAT KEPENTINGAN ATRIBUT PERPUSTAKAAN BERBASIS RISET MELALUI METODE CONJOINT ANALYSIS STUDI KASUS DI UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO PERANCANGAN ALAT PENYADAP KARET DI KABUPATEN LANGKAT SUMATERA UTARA DENGAN METODE QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT (QFD) DAN MODEL KANO More cited articles
  1. Adegbohun, F., von Jouanne, A., Agamloh, E., & Yokochi, A. (2023). Geographical modeling of charging infrastructure requirements for heavy-duty electric autonomous truck operations. Energies, 16(10), 4161. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16104161
  2. Alamoush, A. S., Ballini, F., & Ölçer, A. I. (2020). Ports' technical and operational measures to reduce greenhouse gas emission and improve energy efficiency: A review. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 160, 111508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111508
  3. Alamoush, A. S., Ölçer, A. I., & Ballini, F. (2022). Port greenhouse gas emission reduction: Port and public authorities' implementation schemes. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 43, 100708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100708
  4. de Saxe, C., Lindsay, C., Subramanian, S. C., & van Eeden, J. (2023). Decarbonising freight transport: Transitions towards net zero. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 48, 100984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2023.100984
  5. Eriksson, A., & Pernestål, A. (2025). Power demand and queuing at heavy truck semi-public charging points: Forestry transport as a case study. European Transport Research Review, 17, Article 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-025-00744-7
  6. Gao, Y., Chang, D., & Chen, C.-H. (2023). A digital twin-based approach for optimizing operation energy consumption at automated container terminals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 385, 135782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135782
  7. Gonzalez-Aregall, M., Bergqvist, R., & Monios, J. (2018). A global review of the hinterland dimension of green port strategies. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 59, 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.12.013
  8. Hakimi, F., Khaled, T., Al-Kharaz, M., Foahom Gouabou, A. C., & Amzil, K. (2024). Towards a digital twin modeling method for container terminal port. Procedia Computer Science, 246, 3113–3121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.09.361
  9. Homayouni, S. M., Pinho de Sousa, J., & Moreira Marques, C. (2024). Unlocking the potential of digital twins to achieve sustainability in seaports: The state of practice and future outlook. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 24(1), 59–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-024-00349-2
  10. Jing, H., Chen, Y., Ma, M., Feng, W., & Xiang, X. (2025). Unlocking global freight transport decarbonization potential: Role of modal shifts. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 148, 105025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2025.105025
  11. Kastner, M., Saporiti, N., Lange, A.-K., & Rossi, T. (2024). Insights into how to enhance container terminal operations with digital twins. Computers, 13(6), 138. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers13060138
  12. Link, S., & Plötz, P. (2022). Technical feasibility of heavy-duty battery-electric trucks for urban and regional delivery in Germany—A real-world case study. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 13(9), 161. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj13090161
  13. Miao, H., Wang, J., Li, S., Lin, Y., Jia, H., Li, J., & Li, X. (2025). Optimization of charging facility configuration for electric heavy-duty trucks in port logistics parks considering transportation network and power grid coupling. Proceedings of CICTP 2025, 3626–3637. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784486269.344
  14. Miklautsch, P., & Woschank, M. (2022). A framework of measures to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions in freight transport: Systematic literature review from a manufacturer's perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 366, 132883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132883
  15. Nkesah, S. K. (2023). Making road freight transport more sustainable: Insights from a systematic literature review. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 22, 100967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2023.100967
  16. Nicoletti, B., & Appolloni, A. (2024). Green Logistics 5.0: A review of sustainability-oriented innovation with foundation models in logistics. European Journal of Innovation Management, 27(9), 542–561. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-07-2024-0787
  17. Okay, N. C., Sencer, A., & Taskin, N. (2024). Quantitative indicators for environmental and social sustainability performance assessment of the supply chain. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 28(3), 6049–6069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05210-3
  18. Okyere, S., Yang, J., & Adams, C. A. (2022). Optimizing the sustainable multimodal freight transport and logistics system based on the genetic algorithm. Sustainability, 14(18), 11577. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811577
  19. Penchev, M., Johnson, K. C., Raju, A. S. K., & Akinci, T. C. (2025). Comprehensive well-to-wheel life cycle assessment of battery electric heavy-duty trucks using real-world data: A case study in Southern California. Vehicles, 7(4), Article 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/vehicles7040162
  20. Ramasan, S. M., Thakur, J., Bhagavathy, S. M., & Laumert, B. (2025). Grid aware electrification for decarbonising port logistics based on a case study from Sweden. Scientific Reports, 15, 38472. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-25136-8
  21. Saeed, M. A., & Kersten, W. (2020). Supply chain sustainability performance indicators: A systematic literature review. Logistics Research, 13(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.23773/2020_6
  22. Savadogo, I., Gardrat, M., & Koning, M. (2023). Environmental and economic evaluation of a low emission zone for urban freight transport. Research in Transportation Economics, 102, 101369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2023.101369
  23. Sharifi, F., Burris, M., Quadrifoglio, L., Duffield, N., Xu, X., Meitiv, A., & Xu, Y. A. (2024). Electric truck feasibility for port drayage operations: Port Houston case study. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 135, 104355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2024.104355
  24. Guo, J., Guo, H., Chen, Z.-S., Fan, Z., & Shang, W.-L. (2025). Spatiotemporal analysis of CO₂ emissions from heavy-duty trucks in belt and road port transportation using GPS trajectory data. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 223, 108540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108540
  25. Wang, B., Liu, Q., Wang, L., Chen, Y., & Wang, J. (2023). A review of the port carbon emission sources and related emission reduction technical measures. Environmental Pollution, 320, 121000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121000
  26. Walz, K., & Rudion, K. (2024). Charging profile modeling of electric trucks at logistics centers. Energies, 17(22), 5613. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17225613
  27. Xiao, L., Chen, L., Sun, P., Laporte, G., & Baldacci, R. (2025). The container drayage problem for electric trucks with charging resource constraints. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 174, 105100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2025.105100
  28. Yang, A., Liu, Y., Xin, C., Chen, Q., & Wang, L. (2024). Towards intuitive visualisation goals for the operation optimisation of automated container terminal based on digital twin technology. Maritime Policy & Management, 51(4), 631–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2023.2166686

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-10-26 00:10:21

No citation recorded.