DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jkli.22.3.351-358

Prevalensi dan Faktor Risiko Infeksi TB Laten pada Anggota Keluarga Kontak Serumah dengan Pasien TB Aktif

1Jurusan Kesehatan Lingkungan, Poltekkes Kemenkes Tanjungkarang, Jl. Soekarno-Hatta No.6, Bandar Lampung 35145, Indonesia

2Balai Pelatihan Kesehatan (Bapelkes) Provinsi Lampung, Jl. Soekarno-Hatta No.7, Bandar Lampung 35142, Indonesia

Open Access Copyright 2023 Jurnal Kesehatan Lingkungan Indonesia under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Latar belakang : Menurut WHO, seperempat penduduk dunia telah terinfeksi Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb), 10% akan berkembang menjadi TB aktif, dan 90% dalam bentuk infeksi TB laten. Sekitar 5-10% infeksi TB laten akan berkembang menjadi TB aktif. Anggota keluarga kontak serumah mempunyai risiko tinggi terjadi infeksi TB laten. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui prevalensi dan menganalisis faktor risiko infeksi TB laten pada anggota keluarga kontak serumah pasien TB aktif.

Metode : Menggunakan desain cross sectional melalui pelacakan anggota keluarga kontak serumah pasien TB aktif. Sebanyak 138 dari 241 anggota keluarga kontak serumah 112 indeks kasus TB aktif yang tercatat di Puskesmas Kedungmundu mengikuti Tuberculin Skin Test (TST) menggunakan 2 Tuberculin Unit (TU) Purified Protein Derivative (PPD) 0,1 ml. Faktor risiko infeksi TB laten dikumpulkan saat melakukan kunjungan rumah. Data dianalisis menggunakan uji chi-square dan regresi logistik ganda.

Hasil : Sebanyak 63,8% anggota keluarga kontak serumah mengalami infeksi TB laten. Secara simultan, variabel yang signifikan terkait dengan infeksi TB laten yaitu jenis pekerjaan (p=0,024) - buruh/petani/nelayan (p=0,007; aOR=7,04; 95%CI=1,70–29,02), pedagang/wirausaha (p=0,021; aOR=4,29; 95%CI=1,25–14,76), karyawan/ASN/TNI/POLRI (p=0,009; aOR=4,55; 95%CI=1,46–14,15), pelajar/mahasiswa (p=0,014; aOR=5,27; 95%CI=1,40–19,83) dibandingkan ibu rumah tangga (IRT)/tidak bekerja, lama kontak (p=0,016; aOR=4,70; 95%CI=1,33–16,66) dan kepadatan kamar tidur (p<0,001; aOR=5,33; 95%CI=2,24–12,71).

Simpulan : Prevalensi infeksi TB laten pada anggota keluarga kontak serumah pasien TB aktif cukup tinggi. Jenis pekerjaan merupakan variabel paling dominan secara signifikan terkait risiko terjadinya infeksi TB laten pada anggota keluarga kontak serumah pasien TB aktif setelah dikontrol variabel kepadatan kamar tidur dan lama kontak.

 

ABSTRACT

Title: Prevalence and Risk Factors for Latent TB Infection in Family Members Who Live in Contact With Active TB Patients

Background: According to WHO, a quarter of the world's population has been infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb), 10% will develop into active TB, and 90% in the form of latent TB infection. Approximately 5-10% of latent TB infections will develop into active TB. Household contact family members have a high risk of developing latent TB infection. This study aims to determine the prevalence and analyze the risk factors for latent TB infection in family members who live in contact with active TB patients.

Methods: Using a cross-sectional design through tracing family members of active TB patients' household contacts. As many as 138 out of 241 family members who lived with 112 index active TB cases recorded at the Kedungmundu Health Center took the Tuberculin Skin Test (TST) using 2 Tuberculin Units (TU) Purified Protein Derivative (PPD) 0.1 ml. Risk factors for latent TB infection were collected during home visits. Data were analyzed using the chi-square test and multiple logistic regression.

Results: As many as 63.8% of household contact family members had latent TB infection. Simultaneously, significant variables related to latent TB infection were occupation (p=0.024) - labourers/farmers/fishermen (p=0.007; aOR=7.04; 95% CI=1.70–29.02), traders / entrepreneur (p=0.021; aOR=4.29; 95%CI=1.25–14.76), employee/ASN/TNI/POLRI (p=0.009; aOR=4.55; 95%CI=1, 46–14.15), student/student (p=0.014; aOR=5.27; 95% CI=1.40–19.83) compared to housewives (IRT)/not working, length of contact (p=0.016 ; aOR=4.70; 95%CI=1.33–16.66) and bedroom density (p<0.001; aOR=5.33; 95%CI=2.24–12.71).

Conclusion: The prevalence of latent TB infection in family members of household contacts of active TB patients is quite high. Type of work is the most dominant variable that is significantly related to the risk of latent TB infection in family members who live in contact with active TB patients after controlling for bedroom density and length of contact.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  EC
Etical Cleareance
Subject
Type EC
  Download (165KB)    Indexing metadata
 ES
Etichal Statement
Subject
Type ES
  Download (196KB)    Indexing metadata
 CTA
Copyright Transfer Agreement
Subject
Type CTA
  Download (36KB)    Indexing metadata
 Turnitin
Turnitin
Subject
Type Turnitin
  Download (1MB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: Prevalensi; Faktor Risiko; Infeksi TB Laten; Kontak Serumah
Funding: PenelitiaKementerian Kesehatan RI melalui Badan PPSDM Kesehatan RI - di Jakarta.

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
Strategi Pengelolaan Air Limbah Domestik di Kawasan Permukiman Hulu Sungai Kelurahan Hutaimbaru Kota Padangsidimpuan Hubungan Kadar Kesadahan dan Fluorida dalam Air Bersih pada Kejadian Penyakit Periodontal di Kecamatan Pundong, Kabupaten Bantul, Yogyakarta Indek Kualitas Air dan Dampak terhadap Kesehatan Masyarakat Sekitar Sungai Karang Mumus, Samarinda Halaman Sampul Halaman Belakang More recent articles
Most cited articles
Analisis Faktor Risiko Keracunan Pestisida Organofosfat Pada Keluarga Petani Hortikultura di Kecamatan Ngablak Kabupaten Magelang Hubungan Kadar Debu Terhirup (Respirable) Dengan Kapasitas Vital Paksa Paru Pada Pekerja Mebel Kayu di Kota Jayapura Peningkatan Pengetahuan dan Sikap Kepala Keluarga tentang Pengelolaan Sampah Melalui Pemberdayaan Keluarga di Kelurahan Tamansari Kota Bandung Halaman Belakang Studi Kondisi Lingkungan Rumah dan Perilaku Masyarakat Sebagai Faktor Risiko Kejadian Filariasis di Kecamatan Buaran dan Tirto Kabupaten Pekalongan More cited articles
  1. Houben RMGJ, Dodd PJ. The global burden of latent tuberculosis infection: a re-estimation using mathematical modelling. PLoS Med 2016; 13: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002152
  2. WHO. Global tuberculosis report 2020. Geneva : WHO, 2020, xiii p
  3. Maceda EB, Goncalves CM, Andrews JR, et al. Serum vitamin D levels and risk of prevalent tuberculosis , incident tuberculosis and tuberculin skin test conversion among prisoners. Sci Rep 2018; 8: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19589-3
  4. Rode AK, Kongsbak M, Hansen MM, et al. Vitamin D counteracts mycobacterium tuberculosis-induced cathelicidin downregulation in dendritic cells and allows Th1 differentiation and IFNγ secretion. Front Immunol 2017; 8: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00656
  5. Hur YG, Stolinska PG, Smith AB, et al. Combination of cytokine responses indicative of latent TB and active TB in Malawian adults. PLoS One 2013; 8: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079742
  6. Kementerian Kesehatan RI. Tuberculosis Control in Indonesia 2022 : Directorate General of Prevention and Disease Control, https://e-renggar.kemkes.go.id/file_performance/1-465827-06-4tahunan-710.pdf (2023)
  7. Osman SA, Saeed WSE, Musa AM, et al. Prevalence of Latent Tuberculosis Infection ( LTBI ) among House Hold Contacts of Sudanese Patients with Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Eastern Sudan : Revisiting the Tuberculin Skin Test. J Tuberc Res 2017; 5: 69–76. https://doi.org/10.4236/jtr.2017.51007
  8. Mendoza OM, Marion SA, Elwood K, et al. Risk factors for developing tuberculosis: A 12-year follow-up of contacts of tuberculosis cases. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2010; 14: 1112–9
  9. Lee SJ, Lee SH, Kim YE, et al. Risk factors for latent tuberculosis infection in close contacts of active tuberculosis patients in South Korea: A prospective cohort study. BMC Infect Dis 2014; 14: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-014-0566-4
  10. Shea KM, Kammerer JS, Winston CA, Navin TR, Horsburgh CR. Estimated Rate of Reactivation of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in the United States , Overall and by Population Subgroup. Am J Epidemiol 2014; 179: 216–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwt246
  11. World Health Organisation. End TB Strategy. In: WHO. Genewa, 2014, pp. 1689–99
  12. Reichler MR, Khan A, Sterling TR, et al. Risk and timing of tuberculosis among close contacts of persons with infectious tuberculosis. J Infect Dis 2018; 218: 1000–1008. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiy265
  13. Fox GJ, Barry SE, Britton WJ MG. Contact investigation for tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J 2013; 41: 140–156. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00070812
  14. Eom JS, Kim I, Kim WY, et al. Household tuberculosis contact investigation in a tuberculosis-prevalent country. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009681
  15. Kementerian Kesehatan RI. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia nomor 67 tahun 2016 tentang penanggulangan tuberkulosis. Jakarta : Kementerian Kesehatan RI, 2016, 163 p. 2016; 163
  16. Wijaya VN. Infeksi tuberkulosis laten-diagnosis dan tatalaksana. Cermin Dunia Kedokt 2017; 44: 706–9
  17. Sharma SK, Vashishtha R, Chauhan LS, et al. Comparison of TST and IGRA in diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection in a high TB-burden setting. PLoS Med 2017; January: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169539
  18. Yap P, Tan KX, Lim WY, et al. Prevalence of and risk factors associated with latent tuberculosis in Singapore : a cross-sectional survey. Int J Infect Dis 2018; 72: 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2018.05.004
  19. Reichler MR, Khan A, Yuan Y, et al. Duration of exposure among close contacts of patients with infectious tuberculosis and risk of latent tuberculosis infection. Clin Infect Dis 2020; 71: 1627–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciz1044
  20. Jones-lópez EC, Acuña-villaorduña C, Fregona G, et al. Incident mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in household contacts of infectious tuberculosis patients in Brazil. BMC Infect Dis 2017; 17: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2675-3
  21. Indreswari SA, Suharyo, . Kadar interferon gamma pada kontak serumah dengan penderita tuberkulosis. J Kesehat Masy Nas 2012; 6: 212–18. https://doi.org/10.21109/kesmas.v6i5.86
  22. Odera S, Mureithi M, Aballa A, et al. Latent tuberculosis among household contacts of pulmonary tuberculosis cases in Nairobi , Kenya. Pan Afr Med J 2020; 37: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2020.37.87.21102
  23. Nardell EA. Transmission and institutional infection control of tuberculosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2016; 6: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a018192
  24. Wang PD LR. Tuberculosis transmission in the family. J Infect 2000; 41: 249–51. https://doi.org/10.1053/jinf.2000.0736
  25. Chen C, Zhu T, Wang Z, et al. High latent TB infection rate and associated risk factors in the Eastern China of low TB incidence. PLoS One 2015; 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141511
  26. Cubilla-Batista I, Ruiz N, Sambrano D, et al. Overweight, obesity, and older age favor latent tuberculosis infection among household contacts in low tuberculosis-incidence settings within Panama. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2019; 100: 1141–4. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.18-0927
  27. Faksri K, Reechaipichitkul W, Pimrin W, et al. Transmission and risk factors for latent tuberculosis infections among index case-matches household contacts. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2015; 46: 486–95
  28. Aman AM, Zeidan ZA. Latent tuberculosis infection among household contacts of pulmonary tuberculosis cases in Central State, Sudan: prevalence and associated factors. J Tuberc Res 2017; 05: 265–75. https://doi.org/10.4236/jtr.2017.54028
  29. Tipayamongkholgul M, Podhipak A, Chearskul S, Sunakorn P. Factors associated with the development of tuberculosis in BCG immunized children. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2005; 36: 145–50
  30. Martinez L, Shen Y, Mupere E, et al. Transmission of mycobacterium tuberculosis in households and the community: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol 2017; 185: 1327–39. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwx025

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-05-07 10:31:17

No citation recorded.