skip to main content

Kepuasan Pengguna Sistem Informasi Rekam Medis Elektronik RSUD Tugurejo

*Nina Dwi Astuti  -  Poltekkes Kemenkes Semarang, Indonesia
Asharul Fahyudi  -  Poltekkes Kemenkes Semarang, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Evaluation of user satisfaction of Electronic Medical Record (EMR) system users can be considered by hospitals in developing EMR systems.  Tugurejo Hospital has implemented EMR both outpatient and inpatient. Quantitative research is conducted to determine user satisfaction. The respondents were 67 users of EMR from doctors and nurses. EMR user satisfaction according to Delone and McLean's IT/IS Success Model theory was analyzed using SMART-PLS to determine how strong the influence of system quality, information quality and service quality on EMR user satisfaction. The results showed that user satisfaction was influenced by system quality (T-stat = 2.96), information quality (T-stat = 1.66), service quality (T-stat = 1.84). There is a mutual influence between system quality, information quality and service quality on user satisfaction with strong categories (R-square = 0.748). 

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: system user satisfaction, RME evaluation

Article Metrics:

  1. Amin, M., Setyonugroho, W., Hidayah, N., Yogyakarta, D. I., Studi, P., Administrasi, M., Sakit, R., & Muhammadiyah, U. (2021). Implementasi Rekam Medik Elektronik: Sebuah Studi Kualitatif. 8(1), 430–441
  2. Andi Dermawan Putra, Muhammad Siri Dangnga, & Makhrajani Majid. (2020). Evaluasi Sistem Informasi Manajemen Rumah Sakit (Simrs) Dengan Metode Hot Fit Di RSUD Andi Makkasau Kota Parepare. Jurnal Ilmiah Manusia Dan Kesehatan, 3(1), 61–68
  3. Andini, H., Widodo, A., Aula Rumana, N., & Indawati, L. (2022). Tinjauan Kepuasan Pengguna Dalam Menggunakan Rekam Medis Elektronik (Rme) Di Rumah Sakit Siloam Balikpapan. Jurnal Kesehatan Tambusai, 3(4), 534–540
  4. Andriani, R., Kusnanto, H., & Istiono, W. (2017). Analisis Kesuksesan Implementasi Rekam Medis Elektronik Di Rs Universitas Gadjah Mada. Jurnal Sistem Informasi, 13(2), 90
  5. Balasopoulou, A., Κokkinos, P., Pagoulatos, D., Plotas, P., Makri, O. E., Georgakopoulos, C. D., Vantarakis, A., Li, Y., Liu, J. J., Qi, P., Rapoport, Y., Wayman, L. L., Chomsky, A. S., Joshi, R. S., Press, D., Rung, L., Ademola-popoola, D., Africa, S., Article, O., … Loukovaara, S. (2017). Symposium Recent advances and challenges in the management of retinoblastoma Globe ‑ saving Treatments. BMC Ophthalmology, 17(1), 1
  6. Cai, T., Zhang, L., Yang, N., Kumamaru, K. K., Rybicki, F. J., Cai, T., & Liao, K. P. (2019). EXTraction of EMR numerical data: An efficient and generalizable tool to EXTEND clinical research. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 19(1), 1–7
  7. Chong, J., Jason, T., Jones, M., & Larsen, D. (2020). A model to measure self-assessed proficiency in electronic medical records: Validation using maturity survey data from Canadian community-based physicians. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 141, 104218
  8. Cresswell, K., Sheikh, A., Krasuska, M., Heeney, C., Franklin, B. D., Lane, W., Mozaffar, H., Mason, K., Eason, S., Hinder, S., Potts, H. W. W., & Williams, R. (2019). Reconceptualising the digital maturity of health systems. The Lancet Digital Health, 1(5), e200–e201
  9. Dharma, I. G. N. A., Sukadarmika, G., & Pramaita, N. (2022). Application of DeLone and McLean Methods to Determine Supporting Factors for the Successful Implementation of Electronic Medical Records at Bali Mandara Eye Hospital. Journal of Applied Science, Engineering, Technology, and Education, 4(2), 146–156
  10. Furukawa, M., & Pollack, E. (2020). Achieving HIMSS Stage 7 designation for EMR adoption. Nursing Management, 51(1), 10–12
  11. Kanakubo, T., & Kharrazi, H. (2019). Comparing the Trends of Electronic Health Record Adoption Among Hospitals of the United States and Japan. Journal of Medical Systems, 43(7)
  12. Kementerian Kesehatan. (2021). Strategi Transformasi Digital 2024. 4(1)
  13. Kementerian Kesehatan. (2022). Permenkes RI. (2022). Peraturan Mentri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor. 24 Tahun 2022 Tentang Rekam Medis. Menkes RI (Issue 8.5.2017)
  14. Kementrian Kesehatan RI. (2022). Kementerian Kesehatan. Infodatin Kemenkes RI
  15. Kusumawardhani, O. B., Octaviana, A., & Supitra, Y. M. (2022). Efektivitas Mobile Jkn Bagi Masyarakat : Literature Review. Prosiding Seminar Informasi Kesehatan Nasional (SIKesNas) 2022, 64–69
  16. Müller, N. U. and B. (2012). The Updated DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success. Springer, 28(May), 461
  17. Republik Indonesia. (2019). Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik (Vol. 2, Issue 3)
  18. Sekretariat Negara. (2019). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 71 Tahun 2019 Tentang Penyelenggaraan Sistem Dan Transaksi Elektronik. Media Hukum, 7(2), 70
  19. Tania, A., Putri, D., Kesehatan, M. P., Administrasi, D., Kesehatan, K., Ilmu, F., Masyarakat, K., Indonesia, U., & Indonesia, U. (2023). Challenges in implementing electronic medical record in Indonesia healthcare facilities
  20. Telenti, A., & Jiang, X. (2020). Treating medical data as a durable asset. Nature Genetics, 52(10), 1005–1010
  21. Tilekar, G. B., & Patil, V. (2023). A Study On Clinical Decision Tools : Optimizing Clinical Outcomes with Decision Support Tools. 12(1), 1–3
  22. Tiorentap, D. R. A. (2020). Manfaat penerapan rekam medis elektronik di negara berkembang: Systematic literature review. Indonesian of Health Information Management Journal (INOHIM), 8(2), 69–79
  23. Wu, Z., Xuan, S., Xie, J., Lin, C., & Lu, C. (2022). How to ensure the confidentiality of electronic medical records on the cloud : A technical perspective . Computers in Biology and Medicine, 147(June), 105726

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-05-25 14:30:08

No citation recorded.